do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Communication from the Commission on the quantity of certain products in the milk and milk products sector available for the first half of 2012 under certain quotas opened by the Union
Date: 2011-10-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: import, milk, milk product, tariff quota








C_2011313EN.01000701.xml










26.10.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 313/7





Communication from the Commission on the quantity of certain products in the milk and milk products sector available for the first half of 2012 under certain quotas opened by the Union
2011/C 313/04
When import licences were allocated for the second half of 2011 for certain quotas referred to in Commission Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001 (1), the licence applications covered quantities smaller than those available for the products concerned. As a result, the quantity available for each quota for the period 1 January to 30 June 2012 should be calculated, taking account of the unallocated quantities resulting from Commission Regulation (EU) No 608/2011 (2) of 22 June 2011 determining the extent to which the applications for import licences submitted in June 2011 for certain dairy products under certain tariff quotas opened by Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001 can be accepted.
The quantities available for the period 1 January to 30 June 2012 for the second half of the year of importation for certain quotas referred to in Commission Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001 are set out below.


(1)  OJ L 341, 22.12.2001, p. 29.

(2)  OJ L 163, 23.6.2011, p. 20.


ANNEX

ANNEX I.A






Quota number


Quantity (kg)




09.4590


68 537 000




09.4599


11 360 000




09.4591


5 360 000




09.4592


18 438 000




09.4593


5 413 000




09.4594


20 007 000




09.4595


7 502 501




09.4596


18 216 703






ANNEX I.F






Products originating in Switzerland




Quota number


Quantity (kg)




09.4155


1 000 001






ANNEX I.H






Products originating in Norway




Quota number


Quantity (kg)




09.4179


2 037 087






ANNEX I.I






Products originating in Iceland




Quota number


Quantity (kg)




09.4205


175 000




09.4206


190 000
Special Report No 10/2011 Are the School Milk and School Fruit Schemes effective?
Date: 2011-10-26
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: EU programme, fruit, milk, nutrition, school life








C_2011313EN.01000901.xml










26.10.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 313/9





Special Report No 10/2011 ‘Are the School Milk and School Fruit Schemes effective?’
2011/C 313/05
The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 10/2011 ‘Are the School Milk and School Fruit Schemes effective?’ has just been published.
The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://www.eca.europa.eu
A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:





European Court of Auditors




Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’




12, rue Alcide De Gasperi




1615 Luxembourg




LUXEMBOURG




Tel. +352 4398-1




E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu




or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.
Case C-546/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Højesteret (Denmark) lodged on 26 October 2011 — Dansk Jurist- og Økonomforbund (DJØF — Danish Union of jurists and economists) acting on behalf of Erik Toftgaard v Indenrigs- og Sundhedsministeriet
Date: 2011-10-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, age discrimination, civil servant, disability insurance, job cuts, pension scheme, social security, social-security benefit








C_2012013EN.01000601.xml










14.1.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 13/6





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Højesteret (Denmark) lodged on 26 October 2011 — Dansk Jurist- og Økonomforbund (DJØF — Danish Union of jurists and economists) acting on behalf of Erik Toftgaard v Indenrigs- og Sundhedsministeriet
(Case C-546/11)
2012/C 13/12
Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Højesteret

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Dansk Jurist- og Økonomforbund (DJØF — Danish Union of jurists and economists) acting on behalf of Erik Toftgaard

Defendant: Indenrigs- og Sundhedsministeriet

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 6(2) of the Employment Directive (1) to be interpreted as meaning that Member States may provide only that the fixing of age limits for access or entitlement to benefits under occupational social security schemes does not constitute discrimination in so far as those social security schemes relate to retirement or invalidity benefits?










2.


Is Article 6(2) to be interpreted as meaning that the possibility of fixing age limits concerns only access to the scheme, or is the provision to be interpreted as meaning that the possibility of fixing age limits also concerns entitlement to the payment of benefits under the scheme?










3.


If question 1 is answered in the negative:
Can the expression ‘occupational social security schemes’ in Article 6(2) include a scheme such as the ‘rådighedsløn’ (availability pay) as referred to in section 32(1) of the Danish Law on Civil Servants (Tjenestemandslov), under which a civil servant may, as special protection in the event of redundancy due to the abolition of his post, retain his current salary for three years and continue to be credited for years of pensionable service, provided he remains available for assignment to another suitable post?










4.


Is Article 6(1) of the Employment Directive to be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude a national provision such as section 32(4)(2) of the Tjenestemandslov, under which an availability salary is not paid to a civil servant who has reached the age at which the State retirement pension becomes payable, if his job has been abolished?






(1)  Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16).
Case T-568/11: Action brought on 26 October 2011 — Kokomarina v OHIM — Euro Shoe Unie (interdit de me gronder I D M G)
Date: 2011-10-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, footwear industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2012013EN.01001901.xml










14.1.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 13/19





Action brought on 26 October 2011 — Kokomarina v OHIM — Euro Shoe Unie (interdit de me gronder I D M G)
(Case T-568/11)
2012/C 13/39
Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties


Applicant: Kokomarina (Concarneau, France) (represented by: C. Charrière-Bournazel, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Euro Shoe Unie NV (Beringen, Belgium)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


declare Kokomarina’s action to be admissible;










—


annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 July 2011 in Case R 1814/2010-1;










—


dismiss the opposition brought by EURO SHOE UNIE NV against the application for registration as a Community trade mark of Kokomarina’s mark ‘I D M G — interdit de me gronder’.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant.

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘interdit de me gronder I D M G’ for goods in class 25.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Euro Shoe Unie NV.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Benelux word mark ‘DMG’ for goods in Classes 18, 25 and 35.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Pleas in law: Lack of use of the opposed mark and no likelihood of confusion.