do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Council Decision 2011/752/CFSP of 24 November 2011 amending Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP on the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo, EULEX KOSOVO
Date: 2011-11-24
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Kosovo, budget, common foreign and security policy, fact-finding mission, rule of law




L_2011310EN.01001001.xml










25.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 310/10








            COUNCIL DECISION 2011/752/CFSP
of 24 November 2011
         
amending Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP on the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (1), EULEX KOSOVO


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28 and Articles 42(4) and 43(2) thereof,


Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:







(1)


On 4 February 2008, the Council adopted Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP (2).












(2)


On 9 June 2009, the Council adopted Joint Action 2009/445/CFSP (3), which amended Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP by increasing the financial reference amount to cover the expenditure of the European Union Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo (‘EULEX KOSOVO’) until the expiry of Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP.












(3)


On 8 June 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/322/CFSP (4), which amended Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP and extended it for a period of 2 years until 14 June 2012.












(4)


The current financial reference amount covers the period until 14 December 2011. Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP should be amended to provide a new financial reference amount for the period from 15 December 2011 until 14 June 2012.












(5)


EULEX KOSOVO will be conducted in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the common foreign and security policy as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Article 16(1) of Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP is hereby replaced by the following:

‘1.   The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure of EULEX KOSOVO until 14 October 2010 shall be EUR 265 000 000.
The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure of EULEX KOSOVO from 15 October 2010 until 14 December 2011 shall be EUR 165 000 000.
The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure of EULEX KOSOVO from 15 December 2011 until 14 June 2012 shall be EUR 72 800 000.’.



Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 24 November 2011.


For the Council


The President

W. PAWLAK
            





(1)  Under United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 (1999).

(2)  
            OJ L 42, 16.2.2008, p. 92.

(3)  
            OJ L 148, 11.6.2009, p. 33.

(4)  
            OJ L 145, 11.6.2010, p. 13.
Case C-586/11 P: Appeal brought on 24 November 2011 by Regione Puglia against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 14 September 2011 in Case T-84/10 Regione Puglia v Commission
Date: 2011-11-24
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU programme, European Regional Development Fund, infringement of EU law, interpretation of the law, judicial proceedings








C_2012025EN.01004001.xml










28.1.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 25/40






Appeal brought on 24 November 2011 by Regione Puglia against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 14 September 2011 in Case T-84/10 Regione Puglia v Commission
(Case C-586/11 P)
(2012/C 25/75)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Appellant: Regione Puglia (represented by: F. Brunelli and A. Aloia, avvocati)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought







—


Set aside the order made on 14 September 2011 by the General Court, notified to the appellant on 15 September 2011, declaring that the action in Case T-84/10 is inadmissible;










—


Accordingly, analyse the substance of the case and, consequently, annul Decision C(2009) 10350 of the European Commission of 22 December 2009 concerning ‘the lifting of the suspension of interim payments from the European Regional Development Fund relating to the programme to which this decision refers’, confirming the validity and applicability only of the provision made in Article 4;










—


Order the Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellant alleges, first, procedural irregularities in the proceedings before the court at first instance, which were seriously detrimental to the appellant, namely the omission of the oral procedure provided for in Article 114(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.
Second, the appellant claims that the General Court infringed Community law, first, by misinterpreting the fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU and Council Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999, (1) in conjunction with Article 4(2) and (3) TFEU and Article 5(3) TFEU, and, second, failing to state adequate grounds for its findings, in breach of Article 81 of its Rules of Procedure.


(1)  OJ 1999 L 161, p. 1.
Composition of the EFTA Court
Date: 2011-11-24
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: EFTA Court, Iceland, appointment of members, judge








C_2011344EN.01001001.xml










24.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 344/10





COMPOSITION OF THE EFTA COURT
2011/C 344/07
Upon nomination by the Government of Iceland, Mr Páll Hreinsson was appointed as Judge of the EFTA Court by common accord of the three Contracting Parties to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice (the Surveillance and Court Agreement) for the period from 15 September 2011 to 31 December 2014, to succeed Mr Thorgeir Örlygsson. At a public sitting of the EFTA Court on 12 September 2011, Mr Páll Hreinsson took the oath prescribed in Protocol 5, Article 2 of the Surveillance and Court Agreement.
Case T-471/11 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 24 November 2011 — Éditions Jacob v Commission (Application for interim measures — Competition — Concentration of enterprises — Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the common market subject to sale of assets — Annulment by the General Court of the initial decision on the Commission’s approval of the purchaser of the sold assets — Application for suspension of operation of the decision on the further approval of the same purchaser — No urgency — Weighing of interests)
Date: 2011-11-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: common market, competition, economic concentration, merger control, size of business








C_2012025EN.01005203.xml










28.1.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 25/52






Order of the President of the General Court of 24 November 2011 — Éditions Jacob v Commission
(Case T-471/11 R)
(Application for interim measures - Competition - Concentration of enterprises - Decision declaring the concentration compatible with the common market subject to sale of assets - Annulment by the General Court of the initial decision on the Commission’s approval of the purchaser of the sold assets - Application for suspension of operation of the decision on the further approval of the same purchaser - No urgency - Weighing of interests)
(2012/C 25/103)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Éditions Odile Jacob SA (Paris, France)) (represented by: O. Fréget, M. Struys and L. Eskenazi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito, O. Beynet and S. Noë, agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2011) 3503 of 13 May 2011 on the approval of Wendel Investissement SA as the purchaser of the assets sold in accordance with Commission Decision 2004/422/EC of 7 January 2004 declaring a concentration compatible with the common market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/M.2978 — Lagardère/Natexis/VUP)),

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The costs are reserved.
Case T-296/09: Judgment of the General Court of 24 November 2011 — EFIM v Commission (Competition — Concerted practice — Abuse of a dominant position — Markets for ink cartridges — Decision rejecting a complaint — No Community interest)
Date: 2011-11-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: competition, dominant position, infringement of EU law, office supplies








C_2012013EN.01001102.xml










14.1.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 13/11





Judgment of the General Court of 24 November 2011 — EFIM v Commission
(Case T-296/09) (1)

(Competition - Concerted practice - Abuse of a dominant position - Markets for ink cartridges - Decision rejecting a complaint - No Community interest)
2012/C 13/21
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: European Federation of Ink and Ink Cartridge Manufacturers (EFIM) (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: D. Ehle, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Antoniadis and A. Biolan, Agents, and W. Berg, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Lexmark International Technology SA (Meyrin, Switzerland) (represented by: R. Snelders, lawyer, and G. Eclair-Heath, Solicitor)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 4125 of 20 May 2009 rejecting complaint COMP/C-3/39.391 concerning purported infringements of Articles 81 EC and 82 EC by Hewlett-Packard, Lexmark, Canon and Epson in the market for ink cartridges.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders European Federation of Ink and Ink Cartridge Manufacturers (EFIM) to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission;










3.


Orders Lexmark International Technology SA to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 256, 24.10.2009.