do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-554/08: Judgment of the General Court of 24 April 2012 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission (Public service contracts — Call for tenders — Provision of business, technical and project consultancy services for European Union computer applications in the customs, excise and taxation areas — Rejection of a tender — Decision to award the contract to another tenderer — Action for annulment — Inadmissibility — Claim in damages — Selection and award criteria — Duty to state the reasons on which a decision is based — Manifest error of assessment)
Date: 2012-04-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: award of contract, customs duties, excise duty, information technology applications, services contract, tax system








C_2012165EN.01001602.xml










9.6.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 165/16





Judgment of the General Court of 24 April 2012 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission
(Case T-554/08) (1)

(Public service contracts - Call for tenders - Provision of business, technical and project consultancy services for European Union computer applications in the customs, excise and taxation areas - Rejection of a tender - Decision to award the contract to another tenderer - Action for annulment - Inadmissibility - Claim in damages - Selection and award criteria - Duty to state the reasons on which a decision is based - Manifest error of assessment)
2012/C 165/26
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, P. Katsimani and M. Dermitzakis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by N. Bambara and E. Manhaeve, and then by E. Manhaeve, acting as Agents, and C. Erkelens, lawyer)

Re:

ACTION for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 26 September 2008 rejecting the tender submitted by the consortium formed by the applicant and other companies in response to call for tenders ‘TAXUD/2007/AO-005’ relating to the provision of business, technical and project consultancy services for Community computer applications in the customs, excise and taxation areas (‘TIMEA’), and all consequential decisions, including the decision to award the contract to the successful tenderer, brought pursuant to Articles 225 EC and 230 EC, and a claim in damages brought pursuant to Articles 225 EC, 235 EC and 288 EC.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.






(1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.
2012/214/EU: Council Decision of 24 April 2012 appointing a German alternate member of the Committee of the Regions
Date: 2012-04-24
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: European Committee of the Regions, Germany, appointment of members








L_2012114EN.01001701.xml










26.4.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 114/17








            COUNCIL DECISION
         
of 24 April 2012
         
appointing a German alternate member of the Committee of the Regions
(2012/214/EU)


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,


Having regard to the proposal of the German Government,

Whereas:







(1)


On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.












(2)


An alternate member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Heino VAHLDIECK,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The following is hereby appointed as alternate member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:






—


Mr Heiko HECHT, Mitglied des Europa-ausschusses der Hamburgischen Bürgerschaft.







Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.




Done at Luxembourg, 24 April 2012.


For the Council


The President

N. WAMMEN
            





(1)  
            OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

(2)  
            OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.
Joined Cases T-76/07, T-362/07 and T-409/08: Order of the General Court of 24 April 2012 — El Fatmi v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures with a view to combating terrorism — Withdrawal from the list of persons concerned — Action for annulment — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2012-04-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: common foreign and security policy, international sanctions, terrorism








C_2012174EN.01002201.xml










16.6.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 174/22





Order of the General Court of 24 April 2012 — El Fatmi v Council
(Joined Cases T-76/07, T-362/07 and T-409/08) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures with a view to combating terrorism - Withdrawal from the list of persons concerned - Action for annulment - No need to adjudicate)
2012/C 174/35
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: Nouriddin El Fatmi (Vught, Netherlands) (represented by G. Pulles and A. M. van Eik (Cases T-76/07, T-362/07 and T-409/08), J. Pauw (Cases T-76/07 and T-362/07) and M. Uiterwaal (T-76/07), lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented initially by G. J. Van Hegelsom and E. Finnegan (T-76/07 and T-362/07), then by B. Driessen and E. Finnegan (T-76/07, T-362/07 and T-409/08), agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented initially by C. Wissels, M. de Mol and Y. de Vries, and by M. de Grave (Case T-76/07), then by C. Wissels, M. Bulterman and J. Langer, agents); and European Commission (represented by S. Boelaert and P. van Nuffel, and, initially, by J. Aquilina (Case T-76/07), agents

Re:

In essence, application for annulment of Council Decision 2006/1008/EC of 21 December 2006 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (OJ 2006 L 379, p. 123), replaced successively by Council Decisions 2007/445/EC of 28 June 2007 (OJ 2007 L 169, p. 58), 2007/868/EC of 20 December 2007 (OJ 2007 L 340, p. 100), 2008/583/EC of 15 July 2008 (OJ 2008 L 188, p. 21), 2009/62/EC of 26 January 2009 (OJ 2009 L 23, p. 25), Council Regulation (EC) No 501/2009 of 15 June 2009 (OJ 2009 L 151, p. 14), Council Implementing Regulations (EU) No 1285/2009 of 22 December 2009 (OJ 2009 L 346, p. 39), (EU) No 610/2010 of 12 July 2010 (OJ 2010 L 178, p. 1), (EU) No 83/2011 of 31 January 2011 (OJ 2011 L 28, p. 14), and (EU) No 687/2011 of 18 July 2011 (OJ 2011 L 188, p. 2), in so far as the applicant is named in the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 of 27 December 2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (OJ 2001 L 344, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

The General Court orders:






1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


The Council of the European Union shall pay the costs.










3.


The European Commission and the Kingdom of the Netherlands shall bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 117, 26.5.2007.
Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community — Changes to public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2012-04-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: France, air transport, inland transport, public service, transport regulations








C_2012119EN.01000701.xml










24.4.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 119/7





Commission notice pursuant to Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community
Changes to public service obligations in respect of scheduled air services
(Text with EEA relevance)
2012/C 119/04






Member State


France




Routes concerned


Cayenne–Maripasoula
Cayenne–Saül
Cayenne–Grand-Santi
Saint-Laurent-du-Maroni–Grand-Santi
Saint-Laurent-du-Maroni–Maripasoula




Original date of entry into force of the public service obligations


1 June 2005




Date of entry into force of the changes


The day after the publication of this notice




Address where the text and any relevant information and/or documentation relating to the public service obligation can be obtained


The Order of 8 March 2012 amending the Order of 16 June 2009 amending the public service obligations imposed on scheduled air services within French Guiana
NOR: DEVA1205810A
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/initRechTexte.do
For further information please contact:





Direction générale de l'aviation civile




DTA/SDT/T2




50 rue Henry Farman




75720 Paris Cedex 15




FRANCE




Tel. +33 158094321




E-mail: osp-compagnies.dta@aviation-civile.gouv.fr
Corrigendum to Commission Decision 2011/383/EU of 28 June 2011 establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the EU Ecolabel to all-purpose cleaners and sanitary cleaners ( OJ L 169, 29.6.2011 )
Date: 2012-04-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: consumer information, eco-label, environmental impact, polishing and scouring preparations








L_2012110EN.01004401.xml










24.4.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 110/44







Corrigendum to Commission Decision 2011/383/EU of 28 June 2011 establishing the ecological criteria for the award of the EU Ecolabel to all-purpose cleaners and sanitary cleaners
(
Official Journal of the European Union L 169 of 29 June 2011
)

On page 60, Annex, ‘Criterion 7 — Packaging requirements’, point (d):
for:







‘(d)


Products packaged in trigger sprays must be sold as a part of a refillable system.’,





read:







‘(d)


All-purpose cleaners packaged in trigger sprays must be sold as a part of a refillable system.’.