do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-300/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 20 June 2012 — Finanzamt Düsseldorf-Mitte v Ibero Tours GmbH
Date: 2012-06-20
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: VAT, basis of tax assessment, interpretation of the law, tax exemption, trade intermediary, travel agency








C_2012287EN.01001702.xml










22.9.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 287/17





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 20 June 2012 — Finanzamt Düsseldorf-Mitte v Ibero Tours GmbH
(Case C-300/12)
2012/C 287/31
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Finanzamt Düsseldorf-Mitte

Defendant: Ibero Tours GmbH

Questions referred







1.


According to the principles of the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-317/94 Elida Gibbs [1996] ECR I-5339, does it also result in a reduction of the taxable amount within the context of a distribution chain if an intermediary (here: a travel agent) refunds to the customer (here: a travel client) in the transaction arranged by him (here: services of the tour operator provided to the travel client) part of the price for the transaction arranged?










2.


In the event that Question 1 is answered in the affirmative: must the principles of the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Case C-317/94 Elida Gibbs [1996] ECR I-5339 also be applied if the tour operator’s transaction which has been arranged by the intermediary falls within the special scheme under Article 26 of the Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes (77/388/EEC (1)) but the intermediary services of the travel agent do not fall within that provision?










3.


In the event that Question 2 is also answered in the affirmative: in the event of the exemption of the services arranged by the intermediary, is a Member State which has correctly transposed Article 11(C)(1) of the Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes (77/388/EEC) authorised to refuse a reduction of the taxable amount only if in exercising the authority included in that provision it has provided for additional conditions on the refusal of the reduction?






(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ L 145, 13.6.1977, p. 1).
Case F-64/11: Order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal of 20 June 2012 — Westeren v Commission
Date: 2012-06-20
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, indemnification, job vacancy








C_2013046EN.01003304.xml










16.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/33





Order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal of 20 June 2012 — Westeren v Commission
(Case F-64/11) (1)

2013/C 46/70
Language of the case: English
The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 252, 27.08.2011, p. 57
Case F-83/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2012 — Cristina v Commission (Civil service — Open competition — Decision of the selection board in the competition not to admit the applicant to the tests — Remedies — Court action brought without waiting for a decision on the administrative complaint — Admissibility — Specific conditions for entry to the competition — Professional experience related to the nature of the duties)
Date: 2012-06-20
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: EPSO, admission to examinations, assistant, competition (EU), damages








C_2012287EN.01004003.xml










22.9.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 287/40





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2012 — Cristina v Commission
(Case F-83/11) (1)

(Civil service - Open competition - Decision of the selection board in the competition not to admit the applicant to the tests - Remedies - Court action brought without waiting for a decision on the administrative complaint - Admissibility - Specific conditions for entry to the competition - Professional experience related to the nature of the duties)
2012/C 287/74
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Alma Yael Cristina (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, A. Blot and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the chairman of the selection board in competition EPSO/AST/112/10 — Assistants (AST 3) not to admit the applicant to the tests.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the application;










2.


Orders Mrs Cristina to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 340, 19.11.2011, p. 41.
Corrigendum to the statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Aviation Safety Agency for the financial year 2012 ( OJ C 95, 30.3.2012 )
Date: 2012-06-20
Institutions: European Union Aviation Safety Agency
Subjects: European Aviation Safety Agency, expenditure, financial year, publication of accounts, revenue








C_2012178EN.01004101.xml










20.6.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 178/41





Corrigendum to the statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Aviation Safety Agency for the financial year 2012

(
Official Journal of the European Union C 95 of 30 March 2012
)

(2012/C 178/09)
On page 81, Function group and grade AD 16, column ‘Temporary posts’, under ‘2012’:

for


read
Case F-66/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2012 — Cristina v Commission (Civil service — Open competition — Decision of the selection board in the competition not to admit the applicant to the tests — Remedies — Court action brought without waiting for a decision on the administrative complaint — Admissibility — Specific conditions for entry to the competition — Professional experience required)
Date: 2012-06-20
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: EPSO, competition (EU), indemnification








C_2012287EN.01004002.xml










22.9.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 287/40





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 20 June 2012 — Cristina v Commission
(Case F-66/11) (1)

(Civil service - Open competition - Decision of the selection board in the competition not to admit the applicant to the tests - Remedies - Court action brought without waiting for a decision on the administrative complaint - Admissibility - Specific conditions for entry to the competition - Professional experience required)
2012/C 287/73
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Alma Yael Cristina (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, A. Blot and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Eggers and P. Pecho, and subsequently B. Eggers, agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the chairman of the selection board in competition EPSO/AST/111/10 — Assistants (AST 1) not to admit the applicant to the tests.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the application;










2.


Orders Mrs Cristina to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.2011, p. 51.
Council Decision 2012/322/CFSP of 20 June 2012 amending Decision 2011/782/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria
Date: 2012-06-20
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Syria, economic sanctions, international sanctions








L_2012165EN.01004501.xml










26.6.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 165/45








            COUNCIL DECISION 2012/322/CFSP
of 20 June 2012
         
amending Decision 2011/782/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


On 1 December 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/782/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (1).












(2)


It is necessary to further develop the application of Article 1(3)(b) and Article 1a(2)(b) of Decision 2011/782/CFSP.












(3)


Decision 2011/782/CFSP should be amended accordingly,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Decision 2011/782/CFSP is hereby amended as follows:






(1)


Article 1(3)(b) is replaced by the following:






‘(b)


provide, directly or indirectly, financing or financial assistance related to the items referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, including in particular grants, loans and export credit insurance, as well as insurance and reinsurance, for any sale, supply, transfer or export of such items, or for the provision of related technical assistance, brokering services or other services to any natural or legal person, entity or body in, or for use in, Syria.’;














(2)


Article 1a(2)(b) is replaced by the following:






‘(b)


financing or financial assistance related to the items referred to in paragraph 1, including in particular grants, loans and export credit insurance, as well as insurance and reinsurance, for any sale, supply, transfer or export of such items, or for the provision of related technical assistance, brokering services or other services to any natural or legal person, entity or body in, or for use in, Syria.’.










Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 20 June 2012.


For the Council


The President

N. WAMMEN
            





(1)  
            OJ L 319, 2.12.2011, p. 56.
Case F-79/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 20 June 2012 — Menidiatis v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Recruitment — Rejection of application — Implementation of the judgment annulling the decision — Reasonable time — Individual implementing measures — Loss of opportunity)
Date: 2012-06-20
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, administrative competition, enforcement of ruling, indemnification








C_2013046EN.01003001.xml










16.2.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 46/30





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 20 June 2012 — Menidiatis v Commission
(Case F-79/11) (1)

(Civil Service - Officials - Recruitment - Rejection of application - Implementation of the judgment annulling the decision - Reasonable time - Individual implementing measures - Loss of opportunity)
2013/C 46/57
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Andreas Menidiatis (Rhode-Saint-Genèse, Belgium) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and G. Berscheid, Agents)

Re:

Civil Service — Application for the payment of an amount of compensation to the applicant for material and non-material damage allegedly suffered because of the failure to take measures to implement the judgment in Case F-128/07

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mr Menidiatis to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 311, 22.10.2011, p. 47.