do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-146/11: Action brought on 14 March 2011 — Yoro v Council of the European Union
Date: 2011-03-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Côte d'Ivoire, action for annulment, change of political system, economic sanctions, human rights, international sanctions, natural person, political rights, political system








C_2011130EN.01002501.xml










30.4.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 130/25





Action brought on 14 March 2011 — Yoro v Council of the European Union
(Case T-146/11)
2011/C 130/50
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Claude Yoro (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire) (represented by: G. Collard, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Forms of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that, concerning the applicant, Mr Claude YORO, Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011, published on 15 January 2011 in the Official Journal of the European Union, have no factual basis,










—


consequently,






—


annul Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011;










—


in the alterntive, order that the name of Mr Claude YORO be removed from the lists annexed to the aforementioned Regulation and the aforementioned Decision.









Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and principal arguments raised by the applicant are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-137/11 Guiai Bi Poin v Council.
2011/165/EU: Council Decision of 14 March 2011 appointing four Hungarian members and six Hungarian alternate members of the Committee of the Regions
Date: 2011-03-14
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: European Committee of the Regions, Hungary, appointment of members








L_2011071EN.01001901.xml










18.3.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 71/19








            COUNCIL DECISION
         
of 14 March 2011
         
appointing four Hungarian members and six Hungarian alternate members of the Committee of the Regions
(2011/165/EU)


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,


Having regard to the proposal of the Hungarian Government,

Whereas:







(1)


On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.












(2)


Four members’ seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Ferenc BENKŐ, Mr Attila JÓSZAI, Mr Gyögy IPKOVICH and Mr András SZALAY. Four alternate members’ seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr László BÁKONYI, Ms Károlyné KOCSIS, Mr Zoltán NAGY and Mr József PAIZS. Two alternate members’ seats will become vacant following the appointment of Mr István BÓKA and Mr Attila KISS as members of the Committee of the Regions,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:






(a)


as members:






—


Mr István BÓKA, Balatonfüred város polgármestere,










—


Mr Attila KISS, Hajdúböszörmény város polgármestere,










—


Mr Sándor KOVÁCS, Jász-Nagykun-Szolnok Megyei Közgyűlés elnöke,










—


Mr Jenő MANNINGER, Zala Megyei Közgyűlés elnöke.




and










(b)


as alternate members:






—


Mr Zoltán HORVÁTH, Baranya Megyei Közgyűlés alelnöke,










—


Mr Ferenc KOVÁCS, Vas Megyei Közgyűlés elnöke,










—


Mr Ferenc TEMERINI, Soltvadkert, önkormányzati képviselő,










—


Mr Attila TILKI, Fehérgyarmat város polgármestere,










—


Mr Botond VÁNTSA, Szigetszentmiklós, önkormányzati képviselő,










—


Mr Tamás VARGHA, Fejér Megyei Közgyűlés elnöke.










Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 14 March 2011.


For the Council


The President


               FAZEKAS S.





(1)  
            OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

(2)  
            OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.
Case F-28/11: Action brought on 14 March 2011 — ZZ v Council
Date: 2011-03-14
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: action for annulment (EU), civil servant, promotion








C_2011173EN.01001601.xml










11.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 173/16





Action brought on 14 March 2011 — ZZ v Council
(Case F-28/11)
2011/C 173/34
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Rodrigues, A. Blot and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

The subject matter and description of the proceedings

The annulment of the decision whereby the Appointing Authority of the Council refused to promote him to grade AD 12 under the 2010 promotion exercise, contained in Staff Note 80/10 of 26 April 2010.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


Ask the Council to provide the reports on the former A officials promoted to the grade AD 12 that were considered under the 2010 promotion exercise, as well as the statistics on the average analytical assessment by first reporting officers that were submitted to the AD ‘Administrators’ Advisory Committee on Promotion;










—


annul the contested decision and, in so far as necessary, the decision rejecting the complaint;










—


order the Council to pay the costs.
Case C-370/10 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 March 2011 — Ravensburger AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Educa Borras SA (Appeal — Community trade mark — Figurative mark EDUCA Memory game — Application for a declaration of invalidity made by the proprietor of the national and international word marks MEMORY — Rejection of the application for a declaration of invalidity by the Board of Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) and (5) — Relative grounds for refusal)
Date: 2011-03-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment, trade mark








C_2011186EN.01001002.xml










25.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 186/10





Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 March 2011 — Ravensburger AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Educa Borras SA
(Case C-370/10 P) (1)

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Figurative mark EDUCA Memory game - Application for a declaration of invalidity made by the proprietor of the national and international word marks MEMORY - Rejection of the application for a declaration of invalidity by the Board of Appeal - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) and (5) - Relative grounds for refusal)
2011/C 186/17
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Ravensburger AG (represented by: H. Harte-Bavendamm and M. Goldmann, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent), Educa Borras SA

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 May 2010 in Case T-243/08 Ravensburger AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) by which the General Court dismissed an action for annulment brought by the proprietor of the national and international word marks ‘MEMORY’ for goods in Class 28 against Decision R 597/2007-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 8 April 2008 annulling the decision of the Cancellation Decision, which upheld the application for a declaration of invalidity lodged by the applicant against the figurative mark ‘EDUCA Memory Game’ for goods in Class 28

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Ravensburger AG shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 260, 25.9.2010.
Healthcare abroad? Who'll foot the bill? : your answer on europa.eu/youreurope.
Date: 2011-03-14
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Internet site, citizens' Europe, communications policy, personal accident insurance, personal insurance, public awareness campaign

Healthcare
                           abroad?

Who’ll foot the 
     bill?

-

-

-

P
N
E
5
1
4
0
1
0
3
M
K

-

-

Your answer on  (cid:76)(cid:92)(cid:89)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:21)(cid:76)(cid:92)(cid:22)(cid:96)(cid:86)(cid:92)(cid:89)(cid:76)(cid:92)(cid:89)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:76)
or call(cid:3)(cid:23)(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:31)(cid:23)(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:29)(cid:30)(cid:3)(cid:31)(cid:32)(cid:3)(cid:24)(cid:23)(cid:3)(cid:24)(cid:24)(cid:3)(cid:15)(cid:44)(cid:92)(cid:89)(cid:86)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:3)(cid:43)(cid:80)(cid:89)(cid:76)(cid:74)(cid:91)(cid:16)
Case C-369/10 P: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 March 2011 — Ravensburger AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) — Educa Borras SA (Appeal — Community trade mark — Community word mark MEMORY — Invalidity proceedings — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 7(1)(c))
Date: 2011-03-14
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), competition law, consumer protection, toy industry, trade-mark law








C_2011252EN.01001001.xml










27.8.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 252/10





Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 March 2011 — Ravensburger AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) — Educa Borras SA
(Case C-369/10 P) (1)

(Appeal - Community trade mark - Community word mark MEMORY - Invalidity proceedings - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 7(1)(c))
2011/C 252/18
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Ravensburger AG (represented by: H. Harte-Bavendamm and M. Goldmann, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent), Educa Borras SA

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 19 May 2010 in Case T-108/09 Ravensburger v OHIM, by which the Court dismissed the action brought against Decision R 305/2008-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 8 January 2009, dismissing the appeal brought against the Cancellation Division’s decision which declares the word mark ‘MEMORY’ invalid, in respect of goods in Classes 9 and 28, in the context of the application for a declaration of invalidity filed by Educa Borras

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Ravensburger AG shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 260, 25.9.2010.
Case T-142/11: Action brought on 14 March 2011 — SIR v Council
Date: 2011-03-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Côte d'Ivoire, action for annulment, change of political system, economic sanctions, human rights, international sanctions, natural person, political rights, political system








C_2011130EN.01002401.xml










30.4.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 130/24





Action brought on 14 March 2011 — SIR v Council
(Case T-142/11)
2011/C 130/47
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Société ivoirienne de raffinage (SIR) (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire) (represented by: M. Ceccaldi, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP and Council Regulation (EU) 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 imposing restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities and in particular as regards the SIR;










—


order the Council to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant puts forward five pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law alleging infringement of the Charter of the United Nations, and of Articles 3(5) and (6) and 21(1) TEU and 7 TFEU, in so far as the defendant has exceeded its powers in imposing restrictive measures, the name of the applicant not being among the persons covered by United Nations Security Council Resolution 1572 (2004).










2.


Second plea in law alleging infringement of the principle of non-interference in a State's internal affairs, the defendant going against the sovereign decision of the Constitutional Council of the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire which declared elected president L. Gbagbo and not A. Ouattara.










3.


Third plea in law alleging the substantive unlawfulness of the contested measures which cannot be linked to a competence and/or to a power of the defendant.










4.


Fourth plea in law alleging infringement of the rights of the defence, in so far as the applicant could not have been apprised of the evidence against him and could not therefore have duly put forward his point of view in that regard.










5.


Fifth plea in law alleging infringement of the principle of proportionality, the consequences of the measures taken both for the applicant and for the population of Côte d’Ivoire being excessive in relation to the objective being pursued.
Case T-259/08: Order of the General Court of 14 March 2011 — Global Digital Disc v Commission
Date: 2011-03-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: anti-dumping duty, anti-dumping legislation, damages, record, restriction on competition








C_2011139EN.01002901.xml










7.5.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 139/29





Order of the General Court of 14 March 2011 — Global Digital Disc v Commission
(Case T-259/08) (1)

2011/C 139/54
Language of the case: German
The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 272, 25.10.2008.
Case T-153/11: Action brought on 14 March 2011 — Zenato Azienda Vitivinicola v OHIM — Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona (ZENATO RIPASSA)
Date: 2011-03-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), trade-mark law, wine








C_2011139EN.01002402.xml










7.5.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 139/24





Action brought on 14 March 2011 — Zenato Azienda Vitivinicola v OHIM — Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona (ZENATO RIPASSA)
(Case T-153/11)
2011/C 139/46
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Zenato Azienda Vitivinicola Srl (Peschiera del Garda, Italy) (represented by: A. Rizzoli, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona (Verona, Italy)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare the present action, together with the related annexes, admissible;










—


annul the decision of the Board of Appeal (points 1, 2 and 3 of the operative part) in so far as it upholds the appeal, upholds the opposition and rejects in its entirety the application for registration, and orders the applicant to pay the costs incurred by the opposing party in the opposition and appeal proceedings;










—


order OHIM to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘ZENATO RIPASSA’ (registration application No 5 848 015), for goods in Class 33 (alcoholic beverages)

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: La Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Italian word mark ‘RIPASSO’ (No 682 213) for goods in Class 33 (‘Wines, spirits and liqueurs’)

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected

Decision of the Board of Appeal: To uphold the opposition and to reject in its entirety the application for registration

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/09.
Case T-144/11: Action brought on 14 March 2011 — Kassarate v Council
Date: 2011-03-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Côte d'Ivoire, action for annulment, change of political system, economic sanctions, human rights, international sanctions, natural person, political rights, political system








C_2011130EN.01002402.xml










30.4.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 130/24





Action brought on 14 March 2011 — Kassarate v Council
(Case T-144/11)
2011/C 130/48
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Tiapé Edouard Kassarate (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire) (represented by: G. Collard and L. Aliot, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that, concerning the applicant, Mr Tiapé Edouard KASSARATE, Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011, published on 15 January 2011 in the Official Journal of the European Union, are not justified in fact,










—


consequently,






—


annul Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011;










—


alternatively, order that the name of Mr Tiapé Edouard KASSARATE be removed from the lists annexed to that regulation and to that decision.









Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments raised by the applicant are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-137/11 Guiai Bi Poin v Council.
Case T-154/11: Action brought on 14 March 2011 — Zenato Azienda Vitivinicola v OHIM — Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona (Ripassa Zenato)
Date: 2011-03-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), trade-mark law, wine








C_2011139EN.01002501.xml










7.5.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 139/25





Action brought on 14 March 2011 — Zenato Azienda Vitivinicola v OHIM — Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona (Ripassa Zenato)
(Case T-154/11)
2011/C 139/47
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Zenato Azienda Vitivinicola Srl (Peschiera del Garda, Italy) (represented by: A. Rizzoli, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona (Verona, Italy)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare the present action, together with the related annexes, admissible;










—


annul the decision of the Board of Appeal (points 1, 2 and 3 of the operative part) in so far as it upholds the appeal, upholds the opposition and rejects in its entirety the application for registration, and orders the applicant to pay the costs incurred by the opposing party in the opposition and appeal proceedings;










—


order OHIM to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark containing the word element ‘RIPASSA ZENATO’ (registration application No 5 877 865), for goods in Class 33

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Italian word mark “RIPASSO” (No 682 213), for goods in Class 33

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected

Decision of the Board of Appeal: To uphold the opposition and to reject in its entirety the application for registration

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/09.
Case T-145/11: Action brought on 14 March 2011 — Vagba v Council
Date: 2011-03-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Côte d'Ivoire, action for annulment, change of political system, economic sanctions, human rights, international sanctions, natural person, political rights, political system








C_2011130EN.01002403.xml










30.4.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 130/24





Action brought on 14 March 2011 — Vagba v Council
(Case T-145/11)
2011/C 130/49
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Gagbei Faussignaux Vagba (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire) (represented by: G. Collard and L. Aliot, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that, concerning the applicant, Mr Gagbei Faussignaux VAGBA, Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011, published on 15 January 2011 in the Official Journal of the European Union, are not justified in fact,










—


consequently,






—


annul Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011;










—


alternatively, order that the name of Mr Gagbei Faussignaux VAGBA be removed from the lists annexed to that regulation and to that decision.









Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments raised by the applicant are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-137/11 Guiai Bi Poin v Council.
Case T-147/11: Action brought on 14 March 2011 — Robe v Council
Date: 2011-03-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Côte d'Ivoire, action for annulment, change of political system, economic sanctions, human rights, international sanctions, natural person, political rights, political system








C_2011130EN.01002502.xml










30.4.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 130/25





Action brought on 14 March 2011 — Robe v Council
(Case T-147/11)
2011/C 130/51
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Gogo Joachim Robe (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire) (represented by: G. Collard, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


declare that, concerning the applicant, Mr Gogo Joachim ROBE, Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011, published on 15 January 2011 in the Official Journal of the European Union, are not justified in fact,










—


consequently,






—


annul Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 and Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011;










—


alternatively, order that the name of Mr Gogo Joachim ROBE be removed from the lists annexed to that regulation and to that decision.









Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments raised by the applicant are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-137/11 Guiai Bi Poin v Council.