do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-423/07: Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2011 — Ryanair v Commission (State aid — Competition — Abuse of a dominant position — Aviation sector — Exclusive use of Terminal 2 at Munich Airport — Action for failure to act — Adoption of a position by the Commission — No need to adjudicate — Obligation to act — None)
Date: 2011-05-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commission, State aid, action for annulment (EU), air transport, complaint to the Commission, restriction on competition, transport company








C_2011194EN.01001201.xml










2.7.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 194/12





Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2011 — Ryanair v Commission
(Case T-423/07) (1)

(State aid - Competition - Abuse of a dominant position - Aviation sector - Exclusive use of Terminal 2 at Munich Airport - Action for failure to act - Adoption of a position by the Commission - No need to adjudicate - Obligation to act - None)
2011/C 194/16
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Ryanair Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: E. Vahida, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, S. Noë and E. Righini, Agents)

Re:

APPLICATION for a declaration that the Commission has failed to act in unlawfully failing to adopt a position on the applicant’s complaint concerning, first, aid allegedly granted by the Federal Republic of Germany to Lufthansa and its Star Alliance partners in the form of the exclusive use of Terminal 2 at Munich Airport (Germany) and, second, alleged abuse of a dominant position by Munich Airport

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that there is no need to give a ruling on the claim submitted by Ryanair Ltd that the Commission failed to act in relation to the alleged State aid to Lufthansa;










2.


Rejects the claim submitted by Ryanair that the Commission failed to act in relation to the alleged State aid to Lufthansa’s Star Alliance partners;










3.


Rejects the claim submitted by Ryanair that the Commission failed to act in relation to the alleged abuse of a dominant position;










4.


Orders the European Commission to pay its own costs and half of those incurred by Ryanair;










5.


Orders Ryanair to pay half its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 8, 12.1.2008.
Case T-81/10: Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2011 — Tempus Vade v OHIM — Palacios Serrano (AIR FORCE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark AIR FORCE — Earlier Community and national word and figurative marks TIME FORCE — Relative grounds for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity of signs — Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2011-05-19
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), pressure equipment, trade-mark law








C_2011194EN.01001402.xml










2.7.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 194/14





Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2011 — Tempus Vade v OHIM — Palacios Serrano (AIR FORCE)
(Case T-81/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark AIR FORCE - Earlier Community and national word and figurative marks TIME FORCE - Relative grounds for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity of signs - Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2011/C 194/21
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Tempus Vade, SL (San Sebastián de los Reyes, Spain) (represented by: A. Gómez López, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court: Juan Palacios Serrano (Alcobendas, Spain) (represented by: E. Ochoa Santamaría, J. del Valle Sánchez and V. Ruiz de Velasco Martinez de Ercilla, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 January 2010 (Case R 1114/208-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Tempus Vade, SL and Mr. Juan Palacios Serrano.

Operative part of the judgment







1.


The action is dismissed.










2.


Tempus Vade, SL is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.