do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Council Decision 2011/100/CFSP of 14 February 2011 amending Common Position 2003/495/CFSP on Iraq
Date: 2011-02-14
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Iraq, UN resolution, common position, petroleum, petroleum product, trading operation








L_2011041EN.01000901.xml










15.2.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 41/9








            COUNCIL DECISION 2011/100/CFSP
of 14 February 2011
         
amending Common Position 2003/495/CFSP on Iraq


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


On 7 July 2003, the Council adopted Common Position 2003/495/CFSP on Iraq (1), in implementation of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 1483 (2003).












(2)


On 15 December 2010, the UNSC adopted Resolution 1956 (2010) by which it decided, inter alia, to extend until 30 June 2011 the arrangements for the depositing into the Development Fund for Iraq of proceeds from export sales of petroleum, petroleum products and natural gas and the arrangements concerning immunity from legal proceedings of certain Iraqi assets, as referred to in UNSC Resolutions 1483 (2003) and 1546 (2004).












(3)


Common Position 2003/495/CFSP should therefore be amended.












(4)


Further action by the Union is needed in order to implement certain measures,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
In Article 7 of Common Position 2003/495/CFSP, the second paragraph shall be replaced by the following:
‘Articles 4 and 5 shall apply until 30 June 2011.’.


Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 14 February 2011.


For the Council


The President


               HOFFMANN R.





(1)  
            OJ L 169, 8.7.2003, p. 72.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 132/2011 of 14 February 2011 entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Piacentinu Ennese (PDO))
Date: 2011-02-14
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Italy, cheese, designation of origin, location of production, mode of production, preparation for market, product designation








L_2011041EN.01000201.xml










15.2.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 41/2








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 132/2011
of 14 February 2011
         
entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Piacentinu Ennese (PDO))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Piacentinu Ennese’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).












(2)


As no statement of objection pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 14 February 2011.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,
Dacian CIOLOŞ
            

Member of the Commission






(1)  
            OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

(2)  
            OJ C 164, 24.6.2010, p. 26.




ANNEX
Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.3.   Cheeses

ITALY
Piacentinu Ennese (PDO)
Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Verwaltungsgerichtshof des Fürstentums Liechtenstein dated 14 February 2011 in the case of Arnulf Clauder (Case E-4/11)
Date: 2011-02-14
Institutions: EFTA Court
Subjects: EFTA Court, European citizenship, Liechtenstein, residence permit, social-security benefit








C_2011176EN.01001002.xml










16.6.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 176/10





Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Verwaltungsgerichtshof des Fürstentums Liechtenstein dated 14 February 2011 in the case of Arnulf Clauder
(Case E-4/11)
2011/C 176/08
A request has been made to the EFTA Court by a letter of 14 February 2011 from Verwaltungsgerichtshof des Fürstentums Liechtenstein (the Administrative Court of the Principality of Liechtenstein), which was received at the Court Registry on 16 February 2011, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of Arnulf Clauder, on the following questions:






1.


Is Directive 2004/38/EC, in particular Article 16(1) in conjunction with Article 7(1), to be interpreted such that a Union citizen with a right of permanent residence, who is a pensioner and in receipt of social welfare benefits in the host Member State, may claim the right to family reunification even if the family member will also be claiming social welfare benefits?










2.


Is it of relevance for the answer to Question 1, whether the Union citizen with a right of permanent residence was employed or self-employed in the host Member State prior to attaining retirement age?










3.


Is it of relevance for the answer to Question 1, whether the family member will be employed or self-employed in the host Member State and still be claiming social welfare benefits?
Council Decision of 14 February 2011 appointing and replacing members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training
Date: 2011-02-14
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: Cedefop, appointment of staff, exchange of information, operation of the Institutions








C_2011056EN.01000801.xml










22.2.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 56/8





COUNCIL DECISION
of 14 February 2011
appointing and replacing members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training
2011/C 56/04
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of 10 February 1975 establishing the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, and in particular Article 4 thereof (1),
Having regard to the nomination submitted to the Council by the Commission in the category of Employees’ representatives,
Whereas:






(1)


By its Decision of 14 September 2009 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2009 to 17 September 2012.










(2)


A member's seat on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Employees’ representatives has become vacant as a result of the resignation of Mr Petri LEMPINEN,




HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:
Sole Article
The following person is hereby appointed as a member of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the remainder of the term of office, which runs until 17 September 2012:

REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYEES’ ORGANISATIONS:








FINLAND


:


Mr Aleksi KALENIUS
Finnish Confederation of Professionals STTK





Done at Brussels, 14 February 2011.


For the Council


The President

HOFFMANN R.




(1)  OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1.

(2)  OJ C 226, 19.9.2009, p. 2.
Council Regulation (EU) No 131/2011 of 14 February 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq
Date: 2011-02-14
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU relations, Iraq, UN resolution, petroleum, petroleum product, trading operation




L_2011041EN.01000101.xml










15.2.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 41/1








            COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) No 131/2011
of 14 February 2011
         
amending Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 215(1) thereof,


Having regard to Council Decision 2011/100/CFSP amending Common Position 2003/495/CFSP on Iraq (1),


Having regard to the joint proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the European Commission,

Whereas:







(1)


In line with United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 1483 (2003), Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 of 7 July 2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq (2) made specific arrangements as regards payments for petroleum, petroleum products and natural gas exported from Iraq, whereas Article 10 of that Regulation made specific arrangements concerning immunity from legal proceedings of certain Iraqi assets. Those specific arrangements were applied until 31 December 2010.












(2)


UNSC Resolution 1956 (2010) provided that those specific arrangements should be extended until 30 June 2011 and that they should no longer apply after that date. In accordance with Council Decision 2011/100/CFSP, Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 should now be amended accordingly.












(3)


In order to ensure that the measures provided for in this Regulation are effective, this Regulation must enter into force immediately,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
In Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003, paragraph 3 shall be replaced by the following:

‘3.   Articles 2 and 10 shall apply until 30 June 2011.’.



Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 14 February 2011.


For the Council


The President


               HOFFMANN R.





(1)  See page 9 of this Official Journal.

(2)  
            OJ L 169, 8.7.2003, p. 6.
Case T-82/11: Action brought on 14 February 2011 — Formica v OHIM — Silicalia (CompacTop)
Date: 2011-02-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), trade-mark law








C_2011113EN.01001601.xml










9.4.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 113/16





Action brought on 14 February 2011 — Formica v OHIM — Silicalia (CompacTop)
(Case T-82/11)
2011/C 113/32
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Formica, SA (Galdakao, Spain) (represented by: A. Goméz López, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Silicalia, SL (Valencia, Spain)

Form of order sought

The applicant requests the Court to:






—


declare as not being in accordance with Regulation EC No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark the decision of 9 December 2010 of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM, in Case R 1083/2010-1;










—


allow registration of the complex Community trade mark No 6 524 243 CompacTop, in Class 20; and










—


order the defendant and, if appropriate, the intervener, to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: Formica

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark ‘CompacTop’ for goods in Class 20.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Silicalia, SL

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community and national figurative marks containing the word elements ‘COMPACquartz’, ‘COMPACMARMOL&QUARTZ’ and ‘COMPAC MARMOL&QUARTZ’ for goods and services in Classes 19, 27, 35, 37 and 39.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1) since there is no similarity or likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.


(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1)
Case T-86/11: Action brought on 14 February 2011 — Bamba v Council
Date: 2011-02-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Council of the European Union, Côte d'Ivoire, action for annulment (EU), human rights








C_2011095EN.01001102.xml










26.3.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 95/11





Action brought on 14 February 2011 — Bamba v Council
(Case T-86/11)
2011/C 95/18
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicant: Nadiany Bamba (Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire) (represented by: P. Haïk, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

declare Mrs Nadiany BAMBA’s action admissible;






—


annul Council Regulation (EU) No 25/2011 of 14 January 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire to the extent that it concerns the applicant;










—


annul Council Decision 2011/18/CFSP of 14 January 2011 amending Council Decision 2010/656/CFSP renewing the restrictive measures against Côte d'Ivoire to the extent that it concerns the applicant;










—


order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs in accordance with Articles 87 and 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant puts forward two pleas in law.






1.


First plea in law alleging an infringement of the rights of the defence and of the right to a fair hearing provided for in Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Articles 6 and 13 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR), in that the contested measures:






 


do not provide for a procedure allowing the applicant to be guaranteed effective exercise of his rights of defence, in particular the right to be heard and the right to the benefit of a procedure allowing her to effectively request her removal from the list of persons covered by the restrictive measures;










 


at no time provide for the communication of detailed reasons for the inclusion on the list of persons subject to the restrictive measures;










 


at no time provide for the interested person to be notified of the methods and time-limits of actions against the decision to include on the list.














2.


Second plea in law alleging an infringement of the fundamental right to respect for property enshrined in Article 1 of Additional Protocol No 1 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.