do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 678/2012 of 16 July 2012 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Szőregi rózsatő (PGI)]
Date: 2012-07-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Hungary, designation of origin, floriculture, product designation








L_2012198EN.01000401.xml










25.7.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 198/4








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 678/2012
of 16 July 2012
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Szőregi rózsatő (PGI)]


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Hungary's application to register the name ‘Szőregi rózsatő’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 July 2012.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,
Dacian CIOLOȘ
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

(2)  
            OJ C 310, 22.10.2011, p. 17.




ANNEX
Agricultural products listed in Annex II to the Regulation:

Class 3.5.   Flowers and ornamental plants

HUNGARY
Szőregi rózsatő (PGI)
Case C-340/12 P: Appeal brought on 16 July 2012 by Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 8 May 2012 in Case T-416/10: Yoshida Metal Industry Co. Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Date: 2012-07-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, Japan, registered trade mark, technology, trade-mark law








C_2012295EN.01002002.xml










29.9.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 295/20





Appeal brought on 16 July 2012 by Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 8 May 2012 in Case T-416/10: Yoshida Metal Industry Co. Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
(Case C-340/12 P)
2012/C 295/36
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings: Yoshida Metal Industry Co. Ltd and Pi-Design AG, Bodum France, Bodum Logistics A/S

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






—


uphold the Appeal in its entirety










—


annul the Contested Judgment










—


order Yoshida Metal Industry Co. Ltd to pay the costs incurred by the Office.





Pleas in law and main arguments







—


The appellant submits that the General Court failed to state the reasons in support of the Contested Judgment to the extent that it did not address the Office’s argument referred to at paragraph 18 of the Contested Judgment.










—


The appellant also submits that the General Court breached Article 7(1)(e)(ii) CTMR. It should have observed that a two-dimensional sign may be, not only applied to, but also incorporated in a three-dimensional object. Applying Article 7(1)(e)(ii) CTMR thus requires to take account of all possible manners in which it can be envisaged, on the date of filing, that the sign in question could be embodied in a three-dimensional object. The General Court distorted the evidence by ruling that the Board of Appeal had based its examination exclusively on the goods actually marketed. In fact, the Board of Appeal made it clear that its findings are primarily based on the patents submitted by Pi-Design. In any event, reference to additional material, including patents and the goods actually marketed, should not be prohibited where such material corroborate the conclusion that the features of the contested sign, as filed, are liable to achieve a technical result once incorporated in a three dimensional object. This is the only appropriate approach for preserving the legal security and the public interest underlying Article 7(1)(e)(ii) CTMR.
Case C-336/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret lodged on 16 July 2012 — Ministeriet for Forskning, Innovation og Videregående Uddannelser v Manova A/S
Date: 2012-07-16
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: balance sheet, equal treatment, invitation to tender








C_2012287EN.01002501.xml










22.9.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 287/25





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret lodged on 16 July 2012 — Ministeriet for Forskning, Innovation og Videregående Uddannelser v Manova A/S
(Case C-336/12)
2012/C 287/47
Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Østre Landsret

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Ministeriet for Forskning, Innovation og Videregående Uddannelser

Defendant: Manova A/S

Question referred

Does the EU law principle of equal treatment mean that a contracting authority, following expiry of the time-limit for applying to take part in a tendering procedure, may not obtain information required in the call for tenders concerning a tenderer’s most recent published balance sheet, when the tenderer in question did not provide such a balance sheet in its application for pre-qualification?
2012/407/EU: Council Decision of 16 July 2012 appointing a Slovenian member of the Committee of the Regions
Date: 2012-07-16
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: European Committee of the Regions, Slovenia, appointment of members








L_2012189EN.01001101.xml










19.7.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 189/11








            COUNCIL DECISION
         
of 16 July 2012
         
appointing a Slovenian member of the Committee of the Regions
(2012/407/EU)


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,


Having regard to the proposal of the Slovenian Government,

Whereas:







(1)


On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.












(2)


A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Barbara ŽGAJNER TAVŠ,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The following is hereby appointed as member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:






—


Ms Jasna GABRIČ, podžupanja občine Trbovlje.






Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 16 July 2012.


For the Council


The President

S. ALETRARIS
            





(1)  
            OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

(2)  
            OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.