do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case F-121/11: Action brought on 22 November 2011 — ZZ v Commission.
Date: 2011-11-22
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, allowances and expenses, family policy








C_2012025EN.01007202.xml










28.1.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 25/72






Action brought on 22 November 2011 — ZZ v Commission.
(Case F-121/11)
(2012/C 25/140)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: L. Levi and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decisions of the Ispra Claims Office refusing to grant authorisation for an official, posted in Jordan, to claim transport and accompaniment expenses incurred to allow his son to carry out psychotherapy in French, the child’s mother tongue, in Beirut (Lebanon).

Form of order sought







—


Annul the refusals to grant authorisation for the medical services sought by the applicant in favour of his son, his wife and himself, those refusals resulting from three decisions adopted respectively on 22 February, 10 March and 18 April 2011 by the Head of the Ispra Claims Office of the European Commission;










—


annul the decision adopted on 12 August 2011 by the Director of Directorate D of DG Human Resources and Security of the European Commission, as the Authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment (AECE), rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant on the basis of Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.
Case C-568/10: Order of the President of the Court of 22 November 2011 — European Commission v Austrian Republic
Date: 2011-11-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Austria, EU migration policy, foreign national, foreign student, residence permit








C_2012049EN.01002201.xml










18.2.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 49/22





Order of the President of the Court of 22 November 2011 — European Commission v Austrian Republic
(Case C-568/10) (1)

2012/C 49/38
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 55, 19.2.2011.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6281 — Microsoft/Skype) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2011-11-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, information technology industry, merger control








C_2011341EN.01000201.xml










22.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 341/2





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6281 — Microsoft/Skype)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 341/02
On 7 October 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6281. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6289 — Alstom/Bouygues Immobilier/Exprimm SAS/Embix JV) Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2011-11-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, energy production, merger control, property development








C_2011341EN.01000301.xml










22.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 341/3





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6289 — Alstom/Bouygues Immobilier/Exprimm SAS/Embix JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 341/04
On 15 November 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6289. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Winding-up proceedings — Notification on behalf of the Malta Financial Services Authority of the appointment of a liquidator for the purposes of winding-up the affairs of the company (Publication made in accordance with Article 14 of Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings)
Date: 2011-11-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Malta, insurance company, judicial proceedings, liquidation








C_2011341EN.01000501.xml










22.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 341/5





Winding-up proceedings
Notification on behalf of the Malta Financial Services Authority of the appointment of a liquidator for the purposes of winding-up the affairs of the company
(Publication made in accordance with Article 14 of Directive 2001/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of insurance undertakings)
2011/C 341/06






Insurance undertaking







European Insurance Group Ltd




Office 1, Verdala Business Centre




Level 2, TG Complex




Brewery Street




Mriehel Birkirkara




BKR 3000




MALTA








Date, entry into force and nature of the decision


On 12 July 2010, the Malta Financial Services Authority (‘the MFSA’) revoked the authorisation of European Insurance Group Ltd. The insurance company has appealed from the decision of the Authority.
The MFSA, with effect from 6 August 2010, appointed Deloitte, Certified Public Accountants, of Deloitte Place Mriehel Bypass Mriehel BKR 3000 Malta, to take charge of the assets of the company and to assume control of its business. The MFSA has, with effect from 29 September 2011, appointed a liquidator for the purpose of winding-up the affairs of the company.




Competent authorities







Malta Financial Services Authority




Notabile Road




Attard




BKR 3000




MALTA








Supervisory authority







Malta Financial Services Authority




Notabile Road




Attard




BKR 3000




MALTA








Liquidator appointed


Mr Brian Tonna, Certified Public Accountant of Nexia BT





Ground Floor, Tower Business Centre




Tower Street




Swatar




BKR 3013




MALTA








Applicable law








 


Insurance Business Act (Chapter 403 of the Laws of Malta)










 


Insurance Business (Reorganisation and Winding-up of Insurance Undertakings) Regulations (Legal Notice 208 of 2004)
Case T-290/10: Judgment of the General Court of 22 November 2011 — Sports Warehouse v OHIM (TENNIS WAREHOUSE) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark TENNIS WAREHOUSE — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Distinctive character — Obligation to state reasons — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2011-11-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, sports equipment, trade-mark law








C_2012013EN.01001303.xml










14.1.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 13/13





Judgment of the General Court of 22 November 2011 — Sports Warehouse v OHIM (TENNIS WAREHOUSE)
(Case T-290/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark TENNIS WAREHOUSE - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Distinctive character - Obligation to state reasons - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2012/C 13/27
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Sports Warehouse GmbH (Schutterwald, Germany) (represented by: M. Douglas, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially S. Schäffner and subsequently R. Pethke, Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 April 2010 (Case R 1259/2009-1) concerning an application for registration of the word sign TENNIS WAREHOUSE as a Community trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Sports Warehosue GmbH to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.