do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case F-89/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 8 September 2011 — Bovagnet v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Remuneration — Family allowances — Education allowance — Education costs — Definition)
Date: 2011-09-08
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: bonus payment, family benefit, school fees








C_2012138EN.01002502.xml










12.5.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/25






Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 8 September 2011 — Bovagnet v Commission
(Case F-89/10) (1)

(Civil Service - Officials - Remuneration - Family allowances - Education allowance - Education costs - Definition)
(2012/C 138/50)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: François-Carlos Bovagnet (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: M. Korving, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin and B. Eggers, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the defendant’s decision not to reimburse fully the education costs in respect of the applicant’s children.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 17 December 2009 in so far as it refuses to reimburse Mr Bovagnet that part of the education costs paid by him and linked to contribution to the investment funds and working capital of the school that his two children attend;










2.


Orders the European Commission to pay Mr Bovagnet the difference between the amount of education allowance granted and that which would result from the calculation of the allowance including the costs incurred for the contribution to the investment funds and the working capital of the school that his two children attend, subject to the ceiling laid down under Article 3 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union;










3.


Orders the European Commission to pay all the costs.






(1)  OJ C 328, 4.12.2010, p. 61.
Communication from the Commission concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2012 under certain quotas opened by the Community for products in the poultrymeat sector  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2011-09-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: poultry, poultrymeat, tariff quota








C_2011264EN.01001901.xml










8.9.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 264/19





Communication from the Commission concerning the quantity not applied for to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2012 under certain quotas opened by the Community for products in the poultrymeat sector
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 264/09
Commission Regulation (EC) No 616/2007 (1) opened tariff quotas for imports of products in the poultrymeat sector. The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of July 2011 for the subperiod 1 October to 31 December 2011, in respect of quotas 09.4212, 09.4214, 09.4217 and 09.4218, are for quantities lower than those available. Pursuant to the second sentence of Article 7(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 (2), the quantities that were not applied for are to be added to the quantity fixed for the following quota subperiod, from 1 January to 31 March 2012; they are set out in the Annex to this notice.


(1)  OJ L 142, 5.6.2007, p. 3.

(2)  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.


ANNEX






Quota order number


Quantities not applied for, to be added to the quantity fixed for the subperiod 1 January to 31 March 2012
(in kg)




09.4212


55 566 000




09.4214


6 449 200




09.4217


17 003 000




09.4218


6 957 600
Case T-439/10 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 8 September 2011 — Fulmen v Council (Interim measures — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds and economic resources — Application for suspension of operation — Lack of urgency)
Date: 2011-09-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: common foreign and security policy, economic sanctions, international sanctions, nuclear non-proliferation, trade restriction








C_2011319EN.01002201.xml










29.10.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 319/22





Order of the President of the General Court of 8 September 2011 — Fulmen v Council
(Case T-439/10 R)
(Interim measures - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds and economic resources - Application for suspension of operation - Lack of urgency)
2011/C 319/46
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Fulmen (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: A. Kronshagen, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop and R. Liudvinaviciute-Cordeiro, Agents)

Party intervening in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Konstantinidis, T. Scharf and E. Cujo, Agents)

Re:

Application for suspension of operation of the following contested measures in so far as they concern the applicant:






—


Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP of 26 July 2010 concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ 2010 L 195, p. 39);










—


Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2010 of 26 July 2010 implementing Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2010 L 195, p. 25);










—


Council Decision 2010/644/CFSP of 25 October 2010 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Common Position 2007/140/CFSP (OJ 2010 L 281, p. 81);










—


Council Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 of 25 October 2010 on restrictive measures against Iran and repealing Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 (OJ 2010 L 281, p. 1).





Operative part of the order







1.


The application for interim relief is rejected.










2.


Costs are reserved.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6351 — ILVA/Taranto Energia) — Candidate case for simplified procedure  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2011-09-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, power plant, steel








C_2011264EN.01002401.xml










8.9.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 264/24





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.6351 — ILVA/Taranto Energia)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 264/13






1.


On 30 August 2011, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which ILVA SpA (‘ILVA,’, Italy), a company controlled by Riva Fire SpA (‘Riva Fire’, Italy), acquires within the meaning of Article 3 (1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control over the whole of Taranto Energia Srl (‘Taranto Energia’, Italy), a vehicle company incorporated by Edison SpA (‘Edison’, Italy’), including two thermoelectric power plants (‘CET 2’ and ‘CET3’, Italy), by way of purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


for ILVA: production of steel and connected activities,










—


for Taranto Energia (CET2 and CET3): thermoelectric power plants for the production of electricity.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the EC Merger Regulation (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.6351 — ILVA/Taranto Energia, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




J-70




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘EC Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32 (‘Notice on a simplified procedure’).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6231 — KKR/Capsugel)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2011-09-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, management, merger control, pharmaceutical industry








C_2011264EN.01000102.xml










8.9.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 264/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6231 — KKR/Capsugel)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 264/02
On 26 July 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011MM.6231. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
2011/533/EU: Decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of 8 September 2011 appointing a judge to the General Court
Date: 2011-09-08
Institutions: Representatives of the Governments of the Member States
Subjects: Court of Justice of the European Union, appointment of members, judge








L_2011234EN.01004301.xml










10.9.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 234/43








            DECISION OF THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES
         
of 8 September 2011
         
appointing a judge to the General Court
(2011/533/EU)


THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 19 thereof,


Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 254 and 255 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to Articles 5 and 7 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and following the resignation of Mr Theodore CHIPEV, a judge should be appointed to the General Court for the remainder of Mr Theodore CHIPEV’s term of office, which runs until 31 August 2013.












(2)


Ms Mariyana KANCHEVA has been proposed for the vacant post.












(3)


The panel set up by Article 255 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union has given an opinion on Ms Mariyana KANCHEVA’s suitability to perform the duties of Judge of the General Court,





HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Ms Mariyana KANCHEVA is hereby appointed Judge to the General Court for the period from 12 September 2011 to 31 August 2013.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




Done at Brussels, 8 September 2011.


The President

J. TOMBIŃSKI
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6342 — UPM-Kymmene/Myllykoski Paper)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2011-09-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, merger control, pulp and paper industry








C_2011264EN.01000101.xml










8.9.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 264/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6342 — UPM-Kymmene/Myllykoski Paper)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 264/01
On 31 August 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6342. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.