do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case F-99/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 16 June 2011 — Ashbrook and Others v Commission (Staff cases — Annual adjustment of the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2011-06-16
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment, indemnification, pay








C_2011252EN.01005502.xml










27.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/55





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 16 June 2011 — Ashbrook and Others v Commission
(Case F-99/10) (1)

(Staff cases - Annual adjustment of the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants - No need to adjudicate)
2011/C 252/121
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Michael Ashbrook (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) and Others (represented by: B. Cortese, C. Cortese and F. Spitaleri)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and G. Berscheid, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the defendant’s decisions, reproduced in the applicants’ pay slips, to limit the adjustment of their salaries, with effect from July 2009, to an increase of 1,85 % in the context of the annual adjustment of the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants on the basis of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1296/2009 of 23 December 2009, and claim for compensation.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no need to adjudicate on Case F-99/10 Ashbrook and Others v Commission.










2.


Each party is ordered to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 13, 15.01.2011, p. 42.
Council Implementing Decision 2011/345/CFSP of 16 June 2011 implementing Decision 2011/137/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya
Date: 2011-06-16
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Libya, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








L_2011159EN.01009301.xml










17.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 159/93








            COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION 2011/345/CFSP
of 16 June 2011
         
implementing Decision 2011/137/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision 2011/137/CFSP of 28 February 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya (1), and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,

Whereas:

In view of the developments in Libya, the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex IV to Decision 2011/137/CFSP should be amended,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The entry for the person set out in the Annex to this Decision shall be deleted from the list set out in Annex IV to Decision 2011/137/CFSP.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 16 June 2011.


For the Council


The President


               MARTONYI J.





(1)  
            OJ L 58, 3.3.2011, p. 53.




ANNEX

Person referred to in Article 1









14.


ZARTI, Mustafa.
Case T-196/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Edison v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the infringement — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)
Date: 2011-06-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), chemical industry, chemical salt, control of restrictive practices, exchange of information, fine, oxide, price agreement








C_2011226EN.01002202.xml










30.7.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 226/22





Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Edison v Commission
(Case T-196/06) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Imputability of the infringement - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)
2011/C 226/43
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Edison S.p.A. (Milan, Italy) (represented by: M. Siragusa, R. Casati, M. Beretta, P. Merlino and E. Bruti Liberati, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by V. Di Bucci and F. Amato, and subsequently by V. Di Bucci and V. Bottka, Agents)

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 1766 final of 3 May 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F/38.620 — Hydrogen peroxide and perborate), in so far as it concerns the applicant and, in the alternative, a reduction of the fine.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Commission Decision C(2006) 1766 final of 3 May 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F/38.620 — Hydrogen peroxide and perborate), in so far as it concerns Edison SpA.;










2.


Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 212, 2.9.2006.
Case T-211/08: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Putters International v Commission (Competition — Cartels — International removal services market in Belgium — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing — Market-sharing — Bid rigging — Single and continuous infringement — Fines — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Gravity — Duration)
Date: 2011-06-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), fine, fixing of prices, invitation to tender, market-sharing agreement, provision of services, restriction on competition








C_2011226EN.01002502.xml










30.7.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 226/25





Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Putters International v Commission
(Case T-211/08) (1)

(Competition - Cartels - International removal services market in Belgium - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Price-fixing - Market-sharing - Bid rigging - Single and continuous infringement - Fines - 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Gravity - Duration)
2011/C 226/51
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: Putters International NV (Cargovil, Belgium) (represented by: K. Platteau, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, Agents)

Re:

Application for the partial annulment of Commission decision C(2008) 926 final of 11 March 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.543 — International Removal Services), and, in the alternative, the annulment or reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Putters International NV to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 197, 2.8.2008.
Case T-240/07: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Heineken Nederland and Heineken v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands beer market — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Proof of the infringement — Access to the file — Fines — Principle of equal treatment — Reasonable period)
Date: 2011-06-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: action for annulment (EU), beer, beverage industry, competition law, fine, unlawful agreement








C_2011226EN.01002302.xml










30.7.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 226/23





Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Heineken Nederland and Heineken v Commission
(Case T-240/07) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Netherlands beer market - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Proof of the infringement - Access to the file - Fines - Principle of equal treatment - Reasonable period)
2011/C 226/46
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicants: Heineken Nederland BV (Zoeterwoude, Netherlands) and Heineken NV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: T. Ottervanger and M. de Jong, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by A. Bouquet, S. Noë and A Nijenhuis, and subsequently by A. Bouquet and S. Noë, acting as Agents, and M. Slotboom, lawyer)

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2007) 1697 of 18 April 2007 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/B/37.766 — Netherlands beer market) and, in the alternative, for reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Article 1 of Commission Decision C(2007) 1697 of 18 April 2007 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/B/37.766) in so far as the European Commission found in it that Heineken NV and Heineken Nederland BV had participated in an infringement consisting in the occasional coordination of commercial conditions, other than prices, offered to individual customers in the on-trade segment in the Netherlands;










2.


Sets the amount of the fine imposed on Heineken and Heineken Nederland in Article 3(a) of Decision C(2007) 1697 at EUR 197 985 937,5;










3.


Dismisses the remainder of the action;










4.


Orders Heineken and Heineken Nederland to pay two-thirds of their own costs and of those of the European Commission;










5.


Orders the Commission to pay one third of its own costs and of those of Heineken and Heineken Nederland.






(1)  OJ C 211, 8.9.2007.
Case T-210/08: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Verhuizingen Coppens v Commission (Competition — Cartels — International removal services market in Belgium — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price-fixing — Market-sharing — Bid-rigging — Single and continuous infringement — Burden of proof)
Date: 2011-06-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), fine, fixing of prices, invitation to tender, market-sharing agreement, provision of services, restriction on competition








C_2011226EN.01002501.xml










30.7.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 226/25





Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Verhuizingen Coppens v Commission
(Case T-210/08) (1)

(Competition - Cartels - International removal services market in Belgium - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Price-fixing - Market-sharing - Bid-rigging - Single and continuous infringement - Burden of proof)
2011/C 226/50
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: Verhuizingen Coppens NV (Bierbeek, Belgium) (represented by: J. Stuyck and I. Buelens, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet and S. Noë, Agents)

Re:

Application for the annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 926 final of 11 March 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.543 — International Removal Services), and, in the alternative, the annulment or reduction of the fine imposed on the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Article 1(i) and Article 2(k) of Commission Decision C(2008) 926 final of 11 March 2008 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38.543 — International Removal Services);










2.


Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 197, 2.8.2008.
Case F-92/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 16 June 2011 — Dricot-Daniele and Others v Commission (Staff cases — Annual adjustment of the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2011-06-16
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment, indemnification, pay








C_2011252EN.01005403.xml










27.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/54





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 16 June 2011 — Dricot-Daniele and Others v Commission
(Case F-92/10) (1)

(Staff cases - Annual adjustment of the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants - No need to adjudicate)
2011/C 252/119
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Luiga Dricot-Daniele (Overijse, Belgium) and Others (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J Currall and G. Berscheid, Agents)

Re:

Annulment of the applicants’ correcting pay slips for the period from July to December 2009 and the pay slips issued after 1 January 2010 in the context of the annual adjustment of remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants on the basis of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1296/2009 of 23 December 2009.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no need to adjudicate on Case F-92/10 Dricot-Daniele and Others v Commission.










2.


Each party is ordered to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 13, 15.01.2011, p. 40.
Case F-87/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 16 June 2011 — Adriaens and Others v Commission (Staff cases — Annual adjustment of the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2011-06-16
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment, indemnification, pay








C_2011252EN.01005402.xml










27.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/54





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 16 June 2011 — Adriaens and Others v Commission
(Case F-87/10) (1)

(Staff cases - Annual adjustment of the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants - No need to adjudicate)
2011/C 252/118
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Stéphane Adriaens (Evere, Belgium) and Others (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid and D. Martin, Agents)

Re:

Application to annul the defendant’s decision, contained in the applicants’ pay slips, to limit their salary adjustment, with effect from July 2009, to an increase of 1.85 % in the context of the annual adjustment of remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants on the basis of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1296/2009 of 23 December 2009.

Operative part of the order







1.


There is no need to adjudicate on Case F-87/10 Adriaens and Others v Commission.










2.


Each party is ordered to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 13, 15.01.2011, p. 40.
Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 573/2011 of 16 June 2011 implementing Article 16(2) of Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya
Date: 2011-06-16
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Libya, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








L_2011159EN.01000501.xml










17.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 159/5








            COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 573/2011
of 16 June 2011
         
implementing Article 16(2) of Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 of 2 March 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya (1), and in particular Article 16(2) thereof,

Whereas:

In view of the developments in Libya, the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 should be amended,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The entry for the person set out in the Annex to this Regulation shall be deleted from the list set out in Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 204/2011.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 June 2011.


For the Council


The President


               MARTONYI J.





(1)  
            OJ L 58, 3.3.2011, p. 1.




ANNEX

Person referred to in Article 1









14.


ZARTI, Mustafa
Composition of the EFTA Court
Date: 2011-06-16
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: EFTA Court, appointment of staff








C_2011176EN.01001001.xml










16.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 176/10





COMPOSITION OF THE EFTA COURT
2011/C 176/07
Upon nomination by the Government of Norway, Mr Per Christiansen was appointed as Judge of the EFTA Court by common accord of the three Contracting Parties to the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice (the Surveillance and Court Agreement) for the period from 17 January 2011 to 16 January 2017, to succeed Mr Henrik Bull. At a public sitting of the EFTA Court on 13 January 2011, Mr Per Christiansen took the oath prescribed in Protocol 5, Article 2 of the Surveillance and Court Agreement.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 578/2011 of 16 June 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2011-06-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, agricultural product, import price








L_2011159EN.01008601.xml










17.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 159/86








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 578/2011
of 16 June 2011
         
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),


Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 June 2011.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 16 June 2011.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ
            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development






(1)  
            OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.




ANNEX
Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables







(EUR/100 kg)




CN code


Third country code (1)



Standard import value




0702 00 00 


MK 


31,8 




TR 


54,0 




ZZ 


42,9 




0707 00 05 


TR 


97,3 




ZZ 


97,3 




0709 90 70 


TR 


115,7 




ZZ 


115,7 




0805 50 10 


AR 


78,8 




BR 


40,6 




CL 


79,9 




TR 


76,6 




ZA 


78,8 




ZZ 


70,9 




0808 10 80 


AR 


108,0 




BR 


77,2 




CL 


89,5 




CN 


84,6 




NZ 


106,4 




US 


178,7 




UY 


55,4 




ZA 


90,6 




ZZ 


98,8 




0809 10 00 


TR 


158,2 




ZZ 


158,2 




0809 20 95 


TR 


383,4 




XS 


175,4 




ZZ 


279,4 






(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
            ZZ
            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.
Case T-185/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Air liquide v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the infringement — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)
Date: 2011-06-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), chemical industry, chemical salt, control of restrictive practices, exchange of information, oxide, price agreement








C_2011226EN.01002001.xml










30.7.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 226/20





Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2011 — Air liquide v Commission
(Case T-185/06) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Imputability of the infringement - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based)
2011/C 226/37
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Air liquide, société anonyme pour l’étude et l’exploitation des procédés Georges Claude (Paris, France) (represented by: R. Saint-Esteben, M. Pittie and P. Honoré, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by F. Arbault and O. Beynet, and subsequently by V. Bottka, P. Van Nuffel and B. Gencarelli, Agents)

Re:

Application for partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 1766 final of 3 May 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F/38.620 — Hydrogen peroxide and perborate), in so far as it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls Commission Decision C(2006) 1766 final of 3 May 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/F/38.620 — Hydrogen peroxide and perborate), in so far as it concerns L’Air liquide, SA pour l’étude et l’exploitation des procédés Georges Claude;










2.


Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 212, 2.9.2006.