do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union OJ C 238, 13.8.2011
Date: 2011-08-27
Institutions: Court of Justice of the European Union
Subjects: Court of Justice of the European Union








C_2011252EN.01000101.xml










27.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/1





2011/C 252/01
Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union



OJ C 238, 13.8.2011



Past publications


OJ C 232, 6.8.2011


OJ C 226, 30.7.2011


OJ C 219, 23.7.2011


OJ C 211, 16.7.2011


OJ C 204, 9.7.2011


OJ C 194, 2.7.2011

These texts are available on:
EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2011-08-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2011251EN.01000101.xml










27.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 251/1





Euro exchange rates (1)

26 August 2011
2011/C 251/01

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,4402




JPY


Japanese yen


110,41




DKK


Danish krone


7,4509




GBP


Pound sterling


0,88565




SEK


Swedish krona


9,1082




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1458




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,7735




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


24,166




HUF


Hungarian forint


272,66




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7096




PLN


Polish zloty


4,1751




RON


Romanian leu


4,2445




TRY


Turkish lira


2,5275




AUD


Australian dollar


1,3727




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4241




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


11,2298




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7262




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,7379




KRW


South Korean won


1 557,78




ZAR


South African rand


10,3676




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


9,1988




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4833




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 339,77




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,3040




PHP


Philippine peso


61,045




RUB


Russian rouble


41,6500




THB


Thai baht


43,177




BRL


Brazilian real


2,3185




MXN


Mexican peso


18,0543




INR


Indian rupee


66,4720






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Final Report of the Hearing Officer — Case COMP/39.796 — Suez Environnement — Breach of seal
Date: 2011-08-27
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: audit, dominant position, fine, infringement procedure (EU), offence, transport under customs control, water supply








C_2011251EN.01000301.xml










27.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 251/3





Final Report of the Hearing Officer (1)

Case COMP/39.796 — Suez Environnement — Breach of seal
2011/C 251/03
This case concerns an infringement of procedural competition rules by the French group Suez Environnement Company SA (‘Suez Environnement’) and its subsidiary Lyonnaise des eaux France SA (‘LDE’) as a result of a breach of a seal affixed during an inspection by the Commission of LDE's headquarters in April 2010.
On 19 October 2010, the Commission adopted a Statement of Objections, which was notified to Suez Environnement and LDE on 21 October 2010. The Statement of Objections came to the preliminary conclusion that a seal affixed at LDE's headquarters during the inspection conducted by the Commission in April 2010 had been broken within the meaning of Article 23(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 and that the Commission intended to impose a fine on LDE and Suez Environnement under that Article. The Statement of Objections also indicated that the Commission intended to hold Suez Environnement liable for the infringement committed by LDE.
On 8 December 2010, the parties, having been granted access to the Commission's case file, submitted their comments in reply to the Statement of Objections. I have not been informed of any incident relating to access to the file.
In their written comments, the parties did not contest that an infringement had taken place, but stated that the infringement had been committed as a result of negligence. They also argued, as a mitigating factor, that they had actively cooperated with the Commission once the breach of seal was discovered. The parties did not contest that liability for the infringement could be attributed to Suez Environnement.
In their written comments, the parties also indicated that they did not wish to exercise their right to a formal oral hearing.
After having examined the Commission's draft decision, I hereby confirm that the parties have been heard on all objections contained therein.
In conclusion, I consider that the right to be heard has been respected in this case.

Brussels, 3 May 2011.

Wouter WILS




(1)  Pursuant to Article 15 and 16 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings (OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21).