do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-197/10: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — BVR v OHIM — Austria Leasing (Austria Leasing Gesellschaft m.b.H. Mitglied der Raiffeisen-Bankengruppe Österreich) (Community trade mark — Opposition Proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Austria Leasing Gesellschaft m.b.H Mitglied der Raiffeisen-Bankengruppe Österreich — Earlier national figurative mark Raiffeisenbank — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2011-09-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2011311EN.01004303.xml










22.10.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 311/43





Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — BVR v OHIM — Austria Leasing (Austria Leasing Gesellschaft m.b.H. Mitglied der Raiffeisen-Bankengruppe Österreich)
(Case T-197/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition Proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark Austria Leasing Gesellschaft m.b.H Mitglied der Raiffeisen-Bankengruppe Österreich - Earlier national figurative mark Raiffeisenbank - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2011/C 311/80
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Bundesverband der Deutschen Volksbanken und Raiffeisenbanken e.V. (BVR) (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: I. Rinke, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: B. Schmidt, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Austria Leasing GmbH (Eschborn, Germany) (represented by: B. Joachim, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought for the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 February 2010 (Case R 248/2009-1), relating to opposition proceedings between the Bundesverband der Deutschen Volksbanken und Raiffeisenbanken e.V. (BVR) and Austria Leasing GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the Bundesverband der Deutschen Volksbanken und Raiffeisenbanken e.V. (BVR) to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.
Case T-257/07: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — France v Commission (Animal health — Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 — Protection against transmissible spongiform encephalopathies — Sheep and goats — Regulation (EC) No 746/2008 — Adoption of less restrictive eradication measures than those earlier prescribed — Precautionary principle)
Date: 2011-09-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: animal disease, disease prevention, goat, health control, sheep








C_2011311EN.01003303.xml










22.10.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 311/33





Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — France v Commission
(Case T-257/07) (1)

(Animal health - Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 - Protection against transmissible spongiform encephalopathies - Sheep and goats - Regulation (EC) No 746/2008 - Adoption of less restrictive eradication measures than those earlier prescribed - Precautionary principle)
2011/C 311/58
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: French Republic (represented initially by E. Belliard, G. de Bergues, R. Loosli-Surrans and A.-L. During, then by E. Belliard, G. de Bergues, R. Loosli Surrans and B. Cabouat, agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Nolin, agent)

Intervener in support of the defendant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented initially by I. Rao and C. Gibbs, then by I. Rao and L. Seeboruth, and then by L. Seeboruth and F. Penlington, agents, and T. Ward, Barrister)

Re:

Annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 746/2008 of 17 June 2008 amending Annex VII to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (OJ 2008 L 202, p. 11), in that it authorises less restrictive measures of surveillance and eradication than those earlier prescribed for sheep and goat herds.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs and to pay those of the European Commission in respect of the main proceedings and the proceedings for interim measures;










3.


Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 211, 8.9.2007.
Case T-10/08: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — Kwang Yang Motor Co. v OHIM — Honda Giken Kogyo (An internal combustion engine with the vent on the top) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing an internal combustion engine with the vent on the top — Earlier national design — Ground for invalidity — No individual character — Visible features of a component part of a complex product — No different overall impression — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — Articles 4, 6 and 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)
Date: 2011-09-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, motor vehicle industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2011311EN.01003601.xml










22.10.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 311/36





Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — Kwang Yang Motor Co. v OHIM — Honda Giken Kogyo (An internal combustion engine with the vent on the top)
(Case T-10/08) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing an internal combustion engine with the vent on the top - Earlier national design - Ground for invalidity - No individual character - Visible features of a component part of a complex product - No different overall impression - Informed user - Degree of freedom of the designer - Articles 4, 6 and 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)
2011/C 311/63
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Kwang Yang Motor Co. (Kaohsiung, Taiwan) (represented by: P. Rath, W. Festl-Wietek and M. Wetzel, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by T. Musmann, H. Timmann, M. Büttner and S. von Petersdorff-Campen, lawyers)

Re:

ACTION brought against the decision of 8 October 2007 of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM (Case R 1337/2006-3), relating to invalidity proceedings for Community designs between Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha and Kwang Yang Motor Co., Ltd

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Kwang Yang Motor Co., Ltd to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 64, 8.3.2008.
Case T-598/10: Order of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — Biodes v OHIM — Manasul Internacional (LINEASUL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Revocation of the decision of the Board of Appeal — Cessation of existence of dispute — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2011-09-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, pharmaceutical industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2011331EN.01002202.xml










12.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 331/22





Order of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — Biodes v OHIM — Manasul Internacional (LINEASUL)
(Case T-598/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Revocation of the decision of the Board of Appeal - Cessation of existence of dispute - No need to adjudicate)
2011/C 331/44
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Biodes SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: E. Manresa Medina, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Manasul Internacional, SL (Ponferrada, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 September 2010 (Case R 1520/2009-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Manasul Internacional, SL and Biodes, SL.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no further need to adjudicate on the present action.










2.


The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 80, 12.3.2011.
Case T-25/06: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — Alliance One International v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Italian market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing and market sharing — Attributability of the unlawful conduct — Fines)
Date: 2011-09-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Italy, competition, fine, fixing of prices, infringement of EU law, market-sharing agreement, tobacco industry








C_2011311EN.01003202.xml










22.10.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 311/32





Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — Alliance One International v Commission
(Case T-25/06) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Italian market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Price-fixing and market sharing - Attributability of the unlawful conduct - Fines)
2011/C 311/54
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Alliance One International, Inc. (Danville, Virginia, United States) (represented by: C. Osti and A. Prastaro, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented: initially by É. Gippini Fournier and F. Amato, and subsequently by E. Gippini Fournier and N. Khan, Agents)

Re:

APPLICATION for partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2005) 4012 final of 20 October 2005 relating to a proceeding under Article 81(1) [EC] (Case COMP/C.38.281/B.2 — Raw tobacco — Italy) and, in the alternative, application for a reduction in the fine imposed on Alliance One International.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Alliance One International, Inc. to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 60, 11.3.2006.
Case T-290/09: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — Omnicare v OHIM — Astellas Pharma (OMNICARE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark OMNICARE — Earlier national figurative mark OMNICARE — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Similarity of the services — Genuine use of the earlier mark)
Date: 2011-09-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, medical research, pharmaceutical product, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2011311EN.01004103.xml










22.10.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 311/41





Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — Omnicare v OHIM — Astellas Pharma (OMNICARE)
(Case T-290/09) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark OMNICARE - Earlier national figurative mark OMNICARE - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Similarity of the services - Genuine use of the earlier mark)
2011/C 311/75
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Omnicare, Inc. (Covington, Kentucky, United States) (represented by: M. Edenborough QC)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Astellas Pharma GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: C. Gutiérrez Martínez, H. Granado Carpenter and M. Polo Carreño, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 May 2009 (Case R 402/2008-4), concerning opposition proceedings between Yamanouchi Pharma GmbH and Omnicare, Inc.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Omnicare, Inc. to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 244, 10.10.2009.
Case T-11/08: Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — Kwang Yang Motor v OHIM — Honda Giken Kogyo (internal combustion engine) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing an internal combustion engine — Earlier national design — Ground for invalidity — No individual character — Visible features of a component part of a complex product — No different overall impression — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — Articles 4, 6 and 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)
Date: 2011-09-09
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, motor vehicle industry, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2011311EN.01003602.xml










22.10.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 311/36





Judgment of the General Court of 9 September 2011 — Kwang Yang Motor v OHIM — Honda Giken Kogyo (internal combustion engine)
(Case T-11/08) (1)

(Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing an internal combustion engine - Earlier national design - Ground for invalidity - No individual character - Visible features of a component part of a complex product - No different overall impression - Informed user - Degree of freedom of the designer - Articles 4, 6 and 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002)
2011/C 311/64
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Kwang Yang Motor Co., Ltd (Kaohsiung, Taiwan) (represented by: P. Rath, W. Festl-Wietek and M. Wetzel, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by: T. Musmann, H. Timmann, M. Büttner and S. von Petersdorff-Campen, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of 8 October 2007 of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM (Case R 1380/2006-3), relating to invalidity proceedings for Community designs between Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha and Kwang Yang Motor Co., Ltd

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Kwang Yang Motor Co., Ltd to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 64, 8.3.2008.