REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION THIRD ANNUAL REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN FISHERIES FUND (2009)    SEC(2011) 139 final
Date: 2011-02-07
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: activity report, common fisheries policy, fishery management, sustainable development

EN 

EN 

   EN 

 
EUROPEAN COMMISSION 

Brussels, 7.2.2011 
COM(2011) 37 final 

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION 

THIRD ANNUAL REPORT ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN 
FISHERIES FUND (2009) 

SEC(2011) 139 final 

EN 

   EN 

 
 
  
 
 
 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION THIRD ANNUAL REPORT ON 
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN FISHERIES FUND (2009)............................... 1 

1. 

2. 

INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................ 3 

ANNUAL REPORT 2009............................................................................................ 3 

2.1. 

Main developments, trends and challenges in the implementation of the OPs............ 3 

2.1.1. 

Implementation of the European Fisheries Fund by Member States ........................... 3 

2.1.2.  Budget implementation by the Commission ................................................................ 5 

2.2. 

2.3. 

2.4. 

Economic situation of the fishing sector...................................................................... 5 

Coordination of the EFF with the structural funds and the EAFRD............................ 6 

Technical assistance ..................................................................................................... 7 

2.4.1.  Use made of Technical Assistance budget by the Member States............................... 7 

2.4.2.  Use made of the Technical Assistance budget by the Commission............................. 7 

3. 

4. 

State of play of audit strategies, management and control systems and annual control 
reports........................................................................................................................... 8 

Financial execution in the Member States ................................................................... 9 

EN 

2 

   EN 

1. 

INTRODUCTION 

According to Article 68 of the EFF Regulation1, by 31 December each year, the Commission 
shall  forward  to  the  European  Parliament,  to  the  Council,  to  the  European  Economic  and 
Social Committee and to the Committee of the Regions a report on actual implementation of 
the EFF. The report must be based on an examination and assessment by the Commission of 
the Member States' Annual Reports and on any other available information. 

This third Commission Annual Report covers the implementation of the EFF during 2009, the 
third  year  of  the  EFF  programming  period  (2007-2013).  Accompanying  this  report  is  a 
Commission  Staff  Working  Document  which  includes  a  short  summary  of  the  EFF 
implementation  in  each  Member  State  as  well  as  four  tables  with  detailed  information  on 
financial execution2. 

2. 

ANNUAL REPORT 2009 

2.1.  Main developments, trends and challenges in the implementation of the OPs. 

2.1.1. 

Implementation of the European Fisheries Fund by Member States 

The  delayed  adoption  of  the  EFF  Regulation  had  as  a  consequence  the  late  adoption  of 
Operational Programmes (OP) in Member States. As a result, a small number of Management 
and Control Systems (MCS) and Audit Strategies had been approved by the Commission by 
the  end  of  2008.  For  this  reason  the  Annual  Reports  for  2007  and  2008  focused  on 
programming rather than actual execution. 

In  most  Member  States  the  proper  implementation  of  the  EFF  took  off  in  2009.The  overall 
EFF  execution  at  the  end  of  this  third  year  was  18,4%  (EUR  793  894  729)  in  terms  of 
commitments and 4.1 % (EUR 175 029 780) in terms of payments. Out of 4.1 % paid, interim 
payments  reached  an  amount  of  EUR  66  208  380,  the  rest  was  due  to  the  pre-financing 
payments. 

There  are  number  of  reasons  for  the  slow  rate  of  implementation,  which  were  beyond  the 
control  of  Member  States.  The  programming  stage  was  significantly  delayed;  besides  the 
already  mentioned  late  adoption  of  EFF  Regulation  and  Implementing  Regulation  another 
reason was additional revisions of OP’s, necessary in those MS which decided to implement 
the Restructuring Regulation3. Member States needed also to give priority to the programming 
and setting up of MCS for larger EU funds. This delayed the acceptance of MCS for the EFF; 

1 

2 

3 

Art. 68 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006 of 27 July 2006 on the European Fisheries Fund, OJ 
L 120, 15.08.2006. 
Table I. Financial execution in convergence regions. 
Table II. Financial execution in non convergence regions. 
Table III. EFF programmed amounts by priority axes and by Member State. 
Table IV. EFF certified expenditure by priority axis and by Member State. 
Council  Regulation  (EC)  N°  744/2008  of  24  July  2008  instituting  a  temporary  specific  action  to 
promote  the  restructuring  of  the  European  EU  fleets  affected  by  the  economic  crisis,  OJ  L  202, 
31.07.2008. 

EN 

3 

   EN 

                                                 
 
 
 
 
more importantly, setting up compliant MCS was a complex task managed for the first time 
by  relatively  small  fisheries  administration  which,  at  the  same  time,  had  to  finalize  the 
implementation of the Financial Instrument for Fisheries Guidance (FIFG) 2000-2006. As a 
result,  although  many  Member  States  had  made  payments  to  beneficiaries  in  2009,  these 
payments  could  not  be  reimbursed  by  the  Commission  prior  to  the  acceptance  of  the  MCS. 
The 10 OPs for which the MCS had not been accepted by December 2009 represented around 
75% of the EFF budget allocated for the whole period. As these causes of delay are no longer 
present,  it  is  expected  that  the  rate  of  implementation  will  be  accelerated  throughout  the 
remaining duration of the programme. 

In  addition,  external  factors  linked  to  economic  crisis  made  the  absorption  of  the  funds  an 
even  more  difficult  task  for  Member  States.  The  economic  and  financial  crisis  hampered 
private investment and thus slowed down productive investment projects. At the same time, 
national  austerity  measures  constrained  national  co-financing.  Private  beneficiaries  in 
fisheries,  aquaculture  and  processing  sectors  were  most  affected  by  the  credit  crunch  which 
added to uncertain economic outlook for the fisheries sector in general.  

As a result, by the end of 2009 Axis 1 (where permanent and temporary cessation measures 
combined  with  high  aid  intensity  facilitate  financial  absorption)  accounted  for  most  of  the 
payments  certified  by  Member  States  (56%  or  EUR  66  432  494)  while  Axis  2  and  Axis  3 
accounted for, respectively, 17% (EUR 20 622 766) and 25% (EUR 29 489 870). 

However, the figure of 18,4% of the overall EFF allocation committed to concrete projects, 
with  some  Member  States  exceeding  30%,  indicates  some  forthcoming  progress  in  the 
implementation. The commitments by axes amounted to 7,7% (EUR 333 489 343) for Axis 1, 
5,3% (EUR 226 739 180) for Axis 2, 4,7% (EUR 200 252 175) for Axis 3 and 0,4% (EUR 15 
872 583) for Axis 4. These figures show some progress not only for Axis 1 but also for the 
support  under  Axis  2  and  3.  This  means  that  the  implementation  of  private  and  collective 
investment projects, notwithstanding the effects of the financial and economic crisis, may be 
picking up. 

Axis 4 had a slower start, due to the longer time needed to set up local partnerships and adopt 
local  development  strategies.  These  delays  are  mainly  due  to  the  novelty  of  this  bottom  up 
approach  which  introduced  a  territorial  dimension  to  OPs  traditionally  focussed  on  sector 
support. By the end of 2009 however, more than 90 Fisheries Local Action Groups (FLAGs) 
had already been selected in nine of the twenty-one Member States implementing axis 4. In 
total 245 FLAGs are expected to be established by mid-2011. 

In order to accelerate the rate of EFF implementation and make the EFF assistance reach the 
beneficiaries in the fisheries, aquaculture and processing sectors, Member States need to act 
as soon as possible, in line with the financial discipline. The Commission will assist Member 
States  in  fostering  programme  implementation  by  a  better  design  of  measures,  simplified 
administration  of  applications,  use  of  facilitators  or  financial  engineering  or  even 
modifications of OPs when these modifications are in line with the objectives of the EFF. The 
recommendations of the FIFG ex-post evaluation – such as better involvement of stakeholders 
with respect to project selection and monitoring, improved communication on EFF, provision 
of  technical  assistance  to  project  holders,  simplification  of  application  and  selection 
procedures and improved monitoring – are particularly relevant in this respect. Some Member 
States  already  successfully  apply  measures  mitigating  the  situation  with  guarantees,  loan 
funds and other financial instruments. Others use a simplified procedure for small projects to 

EN 

4 

   EN 

speed up the application-evaluation process. The Commission will intensify dialogue with the 
Member States in order to better communicate and disseminate these practices. 

According  to  the  EFF  regulation,  by  30  June  2011  Member  States  shall  forward  to  the 
Monitoring  Committee  and  the  Commission  an  interim  evaluation  of  their  OPs.  The  EFF 
Committee at the meeting on October 16th, 2009, approved the Commission's idea to set up 
the network of evaluators, with the objective of developing common evaluation methods and 
standards in order to provide the evaluators in the Member States with guidelines to allow for 
harmonised  and  high  quality  interim  evaluations  across  the  Member  States.  The  ultimate 
objective  of  these  evaluations  will  be  to  examine  the  effectiveness  of  the  operational 
programmes  with  the  aim  of  further  improving  the  quality  of  EFF  assistance  and  its 
implementation. 

2.1.2.  Budget implementation by the Commission 

In  terms  of  annual  commitments,  in  2009  14.56%  (EUR  626  982  387)  of  the  total 
appropriations for 2007-2013 (EUR 4 304 949 019) were committed, of which EUR 476 025 
821  for  convergence  and  EUR  150  956  566  for  non-convergence  regions.  In  terms  of 
payments  in  2009  4.1%  (EUR 175  029  780)  of  the  total  appropriations  for  2007-2013  were 
paid, of which 61.93% for convergence (EUR 108 408 149) and 38.06% for non-convergence 
regions  (EUR 66  621  631).  These  payments  were  partly  made  in  the  form  of  second  pre-
financing  payments  (EUR  108  821  400),  an  opportunity  introduced  by  the  Restructuring 
Regulation, claimed by 7 Member States in 2009. The other payments were made in the form 
of interim payments for a total of EUR 66 208 380. Detailed information is provided under 
point  4  of  this  report  (table  showing  financial  execution  in  the  Member  States)  and  in  the 
COM Staff working Document accompanying this report (tables I, II, III and IV). 

At the end of 2009, no Member State was concerned by a risk of de-commitment. The 2007 
commitments were fully covered by pre-financings and interim payments. 

2.2. 

Economic situation of the fishing sector 

Reduction of fishing capacity and economic performance 

Member  States  adopted  until  now  52  Fishing  Effort  Adjustment  Plans  (FEAS),  foreseen  by 
article 22 of the EFF Regulation. In addition, in 2009, 7 OPs have been modified following 
the adoption of the Restructuring Regulation with the objective of reinforcing and increasing 
the  Community  co-financing  rate  for  Axis  1.  In  total,  Member  States  adopted  13  Fleet 
Adjustment  Schemes  (FAS),  which  foresee  the  scrapping  of  367  vessels  accounting  for  32 
448 GT and 50 934 kW. 

Between 01.01.2007 and 31.12.2009 the size of the EU fleet has been reduced from 1 970 860 
GT  to  1  797  292  GT  and  from  7  168  605  kW  to  6  627  994  kW.  Cumulated  figures  from 
Member  States  annual  reports  on  EFF  implementation  for  2007-2009  show  that  fleet 
reduction with EFF assistance planned in this period is 138 427 GT and 442 232 kW. These 
figures show that the mid-term target of 7% reduction GT by 2010 (~ 140 000 GT) and 15% 
kW  reduction  envisaged  for  the  period  2007-2013  has  been  achieved.  Concerns  expressed 
about  proper  measurement  of  KW  in  this  context  will  be  addressed  in  the  framework  of 
control implementing regulation. 

According to Report on Member States' efforts during 2009 to achieve a sustainable balance 
between fishing capacity and fishing opportunities, EU assistance accounted for less than 50% 

EN 

5 

   EN 

of the overall reduction of the EU fleet. This seems to indicate that economic problems and 
the overfished stocks are pushing down the size of the fleet. The result is a significant amount 
of capacity withdrawn without public aid which is not being replaced. 

Indeed,  according  to  the  latest  Annual  Economic  Report  on  the  European  Fishing  Fleet,  in 
2009 further economic deterioration of performance of EU fleets could be expected. In 2008, 
EU fleets showed on average a relatively low profit (representing around 4% of total income) 
and registered a significant reduction of Gross Value Added (by 20% compared to 2007). In 
2009, fuel prices were lower on average than the previous year, so a marginal increase in crew 
revenues and profits could be expected compared to 2008. Nevertheless, the global economic 
crisis continued to affect the demand for seafood which in turn has been causing a negative 
impact  on  fish  prices,  and  hence  in  the  economic  performance  of  EU  fleets  in  2009.  In 
conclusion,  we  could  expect  reductions  in  employment  in  some  important  fleets,  especially 
those with high fuel consumption, and a modest or low economic profitability in other fleet 
segments which, in turn, might limit available private investment. 

Innovation in the fishing sector – EFF best practices 

The  future  of  fisheries  and  aquaculture  sector,  given  its  dependence  on  limited  natural 
resources  and  competition  from  third  countries,  is  particularly  dependent  on  its  capacity  to 
innovate  and  add  more  value  to  its  products,  in  order  to  enhance  the  sustainability  and 
profitability.  Accordingly,  an  increasing  amount  of  the  EFF  co-financed  projects  place 
emphasis on eco-innovations. Some projects use ICT applications in the fishery industry, such 
as  innovative  electronic  devices  coupled  with  fishing  gears  that  minimize  both  incidental 
catches  and  damage  caused  by  seals.  Innovations  are  also  found  in  aquaculture,  such  as 
testing  new  technologies  with  the  aim  to  increase  the  nutritional  value  of  aquaculture 
products. Yet another  example  is the Fisheries Innovation Platform, created with  the aim to 
save costs and energy, increase the product quality and the profitability and reduce the impact 
of fishing on the ecosystem. 

As the FLAGs are progressively starting to implement their integrated local strategies under 
the EFF, Axis 4 begins to generate innovative projects responding to the challenges faced by 
fisheries  areas.  Importantly,  with  its  strong  emphasis  on  diversification,  axis  4  also  offers  a 
unique  opportunity  for  women  who  play  a  key  role  in  the  creation  of  alternative  economic 
activities  and  innovation  in  local  fishing  communities,  such  as  pesca-tourism  projects, 
building on the attractiveness of traditional fishing culture and life styles. In many fisheries 
areas women and their organisations are involved in the FLAG partnerships and benefit from 
support  for  adding  value  to  local  fisheries  products  and  for  diversifying  their  sources  of 
income.  EFF  grants  allow  (shellfish  gatherers)  to  better  valorise  their  products:  to  purchase 
the equipment necessary to sell their shellfish directly and to organise guided tours and tasting 
sessions in order to raise awareness of their activity, their products and the environment they 
work in. 

2.3. 

Coordination of the EFF with the structural funds and the EAFRD 

The  OPs  show  that  all  Member  States  are  aware  of  the  need  to  ensure  consistency  and 
coordination  in  EFF  implementation  with  the  Structural  Funds,  the  ERDF  and  the  ESF  in 
particular, as well as with the EAFRD. The OPs provide information about the systems set up 
(or being set up) in the Member States in order to avoid overlapping, as requested by Article 6 
of the EFF Regulation. 

EN 

6 

   EN 

New  Axis  4  was  implemented  in  close  cooperation  with  the  LEADER  programme  under 
EAFRD,  since  these  two  strands  of  local  development  share  many  characteristics  (local 
partnership, integrated local strategy, territorial approach, networking, etc). This cooperation 
takes different forms such as the use of the same partnership for implementing the two strands 
of funding on the same territory: this was usually applied by Member States who decided to 
allocate a limited budget to Axis 4 (Finland, France, Sweden, etc.). Member States with larger 
budgets  (Poland,  Romania,  Bulgaria,  etc.)  generally  chose  to  set-up  specific  groups  for 
delivering Axis 4. The cooperation is also well  established  between the Rural Development 
Network and the FARNET network, both in the Member States and at EU level. 

2.4. 

Technical assistance 

2.4.1.  Use made of Technical Assistance budget by the Member States. 

On the  basis  of  the Annual Reports received and  accepted so far, it results that 18  Member 
States  committed  amounts  under  the  Technical  Assistance  budget.  The  Member  States  with 
larger amounts committed to TA were: Spain (EUR 5 904 139), Romania (EUR 1 896 429), 
Portugal (EUR 1 599 693), Lithuania (EUR 1 511 932) and Italy (EUR 1 128 831). Measures 
funded  aimed  to  improve  administrative  capacity, develop  IT,  to  launch  studies,  to  increase 
publicity and information and to support the management and implementation of the OPs. 

2.4.2.  Use made of the Technical Assistance budget by the Commission 

In 2009 the Commission used EUR 3.564.291 of the EFF Technical Assistance budget on the 
following items: 

Information technology 

The  Commission  committed  EUR  527.322  for  provision  of  computer  and  related  services 
related to the maintenance and development of DG MARE information systems necessary for 
the implementation of EFF. 

Support Unit for the European Fisheries Areas Network (FAR-NET) 

EUR  1.979.992  were  committed  for  the  Support  Unit  of  the  Fisheries  Areas  Network 
(FARNET) which was set up by the Commission in May 2009 to assist in the implementation 
of axis 4 of the EFF. The FARNET Support Unit acts as a platform for networking between 
FLAGs and for the exchange of good practices. In 2009 the Support Unit devoted most of the 
resources to the direct capacity building for both FLAGs and Member States' administrations 
in  order  to  help  them  roll  out  an  initiative  so  radically  different  from  past  programmes.  
For more information see www.farnet.eu. 

Studies 

Under DG MARE framework contract for socio-economic studies the Commission committed 
EUR 399 953 for a study on a socio-economic analysis of fisheries regions. The main aim of 
the study is to review statistical data and socio-economic indicators for 24 EU fisheries areas 
(NUTS  –  4,  NUTS-5)  and  to  support  the  discussion  about  the  future  CFP,  in  particular  as 
regards the rationale for public intervention in the fisheries areas. The study will be completed 
and made available to the public by the end of 2010. 

EN 

7 

   EN 

Under DG MARE framework contract for studies linked to the implementation of the EFF the 
Commission committed EUR 395 864 for the ex-post evaluation of the Financial Instrument 
for Fisheries Guidance (2000-2006). This study is available at 

http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/documentation/studies/fifg_evaluation/index_en.htm. 

Under DG BUDG framework contract for performing audits and controls for the Commission 
services,  the  Commission  committed  EUR  261  160  for  auditing  the  implementation  of  the 
temporary  and  specific  action  to  promote  the  restructuring  of  the  EU  fleet  affected  by  the 
economic crisis (Restructuring Regulation). 

Non-permanent staff 

The Commission committed EUR 850.000 for the salaries of non permanent staff involved in 
the  implementation  of  the  EFF,  in  particular  in  order  to  ensure  proper  language  coverage 
allowing for equal treatment of all Member States. 

3. 

STATE OF PLAY OF AUDIT STRATEGIES, MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL SYSTEMS AND 
ANNUAL CONTROL REPORTS 

Member  States  have  to  submit  their  management  and  control  systems  (MCS)  to  the 
Commission  one  year  after  the  approval  of  their  OPs.  The  Audit  Strategies  (AS)  must  be 
submitted within 9 months of approval. Due to the late adoption of OPs, by the end of 2008 
only a very small number of MCSs and ASs had been accepted by the Commission. At the 
end of 2009 18 Member States had submitted their ASs, 17 of which were accepted and 1 was 
under  analysis.  As  regards  the  MCS,  all  26  were  submitted  at  the  end  of  2009;  13  were 
accepted; 10 have been rejected or the period for their analysis have been interrupted; and 3 
were under analysis. Given the low level of implementation of the programmes, most of the 
audit  authorities  in  their  annual  control  reports  were  obliged  to  provide  a  disclaimer  of 
opinion due to the absence of sufficient audit activity. 

EN 

8 

   EN 

4. 

FINANCIAL EXECUTION IN THE MEMBER STATES 

TABLE: FINANCIAL EXECUTION CONVERGENCE AND NON-CONVERGENCE 

Member State 

Decided 
a 

Committed 
b 

Paid 
c 

% 
(b) / (a) 

% 
(c) / (a) 

Belgium 

Bulgaria 

Czech Republic 

Denmark 

Germany 

Estonia 

Ireland 

Greece 

Spain 

France 

Italy 

Cyprus 

Latvia 

Period 2007-2013 

 26 261 648,00 

 8 455 876,00 

 3 676 630,00 

32,20% 

14,00% 

Financial year: 2009 

 4 263 970,00 

 4 263 970,00 

 1 838 315,00 

Period 2007-2013 

 80 009 708,00 

 25 934 823,00 

 11 201 359,11 

32,41% 

14,00% 

Financial year: 2009 

 11 598 136,00 

 11 598 136,00 

 5 600 679,55 

Period 2007-2013 

 27 106 675,00 

 10 580 186,00 

 3 794 934,50 

39,03% 

14,00% 

Financial year: 2009 

 3 693 682,00 

 3 693 682,00 

0,00 

Period 2007-2013 

 133 675 169,00 

 55 028 771,00 

 18 714 523,66 

41,17% 

14,00% 

Financial year: 2009 

 18 707 336,00 

 18 707 336,00 

 9 357 261,83 

Period 2007-2013 

 155 865 417,00 

 65 750 908,00 

 27 993 156,33 

42,18% 

17,96% 

Financial year: 2009 

 22 094 648,00 

 22 094 648,00 

 17 082 577,14 

Period 2007-2013 

 84 568 039,00 

 29 992 004,00 

 10 594 324,53 

35,46% 

12,53% 

Financial year: 2009 

 10 889 823,00 

 10 889 823,00 

 4 674 561,80 

Period 2007-2013 

 42 266 603,00 

 13 609 245,00 

 5 917 324,00 

32,20% 

14,00% 

Financial year: 2009 

 6 862 613,00 

 6 862 613,00 

 2 958 662,00 

Period 2007-2013 

 207 832 237,00 

 90 288 908,00 

 29 096 513,18 

43,44% 

14,00% 

Financial year: 2009 

 29 925 751,00 

 29 925 751,00 

0,00 

Period 2007-2013 

1 131 890 912,00 

 479 587 587,00 

 158 464 726,00 

42,37% 

14,00% 

Financial year: 2009 

 160 824 795,00 

 160 824 795,00 

0,00 

Period 2007-2013 

 216 053 084,00 

 88 940 498,00 

 52 399 052,53 

41,17% 

24,25% 

Financial year: 2009 

 30 235 817,00 

 30 235 817,00 

 22 151 622,53 

Period 2007-2013 

 424 342 854,00 

 175 722 574,00 

 59 407 998,00 

41,41% 

14,00% 

Financial year: 2009 

 59 569 412,00 

 59 569 412,00 

0,00 

Period 2007-2013 

 19 724 418,00 

 8 119 763,00 

 2 761 418,52 

41,17% 

14,00% 

Financial year: 2009 

 2 760 358,00 

 2 760 358,00 

0,00 

Period 2007-2013 

 125 015 563,00 

 44 767 413,00 

 29 139 082,74 

35,81% 

23,31% 

Financial year: 2009 

 16 282 146,00 

 16 282 146,00 

 20 387 993,74 

EN 

9 

   EN 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Lithuania 

Luxembourg 

Hungary 

Malta 

Netherlands 

Austria 

Poland 

Portugal 

Romania 

Slovenia 

Slovakia 

Finland 

Sweden 

United Kingdom 

Total  

Period 2007-2013 

 54 713 408,00 

 21 002 300,00 

 9 604 620,53 

38,39% 

17,55% 

Financial year: 2009 

 7 086 453,00 

 7 086 453,00 

 5 774 681,97 

Period 2007-2013 

Financial year: 2009 

0,00 

0,00 

0,00 

0,00 

0,00 

0,00% 

0,00% 

0,00 

Period 2007-2013 

 34 850 860,00 

 10 774 860,00 

 4 879 120,40 

30,92% 

14,00% 

Financial year: 2009 

 5 229 751,00 

 5 229 751,00 

 2 439 560,20 

Period 2007-2013 

 8 372 329,00 

 2 778 812,00 

 1 172 126,06 

33,19% 

14,00% 

Financial year: 2009 

 1 356 456,00 

 1 356 456,00 

586 063,03 

Period 2007-2013 

 48 578 417,00 

 19 997 810,00 

 11 648 010,18 

41,17% 

23,98% 

Financial year: 2009 

 6 798 367,00 

 6 798 367,00 

 8 247 520,99 

Period 2007-2013 

 5 259 318,00 

 2 177 383,00 

 1 810 257,13 

41,40% 

34,42% 

Financial year: 2009 

738 212,00 

738 212,00 

 1 104 609,87 

Period 2007-2013 

 734 092 574,00 

 241 826 781,00 

 102 772 960,36 

32,94% 

14,00% 

Financial year: 2009 

 121 825 117,00 

 121 825 117,00 

 51 386 480,18 

Period 2007-2013 

 246 485 249,00 

 102 283 331,00 

 34 507 934,00 

41,50% 

14,00% 

Financial year: 2009 

 34 639 430,00 

 34 639 430,00 

0,00 

Period 2007-2013 

 230 714 207,00 

 67 440 811,00 

 32 299 988,49 

29,23% 

14,00% 

Financial year: 2009 

 30 156 234,00 

 30 156 234,00 

0,00 

Period 2007-2013 

 21 640 283,00 

 8 031 420,00 

 3 029 639,62 

37,11% 

14,00% 

Financial year: 2009 

 3 921 112,00 

 3 921 112,00 

 1 514 819,81 

Period 2007-2013 

 13 688 528,00 

 5 735 396,00 

 2 181 455,18 

41,90% 

15,94% 

Financial year: 2009 

 1 821 708,00 

 1 821 708,00 

265 061,26 

Period 2007-2013 

 39 448 827,00 

 16 239 518,00 

 8 427 052,63 

41,17% 

21,36% 

Financial year: 2009 

 5 520 715,00 

 5 520 715,00 

 5 665 634,74 

Period 2007-2013 

 54 664 803,00 

 22 503 333,00 

 8 172 258,21 

41,17% 

14,95% 

Financial year: 2009 

 7 650 134,00 

 7 650 134,00 

 4 345 722,21 

Period 2007-2013 

 137 827 889,00 

 44 774 819,00 

 19 295 904,46 

32,49% 

14,00% 

Financial year: 2009 

 22 530 211,00 

 22 530 211,00 

 9 647 952,23 

Period 2007-2013 

4 304 949 019,00 

1 662 345 130,00 

 652 962 370,35 

38,61% 

15,17% 

Financial year: 2009 

 626 982 387,00 

 626 982 387,00 

 175 029 780,08 

EN 

10 

   EN