do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-299/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 15 June 2011 — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Gemeente Vlaardingen
Date: 2011-06-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Netherlands, VAT, interpretation of the law, real property, tax exemption








C_2011269EN.01002601.xml










10.9.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 269/26





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 15 June 2011 — Staatssecretaris van Financiën v Gemeente Vlaardingen
(Case C-299/11)
2011/C 269/48
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Defendant: Gemeente Vlaardingen

Question referred

Must Article 5(7)(a) of the Sixth Directive, (1) read in conjunction with Article 5(5) and Article 11(A)(1)(b) of the Sixth Directive, be interpreted as meaning that, upon the occupation of immovable property by a taxable person for exempt purposes, a Member State may charge VAT in a case where:






—


that immovable property consists of a (building) work completed on the taxable person’s own land and to his own order by a third person for consideration, and










—


that land was previously used by the taxable person for (the same) exempt business purposes, and the taxable person did not previously enjoy a VAT deduction in respect of that same land,




with the result that (the value of that) same land becomes included in the VAT charge?


(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6104 — Safran/SNPE Matériaux Energétiques/Regulus)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2011-06-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: aerospace industry, economic concentration, exchange of information, merger control








C_2011174EN.01000501.xml










15.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 174/5





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6104 — Safran/SNPE Matériaux Energétiques/Regulus)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 174/03
On 30 March 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6104. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (Codification)’ COM(2011) 189 final — 2011/0080 (COD)
Date: 2011-06-15
Institutions: European Economic and Social Committee
Subjects: environmental protection, industrial project, private sector, project evaluation, public sector








C_2011248EN.01015401.xml










25.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 248/154





Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (Codification)’
COM(2011) 189 final — 2011/0080 (COD)
2011/C 248/28
On 10 May 2011 the European Parliament and on 3 May 2011 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 192, paragraph 1 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, on the

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (Codification)

COM(2011)189 final — 2011/0080 COD.
Since the Committee endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CES 23/81 fin, adopted on 29 April 1981 (1), it decided, at its 472nd plenary session of 15 and 16 June 2011 (meeting of 15 June 2011), by 154 votes to 2 with 10 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text and to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.

Brussels, 15 June 2011.


The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Staffan NILSSON




(1)  EESC opinion on the proposal for a Council Directive concerning the assessment of the environmental effects of certain public and private projects, OJ C 185, p. 8 of 27 July 1981.
Case T-229/10: Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2011 — Graf-Syteco v OHIM — Teco Electric & Machinery (SYTECO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark SYTECO — Earlier figurative national and Benelux marks TECO — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Partial refusal to register)
Date: 2011-06-15
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, registered trade mark, trade-mark law








C_2011219EN.01001502.xml










23.7.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 219/15





Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2011 — Graf-Syteco v OHIM — Teco Electric & Machinery (SYTECO)
(Case T-229/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark SYTECO - Earlier figurative national and Benelux marks TECO - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity between the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Partial refusal to register)
2011/C 219/20
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: Graf-Syteco GmbH & Co. KG (Tuningen, Germany) (represented by: T. Kieser, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Teco Electric & Machinery Co. Ltd (Taipei, Taiwan)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 February 2010 (Case R 230/2009-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Teco Electric & Machinery Co. Ltd and Graf-Syteco GmbH & Co. KG

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Graf-Syteco GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.
Case C-20/11: Order of the President of the Court of 15 June 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Poland
Date: 2011-06-15
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Poland, flood, national implementing measure, natural hazard








C_2011269EN.01003901.xml










10.9.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 269/39





Order of the President of the Court of 15 June 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Poland
(Case C-20/11) (1)

2011/C 269/82
Language of the case: Polish
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 80, 12.3.2011.
Case F-17/05 REV: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 15 June 2011 — de Brito Sequeira Carvalho v Commission (Civil service — Application for revision of a judgment — No new facts — Application inadmissible)
Date: 2011-06-15
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: United Kingdom, bonus payment, equal pay, gender equality, interpretation of the law, part-time employment, seniority, wage determination








C_2011252EN.01004701.xml










27.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/47





Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 15 June 2011 — de Brito Sequeira Carvalho v Commission
(Case F-17/05 REV)
(Civil service - Application for revision of a judgment - No new facts - Application inadmissible)
2011/C 252/98
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: José Antonio de Brito Sequeira Carvalho (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: N. Kanyonga Mulumba and M. Boury, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin, Agent)

Re:

Action by the applicant for revision of a judgment delivered by the Third Chamber of the Civil Service Tribunal on 13 December 2006 in Case F-17/05

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:






1.


Dismisses the application as inadmissible;










2.


Orders Mr. de Brito Sequeira Carvalho to pay all the costs.
Commission Decision of 15 June 2011 appointing members and alternates of the Paediatric Committee to represent health professionals and patient associations  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2011-06-15
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: European Medicines Agency, appointment of members, nursing staff








C_2011176EN.01000201.xml










16.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 176/2





COMMISSION DECISION
of 15 June 2011
appointing members and alternates of the Paediatric Committee to represent health professionals and patient associations
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 176/02
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on medicinal products for paediatric use and amending Regulation (EEC) No 1768/92, Directive 2001/20/EC, Directive 2001/83/EC and Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,
Whereas:






(1)


Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006 requires that the Commission appoints representatives of health professionals and patient associations to the European Medicines Agency Paediatric Committee.










(2)


In accordance with Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006, a public call for expression of interest has been undertaken by the Commission. The European Parliament has been consulted on the result of the evaluation of the applications received in the framework of this call for expression of interest.










(3)


The members and alternates of the Committee shall be appointed for a period of three years starting on 1 August 2011,




HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Sole Article
1.   The following are hereby appointed members and alternates of the Paediatric Committee to represent health professionals for a term of three years from 1 August 2011:






—


Member: Jean Pierre ABOULKER,










—


Alternate: Alexandra COMPAGNUCCI,










—


Member: Adriana CECI,










—


Alternate: Paolo PAOLUCCI,










—


Member: Anthony James NUNN,










—


Alternate: André RIEUTORD.




2.   The following are hereby appointed members and alternates of the Committee to represent the patients’ organisations for a term of three years from 1 August 2011:






—


Member: Matthias KELLER,










—


Alternate: Gerlind BODE,










—


Member: Michal ODERMARSKY,










—


Alternate: Milena STEVANOVIC,










—


Member: Tsvetana SCHYNS-LIHARSKA,










—


Alternate: Gérard NGUYEN.





Done at Brussels, 15 June 2011.


For the Commission

John DALLI

Member of the Commission





(1)  OJ L 378, 27.12.2006, p. 1.