do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 346/2011 of 8 April 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2011-04-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, import price, pip fruit








L_2011096EN.01001901.xml










9.4.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 96/19








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 346/2011
of 8 April 2011
         
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),


Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 9 April 2011.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 8 April 2011.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ
            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development






(1)  
            OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.




ANNEX
Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables







(EUR/100 kg)




CN code


Third country code (1)



Standard import value




0702 00 00 


JO 


68,6 




MA 


44,5 




TN 


104,8 




TR 


86,7 




ZZ 


76,2 




0707 00 05 


EG 


152,2 




TR 


144,8 




ZZ 


148,5 




0709 90 70 


MA 


50,5 




TR 


102,8 




ZA 


15,5 




ZZ 


56,3 




0805 10 20 


EG 


55,7 




IL 


71,6 




MA 


51,2 




TN 


55,4 




TR 


73,3 




ZZ 


61,4 




0805 50 10 


TR 


48,2 




ZZ 


48,2 




0808 10 80 


AR 


75,8 




BR 


82,5 




CA 


107,4 




CL 


87,8 




CN 


94,0 




MK 


50,2 




NZ 


122,9 




US 


174,9 




UY 


74,1 




ZA 


80,4 




ZZ 


95,0 




0808 20 50 


AR 


98,3 




CL 


100,9 




CN 


76,3 




US 


72,1 




ZA 


94,1 




ZZ 


88,3 






(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
            ZZ
            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.
Council Implementing Decision 2011/230/CFSP of 8 April 2011 implementing Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d’Ivoire
Date: 2011-04-08
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Côte d'Ivoire, arms control, economic sanctions, import restriction, precious stones








L_2011097EN.01004601.xml










12.4.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 97/46








            COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION 2011/230/CFSP
of 8 April 2011
         
implementing Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d’Ivoire


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP of 29 October 2010 renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d’Ivoire (1), and in particular Article 6(2) thereof, in conjunction with Article 31(2) of the Treaty on European Union,

Whereas:







(1)


On 29 October 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/656/CFSP.












(2)


In view of the developments in Côte d’Ivoire, the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex II to Decision 2010/656/CFSP should be amended,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The entities listed in the Annex to this Decision shall be deleted from the list set out in Annex II to Decision 2010/656/CFSP.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 8 April 2011.


For the Council


The President


               MARTONYI J.





(1)  
            OJ L 285, 30.10.2010, p. 28.




ANNEX

ENTITIES REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 1







1.


SIR (Ivorian Refining Company)




2.


Autonomous Port of Abidjan




3.


Autonomous Port of San Pedro




4.


CGFCC (Coffee and Cocoa Trade Management Committee)
Case T-291/10: Order of the General Court of 8 April 2011 — Martin v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Implied refusal of access — Explicit decision adopted after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)
Date: 2011-04-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Council of the European Union, European Commission, European Parliament, access to information, action for annulment, provision of documents








C_2011179EN.01001502.xml










18.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 179/15





Order of the General Court of 8 April 2011 — Martin v Commission
(Case T-291/10) (1)

(Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Implied refusal of access - Explicit decision adopted after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate)
2011/C 179/27
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Anne Martin (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: U. O’Dwyer, solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Costa de Oliveira and C. ten Dam, agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by: S. Juul Jørgensen, agent)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Commission's implied decision of 20 April 2010 refusing the applicant access to the documents in the file relating to the State aid N 654/2008, notified by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland on 19 December 2008, in favour of Short Brothers plc.

Operative part of the order

The Court:






1.


Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on this action.










2.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ms Anne Martin.










3.


Orders the Kingdom of Denmark to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2011-04-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2011109EN.01000101.xml










8.4.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 109/1





Euro exchange rates (1)

7 April 2011
2011/C 109/01

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,4283




JPY


Japanese yen


121,70




DKK


Danish krone


7,4571




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87590




SEK


Swedish krona


9,0455




CHF


Swiss franc


1,3118




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,8175




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


24,435




HUF


Hungarian forint


264,28




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7093




PLN


Polish zloty


3,9755




RON


Romanian leu


4,1125




TRY


Turkish lira


2,1620




AUD


Australian dollar


1,3614




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3695




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


11,1009




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8345




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,8002




KRW


South Korean won


1 557,45




ZAR


South African rand


9,5544




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


9,3442




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,3720




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 387,16




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,3263




PHP


Philippine peso


61,531




RUB


Russian rouble


40,3840




THB


Thai baht


42,963




BRL


Brazilian real


2,2842




MXN


Mexican peso


16,8443




INR


Indian rupee


63,1380






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-207/11: Action brought on 8 April 2011 — EyeSense v OHIM — Osypka Medical (ISENSE)
Date: 2011-04-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), trade-mark law








C_2011194EN.01001501.xml










2.7.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 194/15





Action brought on 8 April 2011 — EyeSense v OHIM — Osypka Medical (ISENSE)
(Case T-207/11)
2011/C 194/23
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: EyeSense AG (Basel, Switzerland) (represented by: N. Aicher, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Osypka Medical GmbH (Berlin, Germany)

Form of order sought







—


Annul the order of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 February 2011 in Appeal R 1098/2010-4;










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs, including the costs of the appeal proceedings before OHIM.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: Osypka Medical.

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘ISENSE’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 10 and 42 — Registration No 7 165 327.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Applicant.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: National word mark ‘EyeSense’ for goods and services in Classes 10 and 42.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Pleas in law: Breach of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, (1) as there is a likelihood of confusion between the opposing marks.


(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).
Joined Cases C-136/10 and C-178/10: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 April 2011 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Târgu-Mureș (Romania)) — Daniel Ionel Obreja v Ministerul Economiei și Finanțelor, Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice a județului Mureș (C-136/10), Ministerul Economiei și Finanțelor, Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice a județului Mureș, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Târgu-Mureș v SC Darmi SRL (C-178/10) (First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Internal taxation — Article 110 TFEU — Pollution tax levied upon first registration of motor vehicles)
Date: 2011-04-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Romania, environmental tax, pollution control measures, vehicle registration








C_2011211EN.01000701.xml










16.7.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 211/7





Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 April 2011 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Târgu-Mureș (Romania)) — Daniel Ionel Obreja v Ministerul Economiei și Finanțelor, Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice a județului Mureș (C-136/10), Ministerul Economiei și Finanțelor, Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice a județului Mureș, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Târgu-Mureș v SC Darmi SRL (C-178/10)
(Joined Cases C-136/10 and C-178/10) (1)

(First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Internal taxation - Article 110 TFEU - Pollution tax levied upon first registration of motor vehicles)
2011/C 211/11
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Târgu-Mureș

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Daniel Ionel Obreja (C-136/10), Ministerul Economiei și Finanțelor, Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice a județului Mureș, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Târgu-Mureș (C-178/10)

Defendants: Ministerul Economiei și Finanțelor, Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice a județului Mureș (C-136/10), SC Darmi SRL (C-178/10)

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Curtea de Apel Târgu-Mureș — Registration of second-hand vehicles previously registered in other Member States — Environmental tax levied on motor vehicles upon first registration in a Member State — Whether national legislation is compatible with Articles 23, 25 and 90 EC — Possible derogation on the basis of Article 174 EC

Operative part of the order

Article 110 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a Member State from introducing a pollution tax affecting motor vehicles on their first registration in that Member State, if that fiscal measure is so designed as to discourage the putting into service, in that Member State, of second-hand vehicles bought in other Member States, without, however, discouraging the purchase of second-hand vehicles of the same age and condition on the national market.


(1)  OJ C 161, 19.6.2010.
Case T-146/97: Order of the General Court of 8 April 2011 — Bakkers v Council and Commission
Date: 2011-04-08
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Community, agricultural levy, agricultural production policy, livestock, milk








C_2011173EN.01001501.xml










11.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 173/15





Order of the General Court of 8 April 2011 — Bakkers v Council and Commission
(Case T-146/97) (1)

2011/C 173/31
Language of the case: Dutch
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 199, 28.6.1997.
Case C-336/10: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 April 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Craiova (Romania)) — Administrația Finanțelor Publice a Municipiului Târgu-Jiu, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu v Victor Vinel Ijac (First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Internal taxation — Article 110 TFEU — Pollution tax levied upon first registration of motor vehicles)
Date: 2011-04-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: application of EU law, competition policy, fiscal policy, interpretation of the law, regions of Romania








C_2011211EN.01000801.xml










16.7.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 211/8





Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 April 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Craiova (Romania)) — Administrația Finanțelor Publice a Municipiului Târgu-Jiu, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu v Victor Vinel Ijac
(Case C-336/10) (1)

(First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Internal taxation - Article 110 TFEU - Pollution tax levied upon first registration of motor vehicles)
2011/C 211/13
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Craiova

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Administrația Finanțelor Publice a Municipiului Târgu-Jiu, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu

Defendant: Victor Vinel Ijac

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Curtea de Apel Craiova — Registration of second-hand vehicles previously registered in other Member States — Environmental tax levied on motor vehicles upon first registration in a Member State — Whether national legislation is compatible with Article 110 TFEU

Operative part of the order

Article 110 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a Member State from introducing a pollution tax affecting motor vehicles on their first registration in that Member State, if that fiscal measure is so designed as to discourage the putting into service, in that Member State, of second-hand vehicles bought in other Member States, without, however, discouraging the purchase of second-hand vehicles of the same age and condition on the national market.


(1)  OJ C 274, 9.10.2010.
Case C-173/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) (United Kingdom) made on 8 April 2011 — Football Dataco Ltd, Scottish Premier League Ltd, Scottish Football League, PA Sport UK Ltd v Sportradar GmbH (a company registered in Germany), Sportradar (a company registered in Switzerland)
Date: 2011-04-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU Member State, electronic component, information, micro-computer, network server








C_2011194EN.01001001.xml










2.7.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 194/10





Reference for a preliminary ruling from Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) (United Kingdom) made on 8 April 2011 — Football Dataco Ltd, Scottish Premier League Ltd, Scottish Football League, PA Sport UK Ltd v Sportradar GmbH (a company registered in Germany), Sportradar (a company registered in Switzerland)
(Case C-173/11)
2011/C 194/13
Language of the case: English

Referring court

Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division)

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Football Dataco Ltd, Scottish Premier League Ltd, Scottish Football League, PA Sport UK Ltd

Defendants: Sportradar GmbH (a company registered in Germany), Sportradar (a company registered in Switzerland)

Questions referred







1.


Where a party uploads data from a database protected by sui generis right under Directive 96/9/EC (1) (‘the Database Directive’) onto that party's web server located in member state A and in response to requests from a user in another member state B the web server sends such data to the user's computer so that the data is stored in the memory of that computer and displayed on its screen






(a)


is the act of sending the data an act of ‘extraction’ or ‘re-utilisation’ by that party?










(b)


does any act of extraction and/or re-utilisation by that party occur






(i)


in A only










(ii)


in B only or










(iii)


in both A and B?














(1)  Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 march 1996 on the legal protection of databases, OJ L 77, p. 20
Joined Cases C-29/11 and C-30/11: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 April 2011 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Suceava (Romania)) — Aurora Elena Sfichi v Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Suceava, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Suceava, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu (C-29/11), Adrian Ilaș v Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Suceava, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Suceava, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu (C-30/11) (First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Internal taxation — Article 110 TFEU — Pollution tax levied upon first registration of motor vehicles)
Date: 2011-04-08
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Romania, environmental tax, free movement of goods, vehicle registration








C_2011211EN.01000902.xml










16.7.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 211/9





Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 8 April 2011 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Suceava (Romania)) — Aurora Elena Sfichi v Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Suceava, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Suceava, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu (C-29/11), Adrian Ilaș v Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Suceava, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Suceava, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu (C-30/11)
(Joined Cases C-29/11 and C-30/11) (1)

(First subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Internal taxation - Article 110 TFEU - Pollution tax levied upon first registration of motor vehicles)
2011/C 211/16
Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Tribunalul Suceava

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicants: Aurora Elena Sfichi (C-29/11), Adrian Ilaș (C-30/11)

Defendants: Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Suceava, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Suceava, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu (C-29/11), Direcția Generală a Finanțelor Publice Suceava, Administrația Finanțelor Publice Suceava, Administrația Fondului pentru Mediu (C-30/11)

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tribunalul Suceava — Registration of second-hand motor vehicles previously registered in other Member States — National legislation making the first registration of such motor vehicles conditional upon payment of an environmental tax, whereas second-hand motor vehicles already present on the national market are exempt from payment of that tax on the occasion of re-registration — Whether the national legislation is compatible with the first and second paragraphs of Article 110 TFEU — Obstacle to the free movement of goods

Operative part of the order

Article 110 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a Member State from introducing a pollution tax affecting motor vehicles on their first registration in that Member State, if that fiscal measure is so designed as to discourage the putting into service, in that Member State, of second-hand vehicles bought in other Member States, without, however, discouraging the purchase of second-hand vehicles of the same age and condition on the national market.


(1)  OJ C 113, 9.4.2011.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 355/2011 of 8 April 2011 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Montasio (PDO))
Date: 2011-04-08
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Italy, cheese, designation of origin, labelling, location of production, mode of production, product designation








L_2011098EN.01000601.xml










13.4.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 98/6








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 355/2011
of 8 April 2011
         
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Montasio (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 and in accordance with Article 17(2) thereof, the Commission has examined Italy’s application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Montasio’ registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1107/96 (2), as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1263/96 (3).












(2)


Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (4), as required by the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of that Regulation. As no statement of objection within the meaning of Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been notified to the Commission, the amendments should be approved,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name in the Annex to this Regulation are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 8 April 2011.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,
Dacian CIOLOŞ
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

(2)  
            OJ L 148, 21.6.1996, p. 1.

(3)  
            OJ L 163, 2.7.1996, p. 19.

(4)  
            OJ C 212, 5.8.2010, p. 9.




ANNEX
Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.3.   Cheeses

ITALY
Montasio (PDO)