do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-115/06: Judgment of the General Court of 21 March 2012 — Fiskeri og Havbruksnæringens Landsforening and Others v Council (Dumping — Imports of salmon originating in Norway — Lesser duty rule — Calculation of minimum import prices and fixed duties)
Date: 2012-03-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Norway, anti-dumping duty, dumping, fresh fish, import (EU), originating product








C_2012133EN.01002201.xml










5.5.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 133/22





Judgment of the General Court of 21 March 2012 — Fiskeri og Havbruksnæringens Landsforening and Others v Council
(Case T-115/06) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of salmon originating in Norway - Lesser duty rule - Calculation of minimum import prices and fixed duties)
2012/C 133/41
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Fiskeri og Havbruksnæringens Landsforening (Oslo, Norway); Norske Sjømatbedrifters Landsforening (Trondheim, Norway); Salmar Farming AS (Kverva, Norway); Hydroteck AS (Kristiansund, Norway); Hallvard Lerøy AS (Bergen, Norway); and Lerøy Midnor AS (Hestvika, Norway) (represented by: B. Servais and T. Paulsen, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix and B. Driessen, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented: initially by P. Stancanelli and K. Talabér-Ritz, and subsequently by K. Talabér-Ritz, T. Scharf and H. van Vliet, acting as Agents, and by E. McGovern, Barrister)

Re:

Application for annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 85/2006 of 17 January 2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of farmed salmon originating in Norway (OJ 2006 L 15, p. 1)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Council Regulation (EC) No 85/2006 of 17 January 2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of farmed salmon originating in Norway in so far as it concerns the Fiskeri og Havbruksnæringens Landsforening, the Norske Sjømatbedrifters Landsforening, Salmar Farming AS, Hydroteck AS, Hallvard Lerøy AS and Lerøy Midnor AS;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay those of the Fiskeri og Havbruksnæringens Landsforening, the Norske Sjømatbedrifters Landsforening, Salmar Farming, Hydroteck, Hallvard Lerøy and Lerøy Midnor;










4.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 143, 17.6.2006.
Case C-87/11 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 March 2012 — Fidelio KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 7(1)(c) — Word mark Hallux — Refusal to register — Absolute ground for refusal — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Date: 2012-03-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, brand name, footwear industry, trade-mark law








C_2012235EN.01000302.xml










4.8.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 235/3





Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 March 2012 — Fidelio KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
(Case C-87/11 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 7(1)(c) - Word mark Hallux - Refusal to register - Absolute ground for refusal - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
2012/C 235/04
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Fidelio KG (represented by: M. Gail, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 16 December 2010 in Case T-286/08 Fidelio v OHIM, by which the General Court dismissed the action for annulment brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 May 2008 concerning registration of the word sign Hallux as a Community trade mark for certain goods in Classes 10 and 25 (orthopaedic articles and footwear) — Distinctive character of a word sign meaning ‘big toe’ in Latin

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Fidelio KG shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 152, 21.05.2011.