do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-466/11: Order of the General Court of 19 October 2012 — Ellinika Nafpigeia and Hoern v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Shipbuilding — Aid granted by the Greek authorities to a shipyard — Measures implementing the Commission’s decision finding that the aid is incompatible with the common market and ordering that it be repaid — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2012-10-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Greece, State aid, application of EU law, control of State aid, shipbuilding








C_2013026EN.01004602.xml










26.1.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 26/46





Order of the General Court of 19 October 2012 — Ellinika Nafpigeia and Hoern v Commission
(Case T-466/11) (1)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Shipbuilding - Aid granted by the Greek authorities to a shipyard - Measures implementing the Commission’s decision finding that the aid is incompatible with the common market and ordering that it be repaid - Inadmissibility)
2013/C 26/91
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Applicants: Ellinika Nafpigeia AE (Skaramagka, Greece), and 2. Hoern Beteiligungs GmbH (Kiel, Germany) (represented by: K Chrysogonos and A. Mitsis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky and M. Konstantinidis, Agents)

Re:

Application for the annulment of Commission letter C(2010) 8274 final of 1 December 2010 relating to ‘State aid case CR 16/2004 — Implementation of the negative Decision with recovery concerning State aid in favour of [the company Ellinika Nafpigeia AE] — Invocation by Greece of Article 346 paragraph 1 (b) TFEU and proceedings under Article 348 paragraph 1 TFEU’, as supplemented by the documents and other material on the file of which the applicants became partially aware in June 2011.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


There is no need to adjudicate on the application by Nafpigikes kai viomichanikes epicheiriseis Elefsinas for leave to intervene.










3.


Ellinika Nafpigeia AE and 2. Hoern Beteiligungs GmbH shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.










4.


The applicant for leave to intervene, Nafpigikes kai viomichanikes epicheiriseis Elefsinas, shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 331, 12.11.2011.
Case T-617/11: Order of the General Court of 19 October 2012 — Meyr-Melnhof Karton v OHIM — Stora Enso (SILVAWHITE)
Date: 2012-10-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, pulp and paper industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2012373EN.01001302.xml










1.12.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 373/13





Order of the General Court of 19 October 2012 — Meyr-Melnhof Karton v OHIM — Stora Enso (SILVAWHITE)
(Case T-617/11) (1)

2012/C 373/23
Language of the case: English
The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 32, 4.2.2012.
Cancellation notice
Date: 2012-10-19
Institutions: Provisional data
Subjects: European Medicines Agency, administrative competition, administrator, legal adviser








CA2012316EN.01000101.xml










19.10.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 316/1





Cancellation notice
(2012/C 316 A/01)
The European Medicines Agency has decided to cancel the following selection procedure:






 



EMA/AD/335: Head of Legal Service, Directorate (AD 10) (1).





A new selection procedure for this position will be published in due course. All candidates who have applied for EMA/AD/335 will be informed personally about a new announcement and will be free to apply.


(1)  OJ C 160 A, 6.6.2012, p. 1.
Case C-467/12: Action brought on 19 October 2012 — Christophe Gassiat v Ordre des avocats de Paris
Date: 2012-10-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative sanction, jurisdiction, legal profession, professional society








C_2013108EN.01001301.xml










13.4.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 108/13





Action brought on 19 October 2012 — Christophe Gassiat v Ordre des avocats de Paris
(Case C-467/12)
2013/C 108/25
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Christophe Gassiat

Defendant: Ordre des avocats de Paris
By order of 21 February 2013, the Court (Seventh Chamber) declared that it clearly has no jurisdiction to rule on the present action. Consequently the action is declared inadmissible. The Court ordered Mr Christophe Gassiat to bear his own costs.
Case C-470/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Svidník (Slovakia) lodged on 19 October 2012 — Pohotovosť, s.r.o. v Miroslav Vašuta
Date: 2012-10-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: association, consumer protection, interpretation of the law, judge, judicial proceedings, unfair terms of contract








C_2013046EN.01001201.xml










16.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/12





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Svidník (Slovakia) lodged on 19 October 2012 — Pohotovosť, s.r.o. v Miroslav Vašuta
(Case C-470/12)
2013/C 46/21
Language of the case: Slovak

Referring court

Okresný súd Svidník

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Pohotovosť, s.r.o.

Defendant: Miroslav Vašuta

Questions referred







1.


Are Articles 6(1), 7(1) and 8 of Council Directive 93/13/EEC (1) on unfair terms in consumer contracts and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in conjunction with Article 38 thereof, to be interpreted as precluding national legislation such as Paragraph 37(1) and (3) of the Exekučný poriadok, which does not allow a consumer protection association to intervene in enforcement proceedings?










2.


Where the answer to the first question is that that legislation does not conflict with Community law, is Paragraph 37(1) and (3) of the Exekučný poriadok to be interpreted as not precluding the national court from granting a consumer protection association leave to intervene in enforcement proceedings in accordance with Articles 6(1), 7(1) and 8 [of Council Directive 93/13/EEC]?






(1)  OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29.
Case C-468/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Cosenza (Italy) lodged on 19 October 2012 — CCIAA di Cosenza v CIESSE SRL in liquidation
Date: 2012-10-19
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU law - national law, Italy, agricultural holding, company constituted under civil law, economic activity, interpretation of the law, lawyer








C_2012399EN.01001401.xml










22.12.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 399/14





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Cosenza (Italy) lodged on 19 October 2012 — CCIAA di Cosenza v CIESSE SRL in liquidation
(Case C-468/12)
2012/C 399/24
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Cosenza

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura (CCIAA) di Cosenza

Defendant: CIESSE SRL in liquidation

Question referred

Do the Italian rules governing the methods for calculating the annual duty to be paid by all persons engaged in economic activity conflict with Article 5 of Directive 2008/7/EC (1) of 12 February 2008 in so far as they place a significantly greater burden on the operation of a business activity by a capital company (‘capital company’ being understood in the exhaustive sense provided for in [Directive 2008/7/EC]) than by a sole trader, inasmuch as under those rules (i) sole traders pay fixed annual duty of EUR 200 if registered in the ordinary section or EUR 88 if noted in the special section, (ii) società semplici agricole (agricultural partnerships) pay fixed annual duty of EUR 100 (in addition to EUR 20 for each local unit), (iii) local units and/or branches of undertakings having their seat abroad pay fixed duty of EUR 110, (iv) non-agricultural partnerships pay fixed duty of EUR 200, and (v) law firms pay fixed duty of EUR 200, whereas all other collective economic undertakings (companies, consortia, and so on) are required to pay ‘duty as a proportion of the preceding year’s turnover’ (thereby paying as much as EUR 40 000)?


(1)  Council Directive 2008/7/EC of 12 February 2008 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital (OJ 2008 L 46, p. 11).
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2012-10-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2012316EN.01000401.xml










19.10.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 316/4





Euro exchange rates (1)

18 October 2012
2012/C 316/02

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3118




JPY


Japanese yen


104,01




DKK


Danish krone


7,4593




GBP


Pound sterling


0,81190




SEK


Swedish krona


8,5843




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2094




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,3770




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


24,756




HUF


Hungarian forint


277,19




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,6961




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1027




RON


Romanian leu


4,5803




TRY


Turkish lira


2,3570




AUD


Australian dollar


1,2632




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,2843




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,1671




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5983




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5972




KRW


South Korean won


1 448,93




ZAR


South African rand


11,3305




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,2006




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5430




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 599,42




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


3,9843




PHP


Philippine peso


54,078




RUB


Russian rouble


40,3022




THB


Thai baht


40,207




BRL


Brazilian real


2,6631




MXN


Mexican peso


16,7891




INR


Indian rupee


70,0470






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 975/2012 of 19 October 2012 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Filderkraut / Filderspitzkraut (PGI)]
Date: 2012-10-19
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Germany, designation of origin, leaf vegetable, product designation








L_2012294EN.01000101.xml










24.10.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 294/1








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 975/2012
of 19 October 2012
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Filderkraut / Filderspitzkraut (PGI)]


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Germany's application to register the name ‧Filderkraut / Filderspitzkraut‧ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 19 October 2012.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,
Dacian CIOLOȘ
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

(2)  
            OJ C 44, 16.2.2012, p. 45.




ANNEX
Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

GERMANY
Filderkraut / Filderspitzkraut (PGI)