do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 437/2011 of 5 May 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2011-05-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, import price, perennial vegetable, pip fruit








L_2011118EN.01000401.xml










6.5.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 118/4








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 437/2011
of 5 May 2011
         
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),


Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 6 May 2011.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 5 May 2011.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ
            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development






(1)  
            OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.




ANNEX
Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables







(EUR/100 kg)




CN code


Third country code (1)



Standard import value




0702 00 00 


JO 


78,3 




MA 


36,2 




TN 


109,4 




TR 


101,5 




ZZ 


81,4 




0707 00 05 


TR 


102,5 




ZZ 


102,5 




0709 90 70 


MA 


78,8 




TR 


121,9 




ZZ 


100,4 




0709 90 80 


EC 


27,0 




ZZ 


27,0 




0805 10 20 


EG 


52,7 




IL 


60,1 




MA 


44,8 




TN 


54,0 




TR 


70,2 




ZZ 


56,4 




0805 50 10 


TR 


52,3 




ZZ 


52,3 




0808 10 80 


AR 


83,1 




BR 


70,4 




CL 


83,4 




CN 


111,0 




MA 


86,7 




NZ 


106,3 




US 


132,1 




UY 


66,3 




ZA 


74,9 




ZZ 


90,5 






(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
            ZZ
            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.
Case C-305/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 May 2011 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — State aid — Tax incentives in favour of companies taking part in trade fairs abroad — Recovery)
Date: 2011-05-05
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Italy, State aid, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, aid recipient, control of State aid, redemption, tax incentive, trade event, type of business








C_2011186EN.01000301.xml










25.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 186/3





Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 5 May 2011 — European Commission v Italian Republic
(Case C-305/09) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - State aid - Tax incentives in favour of companies taking part in trade fairs abroad - Recovery)
2011/C 186/04
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, V. Di Bucci and E. Righini, Agents)

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, Agent, assisted by D. Del Gaizo and P. Gentili, avvocati dello Stato)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to take, within the prescribed time-limit, the measures necessary to comply with Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Commission Decision 2005/919/EC of 14 December 2004: Direct tax incentives in favour of companies taking part in trade fairs abroad (notified under document No C(2004) 4746) (OJ 2005 L 335, p. 39)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed time-limits, all necessary measures to recover from the beneficiaries all the aid granted under the aid scheme declared unlawful and incompatible with the common market by Commission Decision 2005/919/EC of 14 December 2004 [on direct] tax incentives in favour of companies taking part in trade fairs abroad, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 2 of that decision;










2.


Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 256, 24.10.2009.
Recruitment for the European Medicines Agency (London)
Date: 2011-05-05
Institutions: European Medicines Agency
Subjects: England, European Medicines Agency, administrator, drug surveillance, recruitment








CA2011135EN.01000101.xml










5.5.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


CA 135/1





RECRUITMENT FOR THE EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY (LONDON)
(2011/C 135 A/01)

The Agency is responsible for coordinating the evaluation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use in the European Union (see Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 136, 30.4.2004, p. 1)). The Agency was established in January 1995. It has many close contacts with the European Commission, 27 EU Member States, EEA-EFTA countries and many other groups in government and the private sector.


Further information on the Agency and its activities is readily accessible through the Internet; our web address is http://www.ema.europa.eu

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is organising a selection procedure with a view to drawing up a reserve list for:






—



EMA/AD/323: Administrator (Scientific), Pharmacovigilance and Risk Management, Patient Health Protection Unit (AD 6)











—



EMA/AD/324: Administrator (Scientific), Pharmacovigilance and Risk Management, Patient Health Protection Unit (AD 8)





Selected candidates will be included on a reserve list and, depending on the budgetary situation, may be offered a five-year renewable contract in accordance with the conditions of employment of other servants of the European Union (OJ L 56, 4.3.1968).
The place of employment shall be London.
Candidates must be nationals of a Member State of the European Union, or of Iceland, Norway or Liechtenstein, on condition that they have full rights as a citizen.

The complete conditions and job description should be downloaded from the Agency website:


http://www.ema.europa.eu/htms/general/admin/recruit/recruitnew.htm


Applications have to be submitted electronically using the form available on the Agency website. Deadline for submission of application form is midnight on 16 June 2011.


Please note that due to the large number of applications the Agency may receive when reaching the deadline for submission of applications, the system may have problems to process the large amounts of data. Applicants are therefore advised to send in their application well ahead of the deadline.

If you wish to receive notification of vacancy publications electronically please register online for an RSS feed at http://www.ema.europa.eu/ under ‘RSS news feeds’.
Case T-460/09: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2011 — CheapFlights International v OHIM — Cheapflights (Cheapflights) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark Cheapflights — Earlier national figurative mark CheapFlights — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Date: 2011-05-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), information processing, information technology industry, trade-mark law, travel








C_2011186EN.01002201.xml










25.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 186/22





Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2011 — CheapFlights International v OHIM — Cheapflights (Cheapflights)
(Case T-460/09) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark Cheapflights - Earlier national figurative mark CheapFlights - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2011/C 186/40
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: CheapFlights International Ltd (Ballybofey, Ireland) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl and H. Hartwig, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Cheapflights Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Edenborough, QC)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 31 August 2009 (Case R 1356/2007-4), relating to opposition proceedings between CheapFlights International Ltd and Cheapflights Ltd

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 31 August 2009 (Case R 1356/2007-4);










2.


Dismisses the action as to the remainder;










3.


Orders OHIM and Cheapflights Ltd to pay the costs including those incurred by CheapFlights International Ltd in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.






(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.
Case C-137/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 May 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État — Belgium) — European Communities v Région de Bruxelles-Capitale (Articles 207(2) EC and 282 EC — Representation of the European Communities before the national courts — Powers conferred on the Commission — Delegation of the power of representation to other Community institutions — Conditions)
Date: 2011-05-05
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU institution, European Community, diplomatic representation, interpretation of the law, legal action, power of attorney








C_2011186EN.01000601.xml










25.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 186/6





Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 5 May 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État — Belgium) — European Communities v Région de Bruxelles-Capitale
(Case C-137/10) (1)

(Articles 207(2) EC and 282 EC - Representation of the European Communities before the national courts - Powers conferred on the Commission - Delegation of the power of representation to other Community institutions - Conditions)
2011/C 186/10
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d'État

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: European Communities

Defendant: Région de Bruxelles-Capitale

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Conseil d’État — Interpretation of Articles 282 EC and the first subparagraph of 207(2) EC — Conditions for the Commission to delegate to another institution the powers to represent the Community in legal proceedings — Validity of the mandate in the absence of an appointment by name of the natural person having authority to represent the institution thus empowered — Jurisdiction of the national court to give judgment on the matter — Doubts relating to the validity of the representation of the Council in legal proceedings by its Deputy Secretary-General, who is responsible for the running of the General Secretariat — Respect of the principle of the organisational autonomy of the institutions

Operative part of the judgment

The mandate by which the European Commission delegated to another Community institution, in a dispute concerning the latter, the power accruing to the Commission under Article 282 EC to represent the European Communities before a national court was validly granted, regardless of whether that mandate specified by name a natural person as having authority to represent the institution thus empowered. In such cases, both the institution thus empowered and the natural person — if one were specified — were entitled to authorise a lawyer to represent the European Communities.


(1)  OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.
Case T-203/09: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2011 — Olymp Bezner v OHIM — Bellido (Olymp) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark OLYMP — Earlier national figurative mark OLIMPO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
Date: 2011-05-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), trade-mark law








C_2011186EN.01002002.xml










25.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 186/20





Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2011 — Olymp Bezner v OHIM — Bellido (Olymp)
(Case T-203/09) (1)

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark OLYMP - Earlier national figurative mark OLIMPO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2011/C 186/37
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Olymp Bezner GmbH & Co. KG (Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany) (represented by: M. Eck and J. Dönch, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Miguel Bellido, SA (Manzanares, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 March 2009 (Case R 531/2008-2) relating to invalidity proceedings between Miguel Bellido SA and Olymp Bezner GmbH & Co. KG.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders Olymp Bezner GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 167, 18.7.2009.
Case C-265/10: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 May 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Chemicals — Registration, evaluation, authorisation of those substances and restrictions applicable to them — REACH Regulation — Article 126 — System of penalties in the event of infringement of the provisions of the REACH Regulation — Lack of implementation within the period prescribed)
Date: 2011-05-05
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Belgium, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, chemical product, dangerous substance, infringement of EU law








C_2011186EN.01000801.xml










25.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 186/8





Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 May 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium
(Case C-265/10) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 - Chemicals - Registration, evaluation, authorisation of those substances and restrictions applicable to them - REACH Regulation - Article 126 - System of penalties in the event of infringement of the provisions of the REACH Regulation - Lack of implementation within the period prescribed)
2011/C 186/13
Language of the case: Dutch

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: P. Oliver and M. van Beek, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: T. Materne and L. Van den Broeck, acting as Agents)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Article 126 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC (OJ 2006 L 396, p.1) — Penalties applicable for infringement of the REACH Regulation

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that, by failing to adopt all the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to implement the penalties applicable to infringements of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 126 of that regulation;










2.


Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 221, 14.8.2010.
Case T-41/10: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2011 — SIMS — École de ski internationale v OHIM — SNMSF (esf école du ski français) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark esf école du ski français — Absolute grounds for refusal — State emblem — Article 7(1)(h) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 6ter of the Paris Convention — Mark of such a nature as to deceive the public — Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation No 207/2009)
Date: 2011-05-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, France, action for annulment (EU), sports body, trade-mark law








C_2011186EN.01002402.xml










25.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 186/24





Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2011 — SIMS — École de ski internationale v OHIM — SNMSF (esf école du ski français)
(Case T-41/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community figurative mark esf école du ski français - Absolute grounds for refusal - State emblem - Article 7(1)(h) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 6ter of the Paris Convention - Mark of such a nature as to deceive the public - Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation No 207/2009)
2011/C 186/45
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Syndicat international des moniteurs de ski — École de ski internationale (SIMS — École de ski internationale) (Albertville, France) (represented by: L. Raison-Rebufat, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially A. Folliard-Monguiral and subsequently by A. Folliard-Monguiral and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Syndicat national des moniteurs du ski français (SNMSF) (Meylan, France) (represented by: J.-P. Stouls, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 November 2009 (Case R 235/2009-1), concerning invalidity proceedings between the Syndicat international des moniteurs de ski — École de ski internationale (SIMS — École de ski internationale) and the Syndicat national des moniteurs du ski français (SNMSF)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


dismisses the action;










2.


orders the Syndicat international des moniteurs de ski — École de ski internationale (SIMS — École de ski internationale) to pay the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM);










3.


orders the Syndicat national des moniteurs du ski français to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6214 — Seagate Technology/the HDD Business of Samsung Electronics)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2011-05-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, electronics, exchange of information, information technology industry, merger control








C_2011135EN.01001401.xml










5.5.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 135/14





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.6214 — Seagate Technology/the HDD Business of Samsung Electronics)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 135/08






1.


On 19 April 2011, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertaking Seagate Technology Public Limited Company. (‘Seagate’, Ireland) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the hard disk drive (‘HDD’) business of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (‘the Samsung HDD business’, Republic of Korea) by way of purchase of assets.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


for Seagate: Development, design, manufacturing and sale of computer storage devices, notably HDDs for sale for mobile, enterprise, desktop and consumer electronics end-uses,










—


for the Samsung HDD Business: Development, design, manufacturing and sale of HDDs.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by e-mail to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.6214 — Seagate Technology/the HDD Business of Samsung Electronics, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




J-70




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘EC Merger Regulation’).
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6122 — Orizonia/BCD Travel/JV)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2011-05-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, exchange of information, merger control, travel agency








C_2011135EN.01000101.xml










5.5.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 135/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6122 — Orizonia/BCD Travel/JV)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 135/01
On 26 April 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6122. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.