do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case F-47/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 14 September 2011 — Hecq v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Social security — Occupational disease — Articles 73 and 78 of the Staff Regulations — Correctness of the opinion of the medical committee — Refusal to accept that the applicant suffers from partial permanent invalidity)
Date: 2011-09-14
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, disability insurance, medical report, occupational disease








C_2011362EN.01002401.xml










10.12.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 362/24





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 14 September 2011 — Hecq v Commission
(Case F-47/10) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Social security - Occupational disease - Articles 73 and 78 of the Staff Regulations - Correctness of the opinion of the medical committee - Refusal to accept that the applicant suffers from partial permanent invalidity)
2011/C 362/40
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Hecq (Chaumont-Gistoux, Belgium) (represented by: L. Vogel, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, acting as Agents, and J.-L. Fagnart, lawyer)

Re:

Application for the annulment of the Commission decisions refusing to accept that the applicant suffers from partial permanent invalidity within the meaning of Article 73 of the Staff Regulations and making him liable for part of the fees and expenses incurred during the proceedings of the medical committee.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the claim for annulment of the decisions of European Commission of 7 September 2009 in so far as they require Mr Hecq to pay the costs and fees of the doctor whom he nominated to represent him in the medical committee and half of the costs and fees of the third doctor in the medical committee nominated by mutual agreement;










2.


Dismisses the claims for annulment of the decisions of 7 September 2009 in so far as they refuse to award Mr Hecq a rate of permanent invalidity as unfounded;










3.


Orders Mr Hecq to pay the entirety of the costs.






(1)  OJ C 221, 14.8.2010, p. 61.
Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Fürstliches Landgericht, dated 14 September 2011 , in the case between Granville Establishment and Volker Anhalt, Melanie Anhalt and Jasmin Barbaro, née Anhalt (Case E-13/11)
Date: 2011-09-14
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: Liechtenstein, civil procedure, fundamental rights, jurisdiction, right to justice








C_2012029EN.01001201.xml










2.2.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 29/12





Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Fürstliches Landgericht, dated 14 September 2011, in the case between Granville Establishment and Volker Anhalt, Melanie Anhalt and Jasmin Barbaro, née Anhalt
(Case E-13/11)
2012/C 29/09
A request has been made to the EFTA Court by a letter of 15 September 2011 from Fürstliches Landgericht, Liechtenstein (Princely Court of Justice, Liechtenstein), which was received at the Court Registry on 22 September 2011, for an Advisory Opinion in the case between Granville Establishment and Volker Anhalt, Melanie Anhalt and Jasmin Barbaro, née Anhalt, on the following questions:






1.


Can a national of an EEA State rely on a provision such as Section 53a of the Liechtenstein Jurisdiction Law, which accords Liechtenstein nationals the right not to be sued abroad on the basis of a jurisdiction agreement unless that jurisdiction agreement has been publicly recorded, and derive directly there from also the right not to be sued in Liechtenstein (and, thus, from the perspective of that national, also abroad) on the basis of a jurisdiction agreement unless it has been publicly recorded?










2.


If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative. Can that right be invoked in a case such as the one at hand, that is, in civil law proceedings, and thus directly in a dispute between private parties?
Case T-308/07: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 September 2011 — Tegebauer v Parliament (Right to petition — Petition addressed to the Parliament — Decision to take no action — Action for annulment — Actionable measure — Admissibility — Obligation to state reasons)
Date: 2011-09-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Parliament, Germany, indemnification, traineeship








C_2011311EN.01003401.xml










22.10.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 311/34





Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 September 2011 — Tegebauer v Parliament
(Case T-308/07) (1)

(Right to petition - Petition addressed to the Parliament - Decision to take no action - Action for annulment - Actionable measure - Admissibility - Obligation to state reasons)
2011/C 311/59
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Ingo-Jens Tegebauer (Trier, Germany) (represented initially by R. Nieporte then by H.-B. Pfriem, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented initially by H. Krück and M. Windisch, then by N. Lorenz and E. Waldherr, agents)

Re:

Annulment of the Decision of the Committee on Petitions of the European Parliament of 20 June 2007 to file and take no further action on the petition submitted by the applicant on 7 February 2007 (Petition No 95/2007).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the Decision of the Committee on Petitions of the European Parliament of 20 June 2007 to file and take no further action on the petition submitted by Mr Ingo-Jens Tegebauer on 7 February 2007 (Petition No 95/2007);










2.


Orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Mr Tegebauer.






(1)  OJ C 269, 10.11.2007.
Case T-223/10: Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Regione Puglia v Commission (ERDF — Reduction of financial assistance — Withdrawal of the contested debit note — Cessation of existence of the dispute — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2011-09-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Regional Development Fund, economic aid, regional authority








C_2011331EN.01002101.xml










12.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 331/21





Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Regione Puglia v Commission
(Case T-223/10) (1)

(ERDF - Reduction of financial assistance - Withdrawal of the contested debit note - Cessation of existence of the dispute - No need to adjudicate)
2011/C 331/40
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Regione Puglia (Bari, Italy) (represented by: F. Brunelli and A. Aloia, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Prete and A. Steiblytė, agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of debit note No 3241001630 of 26 February 2010 concerning Commission Decision C(2009) 10350 of 22 December 2009, incorporating a reduction in the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) assistance granted in application of Commission Decision C(2000) 2349 of 8 August 2000, incorporating approval of the operational programme POR Puglia for the period 2000-2006, on the basis of Objective No 1.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Each party shall bear its own costs relating to the present proceedings and the Regione Puglia shall bear the costs relating to the interlocutory proceedings.






(1)  OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.
Notice of open competitions
Date: 2011-09-14
Institutions: European Personnel Selection Office
Subjects: EPSO, competition (EU), information profession, international cooperation, invitation to tender








C_2011271EN.01001901.xml










14.9.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 271/19





NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITIONS
2011/C 271/07
The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competitions:






 


EPSO/AD/227/11 — Archivistics (AD 6)










 


EPSO/AD/228/11 — Information and communication technologies (ICT) (AD 7)










 


EPSO/AD/229/11 — Cooperation and management of aid to non-member countries (AD 7)




The competition notice is published in 23 languages in Official Journal C 271 A of 14 September 2011.
Further details can be found on the EPSO website: http://eu-careers.eu
Case F-12/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 14 September 2011 — A v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Occupational disease — Relationship between the procedures under Articles 73 and 78 of the Staff Regulations — Provisional allowance — Reimbursement of medical costs — Access to the individual file)
Date: 2011-09-14
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, access to information, health expenditure, indemnification, medical data, occupational disease, redemption








C_2011362EN.01002201.xml










10.12.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 362/22





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 14 September 2011 — A v Commission
(Case F-12/09) (1)

(Staff case - Officials - Occupational disease - Relationship between the procedures under Articles 73 and 78 of the Staff Regulations - Provisional allowance - Reimbursement of medical costs - Access to the individual file)
2011/C 362/34
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: A (P., France) (represented by: B. Cambier and A. Paternostre, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission (represented by: J. Currall and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application that the Commission be declared liable for certain faults allegedly committed against the applicant in the context of the procedure under Article 73 of the Staff Regulations, and for the annulment of various decisions refusing to apply to the applicant the provisions of Article 73(2)(b) of the Staff Regulations, to communicate to him a series of documents forming part of his medical file and to reimburse him for certain medical costs — Application for damages

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the applicant to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 113, 16.5.2009, p. 45.
Case T-84/10: Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Regione Puglia v Commission (Action for annulment — ERDF — Decision incorporating reduction of financial assistance — Regional entity — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2011-09-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Regional Development Fund, economic aid, regional authority








C_2011331EN.01002003.xml










12.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 331/20





Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Regione Puglia v Commission
(Case T-84/10) (1)

(Action for annulment - ERDF - Decision incorporating reduction of financial assistance - Regional entity - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)
2011/C 331/39
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Regione Puglia (Bari, Italy) (represented by: F. Brunelli and A. Aloia, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Cattabriga and A. Steiblytė, agents)

Re:

Action for partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 10350 of 22 December 2009, incorporating a reduction in the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) assistance granted in application of Commission Decision C(2000) 2349 of 8 August 2000, incorporating approval of the operational programme POR Puglia for the period 2000-2006, on the basis of Objective No 1.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


The Regione Puglia will bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission, including the costs related to the interlocutory proceedings.






(1)  OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.
Case C-470/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 14 September 2011 — SIA Garkalns v Rīgas dome
Date: 2011-09-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: administrative transparency, freedom to provide services, liberalisation of trade, services of general interest








C_2011331EN.01001302.xml










12.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 331/13





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 14 September 2011 — SIA ‘Garkalns’ v Rīgas dome
(Case C-470/11)
2011/C 331/23
Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Augstākās tiesas Senāts

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: SIA ‘Garkalns’

Respondent: Rīgas dome

Question referred

Must Article 49 EC and the related obligation of transparency be interpreted as meaning that the use, in a law that has been enacted publicly and in advance, of an imprecise legal concept such as ‘substantial impairment of the interests of the State and of the residents of the administrative area concerned’ — a concept which has to be defined in each individual case in which it applies with the help of interpretative guidelines but which at the same time allows a degree of flexibility in the assessment of restrictions on the freedom to provide services — is compatible with the permissible restrictions on that freedom?
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 920/2011 of 14 September 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2011-09-14
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: common organisation of markets, fruit, import (EU), import price, vegetable








L_2011238EN.01002801.xml










15.9.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 238/28








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 920/2011
of 14 September 2011
         
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),


Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors (2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex hereto.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 15 September 2011.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 14 September 2011.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,
José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ
            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development






(1)  
            OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.




ANNEX
Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables







(EUR/100 kg)




CN code


Third country code (1)



Standard import value




0707 00 05 


EG 


135,3 




TR 


123,1 




ZZ 


129,2 




0709 90 70 


TR 


121,3 




ZZ 


121,3 




0805 50 10 


AR 


78,2 




CL 


83,5 




MX 


39,8 




TR 


67,0 




UY 


65,3 




ZA 


74,0 




ZZ 


68,0 




0806 10 10 


TR 


102,5 




ZA 


59,8 




ZZ 


81,2 




0808 10 80 


AR 


148,7 




CL 


147,2 




NZ 


111,8 




US 


82,6 




ZA 


90,9 




ZZ 


116,2 




0808 20 50 


AR 


217,1 




CN 


62,5 




TR 


120,2 




ZA 


114,1 




ZZ 


128,5 




0809 30 


TR 


137,7 




ZZ 


137,7 






(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
            ZZ
            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.
Case T-236/02: Judgment of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission (Referral to the General Court after annulment — Civil service — Officials — Employment in a non-Member state — Reassignment of post and post holder — Rights of the defence — Claim for damages — Full jurisdiction)
Date: 2011-09-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European official, indemnification, reassignment, third country








C_2011311EN.01003101.xml










22.10.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 311/31





Judgment of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Marcuccio v Commission
(Case T-236/02) (1)

(Referral to the General Court after annulment - Civil service - Officials - Employment in a non-Member state - Reassignment of post and post holder - Rights of the defence - Claim for damages - Full jurisdiction)
2011/C 311/51
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: L. Garofolo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

First, application for annulment of the European Commission’s decision of 18 March 2002 which reassigned the applicant from the Directorate-General for Development, Commission Delegation in Luanda (Angola), to the Directorate General for Development in Brussels (Belgium), of all preliminary, connected or consecutive measures, in particular those relating to the recruitment of another official to occupy his post, of the Commission’s notes of 13 and 14 November 2001 and of the opinion or opinions of the External Service Steering Committee, and, second, a claim for allowances in connection with his duties in Angola and damages for harm suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 18 March 2002 which reassigned Mr Luigi Marcuccio from the Directorate-General for Development, Commission Delegation in Luanda (Angola), to the Directorate-General for Development in Brussels (Belgium).










2.


Dismisses the application as to the remainder.










3.


Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Mr Marcucccio.






(1)  OJ C 233, 28.9.2002.
2011/539/CFSP: Political and Security Committee Decision EUMM Georgia/2/2011 of 14 September 2011 extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia, EUMM Georgia
Date: 2011-09-14
Institutions: Political and Security Committee
Subjects: Georgia, appointment of staff, fact-finding mission








L_2011238EN.01003201.xml










15.9.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 238/32








            POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EUMM GEORGIA/2/2011
of 14 September 2011
         
extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia, EUMM Georgia
(2011/539/CFSP)


THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,


Having regard to Council Joint Action 2008/736/CFSP of 15 September 2008 on the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia, EUMM Georgia (1), and in particular Article 10(1) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


On 15 September 2008 the Council adopted Joint Action 2008/736/CFSP establishing the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia, EUMM Georgia (‘EUMM Georgia’).












(2)


On 1 July 2011, upon a proposal from High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the Political and Security Committee (‘PSC’) adopted Decision EUMM/1/2011 (2) appointing Mr Andrzej TYSZKIEWICZ as Head of Mission of EUMM Georgia until 14 September 2011.












(3)


Pursuant to Article 10(1) of Council Decision 2010/452/CFSP (3), the PSC is authorised, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising political control and strategic direction of EUMM Georgia, including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The mandate of Mr Andrzej TYSZKIEWICZ as Head of Mission of the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia, EUMM Georgia is hereby extended until 14 September 2012.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 14 September 2011.


For the Political and Security Committee


The Chairperson

O. SKOOG
            





(1)  
            OJ L 248, 17.9.2008, p. 26.

(2)  
            OJ L 175, 2.7.2011, p. 27.

(3)  
            OJ L 213, 13.8.2010, p. 43.
Case T-279/10: Judgment of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — K-Mail Order v OHIM — IVKO (MEN’Z) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark MEN’Z — Prior trade name WENZ — Relative ground for refusal — Local range of the earlier sign — Article 8(4) and Article 41(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2011-09-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2011311EN.01004402.xml










22.10.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 311/44





Judgment of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — K-Mail Order v OHIM — IVKO (MEN’Z)
(Case T-279/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark MEN’Z - Prior trade name WENZ - Relative ground for refusal - Local range of the earlier sign - Article 8(4) and Article 41(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2011/C 311/82
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: K-Mail Order GmbH & Co. KG (Pforzheim, Germany) (represented by: T. Zeiher and G. Stallecker, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: IVKO Industrieprodukt-Vertriebskontakt GmbH (Baar-Wanderath, Germany)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 March 2010 (Case R 746/2009-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Wenz GmbH and IVKO Industrieprodukt-Vertriebskontakt GmbH

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders K-Mail Order GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.
Case T-239/10: Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Italy v Commission (ERDF — Reduction of financial assistance — Withdrawal of the contested debit note — Cessation of existence of the dispute — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2011-09-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Regional Development Fund, economic aid, regional authority








C_2011331EN.01002102.xml










12.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 331/21





Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Italy v Commission
(Case T-239/10) (1)

(ERDF - Reduction of financial assistance - Withdrawal of the contested debit note - Cessation of existence of the dispute - No need to adjudicate)
2011/C 331/41
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Prete and A. Steiblytė, agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of debit note No 3241001630 of 26 February 2010 concerning Commission Decision C(2009) 10350 of 22 December 2009, incorporating a reduction in the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) assistance granted in application of Commission Decision C(2000) 2349 of 8 August 2000, incorporating approval of the operational programme POR Puglia for the period 2000-2006, on the basis of Objective No 1.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.










2.


Each party shall bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.