do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
2011/114/EU: Commission Decision of 18 February 2011 amending Decision 2008/589/EC establishing a specific control and inspection programme related to the cod stocks in the Baltic Sea (notified under document C(2011) 938)
Date: 2011-02-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Baltic Sea, common fisheries policy, fishery management, fishing controls, sea fish




L_2011046EN.01005001.xml










19.2.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 46/50








            COMMISSION DECISION
         
of 18 February 2011
         
amending Decision 2008/589/EC establishing a specific control and inspection programme related to the cod stocks in the Baltic Sea
(notified under document C(2011) 938)
(2011/114/EU)


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy, amending Regulations (EC) No 847/96, (EC) No 2371/2002, (EC) No 811/2004, (EC) No 768/2005, (EC) No 2115/2005, (EC) No 2166/2005, (EC) No 388/2006, (EC) No 509/2007, (EC) No 676/2007, (EC) No 1098/2007, (EC) No 1300/2008, (EC) No 1342/2008 and repealing Regulations (EEC) No 2847/93, (EC) No 1627/94 and (EC) No 1966/2006 (1), and in particular Article 95 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Commission Decision 2008/589/EC (2) establishes a specific control and inspection programme applicable for a period of 3 years to ensure the harmonised implementation of the multiannual plan set up by Council Regulation (EC) No 1098/2007 (3) for cod stocks in the Baltic Sea and the fisheries exploiting those stocks.












(2)


The specific control and inspection programme is necessary for the organisation of operational cooperation between Member States concerned and to allow the Community Fisheries Control Agency to organise joint deployment plans in accordance with Article 9 of Council Regulation (EC) No 768/2005 (4).












(3)


In order to ensure the continued harmonised implementation of the multiannual plan set up by Regulation (EC) No 1098/2007, the specific control and inspection programme should be extended for a period of 1 year.












(4)


Decision 2008/589/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.












(5)


The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for Fisheries and Aquaculture,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
In Article 2 of Decision 2008/589/EC, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:

‘2.   The specific control and inspection programme shall apply for 4 years.’



Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Member States.




Done at Brussels, 18 February 2011.


For the Commission

Maria DAMANAKI
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 190, 18.7.2008, p. 11.

(3)  
            OJ L 248, 22.9.2007, p. 1.

(4)  
            OJ L 128, 21.5.2005, p. 1.
Case C-73/11 P: Appeal brought on 18 February 2011 by Frucona Košice a.s. against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 7 December 2010 in Case T-11/07: Frucona Košice a.s. v European Commission, St. Nicolaus — trade a.s.
Date: 2011-02-18
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, Slovakia, State aid, action for annulment (EU), control of State aid, tax debt write-off








C_2011130EN.01001201.xml










30.4.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 130/12





Appeal brought on 18 February 2011 by Frucona Košice a.s. against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 7 December 2010 in Case T-11/07: Frucona Košice a.s. v European Commission, St. Nicolaus — trade a.s.
(Case C-73/11 P)
2011/C 130/22
Language of the case: English

Parties


Appellant: Frucona Košice a.s. (represented by: P. Lasok QC, J. Holmes, Barrister, B. Hartnett, Barrister, O. Geiss, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, St. Nicolaus — trade a.s.

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:






1.


set aside the General Court’s decision of 7 December 2010 in Case T-11/07 as it relates to the fourth and sixth pleas in the Appellant’s Application before the General Court;










2.


uphold those pleas as well-founded;










3.


refer the case back to the General Court so that it can decide upon the Appellant’s fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth and ninth pleas as they relate to the tax execution procedure; and










4.


order the Commission to pay the Appellant’s costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on the following two pleas.
1.   First plea: the General Court failed to assess the Commission’s application of the private creditor test against the correct legal standard.

2.   Second plea: the General Court impermissibly sought to substitute its own reasoning for that of the Commission as regards the application of the private creditor test; and/or assessed the existing evidence relevant to that test in a manner that was manifestly incorrect, thereby distorting the clear sense of the evidence.
Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation
Date: 2011-02-18
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Georgia, admission of aliens, cooperation agreement (EU), residence permit








L_2011044EN.01000102.xml










18.2.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 44/1







Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation

The Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation will enter into force on 1 March 2011, the procedure provided for in Article 23 of the Agreement having been completed on 18 January 2011.
Case T-118/07: Judgment of the General Court of 18 February 2011 — P.P.TV v OHIM — Rentrak (PPT) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark PPT — Earlier national figurative mark PPTV — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
Date: 2011-02-18
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), audiovisual equipment, distributive trades, trade-mark law, video disc








C_2011103EN.01001901.xml










2.4.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 103/19





Judgment of the General Court of 18 February 2011 — P.P.TV v OHIM — Rentrak (PPT)
(Case T-118/07) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark PPT - Earlier national figurative mark PPTV - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2011/C 103/32
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: P.P.TV — Publicidade de Portugal e Televisão, SA (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: I. de Carvalho Simões and J.M. Conceição Pimenta, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Laitinen and, subsequently, D. Botis, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Rentrak Corp. (Portland, Oregon, United States)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 January 2007 (Case R 1040/2005-1) concerning opposition proceedings between P.P.TV — Publicidade de Portugal e Televisão, SA and Rentrak Corp.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders P.P.TV — Publicidade de Portugal e Televisão, SA, to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 155, 7.7.2007.