do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders (Frontex) for the financial year 2011 — Amending Budget No 2
Date: 2011-12-22
Institutions: Frontex
Subjects: Frontex, amending budget, expenditure, financial year, publication of accounts, revenue








C_2011375EN.01002101.xml










22.12.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 375/21





Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders (Frontex) for the financial year 2011 — Amending Budget No 2
(2011/C 375/06)

REVENUE










Title
Chapter


Heading


Budget 2011


Amending budget No 2


New amount





9






REVENUE





9 0


SUBSIDIES AND CONTRIBUTIONS


86 384 000


12 721 000


99 105 000




9 1


OTHER REVENUE


p.m.


 


p.m.




9 4


EARMARKED REVENUE


p.m.


 


p.m.




 



Title 9 — Total




86 384 000




12 721 000




99 105 000





 



GRAND TOTAL




86 384 000




12 721 000




99 105 000






EXPENDITURE










Title
Chapter


Heading


Appropriations 2011


Amending budget No 2


New amount





1






STAFF





1 1


STAFF IN ACTIVE EMPLOYMENT


19 950 000


 


19 950 000




1 2


RECRUITMENT


173 000


 


173 000




1 3


ADMINISTRATIVE MISSIONS


600 000


 


600 000




1 4


SOCIOMEDICAL INFRASTRUCTURE


61 000


 


61 000




1 5


OTHER STAFF-RELATED EXPENDITURE


772 000


 


772 000




1 6


SOCIAL WELFARE


70 000


 


70 000




1 7


ENTERTAINMENT AND REPRESENTATION EXPENSES


135 000


 


135 000




 



Title 1 — Total




21 761 000



 



21 761 000






2






OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE





2 0


RENTAL OF BUILDINGS AND ASSOCIATED COSTS


4 065 000


 


4 065 000




2 1


DATA-PROCESSING


5 425 000


 


5 425 000




2 2


MOVABLE PROPERTY AND ASSOCIATED COSTS


65 000


 


65 000




2 3


CURRENT ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE


655 000


 


655 000




2 4


POSTAL CHARGES


100 000


 


100 000




2 5


NON-OPERATIONAL MEETINGS


750 000


 


750 000




2 6


AUDIT AND EVALUATION


250 000


 


250 000




 



Title 2 — Total




11 310 000



 



11 310 000






3






OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES





3 0


OPERATIONS


40 631 000


12 721 000


53 352 000




3 1


RISK ANALYSIS AND SITUATION CENTER


2 800 000


 


2 800 000




3 2


TRAINING


5 700 000


 


5 700 000




3 3


RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AND EUROSUR


1 032 000


 


1 032 000




3 4


POOLED RESOURCES


1 000 000


 


1 000 000




3 5


MISCELLANEOUS OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES


2 150 000


 


2 150 000




 



Title 3 — Total




53 313 000




12 721 000




66 034 000





 



GRAND TOTAL




86 384 000




12 721 000




99 105 000
Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders (Frontex) for the financial year 2011 — Amending Budget No 1
Date: 2011-12-22
Institutions: Frontex
Subjects: Frontex, amending budget, expenditure, financial year, publication of accounts, revenue








C_2011375EN.01001701.xml










22.12.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 375/17





Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders (Frontex) for the financial year 2011 — Amending Budget No 1
(2011/C 375/05)

REVENUE










Title
Chapter


Heading


Budget 2011


Amending budget No 1


New amount





9






REVENUE





9 0


SUBSIDIES AND CONTRIBUTIONS


86 384 000


 


86 384 000




9 1


OTHER REVENUE


p.m.


 


p.m.




9 4


EARMARKED REVENUE


p.m.


 


p.m.




 



Title 9 — Total




86 384 000



 



86 384 000





 



GRAND TOTAL




86 384 000



 



86 384 000






EXPENDITURE










Title
Chapter


Heading


Appropriations 2011


Amending budget No 1


New amount





1






STAFF





1 1


STAFF IN ACTIVE EMPLOYMENT


19 950 000


 


19 950 000




1 2


RECRUITMENT


173 000


 


173 000




1 3


ADMINISTRATIVE MISSIONS


600 000


 


600 000




1 4


SOCIOMEDICAL INFRASTRUCTURE


61 000


 


61 000




1 5


OTHER STAFF-RELATED EXPENDITURE


772 000


 


772 000




1 6


SOCIAL WELFARE


70 000


 


70 000




1 7


ENTERTAINMENT AND REPRESENTATION EXPENSES


135 000


 


135 000




 



Title 1 — Total




21 761 000



 



21 761 000






2






OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE





2 0


RENTAL OF BUILDINGS AND ASSOCIATED COSTS


4 065 000


 


4 065 000




2 1


DATA-PROCESSING


5 425 000


 


5 425 000




2 2


MOVABLE PROPERTY AND ASSOCIATED COSTS


65 000


 


65 000




2 3


CURRENT ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE


655 000


 


655 000




2 4


POSTAL CHARGES


100 000


 


100 000




2 5


NON-OPERATIONAL MEETINGS


750 000


 


750 000




2 6


AUDIT AND EVALUATION


250 000


 


250 000




 



Title 2 — Total




11 310 000



 



11 310 000






3






OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES





3 0


OPERATIONS


40 631 000


 


40 631 000




3 1


RISK ANALYSIS AND SITUATION CENTER


2 800 000


 


2 800 000




3 2


TRAINING


5 700 000


 


5 700 000




3 3


RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AND EUROSUR


1 032 000


 


1 032 000




3 4


POOLED RESOURCES


1 000 000


 


1 000 000




3 5


MISCELLANEOUS OPERATIONAL ACTIVITIES


2 150 000


 


2 150 000




 



Title 3 — Total




53 313 000



 



53 313 000





 



GRAND TOTAL




86 384 000



 



86 384 000
Case F-140/11: Action brought on 22 December 2011 — ZZ v Commission
Date: 2011-12-22
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Anti-fraud Office, company research, exchange of information, indemnification








C_2012065EN.01002502.xml










3.3.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 65/25





Action brought on 22 December 2011 — ZZ v Commission
(Case F-140/11)
2012/C 65/49
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: Ph.-E. Partsch, E. Raimond, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the Director General of OLAF issuing a final invitation to the applicant to be heard in an internal enquiry and stating that a final report on the enquiry was to be adopted on the basis only of the information gathered and analysed unilaterally by OLAF if the applicant did not comply with that invitation and the letter rejecting the applicant’s claim

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of 28 October 2011;










—


Annul the decision of 2 December 2011 ruling on the claim of 21 November 2011;










—


Award the applicant the sum of EUR 7 000 in respect of compensatory damages;










—


Order the European Commission to pay the costs.
Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1192/2010 of 16 December 2010 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Ricotta Romana (PDO)) ( OJ L 333, 17.12.2010 )
Date: 2011-12-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: designation of origin, fresh cheese, product designation, regions of Italy, sheep's milk cheese








L_2011341EN.01008801.xml










22.12.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 341/88







Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1192/2010 of 16 December 2010 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Ricotta Romana (PDO))
(
Official Journal of the European Union L 333 of 17 December 2010
)

On page 22, in the second line of the Annex,
for:

‘Class 1.3.   Cheeses’

read:

‘Class 1.4.   Other products of animal origin (eggs, honey, various dairy products except butter, etc.)’.
Case F-139/11: Action brought on 22 December 2011 — ZZ v Commission
Date: 2011-12-22
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Anti-fraud Office, company research, exchange of information, indemnification








C_2012065EN.01002501.xml










3.3.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 65/25





Action brought on 22 December 2011 — ZZ v Commission
(Case F-139/11)
2012/C 65/48
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: Ph.-E. Partsch and E. Raimond, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment, first, of the decision of OLAF’s Director-General containing a final invitation to a hearing of the applicant in the framework of an internal investigation and stating that a final report on the investigation would be adopted on the basis only of the information collected and analysed unilaterally by OLAF, if the applicant did not accept the invitation and, second, of the letter rejecting his complaint.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of 28 October 2011;










—


Annul the letter of 2 December 2011 ruling on the complaint of 21 November 2011;










—


Award the applicant compensation in the sum of EUR 6000 in damages with interest;










—


Order the European Commission to pay the costs.
Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Research Council Executive Agency for the financial year 2011 — Amending Budget No 1
Date: 2011-12-22
Institutions: European Commission, European Research Council Executive Agency
Subjects: EU office or agency, amending budget, expenditure, financial year, publication of accounts, revenue








C_2011375EN.01002501.xml










22.12.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 375/25





Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Research Council Executive Agency for the financial year 2011 — Amending Budget No 1
(2011/C 375/07)

REVENUE (1)











Title
Chapter


Heading


Budget 2011


Amending budget No 1


New amount





9






EUROPEAN COMMUNITY SUBSIDY





9 2


EUROPEAN COMMUNITY SUBSIDY


35 950 737


– 350 000


35 600 737




9 9


MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE


p.m.


 


p.m.




 



Title 9 — Total




35 950 737




– 350 000




35 600 737





 



GRAND TOTAL




35 950 737




– 350 000




35 600 737






EXPENDITURE










Title
Chapter


Heading


Appropriations 2011


Amending budget No 1


New amount





1






STAFF EXPENDITURE





1 1


SALARIES, ALLOWANCES AND OTHER PERSONNEL CHARGES


23 088 987


–2 115 600


20 973 387




1 2


SUNDRIES OF RECRUITMENT AND CHANGE OF PERSONNEL


144 000


6 500


150 500




1 3


MISSION EXPENSES AND OTHER RELATED EXPENSES


400 000


–50 000


350 000




1 4


SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND TRAINING EXPENSES


663 000


–70 900


592 100




1 6


SOCIAL SERVICE, OTHER EXPENSES


92 000


140 000


232 000




1 7


REPRESENTATION AND ENTERTAINMENT EXPENSES


20 000


 


20 000




 



Title 1 — Total




24 407 987




–2 090 000




22 317 987






2






INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPERATING EXPENDITURE





2 0


OFFICES


4 250 000


365 000


4 615 000




2 1


INFORMATICS


2 160 000


3 473 000


5 633 000




2 2


MOVABLE PROPERTY AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES


302 000


–78 000


224 000




2 3


CURRENT ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE


139 750


–43 000


96 750




2 4


TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND POSTING EXPENSES


778 000


113 000


891 000




2 5


INTERNAL MEETINGS EXPENSES


12 000


4 000


16 000




2 6


TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT EXPENSES


3 305 000


–1 741 000


1 564 000




2 7


EXPENSES WITH CONSOLIDATED ENTITIES


596 000


– 353 000


243 000




 



Title 2 — Total




11 542 750




1 740 000




13 282 750





 



GRAND TOTAL




35 950 737




– 350 000




35 600 737







(1)  Detailed budget available on the ERCEA website http://erc.europa.eu/
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6429 — Hyundai Motor Company/Hyundai Motor Deutschland/Automobiles Hyundai France/FAAP/FEA)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2011-12-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, motor vehicle industry








C_2011374EN.01000501.xml










22.12.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 374/5





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6429 — Hyundai Motor Company/Hyundai Motor Deutschland/Automobiles Hyundai France/FAAP/FEA)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 374/03
On 16 December 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6429. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2011-12-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2011374EN.01000601.xml










22.12.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 374/6





Euro exchange rates (1)

21 December 2011
2011/C 374/05

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3054




JPY


Japanese yen


101,66




DKK


Danish krone


7,4339




GBP


Pound sterling


0,83230




SEK


Swedish krona


9,0021




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2190




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,7520




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,618




HUF


Hungarian forint


302,38




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,6965




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4568




RON


Romanian leu


4,3063




TRY


Turkish lira


2,4594




AUD


Australian dollar


1,2943




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3422




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,1578




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6987




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6927




KRW


South Korean won


1 502,28




ZAR


South African rand


10,6929




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,2734




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,5168




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


11 841,23




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,1362




PHP


Philippine peso


56,977




RUB


Russian rouble


41,4525




THB


Thai baht


40,820




BRL


Brazilian real


2,4223




MXN


Mexican peso


18,0666




INR


Indian rupee


68,7750






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Héraðsdómur Reykjavíkur, dated 22 December 2011 , in the case of Irish Bank Resolution Corporation Ltd v Kaupthing hf. (Case E-18/11)
Date: 2011-12-22
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: Iceland, claim, credit institution, dissemination of information, liquidation








C_2012128EN.01001001.xml










3.5.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 128/10





Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Héraðsdómur Reykjavíkur, dated 22 December 2011, in the case of Irish Bank Resolution Corporation Ltd v Kaupthing hf.
(Case E-18/11)
2012/C 128/06
A request has been made to the EFTA Court by a letter of 22 December 2011 from Héraðsdómur Reykjavíkur (Reykjavik District Court), which was received at the Court Registry on 22 December 2011, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Irish Bank Resolution Corporation Ltd v Kaupthing hf., on the following questions:






1.


In the case of a discrepancy between the text of the EEA Agreement or rules based upon it, in different languages, so that the substance of individual provisions or rules is unclear, how should their substance be construed in order to apply them in resolving disputes?










2.


Having regard to the answer to question 1, does it comply with paragraph 1 of Article 14 of Directive 2001/24/EC on the reorganisation and winding-up of credit institutions, that the national legislation of a State, which is a member of the European Economic Area, vests the winding-up board or other competent authority or agency with competence to decide whether information should be disclosed on the aspects described in the provision, with an advertisement published abroad instead of individually notifying all known creditors?
Case F-138/11: Action brought on 22 December 2011 — ZZ v Commission
Date: 2011-12-22
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, integration into employment, transfer of pension rights








C_2012065EN.01002403.xml










3.3.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 65/24





Action brought on 22 December 2011 — ZZ v Commission
(Case F-138/11)
2012/C 65/47
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision to transfer pension rights acquired before entry into service with the Commission on the basis of the recalculated proposal of the PMO

Form of order sought







—


Annul the Commission decision of 11 May 2011 annulling and replacing the decision of 22 October 2009;










—


establish the validity of the agreement concerning the transfer of the applicant’s pension rights on the basis of the offer accepted in accordance with the calculation of the decision of 22 October 2009;










—


in so far as necessary, annul the decision dated 12 September 2011, expressly dismissing the applicant’s complaint;










—


in the alternative, acknowledge the damage suffered and grant the applicant the sum of EUR 6 207,71 by way of damages, plus interest for delay at two percentage points over the rate of the European Central Bank;










—


order the European Commission to pay the costs.
Case C-678/11: Action brought on 22 December 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain
Date: 2011-12-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Spain, foreign national, freedom to provide services, infringement of EU law, supplementary pension, tax system








C_2012073EN.01002001.xml










10.3.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 73/20





Action brought on 22 December 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain
(Case C-678/11)
2012/C 73/35
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: W. Roels and F. Jimeno Fernández, Agents)

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that the Kingdom of Spain has failed to meet its obligations under Article 56 TFEU (formerly Article 49 TEC) and Article 36 of the EEA Agreement by adopting and maintaining in force Article 46(c) of the consolidated version of the Ley de Regulación de los Planes y Fondos de Pensiones, Article 86 of Real Decreto Legislativo 6/2004 of 29 October 2004 approving the consolidated version of the Ley de ordenación y supervisión de los seguros privados, Article 10 of Real Decreto Legislativo 5/2004 approving the consolidated version of the Ley del Impuesto sobre la renta de los no residentes, and Article 47 of Ley 58/2003 (General Tributaria) of 17 December 2003, pursuant to which foreign pension funds based in other Member States and which offer occupational pension schemes in Spain, and insurance companies which operate in Spain under the freedom to provide services, inter alia, are required to designate a tax representative who is resident in Spain.










—


order the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments







1.


The Spanish tax law provisions referred to above require tax payers who are not resident in Spain to designate a tax representative who is resident in Spain. In particular, that requirement is imposed on foreign pension funds based in other Member States and which offer occupational pension schemes in Spain, and insurance bodies which operate in Spain under the freedom to provide services.










2.


The Commission considers that the requirement to designate a tax representative resident in Spain in the cases referred to constitutes an obstacle to the free movement of services in so far as it imposes an additional burden on the entities and physical persons mentioned, who are required to solicit the services of a representative. In addition, that requirement constitutes an obstacle to the free movement of services for persons resident, and undertakings established, in a Member State other than Spain wishing to provide tax representation services to entities or physical persons operating in Spain.










3.


The provisions in question infringe Article 56 TFEU (formerly Article 49 TEC) and Article 36 of the EEA Agreement.
Case T-655/11: Action brought on 22 December 2011 — FSL and Others v Commission
Date: 2011-12-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: equal treatment, fine, infringement of EU law, provision of documents, rights of the defence, tax inspection, tropical fruit








C_2012058EN.01001302.xml










25.2.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 58/13





Action brought on 22 December 2011 — FSL and Others v Commission
(Case T-655/11)
2012/C 58/25
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: FSL Holdings (Antwerp, Belgium), Firma Léon Van Parys (Antwerp, Belgium) and Pacific Fruit Company Italy SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: P. Vlaemminck and C. Verdonck, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought







—


Annul Articles 1 and 2 of the Decision of the Commission of 12 October 2011 rendered in Case COMP/39.482 — Exotic Fruits — Bananas;










—


In subsidiary order, annul Article 2 of the contested decision insofar as it imposes a fine on the applicants of EUR 8 919 000 and to reduce the fine in line with the arguments raised by the applicants in the application before the General Court.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law, alleging breach of essential procedural requirements and the rights of defence, as:






—


Documents obtained solely for the purpose of a national tax investigation were used;










—


Documents from other files were used; and










—


The immunity applicant has been illegally steered.














2.


Second plea in law, alleging misuse of powers by the defendant.










3.


Third plea in law, alleging an incorrect assessment of evidence, as well as the inability of the evidence to support the finding of an infringement.










4.


Fourth plea in law, alleging an infringement of Article 23(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (1) and of the 2006 fining guidelines (2) due to a manifest incorrect assessment of the gravity and duration of the infringement, as well as of the mitigating circumstances, and a breach of the principle of non-discrimination in the calculation of the fine.






(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (OJ 2003 L 1, p. 1)

(2)  Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation No 1/2003 (OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2)