do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
New national side of euro coins intended for circulation
Date: 2012-07-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Monaco, commemoration, euro, issuing of currency








C_2012223EN.01000201.xml










27.7.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 223/2





New national side of euro coins intended for circulation
2012/C 223/02




National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Monaco

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the Community providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.
Issuing country: Monaco
Subject of commemoration: The 500th anniversary of the foundation of Monaco's Sovereignty, by founder Lucien 1er GRIMALDI
Description of the design: The inner part of the coin shows a portrait of Lucien 1er GRIMALDI in profile facing to the left. The words ‘SOUVERAINETE DE MONACO’ appear above the portrait in an arc along the upper edge of the inner part of the coin, flanked by the years ‘1512’ and ‘2012’. Two ornamental details are engraved at the beginning and at the end of the text. At the bottom, the horn of plenty, mintmark of the ‘Monnaie de Paris’, and the ‘fleurette’, hallmark of the engraving workshop, flank the portrait on the left hand side and the right hand side, respectively. Above the mintmark is engraved the inscription ‘Lucien Ier’.
The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.
Number of coins to be issued: 
Date of issue: 


(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).
Case F-81/12: Action brought on 27 July 2012 — ZZ v Council
Date: 2012-07-27
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: administrator, indemnification, promotion








C_2012295EN.01003402.xml










29.9.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/34





Action brought on 27 July 2012 — ZZ v Council
(Case F-81/12)
2012/C 295/60
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decisions not to promote the applicant to grade AD12 in respect of promotion years 2010 and 2011.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority not to promote the applicant to grade AD12 in respect of promotion year 2010;










—


Annul the decision of the Appointing Authority not to promote the applicant to grade AD12 in respect of promotion year 2011;










—


If necessary, annul the decision of 18 April 2012 rejecting the claims brought against the decisions not to promote him to grade AD12 in respect of promotion years 2010 and 2011;










—


Order the Council to pay the costs.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2012-07-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2012223EN.01000101.xml










27.7.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 223/1





Euro exchange rates (1)

26 July 2012
2012/C 223/01

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2260




JPY


Japanese yen


95,79




DKK


Danish krone


7,4384




GBP


Pound sterling


0,78280




SEK


Swedish krona


8,4505




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2010




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,3990




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,505




HUF


Hungarian forint


284,81




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,6963




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1506




RON


Romanian leu


4,6230




TRY


Turkish lira


2,2317




AUD


Australian dollar


1,1790




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,2356




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,5107




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,5353




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,5336




KRW


South Korean won


1 404,59




ZAR


South African rand


10,1680




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


7,8283




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5260




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


11 622,38




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


3,8766




PHP


Philippine peso


51,485




RUB


Russian rouble


39,6880




THB


Thai baht


38,729




BRL


Brazilian real


2,4806




MXN


Mexican peso


16,5217




INR


Indian rupee


68,0740






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-356/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 27 July 2012 — Wolfgang Glatzel v Freistaat Bayern
Date: 2012-07-27
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: driving licence, eye disease, medical report








C_2013009EN.01002501.xml










12.1.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 9/25





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 27 July 2012 — Wolfgang Glatzel v Freistaat Bayern
(Case C-356/12)
2013/C 9/41
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Wolfgang Glatzel

Defendant: Freistaat Bayern

Question referred

Is point 6.4 of Annex III to Directive 2006/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on driving licences (1) as amended by Commission Directive 2009/113/EC of 25 August 2009 (2) compatible with Article 20, Article 21(1) and Article 26 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in so far as that provision requires — without permitting any derogation — that applicants for Category C1 and Category C1E driving licences have a minimum visual acuity of 0.1 in their worse eye even if those persons use both eyes together and have a normal field of vision when using both eyes?


(1)  OJ 2006 L 403, p. 18.

(2)  OJ 2009 L 223, p. 31.
Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
Date: 2012-07-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU waters, English Channel, Faroes, Irish Sea, Spain, catch by species, catch quota, fishing rights, international waters, sea fish








C_2012223EN.01000301.xml










27.7.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 223/3





Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries
2012/C 223/03
In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:






Date and time of closure


12.6.2012




Duration


12.6.2012-31.12.2012




Member State


Spain




Stock or group of stocks


BLI/5B67-




Species


Blue ling (Molva dypterygia)




Zone


EU waters and international waters of Vb, VI, VII




Type(s) of fishing vessels


—




Reference number


—






(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of 25 July 2012 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables ( OJ L 199, 26.7.2012 )
Date: 2012-07-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: citrus fruit, common organisation of markets, fruit vegetable, grape, import (EU), import price, pip fruit, stone fruit








L_2012200EN.01002801.xml










27.7.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 200/28







Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of 25 July 2012 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
(
Official Journal of the European Union L 199 of 26 July 2012
)

In the title of the Regulation, in the contents on the cover and on page 4:
for:

               ‘(EU) No 648/2012’,
read:

               ‘(EU) No 684/2012’.
Case T-331/12: Action brought on 27 July 2012 — Sartorius Weighing Technology v OHIM (Representation of a yellow curve)
Date: 2012-07-27
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, medical device, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2012287EN.01003402.xml










22.9.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 287/34





Action brought on 27 July 2012 — Sartorius Weighing Technology v OHIM (Representation of a yellow curve)
(Case T-331/12)
2012/C 287/64
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Sartorius Weighing Technology GmbH (Göttingen, Germany) (represented by K. Welkerling, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 3 May 2012 in Case R 1783/2011-1;










—


order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark concerned: other mark, which represents a yellow curve at the bottom edge of an electronic display unit, for goods in Classes 7, 9, 10 and 11

Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009