do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-323/11: Action brought on 22 June 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Denmark
Date: 2011-06-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Denmark, hydrology, infringement of EU law, inland waters, national implementing measure








C_2011282EN.01000302.xml










24.9.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 282/3





Action brought on 22 June 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Denmark
(Case C-323/11)
2011/C 282/05
Language of the case: Danish

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: I. Hadjiyiannis and U. Nielsen, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Kingdom of Denmark

Form of order sought







—


declare that, by failing to publish the final river basin management plans by 22 December 2009 and by failing to send the Commission copies thereof by 22 March 2010 and, in any event, by failing to inform the Commission thereof, the Kingdom of Denmark has failed to fulfil its obligations under Directive 2000/60/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy;










—


order the Kingdom of Denmark to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

Article 13(1), (2) and (6) of the Directive provides that the Member States were to adopt the laws and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the Directive by 22 December 2009 and to send the Commission copies thereof by 22 March 2010.
Since the Commission is not in possession of any information which enables it to establish that the necessary provisions have been adopted, the Commission must proceed on the assumption that Denmark has not yet adopted those provisions and has therefore failed to fulfil its obligations under the Directive.


(1)  OJ 2000 L 327, p. 1, 22.12.2000.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 610/2011 of 22 June 2011 on the allocation of import rights for applications lodged for the period 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 under the tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 431/2008 for frozen meat of bovine animals
Date: 2011-06-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: beef, frozen product, import (EU), import licence, tariff quota








L_2011163EN.01002301.xml










23.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 163/23








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 610/2011
of 22 June 2011
         
on the allocation of import rights for applications lodged for the period 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 under the tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 431/2008 for frozen meat of bovine animals


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),


Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 of 31 August 2006 laying down common rules for the administration of import tariff quotas for agricultural products managed by a system of import licences (2), and in particular Article 7(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Commission Regulation (EC) No 431/2008 of 19 May 2008 opening and providing for the administration of an import tariff quota for frozen meat of bovine animals covered by CN code 0202  and products covered by CN code 0206 29 91  (3) opens an import tariff quota for beef and veal products.












(2)


The applications for import rights lodged for the period 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 relate to quantities exceeding those available. The extent to which import rights may be allocated should therefore be determined and an allocation coefficient laid down to be applied to the quantities applied for,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The quantities for which import right applications covered by the quota with the serial number 09.4003 have been lodged for the period 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 under Regulation (EC) No 431/2008 shall be multiplied by an allocation coefficient of 28,953811 %.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 23 June 2011.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 22 June 2011.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ
            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development






(1)  
            OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

(3)  
            OJ L 130, 20.5.2008, p. 3.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 607/2011 of 22 June 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2011-06-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, agricultural product, import price








L_2011163EN.01001801.xml










23.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 163/18








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 607/2011
of 22 June 2011
         
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1) ,


Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors (2) , and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex hereto.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 23 June 2011.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 22 June 2011.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,
José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ
            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development






(1)  
            OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1





ANNEX
Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables







(EUR/100 kg)




CN code


Third country code (1)



Standard import value




0702 00 00 


MA 


57,8 




MK 


54,8 




TR 


55,0 




ZZ 


55,9 




0707 00 05 


TR 


95,0 




ZZ 


95,0 




0709 90 70 


TR 


117,7 




ZZ 


117,7 




0805 50 10 


AR 


75,4 




BR 


40,6 




TR 


65,0 




UY 


65,6 




ZA 


85,9 




ZZ 


66,5 




0808 10 80 


AR 


123,2 




BR 


76,1 




CL 


90,5 




CN 


95,4 




NZ 


142,3 




UY 


58,7 




ZA 


93,4 




ZZ 


97,1 




0809 10 00 


TR 


283,9 




ZZ 


283,9 




0809 20 95 


TR 


366,8 




XS 


382,4 




ZZ 


374,6 






(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
            ZZ
            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.
Case C-316/11 P: Appeal brought on 22 June 2011 by Longevity Health Products, Inc. against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 15/04/2011 in Case T-96/11: Longevity Health Products, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Date: 2011-06-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2011269EN.01002801.xml










10.9.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 269/28





Appeal brought on 22 June 2011 by Longevity Health Products, Inc. against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 15/04/2011 in Case T-96/11: Longevity Health Products, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
(Case C-316/11 P)
2011/C 269/52
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Longevity Health Products, Inc. (represented by: J. Korab, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Admit the complaint filed by the company Longevity Health Products, Inc.;










—


Annul the decision of the General Court of April 15, 2011, T-96/11;










—


Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant submits that the contested order should be annulled on the following grounds:






—


The reasoning of the General Court is defective;










—


The General Court did not consider the arguments advanced by the holder of the trade mark.
Case F-33/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 22 June 2011 — Lebedef v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Appraisal for the year 2005 — Career development report — General provisions implementing Article 43 of the Staff Regulations — Report drawn up following the judgment in Case F-36/07 — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2011-06-22
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Commission, European official, action for annulment (EU), professional career, report








C_2011232EN.01004201.xml










6.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 232/42






Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 22 June 2011 — Lebedef v Commission
(Case F-33/10) (1)

(Staff case - Officials - Appraisal for the year 2005 - Career development report - General provisions implementing Article 43 of the Staff Regulations - Report drawn up following the judgment in Case F-36/07 - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2011/C 232/75)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Giorgio Lebedef (Senningerberg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and G. Berscheid, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the applicant’s career development report for the period from 1 January 2005 till 31 December 2005, as drawn up following its annulment by the Civil Service Tribunal in its judgment in Case F-36/07.

Operative part of the order

The Tribunal






1.


Dismisses the action as manifestly inadmissible;










2.


Orders Mr Lebedef to pay all the costs.






(1)  OJ C 209, 31.7.2010, p. 53.
Case C-56/10 P: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 June 2011 — Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Figurative marks 100 and 300 — Refusal of registration — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) — Distinctive character — Descriptive character — Article 38(2) — Disclaimer of any exclusive right to a non-distinctive element of a trade mark applied for)
Date: 2011-06-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, book trade, newspaper, press, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2011340EN.01000501.xml










19.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 340/5





Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 June 2011 — Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
(Case C-56/10 P) (1)

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Figurative marks 100 and 300 - Refusal of registration - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) - Distinctive character - Descriptive character - Article 38(2) - Disclaimer of any exclusive right to a non-distinctive element of a trade mark applied for)
2011/C 340/08
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Appellant: Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. (represented by: D. Rzążwska radca prawny)

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 19 November 2009 in Joined Cases T-425/07 and T-426/07 Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v OHIM, by which that Court dismissed two actions brought against the decisions of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 September 2007 (Cases R 1274/2006-4 and R 1275/2006-4), concerning the applications for registration of the word marks 100 and 300 as Community trade marks — Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c), and Article 38(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1), as replaced by Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1) — Descriptive character of marks composed exclusively of figures.

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed,










2.


Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 113, 1.05.2010.
Joined Cases C-54/10 P and C-55/10 P: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 June 2011 — Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. zoo v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Refusal to register signs 350 , 250 , 150 , 222 , 333 and 555 as trade marks for periodicals, books and game booklets — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 7(1)(c) — Descriptive character — Obligation on OHIM to take account of its earlier decision-making practice)
Date: 2011-06-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, publishing, registered trade mark, serial publication, trade-mark law








C_2011340EN.01000402.xml










19.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 340/4





Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 June 2011 — Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. zoo v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
(Joined Cases C-54/10 P and C-55/10 P) (1)

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Refusal to register signs ‘350’, ‘250’, ‘150’, ‘222’, ‘333’ and ‘555’ as trade marks for periodicals, books and game booklets - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 7(1)(c) - Descriptive character - Obligation on OHIM to take account of its earlier decision-making practice)
2011/C 340/07
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Appellant: Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. (represented by: D. Rzążewska, radca prawny)

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 19 November 2009 in Joined Cases T-64/07 to T-66/07 Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol v OHIM, by which that Court dismissed the three actions brought against the decisions of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 December 2006 (Cases R 1033/2006-4, R 1034/2006-4 and R 1035/2006-4) concerning applications for registration of the word marks 150, 250 and 350 as Community trade marks — Breach of Articles 7(1)(c) and 76 of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1), as replaced by Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1) — Descriptive character of marks composed exclusively of figures.

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeals are dismissed.










2.


Agencja Wydawnicza Technopol sp. z o.o. is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2011-06-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2011181EN.01003401.xml










22.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 181/34





Euro exchange rates (1)

21 June 2011
2011/C 181/04

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,4373




JPY


Japanese yen


115,20




DKK


Danish krone


7,4587




GBP


Pound sterling


0,88670




SEK


Swedish krona


9,1564




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2127




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,9120




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


24,213




HUF


Hungarian forint


266,93




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7088




PLN


Polish zloty


3,9762




RON


Romanian leu


4,2355




TRY


Turkish lira


2,3090




AUD


Australian dollar


1,3568




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4023




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


11,1957




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7694




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,7731




KRW


South Korean won


1 550,02




ZAR


South African rand


9,7082




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


9,2926




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,3833




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 361,23




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,3586




PHP


Philippine peso


62,568




RUB


Russian rouble


40,1950




THB


Thai baht


43,881




BRL


Brazilian real


2,2870




MXN


Mexican peso


17,0106




INR


Indian rupee


64,4590






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-409/09: Order of the General Court of 22 June 2011 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Public service contracts — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Annulment of the decision by a judgment of the General Court — Limitation period — Time-limits on account of distance — Action in part inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded in law)
Date: 2011-06-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: award of contract, indemnification, information technology industry, invitation to tender, provision of services








C_2011238EN.01001603.xml










13.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 238/16





Order of the General Court of 22 June 2011 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission
(Case T-409/09) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Public service contracts - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Annulment of the decision by a judgment of the General Court - Limitation period - Time-limits on account of distance - Action in part inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded in law)
2011/C 238/26
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and M. Dermitzakis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Wilderspin and E. Manhaeve, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action for damages for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the decision of the Commission of 15 September 2004 rejecting its bid and awarding the contract to another tenderer in the course of the tendering procedure for the provision of computer and related services linked to the information systems of the Directorate-General for Fisheries.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 11, 16.1.2010.
Case T-76/09: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2011 — Mundipharma v OHIM — Asociación Farmaceuticos Mundi (FARMA MUNDI FARMACEUTICOS MUNDI) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark ‘FARMA MUNDI FARMACEUTICOS MUNDI’ — Earlier Community figurative ‘markmundipharma’ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
Date: 2011-06-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), medicinal product, pharmaceutical industry, trade-mark law








C_2011226EN.01002601.xml










30.7.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 226/26





Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2011 — Mundipharma v OHIM — Asociación Farmaceuticos Mundi (FARMA MUNDI FARMACEUTICOS MUNDI)
(Case T-76/09) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark ‘FARMA MUNDI FARMACEUTICOS MUNDI’ - Earlier Community figurative ‘markmundipharma’ - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2011/C 226/52
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Mundipharma GmbH (Limburg an der Lahn (Germany)) (represented by: F. Nielsen, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: W. Verburg, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Asociación Farmaceuticos Mundi (Alfafar, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 December 2008 (Case R 825/2008-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Mundipharma GmbH and Asociación Farmaceuticos Mundi.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Mundipharma GmbH to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 102, 1.5.2009.
Case C-161/11: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Trani (Italy)) — Vino Cosimo Damiano v Poste Italiane SpA (Articles 92(1), 103(1) and 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Social policy — Fixed-term employment contracts — Public sector — First or only contract — Derogation from the obligation to state objective reasons — Non-discrimination principle — Lack of connection to European Union law — Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
Date: 2011-06-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, temporary employment, type of business








C_2011269EN.01001802.xml










10.9.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 269/18





Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Trani (Italy)) — Vino Cosimo Damiano v Poste Italiane SpA
(Case C-161/11) (1)

(Articles 92(1), 103(1) and 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Social policy - Fixed-term employment contracts - Public sector - First or only contract - Derogation from the obligation to state objective reasons - Non-discrimination principle - Lack of connection to European Union law - Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
2011/C 269/31
Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale di Trani

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Vino Cosimo Damiano

Defendant: Poste Italiane SpA

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale di Trani — Interpretation of the general European Union principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination and of Articles 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Scope of those principles — Compatibility of national legislation validating in the national legal system a clause not specifying the reason for employment on a fixed-term basis for recruitment of workers at the SpA Poste Italiane

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly has no jurisdiction to answer the first question referred for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunale di Trani (Italy) by decision of 7 February 2011.


(1)  OJ C 173, 11.6.2011.