do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-193/11: Order of the General Court of 23 September 2011 — Ahoua-N’Guetta and Others v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in the light of the situation in Côte d'Ivoire — Actions for annulment — Inaction by the applicant — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2011-09-23
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Côte d'Ivoire, common foreign and security policy, economic sanctions, international sanctions








C_2011340EN.01002302.xml










19.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 340/23





Order of the General Court of 23 September 2011 — Ahoua-N’Guetta and Others v Council
(Case T-193/11) (1)

(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in the light of the situation in Côte d'Ivoire - Actions for annulment - Inaction by the applicant - No need to adjudicate)
2011/C 340/49
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Timothée Ahoua-N’Guetta (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire), Jacques André Monoko Daligou (Abidjan), Bruno Walé Ekpo (Abidjan), Félix Tano Kouakou (Abidjan), Hortense Sess (Abidjan) and Joséphine Suzanne Ebah (Abidjan) (represented by: J.-C. Tchikaya, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and M. Chavrier, Agents)

Re:

Partial annulment, first, of Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011 amending Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 36), and, second, of Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 11, p. 1), in so far as they concern the applicants.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Timothée Ahoua-N’Guetta, Jacques André Monoko Daligou, Bruno Walé Ekpo, Félix Tano Kouakou, Hortense Sess and Joséphine Suzanne Ebah are ordered to pay the costs.










3.


There is no need to rule on the applications made by the European Commission and the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire for leave to intervene.






(1)  OJ C 152, 21.5.2011.