do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2012-05-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2012142EN.01000701.xml










22.5.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 142/7





Euro exchange rates (1)

21 May 2012
2012/C 142/04

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2750




JPY


Japanese yen


101,06




DKK


Danish krone


7,4320




GBP


Pound sterling


0,80750




SEK


Swedish krona


9,1191




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2011




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,6265




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,225




HUF


Hungarian forint


297,49




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,6978




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3330




RON


Romanian leu


4,4440




TRY


Turkish lira


2,3371




AUD


Australian dollar


1,2969




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3047




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,8994




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6841




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6223




KRW


South Korean won


1 490,29




ZAR


South African rand


10,6030




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,0604




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5615




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


11 861,21




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


3,9952




PHP


Philippine peso


55,089




RUB


Russian rouble


39,8647




THB


Thai baht


39,959




BRL


Brazilian real


2,5842




MXN


Mexican peso


17,5896




INR


Indian rupee


70,1000






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-317/11 P: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Vakalis v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Pensions — Transfer of national pension rights — Calculation of years of pensionable service — General implementing provisions — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of the right to be heard — Equal treatment)
Date: 2012-05-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, transfer of pension rights








C_2012200EN.01001602.xml










7.7.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 200/16





Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Vakalis v Commission
(Case T-317/11 P) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Pensions - Transfer of national pension rights - Calculation of years of pensionable service - General implementing provisions - Obligation to state reasons - Principle of the right to be heard - Equal treatment)
2012/C 200/33
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: Ioannis Vakalis (Luvinate, Italy) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin and J. Baquero Cruz, agents

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 13 April 2011, delivered in Case F-38/10 Vakalis v Commission (not yet published in the ECR), requesting that that judgment be set aside.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders Mr Ioannis Vakalis to bear his own costs and to pay those of the European Commission relating to these proceedings.






(1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.
Case T-273/10: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Olive Line International v OHIM — Umbria Olii International (O·LIVE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for figurative Community trade mark O·LIVE — Earlier Community and Spanish figurative and word marks Olive line — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2012-05-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, olive oil, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2012200EN.01001301.xml










7.7.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 200/13





Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Olive Line International v OHIM — Umbria Olii International (O·LIVE)
(Case T-273/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for figurative Community trade mark O·LIVE - Earlier Community and Spanish figurative and word marks Olive line - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2012/C 200/24
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Olive Line International, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: P. Koch Moreno, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Umbria Olii International Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: E. Montelione, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 April 2010 (Case R 4/2009-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Olive Line International, SL and O. International Srl.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (trade marks and designs) (OHIM) of 14 April 2010 (Case R 4/2009-4) is annulled in so far as it concerns, first, all the goods covered by the trade mark application in Class 3, namely ‘bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use, cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations, soaps, perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions, dentifrices’, and, second, ‘hygiene and beauty care for humans and animals’ in Class 44 covered by the trade mark application;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders OHIM and Umbria Olii International Srl to bear three quarters of their own costs and to each pay three eighths of the costs incurred by Olive Line International, SL;










4.


Orders Olive Line International, SL to pay, in addition to one quarter of its own costs, one quarter of the costs incurred by OHIM and the intervener.






(1)  OJ C 221, 14.8.2010.
Case T-110/11: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Asa v OHIM — Merck (FEMIFERAL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark FEMIFERAL — Earlier national word mark Feminatal and earlier national figurative mark feminatal — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2012-05-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, food supplement, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2012200EN.01001502.xml










7.7.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 200/15





Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Asa v OHIM — Merck (FEMIFERAL)
(Case T-110/11) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark FEMIFERAL - Earlier national word mark Feminatal and earlier national figurative mark feminatal - Relative ground for refusal - Similarity of the signs - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2012/C 200/30
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: Asa sp. z o.o. (Głubczyce, Poland) (represented by: M. Chimiak, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Merck sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 November 2010 (Case R 182/2010-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Merck sp. z o.o. and Asa sp. z o.o.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Asa sp. z o.o. to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 139, 7.5.2011.
Case F-55/12: Action brought on 22 May 2012 — ZZ and ZZ v European Commission
Date: 2012-05-22
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: social-security benefit, transfer of pension rights








C_2012200EN.01002301.xml










7.7.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 200/23





Action brought on 22 May 2012 — ZZ and ZZ v European Commission
(Case F-55/12)
2012/C 200/47
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: ZZ and ZZ (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, E. Marchal and S. Orlandi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the proposals for transfer of pension entitlements before the entry into service at the Commission, on the calculation basis which takes into account the new general implementing provisions which entered into effect after the applicants’ applications for transfer.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision containing the proposals for transfer of the applicants’ pension entitlements in the context of their application under Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations, which contains a proposal calculated on the basis of the general implementing provisions adopted on 3 March 2011;










—


Order the Commission to pay the costs.
Case T-300/10: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Internationaler Hilfsfonds v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to contract LIEN 97 2011 — Partial refusal of access — Determination of the subject-matter of the initial application — Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual — Exception relating to protection of the decision-making process — Principle of sound administration — Concrete and individual examination — Duty to state reasons)
Date: 2012-05-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Ombudsman, access to EU information, award of contract, provision of documents








C_2012194EN.01001901.xml










30.6.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 194/19





Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Internationaler Hilfsfonds v Commission
(Case T-300/10) (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to contract LIEN 97 2011 - Partial refusal of access - Determination of the subject-matter of the initial application - Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual - Exception relating to protection of the decision-making process - Principle of sound administration - Concrete and individual examination - Duty to state reasons)
2012/C 194/29
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Internationaler Hilfsfonds eV (Rosbach, Germany) (represented by: H. Kaltenecker, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Costa de Oliveira and T. Scharf, Agents, assisted by R. van der Hout, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 29 April 2010 refusing the applicant full access to the file relating to contract LIEN 97 2011

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 29 April 2010 in so far as it impliedly refuses access to the documents which it sent to the colleague of the European Ombudsman, other than those identified by the latter in files 1 to 4 of the file relating to contract LIEN 97 2011;










2.


Also annuls the Commission’s decision of 29 April 2010 in so far as it expressly or impliedly refuses access to the documents of the file relating to contract LIEN 97 2011 referred to in paragraphs 106, 134, 194 and 196 of this judgment;










3.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










4.


Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and four fifths of the costs incurred by Internationaler Hilfsfonds eV.






(1)  OJ C 246, 11.9.2010.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2012-05-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2012142EN.01000501.xml










22.5.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 142/5





Euro exchange rates (1)

17 May 2012
2012/C 142/02

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,2682




JPY


Japanese yen


101,77




DKK


Danish krone


7,4328




GBP


Pound sterling


0,8008




SEK


Swedish krona


9,1356




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2011




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,5802




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,515




HUF


Hungarian forint


297,85




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,6976




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3484




RON


Romanian leu


4,4447




TRY


Turkish lira


2,3199




AUD


Australian dollar


1,2795




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,2858




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


9,8521




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6625




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6082




KRW


South Korean won


1 477,92




ZAR


South African rand


10,611




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,0216




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,551




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


11 723,02




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


3,9485




PHP


Philippine peso


54,55




RUB


Russian rouble


39,575




THB


Thai baht


39,834




BRL


Brazilian real


2,544




MXN


Mexican peso


17,5316




INR


Indian rupee


69,098






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-371/09: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Retractable Technologies v OHIM — Abbott Laboratories (RT) (Community trade mark — Opposition Procedure — Application for figurative Community mark FT — Earlier national word mark RTH — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2012-05-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, medical device, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2012200EN.01001102.xml










7.7.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 200/11





Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Retractable Technologies v OHIM — Abbott Laboratories (RT)
(Case T-371/09) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition Procedure - Application for figurative Community mark FT - Earlier national word mark RTH - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2012/C 200/21
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Retractable Technologies (Little Elms, Texas, USA) (represented by: K. Dröge, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented initially by C. Jenewein, then by G. Schneider and D. Walicka, agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Abbott Laboratories (Abbot Park, Illinois, USA)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 July 2009 (Case R 1234/2008-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Abbott Laboratories and Retractable Technologies, Inc.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action.










2.


Orders Retractable Technologies to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 282, 21.11.2009.
Denominations and technical specifications of euro coins intended for circulation * European Parliament legislative resolution of 22 May 2012 on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 975/98 on denominations and technical specifications of euro coins intended for circulation (COM(2011)0296 – C7-0189/2011 – 2011/0128(NLE))
Date: 2012-05-22
Institutions: Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, European Parliament
Subjects: euro, issuing of currency, money, technical specification








CE2013264EN.01010101.xml










13.9.2013   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CE 264/101





Tuesday 22 May 2012Denominations and technical specifications of euro coins intended for circulation *
P7_TA(2012)0206
European Parliament legislative resolution of 22 May 2012 on the proposal for a Council regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 975/98 on denominations and technical specifications of euro coins intended for circulation (COM(2011)0296 – C7-0189/2011 – 2011/0128(NLE))
2013/C 264 E/19
(Consultation)

The European Parliament,







—


having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2011)0296),










—


having regard to Article 128(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C7-0189/2011),










—


having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure,










—


having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A7-0440/2011),










1.


Approves the Commission proposal as amended;










2.


Calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly, in accordance with Article 293(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;










3.


Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;










4.


Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the Commission proposal;










5.


Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.










TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION


AMENDMENT





Amendment 1






Proposal for a regulation


Article 1

Regulation (EC) 975/98
Article 1g – paragraph 2




2.   For the purpose of paragraph 1, new draft designs of euro coins shall be forwarded by the issuing MemberStateto the Commission at least six months before the planned issue date. The Commission shall verify compliance with the provisions of this Regulation without delay and at the latest within ten working days.


2.   For the purpose of paragraph 1, new draft designs of euro coins shall be forwarded by the issuing MemberStateto the Commission at least six months before the planned issue date. The Commission shall verify compliance with the provisions of this Regulation without delay and at the latest within 10 working days. 
The Commission shall inform the other Member States and the ECB of its findings within 10 working days of such verification.
Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 90/2011 of 3 February 2011 laying down detailed rules for implementing the system of export licences in the poultrymeat sector ( OJ L 30, 4.2.2011 )
Date: 2012-05-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: export (EU), export licence, export refund, poultry, poultrymeat








L_2012131EN.01001101.xml










22.5.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 131/11







Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 90/2011 of 3 February 2011 laying down detailed rules for implementing the system of export licences in the poultrymeat sector
(
Official Journal of the European Union L 30 of 4 February 2011
)

On Page 9, Annexe IV, point (b), third indent:
for:

‘—   In Czech: Vývoz povinný do zemí uvedených v příloze VIII nařízení (EU) č. 90/2011’,

read:

‘—   In Czech: Vývoz povinný do zemí neuvedených v příloze VIII nařízení (EU) č. 90/2011.’.
Case T-17/09: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission (Public services contracts — Tender procedure — Provision of informatics services for an electronic exchange of social security information project (EESSI project) in the field of the coordination of social security for persons mobile in Europe — Rejection of bid submitted by a tenderer — Award of the contract — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Transparency — Equal treatment — Manifest error of assessment — No interest in bringing proceedings — Non contractual liability)
Date: 2012-05-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: award of contract, computer systems, contractual liability, damages, equal treatment, invitation to tender, provision of services, services contract, social security








C_2012258EN.01001502.xml










25.8.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 258/15





Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission
(Case T-17/09) (1)

(Public services contracts - Tender procedure - Provision of informatics services for an electronic exchange of social security information project (EESSI project) in the field of the coordination of social security for persons mobile in Europe - Rejection of bid submitted by a tenderer - Award of the contract - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Transparency - Equal treatment - Manifest error of assessment - No interest in bringing proceedings - Non contractual liability)
2012/C 258/24
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and P. Katsimani, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: N. Bambara and E. Manhaeve, Agents, and initially by W. Sparks, Solicitor, subsequently by E. Petritsi, lawyer, and latterly by O. Graber-Soudry, Solicitor)

Re:

Application, first, for annulment of the Commission’s decision rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant in respect of the call for tenders VT/2008/019 EMPL EESSI for the provision of informatics products and services for the EESSI project (OJ 2008/S 111–148 213) and of the decision to award the contract to another tenderer and, secondly, for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 82, 4.4.2009.
Case T-546/10: Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Nordmilch v OHIM — Lactimilk (MILRAM) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark MILRAM — Earlier national word and figurative marks RAM — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of goods and signs — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2012-05-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, medical device, milk product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2012200EN.01001302.xml










7.7.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 200/13





Judgment of the General Court of 22 May 2012 — Nordmilch v OHIM — Lactimilk (MILRAM)
(Case T-546/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark MILRAM - Earlier national word and figurative marks RAM - Relative ground for refusal - Similarity of goods and signs - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2012/C 200/25
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Nordmilch AG (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: R. Schneider, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: K. Klüpfel, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Lactimilk, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: P. Casamitjana Lleonart, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 September 2010 (Joined Cases R 1041/2009-4 and R 1053/2009-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Lactimilk SA and Nordmilch AG.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Nordmilch AG to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 30, 29.1.2011.