do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 637/2011 of 29 June 2011 approving a non-minor amendment to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Beaufort (PDO)]
Date: 2011-06-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: France, cheese, designation of origin, labelling, product designation








L_2011170EN.01003001.xml










30.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 170/30








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 637/2011
of 29 June 2011
         
approving a non-minor amendment to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Beaufort (PDO)]


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


By virtue of the first subparagraph of Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the Commission has examined France's application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Beaufort’ registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1107/96 (2).












(2)


Since the amendment in question is not minor within the meaning of Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (3), as required by the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of that Regulation. As no statement of objection within the meaning of Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the amendment should be approved,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendment to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 29 June 2011.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,
Dacian CIOLOŞ
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

(2)  
            OJ L 148, 21.6.1996, p. 1.

(3)  
            OJ C 302, 9.11.2010, p. 16.




ANNEX
Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.3.   Cheeses

FRANCE
Beaufort (PDO)
New national side of euro coins intended for circulation
Date: 2011-06-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Monaco, commemoration, euro, issuing of currency, technical specification








C_2011189EN.01002501.xml










29.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 189/25





New national side of euro coins intended for circulation
2011/C 189/07




National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Monaco

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), the Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the Community providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.
Issuing country: Monaco
Subject of commemoration: The wedding of Prince Albert and Charlene
Description of the design: The inner part of the coin shows, at the centre, the effigies of Prince Albert and Charlene. At the bottom, the name of the issuing country ‘MONACO’ and the year of issuance ‘2011’. The mint mark and the mint engravers mark appear before and after ‘MONACO 2011’, respectively.
The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.
Number of coins to be issued: 
Date of issue: 


(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).
Case C-532/10 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 June 2011 — adp Gauselmann GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Likelihood of confusion — Figurative mark Archer Maclean’s Mercury — Opposition by the proprietor of the national word mark Merkur)
Date: 2011-06-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2011311EN.01001402.xml










22.10.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 311/14





Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 June 2011 — adp Gauselmann GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
(Case C-532/10 P) (1)

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) - Likelihood of confusion - Figurative mark Archer Maclean’s Mercury - Opposition by the proprietor of the national word mark Merkur)
2011/C 311/21
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: adp Gauselmann GmbH (represented by: P. Koch Moreno, abogada)

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 September 2010 in Case T-106/09 adp Gauselmann v OHIM by which the General Court dismissed an action for annulment brought by the proprietor of the national word mark ‘Merkur’ for goods in Classes 6, 9, 28, 35, 37, 41 and 42 against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 12 January 2009 in Case R 1266/2007-1 dismissing the appeal against the Opposition Division’s decision, which rejected the opposition brought by the appellant against the registration of the figurative mark ‘Archer Maclean’s Mercury’ in respect of goods in Classes 9, 16 and 28 — Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Likelihood of confusion — Criteria for assessment

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


adp Gauselmann GmbH shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 38, 5.2.2011.
Publication pursuant to Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of credit institutions
Date: 2011-06-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Ireland, credit institution, liquidation








C_2011189EN.01002801.xml










29.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 189/28





Publication pursuant to Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reorganisation and winding-up of credit institutions
2011/C 189/09

The High Court of Ireland


IN THE MATTER OF IRISH LIFE AND PERMANENT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY (‘IL&P’) AND IN THE MATTER OF THE CREDIT INSTITUTIONS (STABILISATION) ACT 2010 (‘THE ACT’)

The High Court of Ireland did on 9 June 2011 make a direction order pursuant to Section 9 of the Act in the following terms:
Directing IL&P (being a credit institution licensed in Ireland) to take certain steps in connection with the preparation for the possible disposal of some or all of the business and assets of Irish Life Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of IL&P, either by way of initial public offering or private sale thereof.
The Court did declare inter alia that the direction order and each part of it is a reorganisation measure for the purposes of Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001.
Pursuant to Section 11 of the Act, an application may be made for the setting aside of the direction order on the conditions set out therein, to the High Court of Ireland, at the Four Courts, Inns Quay, Dublin 7, Ireland not later than five working days after the making of the direction order.
Pursuant to Section 64(2) of the Act, no appeal lies from the direction order to the Supreme Court without leave of the High Court.
Full copies of the order are available from the Central Office of the High Court by e-mail to listroomhighcourt@courts.ie
Latest publication of COM documents other than legislative proposals and legislative proposals adopted by the Commission OJ C 140, 11.5.2011
Date: 2011-06-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European Commission, directory, official document








C_2011189EN.01001201.xml










29.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 189/12





Latest publication of COM documents other than legislative proposals and legislative proposals adopted by the Commission
2011/C 189/04

OJ C 140 of 11.5.2011


History of previous publications:







 



OJ C 121 of 19.4.2011











 



OJ C 94 of 26.3.2011











 



OJ C 88 of 19.3.2011











 



OJ C 26 of 28.1.2011











 



OJ C 296 of 30.10.2010











 



OJ C 76 of 25.3.2010
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2011-06-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2011189EN.01001101.xml










29.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 189/11





Euro exchange rates (1)

28 June 2011
2011/C 189/03

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,4261




JPY


Japanese yen


115,31




DKK


Danish krone


7,4590




GBP


Pound sterling


0,89420




SEK


Swedish krona


9,2475




CHF


Swiss franc


1,1884




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,8020




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


24,398




HUF


Hungarian forint


269,73




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7097




PLN


Polish zloty


4,0132




RON


Romanian leu


4,2105




TRY


Turkish lira


2,3461




AUD


Australian dollar


1,3630




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4070




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


11,1042




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7762




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,7718




KRW


South Korean won


1 545,36




ZAR


South African rand


9,7863




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


9,2272




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,3793




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 305,45




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,3507




PHP


Philippine peso


62,098




RUB


Russian rouble


40,2485




THB


Thai baht


44,152




BRL


Brazilian real


2,2732




MXN


Mexican peso


16,9650




INR


Indian rupee


64,2320






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case F-125/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2011 — Schuerewegen v Parliament (Staff case — Officials — Measure removing the applicant from his place of work — Withdrawal of his staff card — Withdrawal of his rights of access to the IT network — Prior complaint — Sent by electronic means — Administration actually aware of it — Out of time — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2011-06-29
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Parliament, action for annulment, damages, health care, redemption








C_2011232EN.01004203.xml










6.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 232/42






Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 29 June 2011 — Schuerewegen v Parliament
(Case F-125/10) (1)

(Staff case - Officials - Measure removing the applicant from his place of work - Withdrawal of his staff card - Withdrawal of his rights of access to the IT network - Prior complaint - Sent by electronic means - Administration actually aware of it - Out of time - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2011/C 232/77)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Daniel Schuerewegen (Marienthal, Luxembourg) (represented by: P. Nelissen Grade and G. Leblanc, lawyers)

Defendant: Parliament (represented by: O. Caisou-Rousseau and E. Despotopoulou, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the appointing authority’s decision by which the applicant was removed from his place of work and his staff card withdrawn, and also of the measures taken as a result of that decision and a claim for damages

Operative part of the order

The Tribunal






1.


Dismisses the action as manifestly inadmissible;.










2.


Orders Mr Schuerewegen to pay all the costs.






(1)  OJ C 30 of 29/1/11, p. 68.
Case T-353/11: Action brought on 29 June 2011 — Event v OHIM — CBT Comunicación Multimedia (eventer EVENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS)
Date: 2011-06-29
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2011252EN.01004302.xml










27.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/43





Action brought on 29 June 2011 — Event v OHIM — CBT Comunicación Multimedia (eventer EVENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS)
(Case T-353/11)
2011/C 252/94
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Event Holding GmbH & Co. KG (Köln, Germany) (represented by: G. Schoenen and V. Töbelmann, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: CBT Comunicación Multimedia, SL (Getxo, Spain)

Form of order sought







—


Overturn the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 March 2011 in case R 939/2010-2;










—


Order the defendant to pay its own costs as well as the costs of the Applicant; and










—


Order the other party to the proceedings, if it becomes intervener before the Tribunal to bear its own costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘eventer EVENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS’, for goods and services in classes 9, 35, 41 and 42 — Community trade mark application No 6483606

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Mark or sign cited in opposition: German trade mark registration No 39 548 073.6 of the word mark ‘Event’, for services in classes 35, 36, 42 and 43

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal wrongly found that there were no grounds for a rejection of the Community trade mark application ‘eventer EVENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS’. Given the similarity of the trade marks, and the similarity of the services covered by both trade marks, there is a likelihood of confusion between the two trade marks.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 636/2011 of 29 June 2011 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Moules de bouchot de la Baie du Mont-Saint-Michel (PDO)]
Date: 2011-06-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: France, designation of origin, labelling, mollusc, product designation








L_2011170EN.01002801.xml










30.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 170/28








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 636/2011
of 29 June 2011
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Moules de bouchot de la Baie du Mont-Saint-Michel (PDO)]


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France's application to register the name ‘Moules de bouchot de la Baie du Mont-Saint-Michel’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 29 June 2011.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,
Dacian CIOLOŞ
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

(2)  
            OJ C 302, 9.11.2010, p. 11.




ANNEX
Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.7.   Fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans and products derived therefrom

FRANCE
Moules de bouchot de la Baie du Mont-Saint-Michel (PDO)
Case C-334/11 P: Appeal brought on 29 June 2011 by Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 14 April 2011 in Case T-466/08: Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Focus Magazin Verlag GmbH
Date: 2011-06-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, cosmetic product, trade-mark law








C_2011282EN.01000402.xml










24.9.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 282/4





Appeal brought on 29 June 2011 by Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 14 April 2011 in Case T-466/08: Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Focus Magazin Verlag GmbH
(Case C-334/11 P)
2011/C 282/08
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl, J. Pagenberg, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Focus Magazin Verlag GmbH

Form of order sought

The appellant requests the Court of Justice to decide as follows:






—


The judgment of the General Court of 14 April 2011 in Case T-466/08 an the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office of 29 July 2008 in Case R 1796/2007-1 are annulled.










—


The costs of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the Office, before the General Court and before this court shall be borne by the Office and by the Intervener.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The Appellant claims that the contested judgment must be annulled because the General Court violated Article 43 (2) and (3) CTMR and committed legal error in deciding that in the contested case the five-year period following registration within which the earlier German mark FOCUS on which the opposition against the CTM application for ACNO FOCUS was based must be put to genuine use did not begin to run until 13 January 2004.
The Appellant does not challenge the finding of likelihood of confusion. While the Appellant disagrees with the finding, the Appellant considers that the General Court did not commit any error of law.
Case C-326/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 29 June 2011 — J.J. Komen en Zonen Beheer Heerhugowaard B.V. v Staatssecretaris van Financiën
Date: 2011-06-29
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Netherlands, VAT, interpretation of the law, real property, tax exemption








C_2011269EN.01003001.xml










10.9.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 269/30





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 29 June 2011 — J.J. Komen en Zonen Beheer Heerhugowaard B.V. v Staatssecretaris van Financiën
(Case C-326/11)
2011/C 269/57
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: J.J. Komen en Zonen Beheer Heerhugowaard B.V.

Respondent: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Question referred

Must Article 13B(g), in conjunction with Article 4(3)(a), of the Sixth Directive (1) be interpreted as meaning that the supply of a building in respect of which, prior to its supply, the vendor had transformation work carried out with a view to the creation of a new building (refurbishment), work which was continued and completed by the purchaser after its supply, is not exempt from VAT?


(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 635/2011 of 29 June 2011 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Aceite Campo de Calatrava (PDO)]
Date: 2011-06-29
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Spain, designation of origin, labelling, olive oil, product designation








L_2011170EN.01002601.xml










30.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 170/26








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 635/2011
of 29 June 2011
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Aceite Campo de Calatrava (PDO)]


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof (1),

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Aceite Campo de Calatrava’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 29 June 2011.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,
Dacian CIOLOŞ
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

(2)  
            OJ C 287, 23.10.2010, p. 16.




ANNEX
Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.5.   Oils and fats (butter, margarine, oils, etc.)

SPAIN
Aceite Campo de Calatrava (PDO)