do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-485/07: Judgment of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Olive Line International v OHIM — Knopf (O-live) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark O-live — Earlier national trade name Olive line — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Right to prohibit use of a subsequent mark — Likelihood of confusion — Article 7 of the Spanish Trade Mark Law and Article 8(1) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 8(1) of Regulation No 207/2009))
Date: 2011-09-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, foodstuff, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2011311EN.01003502.xml










22.10.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 311/35





Judgment of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Olive Line International v OHIM — Knopf (O-live)
(Case T-485/07) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark O-live - Earlier national trade name Olive line - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Right to prohibit use of a subsequent mark - Likelihood of confusion - Article 7 of the Spanish Trade Mark Law and Article 8(1) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 8(1) of Regulation No 207/2009))
2011/C 311/62
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Olive Line International, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: P. Koch Moreno, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner and B. Schmidt, agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Reinhard Knopf (Malsch, Germany) (represented by: W. Weber, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 September 2007 (Case R 1478/2006-2) in opposition proceedings between Olive Line International, SL, and Mr Reinhard Knopf.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 26 September 2007 (Case R 1478/2006-2);










2.


orders OHIM to pay the costs;










3.


orders Mr Reinhard Knopf to bear his own costs.






(1)  OJ C 51, 23.2.2008
Case T-210/10: Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Condé v Council
Date: 2011-09-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Guinea, economic sanctions, international sanctions, trade restriction








C_2011331EN.01002801.xml










12.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 331/28





Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Condé v Council
(Case T-210/10) (1)

2011/C 331/54
Language of the case: French
The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.
Case T-295/10: Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Camara v Council
Date: 2011-09-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Guinea, economic sanctions, international sanctions, trade restriction








C_2011331EN.01002802.xml










12.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 331/28





Order of the General Court of 14 September 2011 — Camara v Council
(Case T-295/10) (1)

2011/C 331/55
Language of the case: French
The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.
Case C-471/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 14 September 2011 — SIA Cido Grupa v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests
Date: 2011-09-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: payment, public finance, transitional period (EU), white sugar








C_2011331EN.01001303.xml










12.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 331/13





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 14 September 2011 — SIA ‘Cido Grupa’ v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests
(Case C-471/11)
2011/C 331/24
Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Augstākās tiesas Senāts

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: SIA ‘Cido Grupa’

Defendant: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

Questions referred







1.


Is the third subparagraph of Article 6(3) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 60/2004 (1) laying down transitional measures in the sugar sector by reason of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia to be interpreted as meaning that, where an operator has been found to be in possession of an individual surplus of a product which may be classed as sugar within the meaning of Article 4, No 1, of the regulation, that operator is required to pay the State Treasury a sum which is calculated on the basis of the quantity of white sugar (Combined Nomenclature code 1701 99 10) corresponding to the sugar content of the product found in the operator’s possession, and not on the basis of the quantity of the actual product found in its possession (for example, sugar syrup)?










2.


In the calculation of that payment, are the highest import duty rates applicable to white sugar to be applied instead of those applicable to the actual product found in the operator’s possession?






(1)  OJ 2004 L 9, p. 8.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2011-09-14
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2011271EN.01000801.xml










14.9.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 271/8





Euro exchange rates (1)

13 September 2011
2011/C 271/04

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,3645




JPY


Japanese yen


105,01




DKK


Danish krone


7,4476




GBP


Pound sterling


0,86315




SEK


Swedish krona


9,1260




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2037




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,7275




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


24,551




HUF


Hungarian forint


283,59




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7093




PLN


Polish zloty


4,3339




RON


Romanian leu


4,2803




TRY


Turkish lira


2,4280




AUD


Australian dollar


1,3214




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3545




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,6476




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6557




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,6973




KRW


South Korean won


1 506,35




ZAR


South African rand


10,0141




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


8,7316




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4963




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


11 881,56




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,1842




PHP


Philippine peso


58,687




RUB


Russian rouble


41,2463




THB


Thai baht


41,222




BRL


Brazilian real


2,3370




MXN


Mexican peso


17,5168




INR


Indian rupee


64,9430






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case C-469/11 P: Appeal brought on 14 September 2011 by Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 22 June 2011 in Case T-409/09: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission
Date: 2011-09-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU institution, contractual liability, equal treatment, limitation of legal proceedings, miscarriage of justice, principle of legal certainty








C_2011331EN.01001301.xml










12.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 331/13





Appeal brought on 14 September 2011 by Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE against the order of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 22 June 2011 in Case T-409/09: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission
(Case C-469/11 P)
2011/C 331/22
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, Δικηγόρος)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


set aside the Order of the General Court in case T-409/09,










—


reject in its entirety the Plea of Inadmissibility submitted by the Commission,










—


refer to the General Court the case in order to Judge the substance of the case,










—


order the Commission to pay the Appellant's legal and other costs including those incurred in connection with the initial procedure, even if the current Appeal is rejected as well as those of the current Appeal, in case it is accepted.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The appellant submits that the contested order should be set aside on the following grounds:






—


The General Court erred in law by not applying the provision of article 102(2) of the Rules of Procedure which refers to the extension on account of distance by a single period of 10 days to cases arriving to establish the non-contractual liability of the European Institutions.










—


The General Court, by not applying the provisions of article 102(2), infringed the principles of equal treatment and legal certainty.










—


The General Court erred in law by accepting that the limitation period began to run as from the time the Commission's decision to reject the appellant's tender was communicated to the appellant.