do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case F-51/11: Action brought on 21 April 2011 — ZZ v Commission
Date: 2011-04-21
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: EPSO, appeal, competition (EU)








C_2011252EN.01005602.xml










27.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/56





Action brought on 21 April 2011 — ZZ v Commission
(Case F-51/11)
2011/C 252/124
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: P. Giatagantzidis and K. Kyriazi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the EPSO decision to re-open the EPSO/AD/77/06 open competition and to invite the applicant to participate again in the first stage of that competition.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:






—


annul the EPSO decision to re-open the competition;










—


annul the EPSO decision of 11 March 2011;










—


order the European Commission to pay the costs.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2011-04-21
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2011123EN.01000201.xml










21.4.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 123/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

20 April 2011
2011/C 123/03

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,4515




JPY


Japanese yen


120,13




DKK


Danish krone


7,4576




GBP


Pound sterling


0,88670




SEK


Swedish krona


8,9011




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2944




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,7895




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


24,174




HUF


Hungarian forint


264,05




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7093




PLN


Polish zloty


3,9723




RON


Romanian leu


4,0873




TRY


Turkish lira


2,2056




AUD


Australian dollar


1,3611




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3808




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


11,2843




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8206




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,7988




KRW


South Korean won


1 567,35




ZAR


South African rand


9,8519




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


9,4716




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,3578




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 554,66




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,3734




PHP


Philippine peso


62,680




RUB


Russian rouble


40,8375




THB


Thai baht


43,472




BRL


Brazilian real


2,2700




MXN


Mexican peso


16,8795




INR


Indian rupee


64,3450






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6182 — MAN/MAN camions et bus/MAN Truck & Bus Belgium)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2011-04-21
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, exchange of information, merger control, motor vehicle industry








C_2011123EN.01000101.xml










21.4.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 123/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.6182 — MAN/MAN camions et bus/MAN Truck & Bus Belgium)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 123/01
On 15 April 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M6182. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 222/2011 of 3 March 2011 laying down exceptional measures as regards the release of out-of-quota sugar and isoglucose on the Union market at reduced surplus levy during marketing year 2010/2011 ( OJ L 60, 5.3.2011 )
Date: 2011-04-21
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agricultural trade, common organisation of markets, farm prices, isoglucose, production surplus, regulation of agricultural production, sugar product








L_2011105EN.01007901.xml










21.4.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 105/79







Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 222/2011 of 3 March 2011 laying down exceptional measures as regards the release of out-of-quota sugar and isoglucose on the Union market at reduced surplus levy during marketing year 2010/2011
(
Official Journal of the European Union L 60 of 5 March 2011
)

On page 9, in the Annex:
for:

               ‘For the marketing year 2010/2011, the levy referred to in Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 967/2006 shall not apply to the quantities issued of this certificate, subject to the respect of the rules laid down in Commission Regulation (EU) No 222/2011, in particular in Article 2(4)(c)’,
read:

               ‘For the marketing year 2010/2011, the levy referred to in Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 967/2006 shall not apply to the quantities issued of this certificate, subject to the respect of the rules laid down in Commission Regulation (EU) No 222/2011, in particular in Article 2(5)(c)’.
Case T-224/11: Action brought on 21 April 2011 — Caventa AG v OHIM — Anson’s Herrenhaus (BERG)
Date: 2011-04-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), trade-mark law








C_2011194EN.01001702.xml










2.7.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 194/17





Action brought on 21 April 2011 — Caventa AG v OHIM — Anson’s Herrenhaus (BERG)
(Case T-224/11)
2011/C 194/28
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant(s): Caventa AG (Rekingen, Switzerland) (represented by: J. Krenzel, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Anson’s Herrenhaus KG (Düsseldorf, Germany)

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 February 2011 in Case R 1494/2010-1;










—


Order OHIM to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: Caventa AG.

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘BERG’ for goods in Classes 25 and 28 (Application No 7 115 009).

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Anson’s Herrenhaus KG.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Word mark ‘Christian Berg’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 18, 25 and 35 (Community trade mark No 3 383 676), the opposition being directed against registration for goods in Classes 25 and 28.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) since there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks in question.


(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (Consolidated Version) (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).
Case T-225/11: Action brought on 21 April 2011 — Caventa AG v OHIM — Anson’s Herrenhaus (BERG)
Date: 2011-04-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), trade-mark law








C_2011194EN.01001801.xml










2.7.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 194/18





Action brought on 21 April 2011 — Caventa AG v OHIM — Anson’s Herrenhaus (BERG)
(Case T-225/11)
2011/C 194/29
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant(s): Caventa AG (Rekingen, Switzerland) (represented by: J. Krenzel, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Anson’s Herrenhaus KG (Düsseldorf, Germany)

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 February 2011 in Case R 740/2010-1;










—


Order OHIM to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: Caventa AG.

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark ‘BERG’ for goods in Classes 25 and 28 (Application No 7 124 084).

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Anson’s Herrenhaus KG.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Word mark ‘Christian Berg’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 18, 25 and 35 (Community trade mark No 3 383 676), the opposition being directed against registration for goods in Classes 25 and 28.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) since there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks in question.


(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (Consolidated Version) (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).
Corrigendum to Council Decision 2011/106/CFSP of 15 February 2011 on adapting and extending the period of application of the measures in Decision 2002/148/EC concluding consultations with Zimbabwe under Article 96 of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement ( OJ L 43, 17.2.2011 )
Date: 2011-04-21
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU aid, Zimbabwe, cooperation agreement (EU), democracy, financial aid, human rights, political violence, rule of law








L_2011105EN.01007902.xml










21.4.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 105/79







Corrigendum to Council Decision 2011/106/CFSP of 15 February 2011 on adapting and extending the period of application of the measures in Decision 2002/148/EC concluding consultations with Zimbabwe under Article 96 of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement
(
Official Journal of the European Union L 43 of 17 February 2011
)

In the contents on the cover page and on page 31, title of the Decision:
for:

               ‘Council Decision 2011/106/CFSP of 15 February 2011 …’,
read:

               ‘Council Decision 2011/106/EU of 15 February 2011 …’.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5927 — BASF/Cognis)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2011-04-21
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: chemical industry, economic concentration, exchange of information, merger control








C_2011123EN.01000102.xml










21.4.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 123/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.5927 — BASF/Cognis)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 123/02
On 30 November 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5927. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Case T-218/11: Action brought on 21 April 2011 — Dagher v Council
Date: 2011-04-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Côte d'Ivoire, arms control, economic sanctions, import restriction, precious stones








C_2011179EN.01001901.xml










18.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 179/19





Action brought on 21 April 2011 — Dagher v Council
(Case T-218/11)
2011/C 179/33
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Habib Roland Dagher (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire) (represented by: J.-Y. Dupeux and F. Dressen, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 85/2011 of 31 January 2011, in so far as that act relates to him;










—


annul Council Decision 2011/71/CFSP of 31 January 2011, in so far as that act relates to him;










—


order the Council to pay the applicant EUR 40 000 as damages to make good the non-material loss and other damage suffered by the applicant;










—


order the Council to pay the entirety of the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea divided into three parts and alleging infringement of essential procedural requirements.






—


By the first part of the plea, the applicant argues that the procedure followed by the Council was not of an adversarial nature, in so far as the Council failed to provide, as soon as possible after the publication of the contested measures, information permitting the applicant to understand the reasons for the measures taken in his regard and, later refused the applicant’s subsequent requests for information, which meant that the applicant was deprived of his right to exercise usefully any action of an administrative nature seeking to have those measures lifted;










—


By the second part of the plea, the applicant alleges failure to state reasons, since the grounds set out in the restrictive measures taken against him are unclear and brief, which prevents him from examining the substance of the complaints underlying the sanctions in question;










—


By the third part of the plea, the applicant claims an infringement of the right to effective judicial protection.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6208 — Aeroports de Paris/JCDecaux Airport France/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2011-04-21
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: air transport, economic concentration, exchange of information, merger control








C_2011123EN.01001501.xml










21.4.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 123/15





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.6208 — Aeroports de Paris/JCDecaux Airport France/JV)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 123/10






1.


On 13 April 2011, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertakings Aéroports de Paris SA (‘ADP’, France) and JCDecaux Airport France SAS (‘JCDAF’, France), controlled by JCDecaux SA (France), acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture (‘JV’, France).










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


ADP: planning, operating and developing Paris-Charles de Gaulle, Paris-Orly and Paris-Le Bourget airports and some other civil airports in the Paris region,










—


JCDAF: setting up, servicing and operating outdoor advertising media or events, particularly advertisements sited in airport terminals, airports and marine terminals,










—


JV: operating and marketing all advertising installations in airports managed by ADP in Île-de-France.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the EC Merger Regulation (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.6208 — Aeroports de Paris/JCDecaux Airport France/JV, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




J-70




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘EC Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32 (‘Notice on a simplified procedure’).