do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/197/CFSP of 31 March 2010 on the launch of a European Union military mission to contribute to the training of Somali security forces (EUTM Somalia) ( OJ L 87, 7.4.2010 )
Date: 2011-08-04
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU military mission, Somalia, common foreign and security policy, international cooperation, military personnel, public safety, technical cooperation, vocational training








L_2011201EN.01001901.xml










4.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 201/19







Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/197/CFSP of 31 March 2010 on the launch of a European Union military mission to contribute to the training of Somali security forces (EUTM Somalia)
(
Official Journal of the European Union L 87 of 7 April 2010
)

On page 33, recital 3:
for:







‘(3)


In accordance with Article 5 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on the European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications. Denmark does not, therefore, participate in the financing of this mission,’,





read:







‘(3)


In accordance with Article 5 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on the European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications. Denmark does not participate in the implementation of this Decision and therefore does not participate in the financing of this mission,’.
Case T-430/11: Action brought on 4 August 2011 — Telefónica v Commission
Date: 2011-08-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, control of State aid, shareholding, tax system, telecommunications industry








C_2011282EN.01004701.xml










24.9.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 282/47





Action brought on 4 August 2011 — Telefónica v Commission
(Case T-430/11)
2011/C 282/86
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Telefónica, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Ruiz Calzado, M. Núñez-Müller and J. Domínguez Pérez, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul Article 1(1) of the decision;










—


in the alternative, annul Article 1(4) and (5) of the decision;










—


in the further alternative, annul Article 4 of the decision, or amend its scope as appropriate, and










—


order the Commission to pay all the costs arising from these proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

This action has been brought against the Commission's Decision of 12 January 2011 in Case No C 45/2007 (ex NN 51/2007, ex CP 9/2007), on the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions implemented by Spain.
The pleas in law and main arguments are those raised in Case T-429/11 BBVA v Commission.
Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/96/CFSP of 15 February 2010 on a European Union military mission to contribute to the training of Somali security forces ( OJ L 44, 19.2.2010 )
Date: 2011-08-04
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU military mission, Somalia, common foreign and security policy, establishment of peace, international cooperation, military personnel, public safety, technical cooperation, vocational training








L_2011201EN.01001902.xml










4.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 201/19







Corrigendum to Council Decision 2010/96/CFSP of 15 February 2010 on a European Union military mission to contribute to the training of Somali security forces
(
Official Journal of the European Union L 44 of 19 February 2010
)

On page 17, recital 16:
for:







‘(16)


In accordance with Article 5 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on the European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications. Denmark does not, therefore, participate in the financing of this mission,’,





read:







‘(16)


In accordance with Article 5 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on the European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications. Denmark does not participate in the implementation of this Decision and therefore does not participate in the financing of this mission,’.
Case C-346/10: Order of the President of the Court of 4 August 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Greece
Date: 2011-08-04
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Greece, road transport, transport insurance








C_2011340EN.01001401.xml










19.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 340/14





Order of the President of the Court of 4 August 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Greece
(Case C-346/10) (1)

2011/C 340/24
Language of the case: Greek
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 246, 11.9.2010.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6221 — Colgate Palmolive/Sanex Business)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2011-08-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: consumer goods, economic concentration, exchange of information, health care, merger control








C_2011229EN.01000801.xml










4.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 229/8





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6221 — Colgate Palmolive/Sanex Business)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 229/04
On 6 June 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6221. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 65/2011 of 27 January 2011 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, as regards the implementation of control procedures as well as cross-compliance in respect of rural development support measures ( OJ L 25, 28.1.2011 )
Date: 2011-08-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU financing arrangements, administrative check, aid to agriculture, management audit, rural development








L_2011201EN.01002001.xml










4.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 201/20







Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 65/2011 of 27 January 2011 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, as regards the implementation of control procedures as well as cross-compliance in respect of rural development support measures
(
Official Journal of the European Union L 25 of 28 January 2011
)







—


On page 11, Article 6(2)(c):




for:


                  ‘ “area determined” means the area of plots or parcels for which aid is claimed, as identified in accordance with Article 11 and Article 15(2), (3) and (4) of this Regulation.’,

read:


                  ‘ “area determined” means the area of plots or parcels for which aid is claimed, as identified in accordance with Article 11 and Article 15(3), (4) and (5) of this Regulation.’;







—


On page 11, Article 6(2)(d):




for:


                  ‘ “animals determined” means the number of animals identified in accordance with Article 11 and Article 15(5) of this Regulation.’,

read:


                  ‘ “animals determined” means the number of animals identified in accordance with Article 11 and Article 15(6) of this Regulation.’.
Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London)
Date: 2011-08-04
Institutions: European Medicines Agency
Subjects: England, European Medicines Agency, administrator, drug surveillance, recruitment








CA2011229EN.01000101.xml










4.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 229/1





Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London)
(2011/C 229 A/01)

The Agency is responsible for coordinating the evaluation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use in the European Union (see Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 136, 30.4.2004, p. 1). The Agency was established in January 1995. It has many close contacts with the European Commission, 27 EU Member States, EEA-EFTA countries and many other groups in government and the private sector.


Further information on the Agency and its activities is readily accessible through the Internet; our web address is http://www.ema.europa.eu

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is organising a selection procedures with a view to drawing up a reserve list for:






—



EMA/AD/328: Administrator in the Medical Information Sector, Patient Health Protection Unit (AD 6)











—



EMA/AD/329: Administrator (Scientific), Unit for Human Medicines Development and Evaluation, Quality of Medicines, Chemicals (AD 8)





Selected candidates will be included on a reserve list and, depending on the budgetary situation, may be offered a five-year renewable contract in accordance with the Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Union (OJ L 56, 4.3.1968).
The place of employment shall be London.
Candidates must be nationals of a Member State of the European Union, or of Iceland, Norway or Liechtenstein, on condition that they have full rights as a citizen.

The complete conditions and job description should be downloaded from the Agency website: http://www.ema.europa.eu/htms/general/admin/recruit/recruitnew.htm


Applications have to be submitted electronically using the form available on the Agency website. The deadline for submission of application forms is 15 September 2011 at midnight.


Please note that due to the large number of applications the Agency may receive when reaching the deadline for submission of applications, the system may have problems processing the large amounts of data. Applicants are therefore advised to send in their application well ahead of the deadline.

If you wish to receive notification of vacancy publications electronically please register online for an RSS feed at http://www.ema.europa.eu/ under ‘RSS news feeds’.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6279 — Toshiba/Landis+Gyr)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2011-08-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electronic device, exchange of information, merger control, technology








C_2011229EN.01000701.xml










4.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 229/7





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6279 — Toshiba/Landis+Gyr)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 229/02
On 7 July 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6279. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Notice from the Government of Malta concerning Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2011-08-04
Institutions: Malta
Subjects: coastal region, energy site, exploitation of resources, hydrocarbon, management of resources








C_2011229EN.01001001.xml










4.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 229/10





Notice from the Government of Malta concerning Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 229/06
In accordance with Article 3(2)(a) of Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons, the Minister for Resources and Rural Affairs of Malta invites applications for the following areas/blocks in offshore Malta under either an exploration licence or an exploration and production licence:






(i)


area 1










(ii)


blocks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 of area 3










(iii)


blocks 1, 2 and 3 of area 4










(iv)


area 5










(v)


area 6




The following areas/blocks are already under an authorisation and are not available until further notification:






(i)


area 2










(ii)


blocks 4, 5, 6 and 7 of area 4










(iii)


area 7




Applications should be clearly marked ‘2011 Malta Offshore Licensing Round’ and should be sent in a sealed envelope addressed to the Chief Executive Officer, Malta Resources Authority, Millennia 2nd Floor, Aldo Moro Road, Marsa MRS 9065, Malta. Applications must be received by not later than noon local time of 1 December 2011. The receipt of an application will not create an obligation on the part of the Government of Malta to grant an authorisation in respect of part or all of the area that is the subject of the application.
Applicants shall provide the information requested in the form published in the Petroleum (Production) Regulations, 2001 (Legal Notice 320 of 2001, 1 December 2001).
The areas/blocks available for authorisation, as well as the areas/blocks already under an authorisation, are delimited by geographical coordinates that may be obtained, together with other information, by contacting the Chief Executive Officer, Malta Resources Authority at the abovementioned address or at ceo@mra.org.mt
It is notified that the Notice of 21 January 2005 (2005/C 62/06) from the Government of Malta concerning the abovementioned Directive and published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 12 March 2005 is hereby being repealed.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6290 — PORR/Teerag-Asdag)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2011-08-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, exchange of information, merger control, road building








C_2011229EN.01000702.xml










4.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 229/7





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6290 — PORR/Teerag-Asdag)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 229/03
On 20 July 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6290. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2011-08-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2011229EN.01000901.xml










4.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 229/9





Euro exchange rates (1)

3 August 2011
2011/C 229/05

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,4300




JPY


Japanese yen


110,18




DKK


Danish krone


7,4488




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87255




SEK


Swedish krona


9,0875




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1022




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,6820




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


24,291




HUF


Hungarian forint


272,38




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7093




PLN


Polish zloty


4,0280




RON


Romanian leu


4,2193




TRY


Turkish lira


2,4336




AUD


Australian dollar


1,3310




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3724




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


11,1506




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,6531




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,7274




KRW


South Korean won


1 515,17




ZAR


South African rand


9,6667




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


9,2008




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,4485




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 123,47




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,2442




PHP


Philippine peso


60,398




RUB


Russian rouble


39,7962




THB


Thai baht


42,557




BRL


Brazilian real


2,2330




MXN


Mexican peso


16,9026




INR


Indian rupee


63,3780






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6310 — FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation/Mitsubishi Corporation/FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies UK & USA) — Candidate case for simplified procedure  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2011-08-04
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, film production, merger control, motor vehicle industry, new technology, pharmaceutical industry, recording equipment








C_2011229EN.01001201.xml










4.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 229/12





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.6310 — FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation/Mitsubishi Corporation/FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies UK & USA)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 229/07






1.


On 28 July 2011, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertakings FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation (‘FH’, Japan) and Mitsubishi Corporation (‘MC’, Japan) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies UK Limited (‘FDBUK’, UK) and FUJIFILM Dyosynth Biotechnologies U.S.A., Inc. (‘FDBUS’, USA) hitherto under sole control of FH by way of purchase of shares.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


for FH: manufacturing and marketing of imaging, information and document, systems,










—


for MC: general trading activities in various industries, including energy, metals, machinery, chemicals, food and general merchandise,










—


for FDBUK and FDBUS: biologics contract manufacturing services.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the EC Merger Regulation (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.6310 — FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation/Mitsubishi Corporation/FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies UK & USA, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




J-70




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘EC Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32 (‘Notice on a simplified procedure’).
Case T-431/11: Action brought on 4 August 2011 — Iberdrola v Commission
Date: 2011-08-04
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: State aid, control of State aid, energy industry, shareholding, tax system








C_2011282EN.01004702.xml










24.9.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 282/47





Action brought on 4 August 2011 — Iberdrola v Commission
(Case T-431/11)
2011/C 282/87
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Iberdrola, SA (Bilbao, Spain) (represented by: J. Ruiz Calzado, M. Núñez-Müller and J. Domínguez Pérez, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul Article 1(1) of the decision;










—


in the alternative, annul Article 1(4) and (5) of the decision;










—


in the further alternative, annul Article 4 of the decision, or amend its scope as appropriate, and










—


order the Commission to pay all the costs arising from these proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments

This action has been brought against the Commission's Decision of 12 January 2011 in Case No C 45/2007 (ex NN 51/2007, ex CP 9/2007), on the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions implemented by Spain.
The pleas in law and main arguments are those raised in Case T-429/11 BBVA v Commission.