do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case F-97/11: Action brought on 3 October 2011 — ZZ v Parliament
Date: 2011-10-03
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: divorce, ruling, supplementary income








C_2011347EN.01004701.xml










26.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 347/47





Action brought on 3 October 2011 — ZZ v Parliament
(Case F-97/11)
2011/C 347/89
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: P. Nelissen Grade and G. Leblanc, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the Parliament as to the date to be regarded as that on which the applicant’s change of marital status took effect for the purposes of withdrawing the household allowance following the civil judgment pronouncing the applicant’s divorce.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of the appointing authority of 4 July 2011 partially dismissing the applicant’s complaint;










—


annul the decision of the appointing authority of 21 January 2011, notified by the Streamline administrative management application, to fix the date on which the change in the applicant’s marital status took effect as the date of the judgment pronouncing the divorce;










—


indicate to the appointing authority the effects of the annulment of the contested decisions, and, in particular, the date to be taken as that on which the judgment pronouncing the applicant’s divorce from his ex-wife took effect, namely the date of the transcription of the judgment, which took place on 26 April 2011;










—


order the Parliament to pay the costs.
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position given at its meeting of 3 October 2011 regarding a draft decision relating to Case COMP/39.482 (1) — Exotic fruits (bananas) — Rapporteur: Poland
Date: 2011-10-03
Institutions: Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions
Subjects: corporate social responsibility, dominant position, offence, parent company, tropical fruit, unlawful agreement








C_2012064EN.01000601.xml










3.3.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 64/6





Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position given at its meeting of 3 October 2011 regarding a draft decision relating to Case COMP/39.482 (1) — Exotic fruits (bananas)
Rapporteur: Poland
2012/C 64/06






1.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission’s assessment of the facts as agreements and/or concerted practices within the meaning of Article 101 of the TFEU.










2.


The Advisory Committee agrees that the complex of agreements and/or concerted practices constitutes a single and continuous cartel infringement in the sector of bananas for the time frame in which it existed.










3.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission that the complex of agreements and/or concerted practices had the object and effect of restricting competition.










4.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission’s assessment on the duration of the infringement for each addressee.










5.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission’s draft decision as regards the conclusion that the agreements and/or concerted practices between the addressees were capable of having an appreciable effect upon trade between EU Member States.










6.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission’s draft decision as regards the addressees of the decision, specifically with reference to imputation of liability to parent companies of the groups concerned.










7.


The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 979/2011 of 3 October 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2011-10-03
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: common organisation of markets, fruit, import (EU), import price, vegetable








L_2011258EN.01007001.xml










4.10.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 258/70








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 979/2011
of 3 October 2011
         
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),


Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors (2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex hereto.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 4 October 2011.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 3 October 2011.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,
José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ
            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development






(1)  
            OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.




ANNEX
Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables







(EUR/100 kg)




CN code


Third country code (1)



Standard import value




0702 00 00 


BR 


31,9 




MK 


48,8 




ZZ 


40,4 




0707 00 05 


MK 


44,0 




TR 


111,6 




ZZ 


77,8 




0709 90 70 


TR 


107,9 




ZZ 


107,9 




0805 50 10 


AR 


66,9 




BR 


41,3 




CL 


65,2 




TR 


56,8 




UY 


61,2 




ZA 


74,6 




ZZ 


61,0 




0806 10 10 


CL 


79,6 




EG 


65,0 




MK 


82,2 




TR 


103,4 




ZA 


62,4 




ZZ 


78,5 




0808 10 80 


CL 


90,0 




CN 


82,6 




NZ 


109,5 




US 


83,3 




ZA 


80,1 




ZZ 


89,1 




0808 20 50 


CN 


102,8 




ZZ 


102,8 






(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
            ZZ
            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.
Case C-512/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Työtuomioistuin (Finland) lodged on 3 October 2011 — Terveys- ja sosiaalialan neuvottelujärjestö TSN ry v Terveyspalvelualan Liitto ry, Mehiläinen Oy
Date: 2011-10-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: collective agreement, equal treatment, female work, gender equality, motherhood, occupational health








C_2011347EN.01002501.xml










26.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 347/25





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Työtuomioistuin (Finland) lodged on 3 October 2011 — Terveys- ja sosiaalialan neuvottelujärjestö TSN ry v Terveyspalvelualan Liitto ry, Mehiläinen Oy
(Case C-512/11)
2011/C 347/35
Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Työtuomioistuin

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Terveys- ja sosiaalialan neuvottelujärjestö TSN ry

Defendants: Terveyspalvelualan Liitto ry, Mehiläinen Oy

Question referred

Do Directive 2006/54/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation and Council Directive 92/85/EEC (2) of 19 October 1992 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding preclude national provisions of a collective agreement, or the interpretation of those provisions, under which an employee moving from unpaid child-care leave to maternity leave is not paid remuneration during maternity leave in accordance with the collective agreement?


(1)  OJ 2006 L 204, p. 23.

(2)  OJ 1992 L 348, p. 1.
Case C-513/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Työtuomioistuin (Finland) lodged on 3 October 2011 — Ylemmät Toimihenkilöt YTN ry v Teknologiateollisuus ry, Nokia Siemens Networks Oy
Date: 2011-10-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: collective agreement, equal treatment, female work, gender equality, motherhood, occupational health








C_2011347EN.01002502.xml










26.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 347/25





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Työtuomioistuin (Finland) lodged on 3 October 2011 — Ylemmät Toimihenkilöt YTN ry v Teknologiateollisuus ry, Nokia Siemens Networks Oy
(Case C-513/11)
2011/C 347/36
Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Työtuomioistuin

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Ylemmät Toimihenkilöt YTN ry

Defendants: Teknologiateollisuus ry, Nokia Siemens Networks Oy

Question referred

Do Directive 2006/54/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation and Council Directive 92/85/EEC (2) of 19 October 1992 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding preclude a national collective agreement from being interpreted as meaning that an employee moving from unpaid child-care leave to maternity leave is not paid remuneration during maternity leave in accordance with the collective agreement?


(1)  OJ 2006 L 204, p. 23.

(2)  OJ 1992 L 348, p. 1.
Case C-515/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 3 October 2011 — Deutsche Umwelthilfe e.V. v Federal Republic of Germany
Date: 2011-10-03
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: access to EU information, environmental law, legislative procedure, public institution








C_2012032EN.01001301.xml










4.2.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 32/13





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin (Germany) lodged on 3 October 2011 — Deutsche Umwelthilfe e.V. v Federal Republic of Germany
(Case C-515/11)
2012/C 32/22
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Deutsche Umwelthilfe e.V.

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany

Questions referred







1.


Is the second sentence of Article 2(2) of Directive 2003/4/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on public access to environmental information and repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC to be interpreted as meaning that bodies and institutions are acting in a legislative capacity when their activities relate to legislation by the executive on the basis of authorisation given by a law enacted by Parliament?










2.


If question 1 is to be answered in the affirmative, are such bodies and institutions permanently excluded from the term ‘public authority’, or only until completion of the legislative process?






(1)  OJ 2003 L 41, p. 26.
Case F-98/11: Action brought on 3 October 2011 — ZZ and Others v European Commission
Date: 2011-10-03
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: Luxembourg, education grant, school fees, university








C_2011347EN.01004702.xml










26.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 347/47





Action brought on 3 October 2011 — ZZ and Others v European Commission
(Case F-98/11)
2011/C 347/90
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant(s): ZZ and Others (represented by: F. Moyse and A. Salerno, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the Commission to consider certain financial aid from a Member State to students in higher education to be allowances of the same nature as family allowances and to deduct that financial aid from the education allowance granted to officials who are parents of such students and annulment of the decision to seek repayment of sums unduly paid.

Form of order sought







—


As regards the first nine applicants, first, annulment of the decisions to deduct from the education allowances paid for their children under the Staff Regulations the amount of the grants for higher education paid to those children by the Centre de Documentation et d’Information sur l’Enseignement Supérieur du Grand Duché du Luxembourg (Centre for documentation and information on higher education of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg ‘CEDIES’), and, second, annulment of the decisions sent to each of those applicants to recover the sums unduly paid corresponding to the allegedly undue amounts of the education allowances previously paid;










—


As regards the last applicant, annulment of the decision asking him to state whether his child had been given a grant by CEDIES and in the meantime suspending the education allowance for that child as of 1 December 2011, only as regards that suspension;










—


Pay the resulting arrears of remuneration with default interest calculated from the date the arrears fell due at the rate fixed by the European Central Bank for principal refinancing operations applicable during the period concerned, plus two points;










—


Order the Commission to pay the costs.
Case F-99/11: Action brought on 3 October 2011 — ZZ v Commission
Date: 2011-10-03
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, deadline for payment, remuneration of work








C_2012025EN.01006702.xml










28.1.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 25/67






Action brought on 3 October 2011 — ZZ v Commission
(Case F-99/11)
(2012/C 25/128)
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the implied decision of the Commission rejecting the applicant’s claim for payment of salary arrears for the period from 1 June 2005 to 21 July 2010.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Civil Service Tribunal should:






—


annul the decision issued by — or, in any event, attributable to — the Commission, rejecting — howsoever and whether in whole or in part — the claims set out in the application of 20 August 2010, sent to the appointing authority on 20 August 2010;










—


annul, quatenus opus est, Note Ares(2011)217354 as registered on 28 February 2011 and received by the applicant on 6 April 2011 at the earliest;










—


annul the decision issued by the Commission rejecting, howsoever, the claims set out in the complaint of 24 February 2011;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.
2011/660/: Council Decision of 3 October 2011 appointing six Polish members and six Polish alternate members of the Committee of the Regions
Date: 2011-10-03
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: European Committee of the Regions, Poland, appointment of members








L_2011263EN.01001701.xml










7.10.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 263/17








            COUNCIL DECISION
         
of 3 October 2011
         
appointing six Polish members and six Polish alternate members of the Committee of the Regions
(2011/660/EU)


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,


Having regard to the proposal of the Polish Government,

Whereas:







(1)


On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.












(2)


Six members’ seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Jacek CZERNIAK, Mr Konstanty DOMBROWICZ, Mr Marcin JABŁOŃSKI, Mr Witold KROCHMAL, Mr Marek NAWARA and Mr Bogusław ŚMIGIELSKI. Five alternate members’ seats have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Jan DZIUBIŃSKI, Mr Władysław HUSEJKO, Mr Tadeusz KOWALCZYK, Mr Andrzej MATUSIEWICZ and Mr Robert SOSZYŃSKI. An alternate member’s seat has become vacant following the appointment of Mr Pawel ADAMOWICZ as a member of the Committee of the Regions,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:






(a)


as members:






—


Mr Paweł ADAMOWICZ, Prezydent Miasta Gdańska,










—


Mr Olgierd GEBLEWICZ, Marszałek Województwa Zachodniopomorskiego,










—


Mr Krzysztof HETMAN, Marszałek Województwa Lubelskiego,










—


Mr Witold KROCHMAL, Radny Miasta i Gminy Wołów (change of mandate),










—


Mr Marek SOWA, Marszałek Województwa Małopolskiego,










—


Mr Witold STĘPIEŃ, Marszałek Województwa Łódzkiego;




and










(b)


as alternate members:






—


Mr Jacek CZERNIAK, Radny Województwa Lubelskiego,










—


Mr Marcin JABŁOŃSKI, Radny Województwa Lubuskiego,










—


Mr Bogdan DYJUK, Przewodniczący Sejmiku Województwa Podłaskiego,










—


Mr Arkadiusz GODLEWSKI, Przewodniczący Rady Miasta Katowice,










—


Ms Teresa KUBAS-HUL, Przewodnicząca Sejmiku Województwa Podkarpackiego,










—


Ms Hanna ZDANOWSKA, Prezydent Miasta Łodzi.










Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.




Done at Luxembourg, 3 October 2011.


For the Council


The President

J. FEDAK
            





(1)  
            OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

(2)  
            OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.
Case T-128/09: Order of the General Court of 3 October 2011 — Meridiana and Meridiana fly v Commission (State aid — Action for annulment — Applicants’ failure to act — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2011-10-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, action for annulment (EU), infringement of EU law








C_2011347EN.01003201.xml










26.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 347/32





Order of the General Court of 3 October 2011 — Meridiana and Meridiana fly v Commission
(Case T-128/09) (1)

(State aid - Action for annulment - Applicants’ failure to act - No need to adjudicate)
2011/C 347/53
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicants: Meridiana SpA (Olbia, Italy) and Meridiana fly SpA, formerly Eurofly SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: N. Green QC, K. Bacon, Barrister, C. Osti and A. Prastaro, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, D. Grespan and E. Righini, Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Italian Republic (represented by G. Palmieri and P. Gentili, lawyers) and Alitalia — Compagnia Aerea Italiana SpA (Fiumicino, Italy) (represented by G.M. Roberti, G. Bellitti and I. Perego, lawyers)

Re:

APPLICATION for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 6745 final of 12 November 2008 (State Aid No 510/2008 — Italy — Sale of assets of Alitalia)

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


Meridiana SpA and Meridiana fly SpA shall bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission and by Alitalia — Compagnia Aerea Italiana SpA.










3.


The Italian Republic shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 141, 20.6.2009.
Case T-421/11 R: Order of the judge of the General Court hearing applications for interim measures of 3 October 2011 — Qualitest FZE v Council (Application for interim measures — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Lack of urgency)
Date: 2011-10-03
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Iran, economic sanctions, fundamental rights, import restriction, international sanctions, judicial proceedings








C_2011347EN.01003501.xml










26.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 347/35





Order of the judge of the General Court hearing applications for interim measures of 3 October 2011 — Qualitest FZE v Council
(Case T-421/11 R)
(Application for interim measures - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds and economic resources - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Lack of urgency)
2011/C 347/63
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Qualitest FZE (Dubai, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: M. Catrain González, lawyer, E. Wright and H. Zhu, Barristers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: G. Marhic and R. Liudvinaviciute-Cordeiro, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 503/2011 of 23 May 2011 implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 136, p. 26) and of Council Decision 2011/299/CFSP of 23 May 2011 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2011 L 136, p. 65), in so far as they concern the applicant.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim measures is dismissed.










2.


The costs are reserved.