Case C-447/09: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 13 September 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany)) — Reinhard Prigge, Michael Fromm, Volker Lambach v Deutsche Lufthansa AG (Directive 2000/78/EC — Articles 2(5), 4(1) and 6(1) — Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age — Airline pilots — Collective agreement — Clause automatically terminating employment contracts at age 60)
Date: 2011-09-13
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: age discrimination, air safety, collective agreement, crew, elderly person, infringement of EU law, retirement conditions, termination of employment








C_2011319EN.01000401.xml










29.10.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 319/4





Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 13 September 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany)) — Reinhard Prigge, Michael Fromm, Volker Lambach v Deutsche Lufthansa AG
(Case C-447/09) (1)

(Directive 2000/78/EC - Articles 2(5), 4(1) and 6(1) - Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age - Airline pilots - Collective agreement - Clause automatically terminating employment contracts at age 60)
2011/C 319/05
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesarbeitsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Reinhard Prigge, Michael Fromm, Volker Lambach

Defendant: Deutsche Lufthansa AG

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundesarbeitsgericht — Interpretation of Articles 2(5), 4(1) and 6(1) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16) — Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age — Whether those rules are compatible with a collective agreement which provides, on grounds of air safety, that a pilot’s contract of employment terminates automatically at the end of the month in which that pilot reaches the age of 60

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(5) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation must be interpreted as meaning that the Member States may authorise, through rules to that effect, the social partners to adopt measures within the meaning of Article 2(5) in the areas referred to in that provision that fall within collective agreements on condition that those rules of authorisation are sufficiently precise so as to ensure that those measures fulfil the requirements set out in Article 2(5). A measure such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which fixes the age limit from which pilots may no longer carry out their professional activities at 60 whereas national and international legislation fixes that age at 65, is not a measure that is necessary for public security and protection of health, within the meaning of the said Article 2(5).
Article 4(1) of Directive 2000/78 must be interpreted as precluding a clause in a collective agreement, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, that fixes at 60 the age limit from which pilots are considered as no longer possessing the physical capabilities to carry out their professional activity while national and international legislation fix that age at 65.
The first paragraph of Article 6(1) of Directive 2000/78 must be interpreted to the effect that air traffic safety does not constitute a legitimate aim within the meaning of that provision.


(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.