do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6400 — ECE/Metro/MEC JV)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2011-09-28
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: business management, economic concentration, merger control, real estate business








C_2011284EN.01002401.xml










28.9.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 284/24





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.6400 — ECE/Metro/MEC JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 284/04






1.


On 21 September 2011 the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking(s) ECE Projektmanagement GmbH & Co. KG (‘ECE’, Germany), ultimately controlled by Alexander Otto, and Metro Group Asset Management Services (‘MAMS’, Germany), fully owned subsidiary of Metro AG (‘Metro’, Germany), acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the undertaking MEC Metro-ECE Centermanagement GmbH & Co. KG (‘MEC’, Germany), by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


ECE: Consultation and management with regard to the acquisition, development, planning and construction of commercial properties and other immovable assets as well as the management of let property and administration, control and disposal of such property,










—


MAMS: Providing essential services within the property segment of the Metro Group for the management, development, leasing, construction and control of investment properties in the portfolio of the Metro Group,










—


MEC: Property management services for retail property.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by e-mail to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.6400 — ECE/Metro/MEC JV, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




J-70




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘EC Merger Regulation’).
Case C-179/10: Order of the President of the Sixth Chamber of the Court of 28 September 2011 — European Commission v French Republic
Date: 2011-09-28
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: France, State aid, aquaculture, control of State aid, fishing industry, infringement of EU law, reimbursement of aid








C_2012025EN.01004503.xml










28.1.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 25/45






Order of the President of the Sixth Chamber of the Court of 28 September 2011 — European Commission v French Republic
(Case C-179/10) (1)

(2012/C 25/85)
Language of the case: French
The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 161, 19.6.2010.
Case T-509/11: Action brought on 28 September 2011 — Makhlouf v Council
Date: 2011-09-28
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Syria, economic sanctions, international sanctions, personal property, protection of privacy, removal, right to justice, rights of the defence








C_2011340EN.01003102.xml










19.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 340/31





Action brought on 28 September 2011 — Makhlouf v Council
(Case T-509/11)
2011/C 340/61
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Mohammad Makhlouf (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: C. Rygaert and G. Karouni, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought







—


annul Council Implementing Decision 2011/488/CFSP of 1 August 2011 implementing Decision 2011/273/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria, in so far as it applies to Mr Mohammad (Mohammed) Makhlouf;










—


order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs, pursuant to Articles 87 and 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on seven pleas in law, essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-383/11 Makhlouf v Council. (1)



(1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.2011, p. 30.
Case F-23/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 28 September 2011 — Allen v Commission (Civil service — Social security — Serious illness — Article 72 of the Staff Regulations — Extension of sickness cover under the JSIS — Criterion of absence of insurance under another scheme)
Date: 2011-09-28
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, health risk, illness, social security








C_2011362EN.01002302.xml










10.12.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 362/23





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 28 September 2011 — Allen v Commission
(Case F-23/10) (1)

(Civil service - Social security - Serious illness - Article 72 of the Staff Regulations - Extension of sickness cover under the JSIS - Criterion of absence of insurance under another scheme)
2011/C 362/38
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Finola Allen (Armacão de Pera, Portugal) (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision to reject the application for recognition that the applicant has a serious illness.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Annuls the decisions of 30 June 2009, 17 July 2009 and 7 January 2010 by which the European Commission refused to recognise that Ms Allen was suffering from a serious illness and refused to extend her sickness cover;










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder of the heads of claim;










3.


Orders the European Commission to bear all the costs.






(1)  OJ C 161, 19.6.2010, p. 58.