do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-187/11: Action brought on 30 March 2011 — Trabelsi and Others v Council
Date: 2011-03-30
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: action for annulment (EU), crime against property, discrimination based on disability, economic sanctions, international sanctions, natural person








C_2011152EN.01002902.xml










21.5.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 152/29





Action brought on 30 March 2011 — Trabelsi and Others v Council
(Case T-187/11)
2011/C 152/52
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Mohamed Trabelsi (Paris, France), Ines Lejri (Paris), Moncef Trabelsi (Paris), Selima Trabelsi (Paris) and Tarek Trabelsi (Paris) (represented by: A. Metzker, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:






—


annul the contested decision of the Council of the European Union of 4 February 2011;










—


remove the name ‘Mohamed TRABELSI’ from the list;










—


remove the name ‘INES LEJRI’ from the list;










—


remove the name of Mr Mohamed TRABELSI’s mother;










—


remove the address indicated in relation to Mr Mohamed TRABELSI;










—


grant Mr and Mrs TRABELSI a right to respond;










—


protect Mr Tarek TRABELSI given his disability;










—


instruct the Council of the European Union to re-examine its text and to comply with the principle of the presumption of innocence;










—


suspend the text adopted by the Council of the European Union;










—


order the Council of the European Union to pay Mr TRABELSI the sum of EUR 150 000 by way of damages for the harm suffered;










—


hold the European Union liable for the sum of EUR 25 000 by way of costs;










—


order the State to pay non-recoverable expenses — which it falls to the Court to set on an equitable basis — pursuant to Article L 761-1 of the Code de justice administrative (Administrative Justice Code).





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law alleging a formal illegality of the contested decision by reason of a misuse of powers and of infringement of the principles of the presumption of innocence, of the legality of criminal offences and penalties, of non bis in idem and of the principle that both parties must be heard, as well as that of fair legal process.










2.


Second plea in law alleging a substantive illegality of the contested decision by reason of an infringement of the right to property as well as of the principles of human dignity and equality, of an infringement of the freedoms of the TRABELSIs, of an interference with private life and of discrimination against a disabled child.
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2011-03-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2011098EN.01000201.xml










30.3.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 98/2





Euro exchange rates (1)

29 March 2011
2011/C 98/02

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,4066




JPY


Japanese yen


115,60




DKK


Danish krone


7,4574




GBP


Pound sterling


0,88145




SEK


Swedish krona


8,9850




CHF


Swiss franc


1,2957




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


7,9040




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


24,511




HUF


Hungarian forint


267,78




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7092




PLN


Polish zloty


3,9955




RON


Romanian leu


4,1225




TRY


Turkish lira


2,1982




AUD


Australian dollar


1,3759




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,3737




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,9664




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8731




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,7763




KRW


South Korean won


1 565,34




ZAR


South African rand


9,6678




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


9,2280




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,3876




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 257,24




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,2599




PHP


Philippine peso


61,220




RUB


Russian rouble


39,9660




THB


Thai baht


42,662




BRL


Brazilian real


2,3370




MXN


Mexican peso


16,8405




INR


Indian rupee


62,9910






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.6156 — JCDecaux/Bolloré/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2011-03-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: advertising, economic concentration, exchange of information, merger control








C_2011098EN.01002401.xml










30.3.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 98/24





Prior notification of a concentration
(Case COMP/M.6156 — JCDecaux/Bolloré/JV)
Candidate case for simplified procedure
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 98/09






1.


On 23 March 2011, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which the undertakings JCDecaux Asie Holding, belonging to the JCDecaux Group (‘JCDecaux’, France) and Socopao, belonging to the Bolloré Group (‘Bolloré’, France) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the undertaking JCDecaux Bolloré Holding (‘JV’, France) by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.










2.


The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:






—


JCDecaux: French group active in the field of outdoor advertising in 56 countries around the world,










—


Bolloré: French group active in various fields such as manufacturing of plastic film, electrical batteries and energy storage components, design, manufacture and marketing of ticketing terminals and machines and access control systems, energy distribution, freight forwarding and international logistics, communication and media and operation of port and rail concessions and plantations,










—


JV: outdoor advertising in Cameroon and in the future possibly other African countries.














3.


On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the EC Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under the EC Merger Regulation (2) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.










4.


The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference number COMP/M.6156 — JCDecaux/Bolloré/JV, to the following address:





European Commission




Directorate-General for Competition




Merger Registry




J-70




1049 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË










(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘EC Merger Regulation’).

(2)  OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32 (‘Notice on a simplified procedure’).
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 309/2011 of 30 March 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2011-03-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, import price, pip fruit








L_2011085EN.01000101.xml










31.3.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 85/1








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 309/2011
of 30 March 2011
         
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),


Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 31 March 2011.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 30 March 2011.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ
            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development






(1)  
            OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.




ANNEX
Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables







(EUR/100 kg)




CN code


Third country code (1)



Standard import value




0702 00 00 


IL 


61,9 




JO 


68,6 




MA 


53,2 




TN 


97,4 




TR 


80,5 




ZZ 


72,3 




0707 00 05 


EG 


158,2 




TR 


141,6 




ZZ 


149,9 




0709 90 70 


MA 


40,6 




TR 


109,9 




ZA 


49,8 




ZZ 


66,8 




0805 10 20 


EG 


50,6 




IL 


78,1 




MA 


50,1 




TN 


49,6 




TR 


54,0 




ZZ 


56,5 




0805 50 10 


TR 


57,6 




ZZ 


57,6 




0808 10 80 


AR 


82,8 




BR 


81,4 




CA 


87,6 




CL 


90,9 




CN 


133,4 




MK 


45,6 




US 


126,7 




UY 


70,6 




ZA 


90,1 




ZZ 


89,9 




0808 20 50 


AR 


91,1 




CL 


88,6 




CN 


58,6 




US 


79,9 




ZA 


110,7 




ZZ 


85,8 






(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
            ZZ
            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5984 — Intel/McAfee)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2011-03-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, exchange of information, information technology industry, merger control, telecommunications industry








C_2011098EN.01000101.xml










30.3.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 98/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.5984 — Intel/McAfee)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2011/C 98/01
On 26 January 2011, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32011M5984. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Notice concerning a request under Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC — Withdrawal — Request from a contracting entity
Date: 2011-03-30
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Italy, award of contract, mining industry, oil industry








C_2011098EN.01002501.xml










30.3.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 98/25





Notice concerning a request under Article 30 of Directive 2004/17/EC — Withdrawal
Request from a contracting entity
2011/C 98/10
On 18 October 2010 the Commission received a request pursuant to Article 30(5) of Directive 2004/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 coordinating the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors (1).
That request, from the Italian oil and mining industry association — Assomineraria, on behalf of the contracting entities in the sector, concerns exploration for and extraction of oil and gas in Italy. The request was published in OJ C 290, 27.10.2010, p. 20. The initial period ended on 19 January 2011. This was extended to 19 April 2011 and the extension of the period was published in OJ C 343, 17.12.2010, p. 31.
On 22 March 2011, the applicant withdrew the request, which is to be considered null and void. There is therefore no reason to decide whether Article 30(1) applies to these sectors in Italy. Directive 2004/17/EC therefore continues to apply when contracting entities award contracts intended to enable exploration for and extraction of oil and gas in Italy and when they organise competitive tendering for the pursuit of such an activity in this geographical area.


(1)  OJ L 134, 30.4.2004, p. 1.
Case C-158/10: Order of the President of the Court of 30 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad Van State — Netherlands) — Johan van Leendert Holding BV v Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid
Date: 2011-03-30
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: interpretation of the law, labour law, labour mobility, work permit








C_2011211EN.01002101.xml










16.7.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 211/21





Order of the President of the Court of 30 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad Van State — Netherlands) — Johan van Leendert Holding BV v Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid
(Case C-158/10) (1)

2011/C 211/39
Language of the case: Dutch
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 161, 19.6.2010.