do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case F-46/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 22 June 2011 — AD v Commission (No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2011-06-22
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, family benefit, marriage








C_2012138EN.01002901.xml










12.5.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/29






Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 22 June 2011 — AD v Commission
(Case F-46/10) (1)

(No need to adjudicate)
(2012/C 138/61)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: AD (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: E. Boigelot, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision not to grant the applicant the household allowance on the ground that the applicant and his partner have access to legal marriage in a Member State

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no need to adjudicate on the application.










2.


The European Commission is ordered to pay all the costs.






(1)  OJ C 246, 11/09/2010, p. 41.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 609/2011 of 22 June 2011 withdrawing the suspension of submission of applications for import licences for sugar products under certain tariff quotas
Date: 2011-06-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: import (EU), import licence, sugar, tariff quota








L_2011163EN.01002201.xml










23.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 163/22








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 609/2011
of 22 June 2011
         
withdrawing the suspension of submission of applications for import licences for sugar products under certain tariff quotas


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (‘Single CMO’ Regulation) (1),


Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 891/2009 of 25 September 2009 opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas in the sugar sector (2), and in particular Article 5(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Submission of applications for import licences concerning order number 09.4318 were suspended as from 20 January 2011 by Commission Regulation (EU) No 42/2011 of 19 January 2011 suspending submission of applications for import licences for sugar products under certain tariff quotas (3), in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 891/2009.












(2)


Following notifications on unused and/or partly used licences, quantities became available again for that order number. The suspension of applications should therefore be withdrawn,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The suspension laid down by Regulation (EU) No 42/2011 of submission of applications for import licences for order number 09.4318 as from 20 January 2011 is withdrawn.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 22 June 2011.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ
            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development






(1)  
            OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 254, 26.9.2009, p. 82.

(3)  
            OJ L 15, 20.1.2011, p. 10.
Case C-151/11: Order of the President of the Court of 22 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany)) — Condor Flugdienst GmbH v Jürgen Dörschel
Date: 2011-06-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: aircraft, indemnification, traveller








C_2011340EN.01001403.xml










19.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 340/14





Order of the President of the Court of 22 June 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main (Germany)) — Condor Flugdienst GmbH v Jürgen Dörschel
(Case C-151/11) (1)

2011/C 340/26
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 204, 9.7.2011.
Case C-521/10 P: Order of the Court of 22 June 2011 — Grúas Abril Asistencia, SL v European Commission (Appeal — Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure — Alleged infringements of the provisions of European Union law relating to competition — Application seeking to require the Commission to initiate proceedings against a Member State for failure to fulfil obligations)
Date: 2011-06-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, competition law, infringement of EU law








C_2011340EN.01000502.xml










19.11.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 340/5





Order of the Court of 22 June 2011 — Grúas Abril Asistencia, SL v European Commission
(Case C-521/10 P) (1)

(Appeal - Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure - Alleged infringements of the provisions of European Union law relating to competition - Application seeking to require the Commission to initiate proceedings against a Member State for failure to fulfil obligations)
2011/C 340/09
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Appellant: Grúas Abril Asistencia, SL (represented by: R. García García, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Castillo de la Torre and F. Castilla Contreras, Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 August 2010 in Case T-386/09 Grúas Abril Asistencia v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed an action seeking annulment of the Commission’s letter of 7 August 2009 informing the then applicant that the facts in respect of which it had lodged a complaint with the Commission did not permit the conclusion that there had been an infringement of Articles 81 EC, 82 EC and 86 EC and that no action would be taken in respect of its complaint.

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Grúas Abril Asistencia, SL is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 30, 29.01.2011.