REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL on EAGF expenditure Early Warning System No 6-7/2012
Date: 2012-08-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agricultural expenditure, aid to agriculture, fruit, fund (EU), implementation of the budget, market gardening, sugar, wine

EUROPEAN COMMISSION 

Brussels, 3.8.2012  
COM(2012) 452 final 

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND 
THE COUNCIL 

on EAGF expenditure 

Early Warning System No 6-7/2012 

EN 

   EN 

 
 
 
 
  
 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

Introduction...................................................................................................................2 

Revenue assigned to EAGF ..........................................................................................2 

Revenue originating from the temporary restructuring amounts (sugar sector)...........3 

Comments on the implementation of the 2012 EAGF budget .....................................3 

Implementation of revenue assigned to EAGF.............................................................6 

Implementation of revenue originating from the temporary restructuring amounts 
(sugar sector) ................................................................................................................7 

Implementation of Sugar Restructuring Fund ..............................................................7 

Conclusions...................................................................................................................7 

ANNEX 1: 

PROVISIONAL CONSUMPTION OF EAGF APPROPRIATIONS UP TO 31/05 2012 

EN 

2 

   EN 

 
 
 
1. 

INTRODUCTION 

For the period 16 October 2011 to 31 May 2012, the budget's actual implementation 
level compared to the expenditure profile foreseen by the indicator, established on the 
basis of the dispositions of article 20 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/20051, is 
presented in Annex 1. 

2. 

REVENUE ASSIGNED TO EAGF 

On the basis of the rules of article 34 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005, on 
the financing of the Common Agricultural Policy, revenue originating from financial 
corrections  under  conformity  clearance  decisions,  from  irregularities  and  from  the 
milk levy are designated as revenue assigned to the financing of EAGF expenditure. 
According  to  these  rules,  assigned  revenue  can  be  used  to  cover  the  financing  of 
EAGF  expenditure  incurred  by  the  Member  States.  In  the  event  where  part  of  this 
revenue  is  not  used,  then,  this  part  will  be  automatically  carried  forward  to  the 
following budget year.2 

The  2012  EAGF  budget  included  both:  the  Commissions'  latest  estimate  on  the 
amount  of  appropriations,  which  would  be  needed  in  order  to  finance  the  expected 
expenditure  for  market  measures  and  direct  aids  and  the  estimates  of  the  assigned 
revenue,  which  was  expected  to  be  collected  in  the  course  of  the  budget  year 
concerned  and  the  carryover  of  the  balance  of  assigned  revenue  left  available  from 
the previous budget year. In its proposal for the amount of EAGF appropriations for 
the 2012 budget, the Commission took into consideration the total expected assigned 
revenue and requested in 2012 a level of appropriations calculated by deducting the 
estimated assigned revenue from its estimated expenditure. The Budgetary Authority 
adopted the new EAGF budget taking account of the expected assigned revenue.  

At the time of establishing the budget for 2012, the Commission’s estimates for the 
available assigned revenue amounted to EUR 1 010 million. Specifically:  

– 

– 

The assigned revenue expected to be generated in the course of the 2012 budget 
year  was  estimated  at  EUR 805 million.  Amounts  of  EUR 600 million  and 
EUR 150 million  were  expected  from  conformity  clearance  corrections  and 
from irregularities respectively. The receipts from the milk levy were estimated 
at EUR 55 million. 

The  amount  of  assigned  revenue  expected  to  be  carried  over  from  the  budget 
year 2011 into 2012 was estimated at EUR 205 million. 

the  2012  budget, 

In 
EUR 1 010 million to two schemes. Specifically:  

the  Commission  allocated 

this  assigned  revenue  of 

– 

EUR 310 million  was  assigned 
organisations in the fruits and vegetables sector, and 

to 

the  operational  funds  for  producer 

1 
2 

OJ L 209, 11.8.2005, p.1 
Assigned  revenue  carried  over  has  to  be  used  first,  this  means  before  the  appropriations  voted  by  the 
Budgetary Authority or the assigned revenues generated in the year (Art 10 of the Financial Regulation). 

EN 

3 

   EN 

 
                                                 
– 

EUR 700 million to the single payment scheme.  

to  EUR 496 million  and 

For  these  two  schemes,  the  Budgetary  Authority  eventually  voted  appropriations 
amounting 
in 
accordance with the Commission’s proposal. The sum of the voted appropriations and 
the  assigned  revenue  mentioned  above  corresponds  to  a  total  estimate  of  available 
appropriations  of  EUR 806 million  for 
the  operational  funds  for  producer 
organisations  in  the  fruits  and  vegetables  sector  and  EUR 31 172 million  for  the 
single payment scheme. 

to  EUR  30 472 million  respectively, 

In annex 1, which presents the 2012 budget’s provisional execution for the period to 
31 May 2012, the figures of the budget appropriations for fruits and vegetables and 
for  decoupled  direct  aids  present  voted  appropriations  for  these  two  sectors,  which 
amount to EUR 788 million and to EUR 37 189 million respectively, without taking 
account  of  the  aforementioned  assigned  revenue.  After  including  the  revenue 
assigned  to  these  sectors,  the  total  appropriations  foreseen  in  the  2012  budget 
amounted to EUR 1 098 million for fruits and vegetables and to EUR 37 889 million 
for decoupled direct aids.  

3. 

REVENUE ORIGINATING FROM THE TEMPORARY RESTRUCTURING AMOUNTS (SUGAR 
SECTOR) 

The  temporary  restructuring  amounts  in  the  sugar  sector  are  treated  as  assigned 
revenue intended to finance the sugar restructuring aid and other aids foreseen in the 
Sugar Restructuring Fund. For three marketing years: 2006/07, 2007/08 and 2008/09, 
these  amounts  relating  to  the  sugar,  inulin  syrup  and  isoglucose  quantitative  quotas 
held  by  operators  in  each  Member  State  were  paid  into  the  Fund.  At  the  time  of 
establishment  of  the  2012  budget  an  amount  of  EUR 832.2 million  was  expected  to 
be carried over from the budget year 2011 into 2012. 

4. 

COMMENTS ON THE PROVISIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE 2012 EAGF BUDGET 

The  budget’s  provisional  implementation  level  for  the  period  16 October 2011  to 
31 May 2012 is presented in Annex 1. This implementation level is compared to the 
expenditure profile based on the indicator, which was established on the basis of the 
provisions  of  article  20  of  Council  Regulation  (EC)  No 1290/2005.  Below  a  brief 
commentary is presented for certain budget articles, which show the most significant 
divergences between the actual and the expected level of implementation of the 2012 
budget. 

4.1.  Market measures 

The  uptake  of  appropriations  for  interventions  in  agricultural  markets  was  higher 
compared to the level of the budget's voted appropriations, as determined by the level 
of the indicator on 31 May 2012, by EUR 211.5 million. This divergence is primarily 
attributed  to  the  wine  and  fruits  and  vegetables  sectors.  At  the  same  time,  other 
sectors presented in total a small under-implementation.   

EN 

4 

   EN 

 
4.1.1.  Fruit and vegetables (+ EUR 127.6 million in comparison with voted appropriations) 

As  regards  voted  appropriations,  this  implementation  level  is  primarily  due  to  the 
expenditure  for  the  operational  funds  for  producer  organisations  scheme,  which  is 
funded both by the budget’s voted appropriations and by the revenue assigned to this 
scheme  in  the  2012  budget  (NB:  For  details  please  see  point  2  above).  This 
implementation level is the result of applying the indicator for the period to 31 May 
2012 to the budget’s voted appropriations, which do not include the revenue assigned 
to this sector.  

Furthermore, for the period under examination,  Member  States  made  payments at a 
rhythm  which  was  faster  than  the  level  of  the  indicator  established  for  the  aid  to 
producer  groups  for  preliminary  recognition  scheme.  At  this  point  in  time,  the 
Commission expects that the expenditure to be incurred for this scheme in 2012 will 
be higher than the corresponding appropriations included in the 2012 budget. 

As from 2010, for the benefit of the reader, the Commission introduced footnote * to 
the provisional execution table which appears in annex 1. This footnote shows what 
the situation would be, had the indicator, as of 31 May 2012, been applied to the total 
appropriations, which are expected to be available in order to fund this sector. As it is 
pointed out in point 2 above, the total funding expected to be available for this sector 
is  composed  of  the  budget’s  voted  appropriations  of  EUR  788  million  and  of  the 
revenue assigned to this sector which is estimated at EUR 310 million. Therefore, had 
the indicator been applied to the total funding of EUR 1 098 million expected to be 
available for this sector, then, the observed over-execution would be reduced to EUR 
1.9 million.   

In view of the assumption that assigned revenue will be available to cover the needs 
for the operational funds for producer organisations scheme, but that the Commission 
expects  the  aid  to  producer  groups  for  preliminary  recognition  scheme  to  be  over-
executed in the 2012 budget, the Commission considers that the total appropriations 
available for this sector may not be sufficient to cover the total expenditure expected 
to be incurred by Member States in 2012. 

4.1.2.  Products of the wine-growing sector (+EUR 91.7 million) 

When  compared  to  the  level  of  execution  pointed  out  by  the  indicator  on  31  May 
2012, the current over-execution is due to the acceleration of the rhythm of payments 
made by Member States for the national support programmes for the wine sector, a 
rhythm  which  has  nevertheless  slowed  down  in  the  last  months  compared  to  the 
beginning of the year. Furthermore, it should be noted that this faster implementation 
rhythm for these programmes does not constitute any risk of exceeding the budget's 
appropriations as they are equal to the financial ceilings established by the legislation 
for these programmes. 

4.2. 

Direct aids  

The uptake of appropriations for direct aids compared to the level of the indicator on 
31 May 2012 was higher by EUR 790.1 million.  

EN 

5 

   EN 

 
4.2.1.  Decoupled  direct  aids 
appropriations) 

(+EUR  754.2  million 

in  comparison  with  voted 

As regards voted appropriations, the single payment scheme (SPS) presents an over-
execution  which  results  both  from  applying  the  indicator  for  the  period  to  31  May 
2012 to the budget's voted appropriations which do not include the revenue assigned 
to this sector as well as from the general authorisation granted by the Commission to 
Member  States  to  pay  advances  of  direct  aids  as  of  16  October  2011.  Furthermore, 
the  implementation  rhythm  of  the  single  area  payment  scheme  (SAPS)  was  faster 
compared  to  the  level  of  the  indicator  while  the  separate  sugar  and  fruits  and 
vegetables payments are being implemented at the level of the indicator. 

Indeed,  Member  States  have  already  paid  till  approximately  98%  of  the  estimated 
needs in the budget as compared to 97.2% at the same time for the 2010 claims paid 
in 2011.  

As from 2010, for the benefit of the reader, the Commission introduced footnote * to 
the provisional execution table which appears in annex 1. This footnote shows which 
would be the situation had the indicator, as of 31 May 2012, been applied to the total 
appropriations  which  are  expected  to  be  available  in  order  to  fund  decoupled  direct 
aids. As it is pointed out in point 2 above, the total funding expected to be available 
for  decoupled  direct  aids  is  composed  of  the  budget’s  voted  appropriations  of  EUR 
37 189  million  and  of  the  revenue  assigned  to  decoupled  direct  aids  which  is 
estimated to amount to EUR 700 million. Therefore, had the indicator been applied to 
the total funding of EUR 37 889 million expected to be available for decoupled direct 
aids, then, the observed over-execution would be smaller at EUR 70 million.  

At  this  point  in  time,  the  Commission  is  closely  following  the  implementation 
situation for decoupled direct aids.   

4.2.2.  Other direct aids (+EUR 36.4  million) 

Following the general authorisation granted by the Commission to Member States to 
pay advances of direct aids as of 16 October 2011, payments were made at a faster 
rhythm  compared  to  the  level  of  the  indicator  on  31  May  2012  for  certain  schemes 
like: the suckler cows premium as well as for the area payments for rice, cotton and 
nuts.  Similarly  to  decoupled  direct  aids,  the  Commission,  at  this  point  in  time,  is 
closely following the implementation situation for other direct aids.   

4.3. 

Audit of agricultural expenditure 

4.3.1.  Accounting clearance of previous years’ accounts (+EUR 78  million) 

For  the  period  to  31  May  2012,  Member  States  declared  clearance  of  accounts 
corrections of - EUR 0.6 million. The current implementation level results from the 
comparison  of  these  corrections  with  the  level  of  the  corresponding  indicator  as  of 
31 May 2012.  

It should be pointed out that the Commission, in its Amending Letter for 2012, had 
proposed  corrections  amounting  to  –  EUR  69  million.  The  Budgetary  Authority 
adopted the 2012 budget in which this amount was set at – EUR 200 million. 

EN 

6 

   EN 

 
However,  it  should  be  noted  that,  at  this  point  in  time,  all  accounting  clearance 
decisions  expected  within  this  budget  year  have  been  presented  to  the  Funds 
committee and they are in their adoption procedure by the Commission. The result of 
these  decisions  is  that  the  Commission  will  need  to  reimburse,  i.e.  make  positive 
corrections in favour of the Member States, a net amount of approximately EUR 33 
million.  Furthermore,  under  the  conformity  clearance  decisions  taken  by  the 
Commission  in  2012,  positive  corrections  in  favour  of  the  Member  States  of 
approximately  EUR  34.5  million  have  to  be  made.  Therefore,  the  Commission  will 
need to find positive budget appropriations, not needed for other EAGF budget items, 
amounting  to  approximately  EUR  67.5  million.  In  addition,  the  Commission  would 
need  to  cover  the  negative  expenditure  of  –  EUR  200  million  imposed  by  the 
to  find  positive 
Budgetary  Authority.  In  fact, 
appropriations, amounting to EUR 267.5 million in order to close this budget item in 
2012.  The  final  amount  of  these  positive  corrections  will  be  determined  by  the 
expected  negative  corrections,  resulting  from  the  non-respect  of  payment  deadlines 
by Member States, which will be presented to the Funds committee in the first half of 
October 2012.     

the  Commission  will  need 

4.4. 

Other expenditure 

4.4.1.  Food  and  feed  safety,  animal  health,  animal  welfare  and  plant  health  (-  EUR  63.5 

million) 

The  schemes  funded  under  this  article  involve  direct  payments  by  the  Commission. 
Due to the improved animal health situation and the changes in the legislation where 
fewer  tests  are  required  for  TSE,  the  expected  needs  for  the  animal  disease  and 
eradication  programmes  are  smaller  compared  to  the  ones  estimated  at  the  time  of 
preparation of the 2012 budget. At this point in time, it is expected that this budget 
article's appropriations will be under-executed.    

5. 

IMPLEMENTATION OF REVENUE ASSIGNED TO EAGF 

The  table  in  Annex 1  shows  that  assigned  revenue  amounting  to  EUR 570 million 
was collected as of 31 May 2012. Specifically: 

– 

– 

– 

the  revenue  from  corrections  based  on  conformity  clearance  decisions 
amounted to EUR 423 million with additional amounts expected by the end of 
the budget year, 

the  revenue  from  irregularities  amounted  to  approximately  EUR 90.4 million 
with additional amounts also expected by the end of the budget year, and  

at this point in time, the main share of the revenue from the milk levy has been 
collected and it amounts to EUR 56.6 million. 

Finally, the amount of assigned revenue eventually carried over from 2011 into 2012 
amounted  to  EUR 441.5 million  which  is  significantly  higher  than  the  initially 
estimated amount of EUR 205 million. 

the  amount  of  assigned  revenue  available  for  financing  EAGF 
Therefore, 
expenditure, on 31 May 2012, amounts to EUR 1 011.6 million. At this point in time, 

EN 

7 

   EN 

 
the  amount  of  assigned  revenue  still  to  be  collected  in  2012  would  amount  to 
approximately    EUR 235 million  (on  the  basis  of  the  2012  budget  hypothesis  that 
estimated  assigned  revenue 
to 
EUR 805 million of which EUR 570  million has been already collected). 

in  2012  would  be  equal 

to  be  generated 

6. 

IMPLEMENTATION  OF  REVENUE  ORIGINATING 
RESTRUCTURING AMOUNTS (SUGAR SECTOR) 

FROM  THE  TEMPORARY 

In accordance with the legislation no new temporary restructuring amounts have been 
collected  from  the  Member  States  since  November  2009.  Therefore,  the  total 
assigned revenue available to the Sugar Restructuring Fund equals the amount carried 
over from the budget 2011, which, contrary to the initial estimates, amounts to EUR 
856.8  million  (higher  than  the  EUR  832.2  million  foreseen  in  the  remarks  to  2012 
budget  due  to  lower,  than  expected,  aid  payments  made  at  the  end  of  2011).  In  the 
Draft  Budget  for  2013,  the  Commission  has  already  made  clear  that  it  expects  a 
balance of assigned revenue from the Sugar Restructuring Fund to be available at its 
closure on 30 September 2012. 

7. 

IMPLEMENTATION OF SUGAR RESTRUCTURING FUND 

As of the end of May 2012, Member States had made payments of EUR 69.1 million 
for aids concerning restructuring measures, for diversification aids or for aids to sugar 
refining.  

8. 

CONCLUSIONS 

The provisional execution of the 2012 EAGF budget's appropriations, for the period 
up to 31 May 2012, shows that monthly reimbursements to Member States exceeded 
the  expenditure  profile  for  budget  execution  based  on  the  indicator,  by  EUR 1 
024.9 million.  This  was  mostly  due  to  the  general  authorisation  granted  by  the 
Commission  to  pay  advances  of  direct  aids  as  of  16  October  2011  which  led  to  a 
faster payment rhythm for these aids.   

Assigned revenue amounting to EUR 1 011.6 million is available and an amount of 
EUR  235 million  is  still  expected  to  be  collected  in  2012.  At  this  point  it  time,  the 
Commission expects that the amount of assigned revenue which is available as well 
the amount which will become available, in the course of the year, will be sufficient 
to cover the funding of the fruits and vegetables and decoupled direct aids sectors as 
initially expected when the 2012 budget was established.  

At  the  time  of  writing  this  report,  the  Commission  closely  follows  the  evolution  of 
the execution of the 2012 budget in order to assess whether certain parts of the budget 
will  eventually  show  an  under-execution  which  will  allow  funding  both  the 
accounting  and  conformity  clearance  positive  corrections  as  well  as  the  negative 
expenditure in chapter 05 07 presented above. 

EN 

8 

   EN 

 
Annex 1

BUDGET YEAR 2012 (**)
PROVISIONAL CONSUMPTION OF THE EAGF APPROPRIATIONS

Situation to the 31/05/2012
in EUR million

05 01

05 02
05 02 01
05 02 02
05 02 03
05 02 04
05 02 05
05 02 06
05 02 07
05 02 08
05 02 09
05 02 10
05 02 11
05 02 12
05 02 13
05 02 14
05 02 15

05 03
05 03 01
05 03 02
05 03 03

05 04

05 07

05 08

11 01
11 02
17 01

17 03

17 04

Expenditure
(1) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE FOR EAGF
05010401
Total 05 01 Administrative expenditure for EAGF
INTERVENTIONS IN AGRICULTURAL MARKETS
Cereals
Rice
Refunds on non-Annex 1 products
Food programmes
Sugar
Olive oil
Textile plants
Fruits and vegetables (estimated 310 Mio EUR from assigned revenue)(*)(****)
Products of the wine-growing sector
Promotion
Other plant products/measures
Milk and milk products
Beef and veal
Sheepmeat and goatmeat
Pigmeat, eggs and poultry, bee-keeping and other animal products
Total 05 02 Interventions in agricultural markets (excluding 05 02 16 and 05 02 17)
DIRECT AIDS
Decoupled direct aids (estimated 700 Mio EUR credits coming from assigned revenue)(*)(****)
Other direct aids
Additional amounts of aid
Total 05 03 Direct aids
OTHER EXPENDITURE
05040114 Rural development financed by the EAGGF-Guarantee Section-Programming
period 2000-2006
05040302 Plant and animal genetic resources-Completion of earlier measures
05070106 Accounting clearance of previous years' accounts
(3) 05070107 Conformity clearance of previous years' accounts
Other lines (05070102 and 050702)
POLICY STRATEGY AND COORDINATION OF THE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL
DEVELOPMENT POLICY AREA (excl. 050810 to 050812)
(2) Only 11010408 EAGF Non-operational technical assistance
(2) FISHERIES MARKETS (excl. 11020103)
(1) (2) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE OF 'HEALTH AND CONSUMER
PROTECTION' POLICY AREA
17010401, 17010405, 17010407 and 17010431
(1) (2) PUBLIC HEALTH
17 03 02 Community tobacco fund - direct payments by the Union
(1) (2) FOOD AND FEED SAFETY, ANIMAL HEALTH, ANIMAL WELFARE AND PLANT HEALTH
170401 to 170407 (excl. 17040102, 17040303 and 170406)
Total Expenditure (excluding 05 02 16 and 05 02 17)

Assigned Revenue

6 7 0 1
6 7 0 2
6 7 0 3

Clearance of EAGF accounts — Assigned revenue
EAGF irregularities — Assigned revenue
Superlevy from milk producers — Assigned revenue
Assigned revenue carried over from 2011
Total Revenue (excluding 6 8)

Sugar Restructuring Fund

05 02 16
6 8 0 1

6 8 0 2
6 8 0 3

Sugar Restructuring Fund
Temporary restructuring amounts — Assigned revenue
Assigned revenue carried over from 2011
Irregularities concerning the temporary restructuring fund — Assigned revenue
Clearance with regard to the temporary restructuring fund — Assigned revenue
Total Sugar Restructuring Fund

(*) For information only: expenditure against original appropriations and estimated assigned revenue
Fruits and vegetables (incl. estimated assigned revenue of 310 Mio EUR)(****)
Decoupled direct aids (including estimated assigned revenue of 700 Mio EUR)(****)

05 02 08
05 03 01

(**) Budget year = 16.10.2011 to 15.10.2012 but direct expenditure possible until 31.12.2012
(***) It concerns the commitments
(****) Including use of assigned revenues carried over from the previous year

Appropriations
Budget (***)

EUR mio
A

Consumption
from
November to
May

EUR mio
B

Utilisation

Consumption profile
as at May

Gap between
implementation and
indicator

%
C=B/A

%
D

EUR mio
E=D*A

%
F=C-D

EUR mio
G=B-E

8.8

8.8

43.0
p.m.
12.0
500.1
1.2
68.5
27.0
788.0
1 108.9
55.4
356.5
91.1
46.1
p.m.
133.0
3 230.8

37 189.0
3 320.7
1.0
40 510.7

p.m.

p.m.
-200.0
p.m.
7.3
45.8

0.5
30.0
2.8

p.m.

333.0

3.3

3.3

40.7
0.0
6.0
87.6
-0.2
37.6
12.7
447.1
441.1
30.7
230.1
69.6
26.2
0.0
73.3
1 502.4

37 103.9
2 667.7
0.1
39 771.7

-2.1

0.0
-0.6
34.5
5.8
19.7

0.0
29.9
1.2

37.8 %

56.2 %

37.8 %

56.2 %

4.9

4.9

-18.4 %

-18.4 %

94.6 %
0.0 %
49.7 %
17.5 %
-16.9 %
54.9 %
46.9 %
56.7 %
39.8 %
55.3 %
64.6 %
76.4 %
56.9 %

55.1 %
46.5 %

99.8 %
80.3 %
9.3 %
98.2 %

91.1 %

39.2

3.5 %

68.5 %
20.2 %
69.3 %
68.3 %
41.9 %
40.5 %
31.5 %
63.9 %
64.0 %
61.3 %
61.5 %

50.4 %
40.0 %

97.7 %
79.2 %
63.9 %
96.2 %

8.2
100.9
0.8
46.8
11.3
319.5
349.4
35.4
228.2
55.8
28.4

67.0
1 290.9

36 349.7
2 631.3
0.6
38 981.6

-18.7 %
-2.7 %
-86.1 %
-13.5 %
5.1 %
16.2 %
8.3 %
-8.5 %
0.5 %
15.1 %
-4.7 %

4.7 %
6.5 %

2.0 %
1.1 %
-54.6 %
2.0 %

0.3 %

39.3 %

-78.6

-39.0 %

79.4 %
43.0 %

0.0 %
99.8 %
44.6 %

77.2 %
89.1 %

0.0 %
100.0 %
74.7 %

5.6
40.8

0.0
30.0
2.1

2.3 %
-46.1 %

0.0 %
-0.2 %
-30.2 %

-1.6

-1.6

1.5

-2.2
-13.3
-1.0
-9.2
1.4
127.6
91.7
-4.7
1.9
13.8
-2.1

6.3
211.5

754.2
36.4
-0.5
790.1

78.0

0.2
-21.1

0.0
-0.1
-0.8

0.0

0.0 %

216.5

65.0 %

84.1 %

280.0

-19.1 %

-63.5

43 969.6

41 582.3

94.6 %

92.2 %

40 557.4

2.3 %

1 024.9

taken into
account in the
budget

600.0
150.0
55.0
205.0
1 010.0

taken into
account in the
budget

193.0
p.m.
832.2
p.m.
p.m.
639.2

423.0
90.4
56.6
441.5
1 011.6

69.1
0.0
856.8
7.8
0.0
795.6

1 098.0
37 889.0

447.1
37 103.9

40.7 %
97.9 %

40.5 %
97.7 %

445.2
37 033.9

0.2 %
0.2 %

1.9
70.0

(1) Chapter not exclusively EAGF
(2) Chapter outside title 05 but included in EAGF
(3) Used only for cases in which Member States are beneficiaries

EN 

9 

   EN