do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Joined Cases T-458/09 and T-171/10: Judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2012 — Slovak Telekom v Commission (Competition — Administrative procedure — Decisions requesting information — Necessity for the information sought — Principle of good administration — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Proportionality)
Date: 2012-03-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: administrative procedure, competition, principle of proportionality








C_2012133EN.01002302.xml










5.5.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 133/23





Judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2012 — Slovak Telekom v Commission
(Joined Cases T-458/09 and T-171/10) (1)

(Competition - Administrative procedure - Decisions requesting information - Necessity for the information sought - Principle of good administration - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Proportionality)
2012/C 133/44
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Slovak Telekom a.s. (Bratislava, Slovakia) (represented: initially by M. Maier, L. Kjølbye and D. Geradin, and subsequently by L. Kjølbye, D. Geradin and G. Berrisch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented: in Case T-458/09, by F. Castillo de la Torre and K. Mojzesowicz and in Case T-171/10, by F. Castillo de la Torre, K. Mojzesowicz and J. Bourke, Agents)

Re:

Applications for annulment, first, of Commission Decision C(2009) 6840 of 3 September 2009 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Articles 18(3) and 24(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (Case COMP/39.523 — Slovak Telekom) and, second, of Commission Decision C(2010) 902 of 8 February 2010 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Articles 18(3) and 24(1) of Regulation No 1/2003 (Case COMP/39.523 — Slovak Telekom)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the actions;










2.


Orders Slovak Telekom a.s. to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 11, 16.1.2010.
Case C-190/10: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 March 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Génesis Seguros Generales Sociedad Anónima de Seguros y Reaseguros (GENESIS) v Boys Toys SA, Administración del Estado (Community trade mark — Definition and acquisition — Earlier trade mark — Procedure for filing — Filing by electronic means — Method enabling precise identification of the day, hour and minute when the application was filed)
Date: 2012-03-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2012133EN.01000401.xml










5.5.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 133/4





Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 March 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo — Spain) — Génesis Seguros Generales Sociedad Anónima de Seguros y Reaseguros (GENESIS) v Boys Toys SA, Administración del Estado
(Case C-190/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Definition and acquisition - Earlier trade mark - Procedure for filing - Filing by electronic means - Method enabling precise identification of the day, hour and minute when the application was filed)
2012/C 133/06
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Génesis Seguros Generales Sociedad Anónima de Seguros y Reaseguros (GENESIS)

Defendants: Boys Toys SA, Administración del Estado

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunal Supremo — Interpretation of Article 27 of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1) — Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark — Priority — Procedure for filing — Method (e-mail) enabling precise identification of the day, hour and minute when the application was filed

Operative part of the judgment

Article 27 of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1992/2003 of 27 October 2003 must be interpreted as precluding account being taken not only of the day but also of the hour and minute of filing of an application for a Community trade mark with the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (trade marks and designs) (OHIM) for the purposes of establishing that trade mark’s priority over a national trade mark filed on the same day, where, according to the national legislation governing the registration of national trade marks, the hour and minute of filing are relevant in that regard.


(1)  OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6500 — Ravago/Barentz Europe/JV)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2012-03-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: chemical industry, coffee, cosmetics industry, food industry, merger control, pharmaceutical industry, waste recycling








C_2012084EN.01000101.xml










22.3.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 84/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6500 — Ravago/Barentz Europe/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2012/C 84/01
On 16 March 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6500. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.