do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-341/07: Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2011 — Sison v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism — Common Position 2001/931/CFSP and Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 — Actions for annulment — Adaptation of heads of claim — Judicial review — Statement of reasons — Conditions for implementation of a Community measure freezing funds)
Date: 2011-11-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Philippines, capital movement, common foreign and security policy, economic sanctions, fundamental rights, indemnification, international sanctions, terrorism








C_2012013EN.01001002.xml










14.1.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 13/10





Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2011 — Sison v Council
(Case T-341/07) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism - Common Position 2001/931/CFSP and Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 - Actions for annulment - Adaptation of heads of claim - Judicial review - Statement of reasons - Conditions for implementation of a Community measure freezing funds)
2012/C 13/19
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Jose Maria Sison (Utrecht, Netherlands) (represented by: J. Fermon, A. Comte, H. Schultz, D. Gürses and W. Kaleck, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop, E. Finnegan and R. Szostak, Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by by C. Wissels, M. de Mol, Y. de Vries, M. Noort, J. Langer and M. Bulterman,, acting as Agents); United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by S. Behzadi Spencer and I. Rao, acting as Agents), and European Commission (represented initially by P. Aalto and S. Boelaert, and subsequently by S. Boelaert and P. Van Nuffel, acting as Agents)

Re:

Following the judgment of the General Court of 30 September 2009 in Case T-341/07 Sison v Council [2009] ECR II–3625, application for compensation for damage allegedly sustained by the applicant as a result of the restrictive measures taken against him with a view to combating terrorism

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action for compensation;










2.


Orders the Council of the European Union to pay, so far as the costs relating to the action for annulment are concerned, the costs incurred by Jose Maria Sison in addition to its own costs;










3.


Orders Mr Sison to pay, so far as the costs relating to the action for compensation are concerned, the costs incurred by the Council in addition to his own costs;










4.


Orders the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Commission to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 269, 10.11.2007.
Case T-320/07: Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2011 — Jones and Others v Commission (ECSC Treaty — Supply of coal intended for the United Kingdom electricity generation industry — Rejection of a complaint alleging discriminatory pricing — Commission’s competence to apply Article 4(b) CS following expiry of the ECSC Treaty, on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Assessment of Community interest — Obligations in relation to the investigation of a complaint — Manifest error of assessment)
Date: 2011-11-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: ECSC Treaty, United Kingdom, coal, declaration of Community interest, delivery, discriminatory price, electrical industry, infringement of EU law








C_2012013EN.01001001.xml










14.1.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 13/10





Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2011 — Jones and Others v Commission
(Case T-320/07) (1)

(ECSC Treaty - Supply of coal intended for the United Kingdom electricity generation industry - Rejection of a complaint alleging discriminatory pricing - Commission’s competence to apply Article 4(b) CS following expiry of the ECSC Treaty, on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Assessment of Community interest - Obligations in relation to the investigation of a complaint - Manifest error of assessment)
2012/C 13/18
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Daphne Jones (Neath, United Kingdom), Glen Jones (Neath), and Fforch-Y-Garon Coal Co. Ltd (Neath) (represented by: D. Jeffreys and S. Llewellyn Jones, Solicitors)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and J. Samnadda, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, (represented: initially by E. Jenkinson, subsequently by C. Gibbs and V. Jackson, and, finally, by S. Hathaway, acting as Agents, and by J. Flynn QC); E.ON UK plc (Coventry, United Kingdom) (represented by P. Lomas, Solicitor); and International Power plc (London, United Kingdom) (represented by D. Anderson QC, M. Chamberlain, Barrister, S. Lister and D. Harrison, Solicitors)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision SG-Greffe (2007) D/203626 of 18 June 2007, pursuant to Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 of 7 April 2004 relating to the conduct of proceedings by the Commission pursuant to Articles 81 [EC] and 82 [EC] (OJ 2004 L 123, p. 18), rejecting the applicants’ complaint concerning infringements of the ECSC Treaty (Case COMP/37.037-SWSMA).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the European Commission to pay, in addition to its own costs, the costs of Mr Glen Jones and of Mrs Daphne Jones, as well as those of Fforch-Y-Garon Coal Co. Ltd.










3.


Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, E.ON UK plc and International Power plc each to bear their own costs.






(1)  OJ C 247, 20.10.2007.
2010 amendments to Regulation No 54 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of pneumatic tyres for commercial vehicles and their trailers
Date: 2011-11-23
Institutions: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe
Subjects: approval, commercial vehicle, pneumatic tyre, technical rule




L_2011307EN.01000201.xml










23.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 307/2






Only the original UN/ECE texts have legal effect under international public law. The status and date of entry into force of this Regulation should be checked in the latest version of the UN/ECE status document TRANS/WP.29/343, available at:
http://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29gen/wp29fdocstts.html

2010 amendments to Regulation No 54 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of pneumatic tyres for commercial vehicles and their trailers

Amendments to Regulation No 54 published in OJ L 183, 11.7.2008, p. 41.
Incorporating:
Supplement 17 to the original version of the Regulation — Date of entry into force: 17 March 2010
      

Amendments to the main text of the Regulation

Paragraph 1, amend to read (including the addition of footnote (**)):

‘1.   SCOPE
This Regulation covers new pneumatic tyres designed primarily for vehicles of categories M2, M3, N, O3 and O4
 (*1)
 (*2). However, it does not apply to tyre types identified by speed category symbols corresponding to speeds below 80 km/h.
Case T-483/10: Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2011 — Pukka Luggage v OHIM — Azpiroz Arruti (PUKKA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark PUKKA — Opposition by the proprietor of Community and national figurative marks featuring the word element pukas — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Partial refusal to register)
Date: 2011-11-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, luxury products industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2012013EN.01001401.xml










14.1.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 13/14





Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2011 — Pukka Luggage v OHIM — Azpiroz Arruti (PUKKA)
(Case T-483/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark PUKKA - Opposition by the proprietor of Community and national figurative marks featuring the word element pukas - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Partial refusal to register)
2012/C 13/28
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: The Pukka Luggage Company Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: K. Gilbert and M. Blair, Solicitors)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Jesús Miguel Azpiroz Arruti (San Sebastián, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 July 2010 (Case R 1175/2008-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Jesús Miguel Azpiroz Arruti and The Pukka Luggage Company Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders The Pukka Luggage Company Ltd to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 328, 4.12.2010.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6323 — Tech Data Europe/MuM VAD Business) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2011-11-23
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: distribution business, economic concentration, electronic device, merger control, software








C_2011343EN.01001501.xml










23.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 343/15





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6323 — Tech Data Europe/MuM VAD Business)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 343/05
On 27 October 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6323. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2011-11-23
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2011343EN.01001601.xml










23.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 343/16





Euro exchange rates (1)

22 November 2011
2011/C 343/06

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3535




JPY


Japanese yen


104,15




DKK


Danish krone


7,4421




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86570




SEK


Swedish krona


9,2035




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2350




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,8250




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


25,485




HUF


Hungarian forint


305,40




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7060




PLN


Polish zloty


4,4637




RON


Romanian leu


4,3573




TRY


Turkish lira


2,5043




AUD


Australian dollar


1,3718




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4059




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,5446




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8086




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,7601




KRW


South Korean won


1 548,68




ZAR


South African rand


11,3785




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,6022




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4886




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 251,89




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,2980




PHP


Philippine peso


58,611




RUB


Russian rouble


41,9475




THB


Thai baht


42,216




BRL


Brazilian real


2,4431




MXN


Mexican peso


18,9490




INR


Indian rupee


70,8900






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.