do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
2011/386/EU: European Council Decision of 24 June 2011 appointing the President of the European Central Bank
Date: 2011-06-24
Institutions: European Council
Subjects: European Central Bank, appointment of staff, president of an institution








L_2011173EN.01000801.xml










1.7.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 173/8








            EUROPEAN COUNCIL DECISION
         
of 24 June 2011
         
appointing the President of the European Central Bank
(2011/386/EU)


THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 283(2) thereof,


Having regard to the Protocol on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 11.2 thereof,


Having regard to the recommendation of the Council of the European Union (1),


Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),


Having regard to the opinion of the Governing Council of the European Central Bank (3),

Whereas:







(1)


The term of office of the President of the European Central Bank, Mr Jean-Claude TRICHET, appointed by Decision of 16 October 2003 (4), expires on 31 October 2011 and it is therefore necessary to appoint a new President of the European Central Bank.












(2)


The European Council wishes to appoint Mr Mario DRAGHI who, in its view, meets all the requirements set out in Article 283(2) of the Treaty,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Mr Mario DRAGHI is hereby appointed President of the European Central Bank for a term of office of 8 years as from 1 November 2011.


Article 2
This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.


Article 3
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 24 June 2011.


For the European Council


The President

H. VAN ROMPUY
            





(1)  
            OJ L 150, 9.6.2011, p. 8.

(2)  Opinion delivered on 23 June 2011 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(3)  
            OJ C 182, 23.6.2011, p. 6.

(4)  Decision taken by common accord, at the level of Heads of State or Government, by the Governments of the Member States having the euro as their currency of 16 October 2003 appointing the President of the European Central Bank (OJ L 277, 28.10.2003, p. 16).
Call for proposals under the work programme of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking
Date: 2011-06-24
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU programme, invitation to tender, nanotechnology, public-private partnership, research and development








C_2011183EN.01001801.xml










24.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 183/18





Call for proposals under the work programme of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking
2011/C 183/07
Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals under the work programme of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking.
Proposals are invited for the following call: ENIAC-2011-2.
Call documentation including deadline and budget is given in the call text, which is published on the following website:
http://www.eniac.eu/web/calls/eniacju_call5_2011.php
Case F-64/11: Action brought on 24 June 2011 — ZZ v European Commission
Date: 2011-06-24
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: appeal, indemnification, job vacancy








C_2011252EN.01005701.xml










27.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/57





Action brought on 24 June 2011 — ZZ v European Commission
(Case F-64/11)
2011/C 252/126
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Crosby and S. Santoro, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

The subject matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the decision of the defendant to revoke unilaterally the offer of employment made to the applicant, despite the fact that the applicant had already accepted the offer.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the Decision of 4 March 2011 whereby the European Commission rejected the internal complaint lodged by the Applicant against the Commission decision HR B2 (2010) 662634 of 5 October 2010;










—


pay a compensation for the damages suffered by the Applicant, including salaries and benefits foregone;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs of this action.
Case T-336/11: Action brought on 24 June 2011 — Italiana Calzature v OHIM — Vicini (Giuseppe GIUSEPPE ZANOTTI DESIGN)
Date: 2011-06-24
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2011252EN.01003801.xml










27.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/38





Action brought on 24 June 2011 — Italiana Calzature v OHIM — Vicini (Giuseppe GIUSEPPE ZANOTTI DESIGN)
(Case T-336/11)
2011/C 252/85
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Società Italiana Calzature SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: A. Rapisardi and C. Ginevra, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Vicini SpA (San Mauro Pascoli, Italy)

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of 8 April 2011 in Case No R 0634/2010-2 and, accordingly, uphold the decision of the Opposition Division of 5 March 2010 relating to Opposition No 1350711.










—


Order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: VICINI SpA

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark containing the word element ‘GIUSEPPE’ (application for registration No 6.513.386), for goods and services in Classes 18 and 25

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community word mark ‘ZANOTTI’ (No 244.277), for goods and services in Class 25, and Italian figurative mark containing the word element ‘Zanotti’, for goods in Classes 18 and 25

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld in part

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Opposition rejected in its entirety

Pleas in law: Misinterpretation and misapplication of Article 8(2)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark.