do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-348/10: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2012 — Panzeri v OHIM — Royal Trophy (Royal Veste e premia lo sport) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for figurative Community mark Royal Veste e premia lo sport — Earlier Community and international word marks veste lo sport — Earlier unregistered figurative mark panzeri veste lo sport — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2012-05-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, sports equipment, textile industry, trade-mark law








C_2012184EN.01001101.xml










23.6.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 184/11





Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2012 — Panzeri v OHIM — Royal Trophy (Royal Veste e premia lo sport)
(Case T-348/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for figurative Community mark Royal Veste e premia lo sport - Earlier Community and international word marks veste lo sport - Earlier unregistered figurative mark panzeri veste lo sport - Relative grounds for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2012/C 184/18
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Luigi Panzeri (Monguzzo, Italy) (represented by: C. Galli, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Royal Trophy Srl (Cava de Tirreni, Italy)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 May 2010 (Case R 988/2009-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Luigi Panzeri and Royal Trophy Srl.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of Board of Appeal of the Office for the Harmonisation of the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 20 May 2010 (Case R 988/2009-1);










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 288, 23.10.2010.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6508 — GIP/Fluxys G/Fluxys Switzerland)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2012-05-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, financial services, gas, investment company, merger control








C_2012134EN.01000401.xml










8.5.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 134/4





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6508 — GIP/Fluxys G/Fluxys Switzerland)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2012/C 134/07
On 27 April 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6508. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Case T-244/10: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2012 — Tsakiris-Mallas v OHIM — Seven (7 Seven Fashion Shoes) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark 7 Seven Fashion Shoes — Earlier national figurative marks Seven and 7seven — Partial refusal to register — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2012-05-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, Greece, footwear industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2012184EN.01001001.xml










23.6.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 184/10





Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2012 — Tsakiris-Mallas v OHIM — Seven (7 Seven Fashion Shoes)
(Case T-244/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark 7 Seven Fashion Shoes - Earlier national figurative marks Seven and 7seven - Partial refusal to register - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2012/C 184/16
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Tsakiris-Mallas AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Simantiras, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Seven SpA (Leinì, Italy) (represented by D. Sindico, lawyer)

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 March 2012 (R 1045/2009-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Seven SpA and Tsakiris-Mallas AE.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Tsakiris-Mallas AE to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 221, 14.8.2010.
EU Regional Policy is investing in your future.
Date: 2012-05-08
Institutions: Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy
Subjects: EU regional policy, European Region, administrative unit, statistical nomenclature

European Commission

DG Regional Policy

i

d
i
t

m
a
r
f
n
d
å
p
r
a
s
t
a
s
k
i
t
i
l

 Регионалната  политика  на  ЕС  инвестира  във  вашето  бъдеще    Regionální  politika  EU  investuje  do  vaší  budoucnosti    EU’s  regionalpolitik  investerer  i  din  fremtid    Die  EU-Regionalpolitik  -  eine  Investition  in  Ihre  Zukunft    ELi  regionaalpoliitika  investeerib  teie  tulevikku  ja   
H
π
ε
ρ
φ
ε
ρ
ε
ι
α
κ
ή
π
ο
λ
ι
τ
ι
κ
ή
τ
η
ς
Ε
Ε
ε
π
ε
ν
δ
ύ
ε
ι

o
p
a
n
o
g
e
r

l

ι

i

European Union
NUTS 2 Regions

s
:
U
E

n
e
e
t
u
u
s
i
a
v
e
u
t

l

s
u
t
i
o

j
i
s
–
a
k
k

i
i
t
i
l

l

o
p
e
u
a
n
U
E


:

t
s
o
n
d
o
h
i
r
p
o
š
a
v
a
z
a
b
ž
o
a
n
e

l

j

e

j
i

n
u
e
k
s
p
o
r
v
E
a
k
i
t
i
l

l

o
p
a
n
a
n
o
g
e
R


i

i
t
s
o
n
c
ú
d
u
b

j

e
š
a
v
o
d
e
u
t
s
e
v
n

j

i

Ú
E
a
k
i
t
i
l

i

l

o
p
a
n
á
n
o
g
e
R

ă
r
t
s
a
o
v
a
e
n
m
u
d

l

u
r
o
t
i
i

v
n

î

e
t
ş
e
t
s
e
v
n

i

e
n
e
p
o
r
u
E

i
i

i

l

n
u
n
U
a
ă
a
n
o
g
e
r
a
c
i
t
i
l

i

o
P

o
r
u
t
u
f
o
s
s
o
v
o
n
e
t
s
e
v
n

i

i

a
e
p
o
r
u
E
o
ã
n
U
a
d

i

l

i

a
n
o
g
e
r
a
c
i
t
í
l

o
p
A
ES reģionālā politika - ieguldījums jūsu nākotnē  ES regioninė politika – investicija į jūsų ateitį  Európai regionális politika – befektetés a jövőbe  Il-politika reġjonali ta’ l-UE qed tinvesti fil-futur tiegħek  Het regionaal beleid van de EU investeert in uw toekomst  Polityka regionalna UE – z myślą o Twojej przyszłości 

σ
τ
ο
μ
έ
λ
λ
ο
ν
σ
α
ς


E
U
r
e
g
o
n
a

i

l

p
o

l
i
c
y

i
s

i

n
v
e
s
t
i
n
g

i

n
y
o
u
r

f
u
t
u
r
e

L
a
p
o

l
í
t
i
c
a
r
e
g
o
n
a

i

l

d
e

l

i

a
U
n
ó
n
E
u
r
o
p
e
a

i

i

n
v
e
r
t
e
e
n
t
u
f
u
t
u
r
o

L
a
p
o

l
i
t
i
q
u
e
r
é
g
o
n
a
e
d
e

l

i

l
’

i

U
n
o
n
e
u
r
o
p
é
e
n
n
e

i

n
v
e
s
t
i
t
d
a
n
s
v
o
t
r
e
a
v
e
n
i
r


T
á
b
e
a
r
t
a
s

i

i

r
é
g
ú
n
a
c
h
a
n
A
E
a
g

i

n
f
h
e
i
s
t
i
ú

i

d
o
t
h
o
d
h
c
h
a

L
a
p
o

í

i

l
i
t
i
c
a
r
e
g
o
n
a
e
d
e

l

l
l
’

i

U
n
o
n
e
e
u
r
o
p
e
a

i

n
v
e
s
t
e
n
e

l

v
o
s
t
r
o
f
u
t
u
r
o


Carte7juin_1.indd   1

13/05/2008   14:16:49

Nuts II regions - May 2008
REGIOgis

KN-81-08-285-EN-P
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6501 — Scholz Austria/Asamer Familienholding/RPE Recyclingpark Eisenerz)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2012-05-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, waste recycling








C_2012134EN.01000301.xml










8.5.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 134/3





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6501 — Scholz Austria/Asamer Familienholding/RPE Recyclingpark Eisenerz)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2012/C 134/05
On 2 May 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6501. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Recruitment to the European Medicines Agency (London)
Date: 2012-05-08
Institutions: Provisional data
Subjects: European Medicines Agency, administrator, job vacancy, public contract








CA2012134EN.01000101.xml










8.5.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 134/1





RECRUITMENT TO THE EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY (LONDON)
(2012/C 134 A/01)

The Agency is responsible for coordinating the evaluation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use in the European Union (see Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 136, 30.4.2004, p. 1)). The Agency was established in January 1995. It has many close contacts with the European Commission, 27 EU Member States, EEA-EFTA countries and many other groups in government and the private sector.


Further information on the Agency and its activities is readily accessible through the internet; our web address is http://www.ema.europa.eu

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is organising a selection procedure with a view to drawing up a reserve list for:






 



EMA/AD/334: Head of Sector, Infrastructure Services, Administration Unit (AD 10)





Selected candidates will be included on a reserve list and, depending on the budgetary situation, may be offered a five-year renewable contract in accordance with the Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Union (OJ L 56, 4.3.1968).
The place of employment shall be London.
Candidates must be nationals of a Member State of the European Union, or of Iceland, Norway or Liechtenstein, on condition that they have full rights as a citizen.

The complete conditions and job description should be downloaded from the Agency website:


http://www.ema.europa.eu/htms/general/admin/recruit/recruitnew.htm


Applications have to be submitted electronically using the form available on the Agency website. The deadline for submission of application forms is 19 June 2012 at midnight.


Please note that due to the large number of applications the Agency may receive when reaching the deadline for submission of applications, the system may have problems processing the large amounts of data. Applicants are therefore advised to send in their application well ahead of the deadline.

If you wish to receive notification of vacancy publications electronically please register online for an RSS feed at http://www.ema.europa.eu/ under ‘RSS news feeds’.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 395/2012 of 8 May 2012 opening a tariff quota for certain quantities of industrial sugar for the 2012/2013 marketing year
Date: 2012-05-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: import (EU), marketing, sugar, suspension of customs duties, tariff quota








L_2012123EN.01003201.xml










9.5.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 123/32








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 395/2012
of 8 May 2012
         
opening a tariff quota for certain quantities of industrial sugar for the 2012/2013 marketing year


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 142, in conjunction with Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


In order to ensure that the supply necessary for the production of the products referred to in Article 62(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 is available at a price that corresponds to the world price, it is in the interest of the Union to suspend the import duties on sugar intended for the production of those products for the 2012/2013 marketing year, for a quantity that would correspond to half of its industrial sugar needs.












(2)


Commission Regulation (EC) No 891/2009 of 25 September 2009 opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas in the sugar sector (2) provides for the administration of the tariff quotas for imports of sugar products under Article 142 of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 with order number 09.4390 (industrial import sugar). However, in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation (EC) No 891/2009 the quantities of those products for which import duties are to be suspended has to be determined by a separate legal act.












(3)


The import quantities of industrial sugar for which no import duties should apply for the 2012/2013 marketing year, need to be set accordingly.












(4)


The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The import duties for industrial sugar falling within CN code 1701  and with order number 09.4390 shall be suspended for a quantity of 400 000 tonnes from 1 October 2012 to 30 September 2013.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
It shall apply from 1 October 2012.
It shall expire on 30 September 2013.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 8 May 2012.


For the Commission


The President

José Manuel BARROSO
            





(1)  
            OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 254, 26.9.2009, p. 82.
Case C-217/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg lodged on 8 May 2012 — Caisse nationale des prestations familiales v Bornand, Pierre-Louis
Date: 2012-05-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Switzerland, family benefit, maternity benefit, residential mobility








C_2012235EN.01000603.xml










4.8.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 235/6





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg lodged on 8 May 2012 — Caisse nationale des prestations familiales v Bornand, Pierre-Louis
(Case C-217/12)
2012/C 235/11
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Caisse nationale des prestations familiales

Respondent: Bornand, Pierre-Louis

Question referred

Does a benefit such as the parental leave allowance provided for by Articles 306 to 308 of the [Luxembourg] Code de la Sécurité Sociale constitute a family benefit within the meaning of Article 1(u)(i) and Article 4(1)(h) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to the members of their families moving within the Community, (1) as amended and updated and applicable in accordance with Annex II, Section A, (1) of the Agreement between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Swiss Confederation, of the other, on the free movement of persons and the Final Act signed in Luxembourg on 21 June 1999? (2)



(1)  OJ 1971, L 149, p. 2.

(2)  OJ 2002, L 114, p. 6.
Case T-158/10: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2012 — Dow Chemical v Council (Dumping — Imports of ethanolamines originating in the United States — Definitive anti-dumping duty — Expiry of anti-dumping measures — Review — Likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of dumping — Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009)
Date: 2012-05-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: United States, anti-dumping duty, import (EU), organic chemical, originating product








C_2012184EN.01000902.xml










23.6.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 184/9





Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2012 — Dow Chemical v Council
(Case T-158/10) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of ethanolamines originating in the United States - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Expiry of anti-dumping measures - Review - Likelihood of a continuation or recurrence of dumping - Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009)
2012/C 184/15
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: The Dow Chemical Company (Midland, Michigan, United States) (represented: initially by J.-F. Bellis, R. Luff and V. Hahn, and subsequently by J.-F. Bellis and R. Luff, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix, R. Szostak and B. Driessen, Agents, and by G. Berrisch, lawyer, and N. Chesaites, barrister)

Intervening party in support of the defendant: European Commission, (represented: initially by H. van Vliet and M. França, and subsequently by M. França and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, Agents)

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 54/2010 of 19 January 2010 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ethanolamines originating in the United States of America (OJ 2010 L 17, p. 1)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 54/2010 of 19 January 2010 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ethanolamines originating in the United States of America in so far as it concerns The Dow Chemical Company;










2.


Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay those of The Dow Chemical Company;










3.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 161, 19.6.2010.
Case C-503/11 P: Order of the President of the Court of 8 May 2012 — ThyssenKrupp Elevator (CENE) GmbH, formerly ThyssenKrupp Aufzüge GmbH, ThyssenKrupp Fahrtreppen GmbH v European Commission
Date: 2012-05-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: abuse of power, equal treatment, fundamental rights, legality, parent company, principle of proportionality, right to justice, rule of law, subsidiary








C_2012303EN.01002103.xml










6.10.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 303/21





Order of the President of the Court of 8 May 2012 — ThyssenKrupp Elevator (CENE) GmbH, formerly ThyssenKrupp Aufzüge GmbH, ThyssenKrupp Fahrtreppen GmbH v European Commission
(Case C-503/11 P) (1)

2012/C 303/38
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 347, 26.11.2011.
Case T-193/12: Action brought on 8 May 2012 — MIP Metro v OHIM — Holsten-Brauerei (H)
Date: 2012-05-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, supermarket, trade-mark law








C_2012194EN.01002602.xml










30.6.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 194/26





Action brought on 8 May 2012 — MIP Metro v OHIM — Holsten-Brauerei (H)
(Case T-193/12)
2012/C 194/44
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: J.-C. Plate and R. Kaase, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Holsten-Brauerei AG (Hamburg, Germany)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 February 2012 in Case R 2340/2010-1 on the basis of incompatibility with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community Trade Mark, in so far as it upheld the opposition against the extension of protection of international registration No 984 017;










—


order the defendant to pay the costs, including the costs of the appeal procedure.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant

Community trade mark concerned: the international registration which has effect in the European Union of a figurative mark representing an escutcheon with the letter ‘H’ for goods in Class 32 — No 984 017

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Holsten-Brauerei AG

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the German figurative mark representing a knight on horseback with a shield bearing the letter ‘H’ for goods in Class 32

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Pleas in law: infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009