do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Council Decision 2011/171/CFSP of 21 March 2011 amending Decision 2010/573/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova
Date: 2011-03-21
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Moldova, common foreign and security policy, international sanctions, political figure, restriction of liberty




L_2011076EN.01006201.xml










22.3.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 76/62








            COUNCIL DECISION 2011/171/CFSP
of 21 March 2011
         
amending Decision 2010/573/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


On 27 September 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/573/CFSP (1).












(2)


On the basis of a review of Decision 2010/573/CFSP, the restrictive measures should be extended until 31 March 2012.












(3)


However, in order to encourage progress in reaching a political settlement to the Transnistrian conflict, addressing the remaining problems of the Latin-script schools and restoring free movement of persons, the restrictive measures should be suspended until 30 September 2011. At the end of that period, the Council will review the restrictive measures in the light of developments, notably in the areas mentioned above. The Council may decide to reapply or lift travel restrictions at any time,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Decision 2010/573/CFSP is hereby amended as follows:






(1)


Article 4(2) is replaced by the following:

‘2.   This Decision shall apply until 31 March 2012. It shall be kept under constant review. It may be renewed or amended, as appropriate, if the Council deems that its objectives have not been met.’;











(2)


Article 4(3) is replaced by the following:

‘3.   The restrictive measures provided for in this Decision shall be suspended until 30 September 2011. At the end of that period, the Council shall review the restrictive measures.’.







Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 21 March 2011.


For the Council


The President

C. ASHTON
            





(1)  
            OJ L 253, 28.9.2010, p. 54.
Council Decision 2011/170/CFSP of 21 March 2011 amending Council Decision 2010/330/CFSP on the European Union Integrated Rule of Law Mission for Iraq, EUJUST LEX – IRAQ
Date: 2011-03-21
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Iraq, defence expenditure, fact-finding mission, rule of law, the EU's international role




L_2011076EN.01006101.xml










22.3.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 76/61








            COUNCIL DECISION 2011/170/CFSP
of 21 March 2011
         
amending Council Decision 2010/330/CFSP on the European Union Integrated Rule of Law Mission for Iraq, EUJUST LEX – IRAQ


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28 and Article 43(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


On 7 March 2005, the Council adopted Joint Action 2005/190/CFSP on the European Union Integrated Rule of Law Mission in Iraq, EUJUST LEX (1). That Joint Action, as subsequently amended and extended, expired on 30 June 2009.












(2)


On 11 June 2009, the Council adopted Joint Action 2009/475/CFSP (2) which continued EUJUST LEX for another 12 months until 30 June 2010 and which provided that during this period EUJUST LEX was to start a pilot phase of activities in Iraq.












(3)


On 14 June 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/330/CFSP (3) which continued EUJUST LEX for a further 24 months until 30 June 2012 and which provided that during this period EUJUST LEX – IRAQ should progressively shift its activities and relevant structures to Iraq, focusing on specialised training, while maintaining out-of-country activities as appropriate.












(4)


Council Decision 2010/330/CFSP provided for a financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUJUST LEX-IRAQ for the period from 1 July 2010 to 30 June 2011. This financial reference amount should be increased to cover the Mission’s operational needs and Council Decision 2010/330/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly.












(5)


The mandate of the Mission is being carried out in a security context that is liable to deteriorate and to undermine the objectives of the external action of the Union as defined in Article 21 of the Treaty.












(6)


The command and control structure of the Mission should be without prejudice to the contractual responsibility of the Head of Mission towards the Commission for implementing the budget of the Mission,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Article 11(1) of Council Decision 2010/330/CFSP is hereby replaced by the following:

‘1.   The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the Mission between 1 July 2010 and 30 June 2011 shall be EUR 22 300 000.’.



Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 21 March 2011.


For the Council


The President

C. ASHTON
            





(1)  
            OJ L 62, 9.3.2005, p. 37.

(2)  
            OJ L 156, 19.6.2009, p. 57.

(3)  
            OJ L 149, 15.6.2010, p. 12.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 273/2011 of 21 March 2011 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Bayerisches Rindfleisch/Rindfleisch aus Bayern (PGI))
Date: 2011-03-21
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Germany, designation of origin, fresh meat, labelling, location of production, mode of production, product designation








L_2011076EN.01003601.xml










22.3.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 76/36








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 273/2011
of 21 March 2011
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Bayerisches Rindfleisch/Rindfleisch aus Bayern (PGI))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Germany’s application to register the name ‘Bayerisches Rindfleisch/Rindfleisch aus Bayern’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of objection pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 21 March 2011.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOŞ
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

(2)  
            OJ C 204, 28.7.2010, p. 15.




ANNEX
Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.1.   Fresh meat (and offal)

GERMANY
Bayerisches Rindfleisch/Rindfleisch aus Bayern (PGI)
Case C-137/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 21 March 2011 — Partena ASBL v Les Tartes de Chaumont-Gistoux SA
Date: 2011-03-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Belgium, foreign national, self-employed person, social security, worker (EU)








C_2011179EN.01000901.xml










18.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 179/9





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour du travail de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 21 March 2011 — Partena ASBL v Les Tartes de Chaumont-Gistoux SA
(Case C-137/11)
2011/C 179/15
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour du travail de Bruxelles

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Partena ASBL

Defendant: Les Tartes de Chaumont-Gistoux SA

Questions referred







1.


For the purposes of applying Article 13 et seq. of Regulation No 1408/71 (1) and, more specifically, Article 14c thereof, may a Member State, within the framework of its powers to define the conditions for coverage by its social security scheme for self-employed persons, treat the ‘management from abroad of a company which is liable to tax in that State’ in the same way as the exercise of an activity within its territory?;










2.


Is subparagraph 4 of Article 3(1) of Decree No 38 of 27 July 1967 organising the social security scheme for self-employed persons compatible with the law of the European Union and, in particular, with freedom of movement and of residence as guaranteed by Article 21 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, in so far as it does not allow a person who is resident in another Member State and who manages from abroad a company which is liable to Belgian tax to rebut the presumption that he is covered by the social security scheme for self-employed persons, whereas an agent who is resident in Belgium and who does not manage such a company from abroad has the right to rebut that presumption and to adduce evidence that he is not carrying on an activity as a self-employed person for the purposes of subparagraph 1 of Article 3(1) of Royal Decree No 38?






(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (OJ L 149, p. 2).
Council Decision of 21 March 2011 appointing the members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for Luxembourg, Malta and Austria
Date: 2011-03-21
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Austria, European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, European social policy, Luxembourg, Malta, appointment of staff, international labour law








C_2011092EN.01000801.xml










24.3.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 92/8





COUNCIL DECISION
of 21 March 2011
appointing the members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for Luxembourg, Malta and Austria
2011/C 92/04
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2062/94 of 18 July 1994 establishing a European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (1), and in particular Article 8 thereof,
Having regard to the list of nominations for appointment submitted to the Council by the governments of the Member States and by the employers’ and the employees’ organisations,
Having regard to the lists of members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work,
Whereas:






(1)


By Decision of 22 November 2010 (2) the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the period from 8 November 2010 to 7 November 2013.










(2)


The Government of Malta and the employees’ organisations have submitted nominations for a number of posts to be filled for Luxembourg, Malta and Austria,




HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
The following shall be appointed members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the period ending on 7 November 2013:
I.   GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES







Country


Members


Alternate members




Malta


Mr Mark GAUCI


Mr Vince ATTARD







II.   REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYEES’ ORGANISATIONS







Country


Members


Alternate members




Luxembourg


Mr Marcel GOEREND


Mr Raffaele PAOLETTI




Malta


Mr Jesmond BONELLO


Mr Joseph CARABOTT




Austria


Ms Julia NEDJELIK-LISCHKA


Mr Alexander HEIDER




Article 2
The Council will appoint the members and alternate members not yet nominated at a later date.
Article 3
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 21 March 2011.


For the Council


The President

MARTONYI J.




(1)  OJ L 216, 20.8.1994, p. 1.

(2)  OJ C 322, 27.11.2010, p. 3.
Case C-445/10: Order of the President of the Court of 21 March 2011 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany
Date: 2011-03-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Germany, geographical information system, information network








C_2011211EN.01002107.xml










16.7.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 211/21





Order of the President of the Court of 21 March 2011 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany
(Case C-445/10) (1)

2011/C 211/45
Language of the case: German
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 301, 6.11.2010.
Case C-139/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 21 March 2011 — Joan Cuadrench More v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM)
Date: 2011-03-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Spain, air transport, consumer protection, indemnification, traveller








C_2011179EN.01000902.xml










18.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 179/9





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 21 March 2011 — Joan Cuadrench More v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM)
(Case C-139/11)
2011/C 179/16
Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Joan Cuadrench More

Defendant: Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM)

Question referred

Is Regulation (EC) No [261]/2004 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 to be interpreted as meaning that, as regards time-limits for bringing proceedings, Article 35 of the Montreal Convention, establishing a two year period, is applicable, or must some other Community provision or the relevant domestic law be regarded as applicable?


(1)  OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.
Case C-138/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria), lodged on 21 March 2011 — Compass-Datenbank GmbH v Republik Österreich
Date: 2011-03-21
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: access to information, branch of activity, data transmission, intellectual property








C_2011186EN.01001201.xml










25.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 186/12





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria), lodged on 21 March 2011 — Compass-Datenbank GmbH v Republik Österreich
(Case C-138/11)
2011/C 186/20
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Compass-Datenbank GmbH

Respondent: Republik Österreich

Interested parties: Bundeskartellanwalt, Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde

Questions referred







1.


Is Article 102 TFEU to be interpreted as meaning that a public authority acts as an undertaking if it stores in a database (business undertakings register) the information reported by undertakings on the basis of statutory reporting obligations and allows inspection and/or printouts to be made in return for payment, but prohibits any more extensive use?
If the reply to Question 1 is in the negative:










2.


Does a public authority act as an undertaking in the case where, in reliance on its sui generis right to protection as the producer of a database, it prohibits uses which go beyond that of allowing inspection and the creation of printouts?
If the reply to Questions 1 or 2 is in the affirmative:










3.


Is Article 102 TFEU to be interpreted as meaning that the principles laid down in the judgments in Joined Cases C-241/91 P and C-242/91 P RTE and ITP [1995] ECR I-743 and in Case C-418/01 IMS Health [2004] ECR I-5039 (‘essential facilities doctrine’) are also to be applied if there is no ‘upstream market’ because the protected data are collected and stored in a database (business undertakings register) in the course of a public-authority activity?
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 274/2011 of 21 March 2011 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Traditional Cumberland Sausage (PGI))
Date: 2011-03-21
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: United Kingdom, designation of origin, labelling, meat product, mode of production, originating product, pigmeat, product designation








L_2011076EN.01003801.xml










22.3.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 76/38








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 274/2011
of 21 March 2011
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Traditional Cumberland Sausage (PGI))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the United Kingdom’s application to register the name ‘Traditional Cumberland Sausage’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 21 March 2011.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOŞ
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

(2)  
            OJ C 208, 31.7.2010, p. 8.




ANNEX
Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.2.   Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.)

UNITED KINGDOM
Traditional Cumberland Sausage (PGI)
Council Decision of 21 March 2011 appointing the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for Luxembourg and Malta
Date: 2011-03-21
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, European social policy, Luxembourg, Malta, appointment of staff, international labour law








C_2011092EN.01000901.xml










24.3.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 92/9





COUNCIL DECISION
of 21 March 2011
appointing the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for Luxembourg and Malta
2011/C 92/05
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Council Decision of 22 July 2003 setting up an Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work (1), and in particular Article 3 thereof,
Having regard to the list of candidates submitted to the Council by the governments of the Member States,
Whereas:






(1)


By Decision of 16 February 2010 (2), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for the period from 1 March 2010 until 28 February 2013, with the exception of certain members.










(2)


The Governments of Luxembourg and Malta have submitted nominations for a number of posts to be filled,




HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
The following are hereby appointed members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work for the period ending on 28 February 2013:
I.   GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES







Country


Members


Alternate members




Luxembourg


Mr Paul WEBER


Mr Robert HUBERTY
Mr Carlo STEFFES







II.   TRADE UNION REPRESENTATIVES







Country


Members


Alternate members




Luxembourg


Mr Marcel GOEREND


Mr Raffaele PAOLETTI
Mr Nico CLEMENT




Malta


Mr Joe CARABOTT


Mr Jesmond BONELLO







III.   EMPLOYERS' REPRESENTATIVES







Country


Members


Alternate members




Luxembourg


Mr Pierre BLAISE


Mr François ENGELS
Mr Marc KIEFFER




Malta


Mr John SCICLUNA


Mr Joseph DELIA




Article 2
The Council will appoint the members and alternate members not yet nominated at a later date.
Article 3
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 21 March 2011.


For the Council


The President

MARTONYI J.




(1)  OJ C 218, 13.9.2003, p. 1.

(2)  OJ L 45, 22.2.2010, p. 5.
Case T-175/10: Order of the General Court of 21 March 2011 — Milux v OHIM (FERTILITYINVIVO) (Community trade mark — Representation of the applicant by a lawyer who is not a third party — Inadmissibility)
Date: 2011-03-21
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), trade-mark law








C_2011145EN.01002801.xml










14.5.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 145/28





Order of the General Court of 21 March 2011 — Milux v OHIM (FERTILITYINVIVO)
(Case T-175/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Representation of the applicant by a lawyer who is not a third party - Inadmissibility)
2011/C 145/47
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: Milux Holding SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: J. Bojs, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 February 2010 (Case R 1116/2009-4), concerning the application for registration of the word sign FERTILITYINVIVO as a Community trade mark

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as inadmissible.










2.


Milux Holding SA is ordered to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 161, 19.6.2010.