do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2012-09-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2012291EN.01000101.xml










27.9.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 291/1





Euro exchange rates (1)

26 September 2012
2012/C 291/01

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2845




JPY


Japanese yen


99,82




DKK


Danish krone


7,4561




GBP


Pound sterling


0,79490




SEK


Swedish krona


8,4998




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2088




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,4030




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


24,983




HUF


Hungarian forint


285,78




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,6962




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1511




RON


Romanian leu


4,5178




TRY


Turkish lira


2,3053




AUD


Australian dollar


1,2421




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,2633




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,9600




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5675




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5844




KRW


South Korean won


1 438,77




ZAR


South African rand


10,5700




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,0961




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4515




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 324,62




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


3,9611




PHP


Philippine peso


53,910




RUB


Russian rouble


40,1730




THB


Thai baht


39,807




BRL


Brazilian real


2,6118




MXN


Mexican peso


16,5957




INR


Indian rupee


68,7400






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-328/09: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Producteurs de légumes de France v Commission (State aid — Fruit and vegetable sector — ‘Contingency plans’ aimed at supporting the fruit and vegetable market in France — Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the common market — Legitimate expectation — Material error in the calculation of the amounts to be recovered)
Date: 2012-09-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, administrative procedure, aid to agriculture, co-financing, producer organisation, reimbursement of aid








C_2012355EN.01002102.xml










17.11.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 355/21





Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Producteurs de légumes de France v Commission
(Case T-328/09) (1)

(State aid - Fruit and vegetable sector - ‘Contingency plans’ aimed at supporting the fruit and vegetable market in France - Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the common market - Legitimate expectation - Material error in the calculation of the amounts to be recovered)
2012/C 355/43
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Producteurs de légumes de France (Paris, France) (represented: by initially O. Fachin, and subsequently O. Redon, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 203 final of 28 January 2009 on the ‘contingency plans’ in the fruit and vegetable sector implemented by the French Republic.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Producteurs de légumes de France to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 267, 7.11.2009.
Case T-351/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Dura Vermeer Groep v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the unlawful conduct)
Date: 2012-09-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Netherlands, administrative sanction, bituminous materials, cartel, oil industry, road building








C_2012355EN.01001502.xml










17.11.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 355/15





Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Dura Vermeer Groep v Commission
(Case T-351/06) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Imputability of the unlawful conduct)
2012/C 355/27
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: Dura Vermeer Groep NV (Rotterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Slotboom, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by A. Bouquet and A. Nijenhuis, Agents, and by F. Wijckmans, F. Tuytschaever and L. Gyselen, lawyers, and subsequently by A. Bouquet, A. Nijenhuis and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, Agents, and by F. Wijckmans and F. Tuytschaever)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 4090 final of 13 September 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.456 — Bitumen (Netherlands)), in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Dura Vermeer Groep NV to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 20, 27.1.2007.
Case T-359/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Heijmans Infrastructuur v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Burden of proof — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence)
Date: 2012-09-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Netherlands, administrative sanction, bituminous materials, cartel, oil industry, road building








C_2012355EN.01001801.xml










17.11.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 355/18





Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Heijmans Infrastructuur v Commission
(Case T-359/06) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Burden of proof - Fines - Gravity of the infringement - Imputability of the unlawful conduct - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence)
2012/C 355/34
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: Heijmans Infrastructuur BV (Rosmalen, Netherlands) (represented initially by M. Smeets and A. Van den Oord, and subsequently by M. Smeets, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented: initially by A. Bouquet and A. Nijenhuis, Agents, and by F. Wijckmans, F. Tuytschaever and L. Gyselen, lawyers, and subsequently by A. Bouquet, A. Nijenhuis and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, Agents, and by F. Wijckmans and F. Tuytschaever)

Re:

Application, principally, for annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 4090 final of 13 September 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.456 — Bitumen (Netherlands)), in so far as it concerns the applicant, and, in the alternative, for reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant by that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Heijmans Infrastructuur BV to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 20, 27.1.2007.
Case T-257/10: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Italy v Commission (State aid — Undertaking with subsidiaries in certain third countries — Reduced rate loans — Decision declaring aid incompatible in part with the internal market and ordering it to be repaid — Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of the initial decision concerning the same procedure — Force of res judicata — Duty to state reasons)
Date: 2012-09-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Italy, State aid, business location, interest rate subsidy, reimbursement of aid, single market, third country








C_2012355EN.01002403.xml










17.11.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 355/24





Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Italy v Commission
(Case T-257/10) (1)

(State aid - Undertaking with subsidiaries in certain third countries - Reduced rate loans - Decision declaring aid incompatible in part with the internal market and ordering it to be repaid - Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of the initial decision concerning the same procedure - Force of res judicata - Duty to state reasons)
2012/C 355/52
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: P. Gentili and M. Fiorilli, avvocati dello Stato)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and D. Grespan, agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2011/134/EU of 24 March 2010 concerning State aid C 4/03 (ex NN 102/02) implemented by Italy for Wam SpA (OJ 2011 L 57, p. 29).

Operative part of the judgment







1.


The action is dismissed;










2.


The Italian Republic is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 221, 14.8.2010.
Case T-356/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Koninklijke Volker Wessels Stevin v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Fines — Imputability of the unlawful conduct)
Date: 2012-09-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Netherlands, bituminous materials, oil industry, price agreement, road building, unlawful agreement








C_2012355EN.01001701.xml










17.11.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 355/17





Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Koninklijke Volker Wessels Stevin v Commission
(Case T-356/06) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Fines - Imputability of the unlawful conduct)
2012/C 355/32
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: Koninklijke Volker Wessels Stevin NV (Rotterdam, Netherlands) (represented: initially by E. Pijnacker Hordijk and Y. de Vries, and subsequently by E. Pijnacker Hordijk and X. Reintjes, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet, A. Nijenhuis and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, Agents, assisted initially by L. Gyselen, F. Tuytschaever and F. Wijckmans, and subsequently by L. Gyselen, lawyers)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 4090 final of 13 September 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.456 — Bitumen (Netherlands)), in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Koninklijke Volker Wessels Stevin NV to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 20, 27.1.2007.
Case T-347/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Nynäs Petroleum and Nynas Belgium v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Fines — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — Significant added value — Equal treatment)
Date: 2012-09-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Netherlands, bituminous materials, oil industry, price agreement, road building, unlawful agreement








C_2012355EN.01001403.xml










17.11.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 355/14





Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Nynäs Petroleum and Nynas Belgium v Commission
(Case T-347/06) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Imputability of the unlawful conduct - Fines - Cooperation during the administrative procedure - Significant added value - Equal treatment)
2012/C 355/25
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Nynäs Petroleum AB (Stockholm, Sweden) and Nynas Belgium AB (Stockholm) (represented by: A. Howard, Barrister, M. Dean and D. McGowan, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre, Agent, and by L. Gyselen, lawyer)

Re:

APPLICATION, principally, for annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 4090 final of 13 September 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.456 — Bitumen (Netherlands)) and, in the alternative, for reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants by that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Nynäs Petroleum AB and Nynas Belgium AB to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 20, 27.1.2007.
Case T-348/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Total Nederland v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Continuous nature of the infringement — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Fines — Gravity and duration of the infringement)
Date: 2012-09-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Netherlands, bituminous materials, oil industry, price agreement, road building, unlawful agreement








C_2012355EN.01001501.xml










17.11.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 355/15





Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Total Nederland v Commission
(Case T-348/06) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Continuous nature of the infringement - Imputability of the unlawful conduct - Fines - Gravity and duration of the infringement)
2012/C 355/26
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Total Nederland NV (Voorburg, Netherlands) (represented by: A. Vandencasteele, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet and F. Castillo de la Torre, Agents)

Re:

APPLICATION, principally, for partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 4090 final of 13 September 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.456 — Bitumen (Netherlands)), and, in the alternative, for reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant by that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Total Nederland NV to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 20, 27.1.2007.
Notice of open competition
Date: 2012-09-27
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: EPSO, assistant, competition (EU), technical profession








C_2012291EN.01001201.xml










27.9.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 291/12





NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION
2012/C 291/03
The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising open competition:
EPSO/AST/121/12 — Conference technicians (AST 3)
The competition notice is published in 23 languages in Official Journal C 291 A of 27 September 2012.
Further details can be found on the EPSO website: http://www.eu-careers.info
Case T-362/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Ballast Nedam Infra v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Fines — Proof of the infringement — Gravity of the infringement — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Rights of the defence — Production of new pleas in the course of proceedings — Unlimited jurisdiction)
Date: 2012-09-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Netherlands, bituminous materials, oil industry, price agreement, road building, unlawful agreement








C_2012355EN.01001901.xml










17.11.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 355/19





Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Ballast Nedam Infra v Commission
(Case T-362/06) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Fines - Proof of the infringement - Gravity of the infringement - Imputability of the unlawful conduct - Rights of the defence - Production of new pleas in the course of proceedings - Unlimited jurisdiction)
2012/C 355/37
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: Ballast Nedam Infra BV (Nieuwegein (Netherlands)) (represented: initially by A. Bosman and J. van de Hel, and subsequently by A. Bosman and E. Oude Elferink, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet, A. Nijenhuis and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, Agents, assisted initially by F. Wijckmans, F. Tuytschaever and L. Gyselen, and subsequently by F. Wijckmans and F. Tuytschaever, lawyers)

Re:

Application, principally, for annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 4090 final of 13 September 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.456 — Bitumen (Netherlands)) in so far as it concerns the applicant, and, in the alternative, first, for annulment in part of that decision and for reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant and, second, for annulment in part of that decision in so far as it sets the duration of the infringement with respect to the applicant and for a corresponding reduction of the fine imposed on it.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Article 1(a) of Commission Decision C(2006) 4090 final of 13 September 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.456 — Bitumen (Netherlands)) in so far as it concerns the participation of Ballast Nedam Infra BV in the infringement between 21 June 1996 and 30 September 2000;










2.


Reduces the amount of the fine imposed jointly and severally on Ballast Nedam Infra in Article 2(a) of that decision to EUR 3.45 million;










3.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 20, 27.1.2007.
Case T-357/06: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Koninklijke Wegenbouw Stevin v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Existence and classification of an agreement — Restriction of competition — Guidelines on the applicability of Article 81 EC to horizontal cooperation agreements — Rights of the defence — Fine — Aggravating circumstances — Role of instigator and leader — Absence of cooperation — Commission's powers of investigation — Right to the assistance of a lawyer — Misuse of powers — Calculation of the amount of the fines — Duration of the infringement — Unlimited jurisdiction)
Date: 2012-09-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Netherlands, bituminous materials, oil industry, price agreement, road building, unlawful agreement








C_2012355EN.01001702.xml










17.11.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 355/17





Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2012 — Koninklijke Wegenbouw Stevin v Commission
(Case T-357/06) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Existence and classification of an agreement - Restriction of competition - Guidelines on the applicability of Article 81 EC to horizontal cooperation agreements - Rights of the defence - Fine - Aggravating circumstances - Role of instigator and leader - Absence of cooperation - Commission's powers of investigation - Right to the assistance of a lawyer - Misuse of powers - Calculation of the amount of the fines - Duration of the infringement - Unlimited jurisdiction)
2012/C 355/33
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: Koninklijke Wegenbouw Stevin BV (Utrecht (Netherlands)) (represented: initially by E. Pijnacker Hordijk and Y. de Vries, and subsequently by E. Pijnacker Hordijk and X. Reintjes, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet, A. Nijenhuis and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, Agents, assisted initially by de L. Gyselen, F. Tuytschaever and F. Wijckmans, and subsequently by L. de Gyselen, lawyers)

Re:

Application, principally, for annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 4090 final of 13 September 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F/38.456 — Bitumen (Netherlands)), in so far as it concerns the applicant, and, in the alternative, for reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant by that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Koninklijke Wegenbouw Stevin BV to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 20, 27.1.2007.
Case T-139/09: Judgment of the General Court of (Sixth Chamber) of 27 September 2012 — France v Commission (State aid — Fruit and vegetable sector — ‘Contingency plans’ seeking to support the fruit and vegetable market in France — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market — Concept of State aid — State resources — Co-financing by a public institution and by voluntary contributions from farmers’ organisations — Arguments not raised during the administrative procedure — Duty to state the reasons on which the decision is based)
Date: 2012-09-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, aid to agriculture, control of State aid, fruit vegetable, marketing year, producer organisation








C_2012355EN.01002002.xml










17.11.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 355/20





Judgment of the General Court of (Sixth Chamber) of 27 September 2012 — France v Commission
(Case T-139/09) (1)

(State aid - Fruit and vegetable sector - ‘Contingency plans’ seeking to support the fruit and vegetable market in France - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market - Concept of State aid - State resources - Co-financing by a public institution and by voluntary contributions from farmers’ organisations - Arguments not raised during the administrative procedure - Duty to state the reasons on which the decision is based)
2012/C 355/41
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: French Republic (represented: initially by E. Belliard, G. de Bergues and A.-L. During, and subsequently by E. Belliard, G. de Bergues and J. Gstalter, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Stromsky, acting as Agent)

Re:

Annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 203 final of 28 January 2009, concerning the ‘contingency plans’ in the fruit and vegetable sectors implemented by France.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the French Republic to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 141, 20.6.2009.