do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EU) No 323/2011 of 31 March 2011 establishing a prohibition of fishing for deep-sea sharks in EU and international waters of V, VI, VII, VIII and IX by vessels flying the flag of France
Date: 2011-03-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU waters, France, common fisheries policy, fishing area, fishing regulations, fishing rights, protected species, sea fish, ship's flag








L_2011087EN.01000501.xml










2.4.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 87/5








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 323/2011
of 31 March 2011
         
establishing a prohibition of fishing for deep-sea sharks in EU and international waters of V, VI, VII, VIII and IX by vessels flying the flag of France


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Council Regulation (EU) No 1225/2010 of 13 December 2010 fixing for 2011 and 2012 the fishing opportunities for EU vessels for fish stocks of certain deep-sea fish species (2), lays down quotas for 2011 and 2012.












(2)


According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for 2011.












(3)


It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2011 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.


Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.


Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 31 March 2011.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,
Lowri EVANS
            

Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 336, 21.12.2010, p. 1.




ANNEX






No


2/DSS




Member State


France




Stock


DWS/56789-




Species


Deep-sea sharks




Zone


EU and international waters of V, VI, VII, VIII and IX




Date


13 January 2011
Case T-192/11: Action brought on 31 March 2011 — Seka Yapo and Others v Council
Date: 2011-03-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Côte d'Ivoire, action for annulment (EU), economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2011152EN.01003002.xml










21.5.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 152/30





Action brought on 31 March 2011 — Seka Yapo and Others v Council
(Case T-192/11)
2011/C 152/54
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Anselme Seka Yapo (Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire), Brouha Nathanaël Ahouma (Abidjan), Blé Brunot Dogbo (Abidjan), Gagbei Faussignaux Vagba (Abidjan), Georges Guiai Bi Poin (Abidjan), Affro (Abidjan), Kassaraté Tiapé (Abidjan) and Philippe Mangou (Abidjan) (represented by: J.-C. Tchikaya, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:






—


annul Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011 amending Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire and Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire, in so far as they concern the applicants;










—


order the Council to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and principal arguments relied on by the applicants are in essence identical or similar to those relied upon in Case T-118/11 Attey v Council.
Case F-23/07 RENV-RX: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 31 March 2011 — M v Agence européenne des médicaments (EMEA)
Date: 2011-03-31
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Medicines Agency, European official, action by staff, occupational accident, physically disabled person, regulations for civil servants








C_2011160EN.01002901.xml










28.5.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 160/29





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 31 March 2011 — M v Agence européenne des médicaments (EMEA)
(Case F-23/07 RENV-RX) (1)

2011/C 160/45
Language of the case: French
The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register, following amicable settlement.


(1)  OJ C 117, 26.5.2007, p. 35.
Specific call for proposals — EAC/16/11 — Erasmus University Charter 2012
Date: 2011-03-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU programme, cultural cooperation, education, higher education, language teaching








C_2011099EN.01003001.xml










31.3.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 99/30





SPECIFIC CALL FOR PROPOSALS — EAC/16/11
Erasmus University Charter 2012
2011/C 99/05
1.   Objectives and description

The Erasmus University Charter provides the general framework for the European cooperation activities a higher education institution (HEI) may carry out within the Erasmus programme as part of the Lifelong Learning Programme (LLP). The Erasmus University Charter must be awarded as a prerequisite for HEI to organise student mobility and teaching and other staff mobility, to carry out Erasmus intensive language courses and intensive programmes, and to apply for multilateral projects, networks, accompanying measures and to organise preparatory visits. The Erasmus University Charter is based on the LLP Decision (1) which covers the 2007 to 2013 period. The specific objectives of the LLP are listed in Article 1.3 of the Decision.
2.   Eligible applicants

The Erasmus University Charter applies to all Higher Education Institutions defined in Article 2.10 of the Decision.
Applicants must be established in one of the following countries:






—


the 27 Member States of the European Union,










—


the EFTA countries: Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, Switzerland,










—


the candidate countries: Turkey, Croatia.




3.   Deadline for the submission of applications

The deadline for submitting applications for the Erasmus University Charter is 25 May 2011.
4.   Full details

The information about the Erasmus programme and the Erasmus University Charter can be found at the following internet address:
http://ec.europa.eu/llp
Applications must be submitted according to the guidelines provided by the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency and available at the address:
http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/llp/index_en.htm


(1)  Decision No 1720/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 November 2006 establishing an action programme in the field of lifelong learning. See http://eur-lex.europa.eu/lex/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:327:0045:0068:EN:PDF
Case T-214/07: Judgment of the General Court of 31 March 2011 — Greece v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — Expenditure excluded from Community financing — Arable crops — Specific measures for certain agricultural products in favour of the smaller Aegean islands)
Date: 2011-03-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Aegean Sea, EAGGF Guarantee Section, EU financing, Greece, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, agricultural expenditure, island, principle of proportionality, supply








C_2011145EN.01002302.xml










14.5.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 145/23





Judgment of the General Court of 31 March 2011 — Greece v Commission
(Case T-214/07) (1)

(EAGGF - Guarantee Section - Expenditure excluded from Community financing - Arable crops - Specific measures for certain agricultural products in favour of the smaller Aegean islands)
2011/C 145/36
Language of the case: Greek

Parties


Applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: V. Kontolaimos and I. Chalikias, Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. Tserepa-Lacombe, Agent and N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2007/243/EC of 18 April 2007 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) (OJ 2007 L 106, p. 55).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 199, 25.8.2007.
Case F-4/11: Action brought on 31 March 2011 — AV v Commission
Date: 2011-03-31
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: disability insurance, duties of civil servants, servant (EU)








C_2011179EN.01002101.xml










18.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 179/21





Action brought on 31 March 2011 — AV v Commission
(Case F-4/11)
2011/C 179/34
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: AV (Cadrezzate, Italy) (represented by: A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of decisions to defer medical cover in respect of the applicant as provided for by Article 32 of the Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Union and not to grant him entitlement to the invalidity allowance.

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of the European Commission of 12 October 2010 rejecting the applicant’s complaint against the decisions of 12 April 2010 to defer medical cover in respect of the applicant as provided for by Article 32 of the Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Union (CEOS) and 16 April 2010 not to grant him entitlement to an invalidity allowance;










—


As necessary, annul the decisions of 12 April 2010 to defer medical cover in respect of the applicant as provided for by Article 32 of the CEOS and 16 April 2010 not to grant him entitlement to an invalidity allowance;










—


order the European Commission to pay the costs.
Case C-155/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank ’s-Gravenhage, sitting at Zwolle-Lelystad (Netherlands) lodged on 31 March 2011 — Bibi Mohammad Imran v Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken
Date: 2011-03-31
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Netherlands, family migration, interpretation of the law








C_2011219EN.01000201.xml










23.7.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 219/2





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank ’s-Gravenhage, sitting at Zwolle-Lelystad (Netherlands) lodged on 31 March 2011 — Bibi Mohammad Imran v Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken
(Case C-155/11)
2011/C 219/02
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank ’s-Gravenhage, sitting at Zwolle-Lelystad

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Bibi Mohammad Imran

Respondent: Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken

Questions referred







1.


Does Article 7(2) of the Family Reunification Directive (1) allow a Member State to refuse entry and residence to a family member, as referred to in Article 4 of the Family Reunification Directive, of a third country national lawfully residing in that Member State, exclusively on the ground that that family member has not passed the integration examination abroad as prescribed in the legislation of that Member State?










2.


Is it important in answering Question 1 that the family member concerned is a mother of eight, of whom seven are minors, lawfully residing in that Member State?










3.


Is it important in answering Question 1 whether, in the country of residence, accessible tuition is available to the family member in the language of that Member State?










4.


Is it important in answering Question 1 whether the family member concerned, given his or her educational background and personal circumstances, particularly medical problems, would be able to pass that examination in the near future?










5.


Is it important in answering Question 1 that no reviews take place in respect of the provisions of Article 5(5) and Article 17 of the Family Reunification Directive, Article 24 of the Charter or the principle of proportionality as contained in European Union law?










6.


Is it important in answering Question 1 that nationals of certain other third countries are exempt, purely on the basis of their nationality, from the obligation to pass the civic examination abroad?






(1)  Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification (OJ 2003 L 251, p. 12).
Case C-367/10 P: Order of the Court of 31 March 2011 — EMC Development AB v European Commission (Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European cement market — Action for annulment of a decision rejecting a complaint against the adoption of a harmonised standard for cement — Procedure for the adoption of the standard — Binding nature of the standard — Appeal clearly inadmissible in part and clearly unfounded in part)
Date: 2011-03-31
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, European standard, action for annulment, cement, complaint to the Commission, horizontal agreement, restriction on competition








C_2011252EN.01000903.xml










27.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/9





Order of the Court of 31 March 2011 — EMC Development AB v European Commission
(Case C-367/10 P) (1)

(Appeal - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European cement market - Action for annulment of a decision rejecting a complaint against the adoption of a harmonised standard for cement - Procedure for the adoption of the standard - Binding nature of the standard - Appeal clearly inadmissible in part and clearly unfounded in part)
2011/C 252/17
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: EMC Development AB (represented by: W.-N. Schelp, avocat)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Bourke, Agent)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 May 2010 in Case T-432/05 EMC Development v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed an action seeking the annulment of the Commission's decision of 28 November 2005 rejecting the applicant's complaint based on Article 2(2) of Regulation No 17 and concerning alleged concerted practices on the part of European Portland cement producers consisting of the adoption of a European standard for cement (EN 197-1) aimed at excluding from the market products and technologies of competitors

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


EMC Development AB shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 288, 23.10.2010.
Call for applications for researcher grants under the work programme of the joint European Metrology Research Programme (EMRP)
Date: 2011-03-31
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU programme, metrology, proposal (EU), research








C_2011099EN.01002901.xml










31.3.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 99/29





Call for applications for researcher grants under the work programme of the joint European Metrology Research Programme (EMRP)
2011/C 99/04
Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for applications for researcher grants under the work programme of the European Metrology Research Programme.
Applications are invited from 31 March 2011 for:






—


Stage 3 of the call on behalf of the JRP-consortia for researcher excellence grants (REG) and researcher mobility grants (RMG).




EMRP researcher grant opportunities are linked to joint research projects (JRPs) funded under:






—


EMRP Call 2009 — Energy,










—


EMRP Call 2010 — Industry & Environment.




Closing date is 6 May 2011.
Information on the modalities of the call and call documentation is published on the following website:
http://www.emrponline.eu/adverts
Case C-433/10 P: Order of the Court of 31 March 2011 — Volker Mauerhofer v European Commission (Appeal — Project supported by the European Union in Bosnia and Herzegovina — Contracts concluded between the Commission and a consortium and between the consortium and experts — Commission’s administrative order amending its contract with the consortium — Action for annulment of that administrative order brought by one of the experts — Admissibility — Action for damages — Non contractual liability of the Union — Causal link between the Commission’s administrative order and the damage allegedly suffered by that expert)
Date: 2011-03-31
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, European Commission, action for annulment (EU), contractual liability, damage, damages








C_2011252EN.01001102.xml










27.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/11





Order of the Court of 31 March 2011 — Volker Mauerhofer v European Commission
(Case C-433/10 P) (1)

(Appeal - Project supported by the European Union in Bosnia and Herzegovina - Contracts concluded between the Commission and a consortium and between the consortium and experts - Commission’s administrative order amending its contract with the consortium - Action for annulment of that administrative order brought by one of the experts - Admissibility - Action for damages - Non contractual liability of the Union - Causal link between the Commission’s administrative order and the damage allegedly suffered by that expert)
2011/C 252/21
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Volker Mauerhofer (represented by: J. Schartmüller, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: S. Boelaert, Agent)

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 29 June 2010 in Case T-515/08 Volker Mauerhofer v European Commission by which the Court dismissed an action for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 9 September 2008 reducing the number of paid days’ work allocated to the applicant to perform tasks resulting from a contract for an expert’s report (Contract No MC/5043/025/001/2008 — ‘Value Chain Mapping Analysis’) concluded with the undertaking responsible for a project carried out in Bosnia and Herzegovina in performance of the framework contract ‘EuropeAid/123314/C/SER/multi — Lot No 5 — Evaluations and presentations in the field of trade, businesses and regional economic integration’ — No challengeable act

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Mr Mauerhofer shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.
Case T-193/11: Action brought on 31 March 2011 — Ahoua-N’Guetta and Others v Council
Date: 2011-03-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Côte d'Ivoire, action for annulment (EU), economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2011152EN.01003101.xml










21.5.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 152/31





Action brought on 31 March 2011 — Ahoua-N’Guetta and Others v Council
(Case T-193/11)
2011/C 152/55
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Timothée Ahoua-N’Guetta (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire), Jacques André Monoko Daligou (Abidjan), Bruno Walé Ekpo (Abidjan), Félix Tano Kouakou (Abidjan), Hortense Sess (Abidjan); and Joséphine Suzanne Ebah (Abidjan) (represented by: J.-C. Tchikaya, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Forms of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:






—


Annul Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011 amending Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire, and Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d'Ivoire, in so far as they concern the applicants;










—


order the Council to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments relied on by the applicants are essentially identical or similar to those submitted in Case T-118/11 Attey v Council
Case T-117/08: Judgment of the General Court of 31 March 2011 — Italy v EESC (Rules on the use of languages — Vacancy notice concerning the recruitment of the Secretary-General of the EESC — Publication in three official languages — Information relating to the vacancy notice — Publication in all official languages — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Articles 12 EC and 290 EC — Article 12 of the CEOS — Regulation No 1)
Date: 2011-03-31
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commission, European Economic and Social Committee, European civil service, Italy, action for annulment (EU), competition (EU), official language








C_2011145EN.01002303.xml










14.5.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 145/23





Judgment of the General Court of 31 March 2011 — Italy v EESC
(Case T-117/08) (1)

(Rules on the use of languages - Vacancy notice concerning the recruitment of the Secretary-General of the EESC - Publication in three official languages - Information relating to the vacancy notice - Publication in all official languages - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Articles 12 EC and 290 EC - Article 12 of the CEOS - Regulation No 1)
2011/C 145/37
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: R. Adam, Agent, and by P. Gentili, lawyer)

Defendant: European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) (represented initially by: M. Bermejo Garde, and subsequently by: M. Arsène, Agents, and by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Spain, (represented by: F. Díez Moreno, Agent)

Re:

ACTION for annulment, firstly, of vacancy notice No 73/07 concerning a post of Secretary-General in the Secretariat of the EESC, published in the English, French and German versions of the Official Journal of the European Union of 28 December 2007 (OJ 2007 C 316 A, p. 1), and, secondly, of the corrigendum to that vacancy notice published in the English, French and German versions of the Official Journal of the European Union of 30 January 2008 (OJ 2008 C 25 A, p. 19)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Annuls vacancy notice No 73/07 concerning a post of Secretary-General in the Secretariat of the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC), published on 28 December 2007, as corrected on 30 January 2008;










2.


Orders each party to bear its own costs.






(1)  OJ C 116, 9.5.2008.