do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case C-95/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Strong Segurança SA v Município de Sintra, Securitas-Serviços e Tecnologia de Segurança (Public service contracts — Directive 2004/18/EC — Article 47(2) — Direct effect — Whether applicable to the services referred to in Annex II B to that directive)
Date: 2011-03-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Portugal, award of contract, interpretation of the law, public contract, services contract, supplies contract, works contract








C_2011139EN.01001101.xml










7.5.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 139/11





Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 March 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Portugal) — Strong Segurança SA v Município de Sintra, Securitas-Serviços e Tecnologia de Segurança
(Case C-95/10) (1)

(Public service contracts - Directive 2004/18/EC - Article 47(2) - Direct effect - Whether applicable to the services referred to in Annex II B to that directive)
2011/C 139/17
Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellant: Strong Segurança SA

Respondents: Município de Sintra, Securitas-Serviços e Tecnologia de Segurança

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Supremo Tribunal Administrativo — Interpretation of Articles 21, 23, 35(4) and 47(2) of, and of Annex II B to, Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts (OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114) — Economic and financial capacity of the tenderers — Whether an economic operator can rely on the capacities of other entities — Direct effect of a directive implemented late

Operative part of the judgment

Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts does not create the obligation, for Member States, to apply Article 47(2) of that directive also to contracts which have as their object services referred to in Annex II B thereto. However, that directive does not preclude Member States and, possibly, contracting authorities from providing for such application in, respectively, their legislation and the documents relating to the contract.


(1)  OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.
Case F-107/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 17 March 2011 — AP v Court of Justice (Civil service — Delay — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2011-03-17
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European civil service, damages, family benefit, indemnification








C_2012138EN.01003003.xml










12.5.2012   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 138/30






Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 17 March 2011 — AP v Court of Justice
(Case F-107/10)
(Civil service - Delay - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2012/C 138/66)
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: AP (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: B. Cortese and C. Cortese, lawyers)

Defendant: Court of Justice

Re:

Application for the annulment of the decision of the appointing authority of the Court of Justice which, although granting the applicant the entitlement to household allowance from 1 July 2009, only makes the applicant eligible for that allowance from 1 November 2009 and, secondarily, application for damages.

Operative part of the order







1.


The application is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.










2.


AP shall bear its own costs.
Case C-278/10: Order of the President of the Seventh Chamber of the Court of 17 March 2011 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic
Date: 2011-03-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Greece, electronic waste, environmental protection, national implementing measure, waste management








C_2011252EN.01002705.xml










27.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/27





Order of the President of the Seventh Chamber of the Court of 17 March 2011 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic
(Case C-278/10) (1)

2011/C 252/56
Language of the case: Greek
The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 209, 31.7.2010.
Case C-131/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 17 March 2011 — Pfeifer & Langen KG v Hauptzollamt Aachen
Date: 2011-03-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Germany, agricultural quota, sugar








C_2011179EN.01000801.xml










18.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 179/8





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 17 March 2011 — Pfeifer & Langen KG v Hauptzollamt Aachen
(Case C-131/11)
2011/C 179/12
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Pfeifer & Langen KG

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Aachen

Question referred

Must Article 3(4) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1443/82 (1) of 8 June 1982 laying down detailed rules for the application of the quota system in the sugar sector be interpreted as extending also to the additional quantities subsequently found by the authorities in the context of an inspection at the producer’s premises?


(1)  OJ 1982 L 158, p. 17.
Case C-326/09: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 March 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Poland (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2004/113/EC — Social policy — Equal treatment between men and women — Access to and supply of goods and services — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)
Date: 2011-03-17
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, Poland, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, equal treatment, gender equality, service industry








C_2011139EN.01000402.xml










7.5.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 139/4





Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 March 2011 — European Commission v Republic of Poland
(Case C-326/09) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2004/113/EC - Social policy - Equal treatment between men and women - Access to and supply of goods and services - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)
2011/C 139/06
Language of the case: Polish

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. van Beek and M. Kaduczak, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Poland (represented by: M. Dowgielewicz, Agent)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt or communicate, within the prescribed period, the provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2004/113/EC of 13 December 2004 implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services (OJ 2004 L 373, p. 37)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2004/113/EC of 13 December 2004 implementing the principle of equal treatment between men and women in the access to and supply of goods and services, the Republic of Poland failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive;










2.


Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 312, 19.12.2009.
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 264/2011 of 17 March 2011 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables
Date: 2011-03-17
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: agri-monetary policy, citrus fruit, fruit vegetable, import price, pip fruit








L_2011071EN.01000901.xml










18.3.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 71/9








            COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 264/2011
of 17 March 2011
         
establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),


Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on 18 March 2011.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 17 March 2011.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ
            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development






(1)  
            OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.




ANNEX
Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables







(EUR/100 kg)




CN code


Third country code (1)



Standard import value




0702 00 00 


JO 


71,2 




MA 


53,2 




TN 


51,7 




TR 


81,8 




ZZ 


64,5 




0707 00 05 


JO 


110,6 




TR 


150,7 




ZZ 


130,7 




0709 90 70 


MA 


42,5 




TR 


110,9 




ZZ 


76,7 




0805 10 20 


EG 


57,6 




IL 


71,1 




MA 


53,7 




TN 


45,3 




TR 


73,3 




ZZ 


60,2 




0805 50 10 


EG 


67,3 




TR 


49,4 




ZZ 


58,4 




0808 10 80 


AR 


96,2 




BR 


84,2 




CA 


103,1 




CL 


97,4 




CN 


119,2 




MK 


50,2 




US 


130,2 




ZZ 


97,2 




0808 20 50 


AR 


91,5 




CL 


74,6 




CN 


53,6 




US 


79,9 




ZA 


84,8 




ZZ 


76,9 






(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
            ZZ
            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.