do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2012-09-11
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2012274EN.01000101.xml










11.9.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 274/1





Euro exchange rates (1)

10 September 2012
2012/C 274/01

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2776




JPY


Japanese yen


99,98




DKK


Danish krone


7,4521




GBP


Pound sterling


0,79970




SEK


Swedish krona


8,4935




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2090




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,3900




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


24,530




HUF


Hungarian forint


285,41




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,6963




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1129




RON


Romanian leu


4,4768




TRY


Turkish lira


2,3025




AUD


Australian dollar


1,2349




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,2486




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,9091




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5770




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5794




KRW


South Korean won


1 442,33




ZAR


South African rand


10,4652




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,0970




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4303




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 228,05




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


3,9638




PHP


Philippine peso


53,072




RUB


Russian rouble


40,5510




THB


Thai baht


39,721




BRL


Brazilian real


2,5847




MXN


Mexican peso


16,6018




INR


Indian rupee


70,8370






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case F-96/12: Action brought on 11 September 2012 — ZZ v Commission
Date: 2012-09-11
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: EPSO, administrator, competition (EU)








C_2012343EN.01002302.xml










10.11.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 343/23





Action brought on 11 September 2012 — ZZ v Commission
(Case F-96/12)
2012/C 343/40
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the selection board EPSO/AD/207/11 upholding the decision not to include the applicant on the reserve list on the ground that the applicant does not fulfil certain specific criteria for admission to that competition and a claim for damages.

Forms of order sought







—


annul the decision of the selection board of EPSO/AD/206/11 (AD5) and EPSO/AD/207/11 (AD 7) dated 1 June 2012 upholding the decision of 9 February 2012 not to place the applicant on the reserve list of the competition on the ground that the applicant does not fulfil certain specific criteria for admission;










—


so far as necessary, annul the decision of the selection board of EPSO/AD/206/11 (AD5) and EPSO/AD/207/l1 (AD 7) dated 9 February 2012;










—


grant the applicant the sum fixed ex aequo et bono and provisionally EUR 3 000 by way of non-pecuniary damages;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.
Case T-565/08: Judgment of the General Court of 11 September 2012 — Corsica Ferries France v Commission (State aid — Maritime cabotage sector — Service of general economic interest — Private investor in a market economy test — Social policy of the Member States — Restructuring aid — Effects of a judgment annulling a decision)
Date: 2012-09-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: France, State aid, aid for restructuring, maritime cabotage, services of general interest








C_2012343EN.01001102.xml










10.11.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 343/11





Judgment of the General Court of 11 September 2012 — Corsica Ferries France v Commission
(Case T-565/08) (1)

(State aid - Maritime cabotage sector - Service of general economic interest - Private investor in a market economy test - Social policy of the Member States - Restructuring aid - Effects of a judgment annulling a decision)
2012/C 343/14
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Corsica Ferries France SAS (Bastia, France) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: French Republic (represented: initially by G. de Bergues and A.-L. Vendrolini, and subsequently by G. de Bergues, N. Rouam and J. Rossi, acting as Agents) and Société nationale maritime Corse-Méditerranée (SNCM) SA (Marseilles, France) (represented by: A. Winckler and F.-C. Laprévote, lawyers)

Re:

Annulment of Commission Decision 2009/611/EC of 8 July 2008 concerning the measures C 58/02 (ex N 118/02) which France has implemented in favour of the Société nationale maritime Corse-Méditerranée (OJ 2009 L 225, p. 180).

Operative part of the judgment

The General Court:






1.


Annuls the first and third paragraphs of Article 1 of Commission Decision 2009/611/EC of 8 July 2008 concerning the measures C 58/02 (ex N 118/02) which France has implemented in favour of the Société nationale maritime Corse-Méditerranée (SNCM);










2.


Orders the European Commission to bear the costs of the applicant together with its own costs;










3.


Orders the French Republic and SNCM to bear their own respective costs.






(1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.
Case C-412/12: Action brought on 11 September 2012 — European Commission v Republic of Cyprus
Date: 2012-09-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: infringement of EU law, national implementing measure, storage of waste, waste disposal








C_2012366EN.01002403.xml










24.11.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 366/24





Action brought on 11 September 2012 — European Commission v Republic of Cyprus
(Case C-412/12)
2012/C 366/43
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: G. Zavvos and D. Düsterhaus, Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Cyprus

Form of order sought







—


declare that the Republic of Cyprus has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 14 of Council Directive 1999/31/EC (1) of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste, because not all the sites for the uncontrolled landfill of waste that operated on Cypriot territory have been decommissioned or been rendered compliant with the requirements of the directive;










—


order the Republic of Cyprus to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments







—


According to Article 14 of Directive 1999/31, existing landfill sites already in operation at the time of transposition of the directive may continue to operate only if the steps required by the European legislation are accomplished by 16 July 2009; otherwise their operation must cease.










—


The Cypriot authorities themselves acknowledge that, of the 115 sites for the uncontrolled landfill of waste (which because of the ‘uncontrolled’ nature of the waste disposal and management, do not fulfil the criteria of Article 14 of Directive 99/31 so as to be able to continue to operate) formerly operating on Cypriot territory, two remain in operation in the districts of Nicosia and Limassol and they are not expected to be decommissioned before the middle of 2015 or the beginning of 2016.










—


A certain improvement has been noted as regards waste management in Cypriot territory, but that occurred after a substantial delay since, under Article 14 of Directive 99/31, the necessary steps should have been completed by 16 July 2009, despite that, as the Cypriot authorities accept, two sites for the uncontrolled landfill of waste continue to operate without control and therefore the infringement of Article 14 of the directive remains, and is not expected to cease at least for the next three years.






(1)  OJ 1999 L 182, p. 1.
Case T-241/03 REV: Order of the General Court of 11 September 2012 — Marcuccio v Commission (Proceedings — Review — Consequences of a later judgment of the General Court — New fact — Absence — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2012-09-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: breach of domicile, judicial proceedings








C_2012331EN.01002302.xml










27.10.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 331/23






Order of the General Court of 11 September 2012 — Marcuccio v Commission
(Case T-241/03 REV) (1)

(Proceedings - Review - Consequences of a later judgment of the General Court - New fact - Absence - Inadmissibility)
(2012/C 331/43)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and J. Baquero Cruz, Agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Application for revision of the Order of the General Court of 17 May 2006 in Case T-241/03 Marcuccio v Commission ECR-SC I-A-2-111 and II-A-2-517.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for revision is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Mr Marcuccio shall bear his own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 200, 23.8.2003.
Case T-403/12: Action brought on 11 September 2012 — Intrasoft International v Commission
Date: 2012-09-11
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: award of contract, infringement of EU law, invitation to tender








C_2012343EN.01001801.xml










10.11.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 343/18





Action brought on 11 September 2012 — Intrasoft International v Commission
(Case T-403/12)
2012/C 343/31
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Intrasoft International SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of the Delegation of the European Union to the Republic of Serbia of 10 August 2012 (ref.: RH(2012)3471), as well as the implicit rejection of the applicant’s complaint of 10 August 2012 against such decision, so that the applicant will be allowed to participate in the subsequent stages of the tender;










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs of the present application.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging infringement of the terms of reference and the principle of good administration. More specifically, the applicant sustains that the additional information-clarifications given by the contracting authority to all tenderers following the tender procedure completed the terms of reference, formed part of the legal framework that governs the tender in question and subsequently was binding on all parties, the contracting authority included. Such terms have in the case at hand been infringed by the defendant.










2.


Second plea in law, alleging an infringement of Article 94 of the Financial Regulation (1), as:






—


The applicant was excluded from the tendering procedure on the ground of conflict of interest without having been given the opportunity to prove and support evidence that there was not such a case;










—


The administration failed to assess and substantiate that the previous involvement of the applicant in another tender could have an impact on the tender in question.










(1)  Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (OJ 2002 L 248, p. 1)
Case C-413/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Salamanca (Spain) lodged on 11 September 2012 — Asociación de Consumidores Independientes de Castilla y León
Date: 2012-09-11
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Spain, consumer protection, court of civil jurisdiction, territorial jurisdiction, unfair terms of contract








C_2012379EN.01001302.xml










8.12.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 379/13





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Salamanca (Spain) lodged on 11 September 2012 — Asociación de Consumidores Independientes de Castilla y León
(Case C-413/12)
2012/C 379/22
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Audiencia Provincial de Salamanca

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Asociación de Consumidores Independientes de Castilla y León

Questions referred







1.


Does the protection afforded to the consumer under Council Directive 93/13/EEC (1) on unfair terms in consumer contracts allow the Audiencia Provincial, as a national court of appeal, to hear and determine, in spite of the absence of any relevant domestic legal rule, the appeal brought against the decision of the court of first instance assigning to a court of the place where the defendant has its address territorial jurisdiction to hear and determine the action for an injunction brought by a consumer association of restricted territorial scope, which is not associated or federated with other associations and which has a small budget and a small number of members?










2.


Must Articles 4, 12, 114 and 169 of the Treaty and Article 38 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, read in conjunction with Directive 93/13 and the case-law of the Court of Justice relating to the high level of protection of the interests of consumers, as well as to the practical effect of directives and the principles of equivalence and effectiveness, be interpreted as meaning that the court of the place where that association has its address, and not the court of the place where the defendant has its address, is to have territorial jurisdiction to hear and determine an action for an injunction against the use of unfair terms, to protect the collective or general interests of consumers and users, brought by a consumer association with restricted territorial scope, which is not associated or federated with other associations and which has a small budget and a small number of members?






(1)  5 April 1993
OJ L 95, p. 29.