do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-3/08: Order of the General Court of 10 January 2011 — Coedo Suárez v Council
Date: 2011-01-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: Belgium, Council of the European Union, access to information, action for annulment, document








C_2011055EN.01003402.xml










19.2.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 55/34





Order of the General Court of 10 January 2011 — Coedo Suárez v Council
(Case T-3/08) (1)

2011/C 55/61
Language of the case: French
The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 64, 8.3.2008.
Case C-12/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Dublin Metropolitan District Court (Ireland) made on 10 January 2011 — Danise McDonagh v Ryanair Ltd
Date: 2011-01-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Ireland, air space, air traffic, interpretation of the law, natural disaster, volcanic eruption








C_2011080EN.01001402.xml










12.3.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 80/14





Reference for a preliminary ruling from Dublin Metropolitan District Court (Ireland) made on 10 January 2011 — Danise McDonagh v Ryanair Ltd
(Case C-12/11)
2011/C 80/27
Language of the case: English

Referring court

Dublin Metropolitan District Court

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Denise McDonagh

Defendant: Ryanair Ltd

Questions referred







1.


Do circumstances such as the closures of European airspace as a result of the eruption of the Eyjafjallajökull volcano in Iceland, which caused widespread and prolonged disruption to air travel, go beyond ‘extraordinary circumstances’ within the meaning of Regulation 261/2004 (1)?










2.


If the answer to question 1 is yes, is liability for the duty to provide care excluded under Articles 5 and 9 in such circumstances?










3.


If the answer to question 2 is no, are Articles 5 and 9 invalid in so far as they violate the principles of proportionality and non-discrimination, the principle of an ‘equitable balance of interests’ enshrined in the Montreal Convention, and Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union?










4.


Is the obligation in Articles 5 and 9 to be interpreted as containing an implied limitation, such as a temporal and/or a monetary limit, to provide care in cases where cancellation is caused by ‘extraordinary circumstances’?










5.


If the answer to question 4 is no, are Articles 5 and 9 invalid in so far as they violate the principles of proportionality and non-discrimination, the principle of an ‘equitable balance of interests’ enshrined in the Montreal Convention, and Articles 16 and 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union?






(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91
OJ L 46, p. 1
Case C-10/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 10 January 2011 — WEGO Landwirtschaftliche Schlachtstellen GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas
Date: 2011-01-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU customs procedure, import, interpretation of the law, third country








C_2011120EN.01000401.xml










16.4.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 120/4





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 10 January 2011 — WEGO Landwirtschaftliche Schlachtstellen GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas
(Case C-10/11)
2011/C 120/06
Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: WEGO Landwirtschaftliche Schlachtstellen GmbH

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Jonas

Question referred

Is the Hauptzollamt (Principal Customs Office) responsible for paying a refund bound by the subsequent amendment made by the customs office of export to the information entered in box 2 of the export declaration or in the T5 control copy? (1)



(1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302, p.1).
Case C-291/10: Order of the President of the Court of 10 January 2011 — European Commission v Italian Republic
Date: 2011-01-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, Italy, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, cross-border transport, labour law, rail transport








C_2011120EN.01000906.xml










16.4.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 120/9





Order of the President of the Court of 10 January 2011 — European Commission v Italian Republic
(Case C-291/10) (1)

2011/C 120/22
Language of the case: Italian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 221, 14.08.2010.
Case T-389/09: Order of the General Court of 10 January 2011 — Labate v Commission
Date: 2011-01-10
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commission, cancer, occupational disease, regulations for civil servants








C_2011072EN.01003301.xml










5.3.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 72/33





Order of the General Court of 10 January 2011 — Labate v Commission
(Case T-389/09) (1)

2011/C 72/51
Language of the case: English
The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 312, 19.12.2009.
Case C-410/10: Order of the President of the Court of 10 January 2011 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic
Date: 2011-01-10
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, Greece, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, data transmission, organisation








C_2011120EN.01001004.xml










16.4.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 120/10





Order of the President of the Court of 10 January 2011 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic
(Case C-410/10) (1)

2011/C 120/26
Language of the case: Greek
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 288, 23.10.2010.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 14/2011 of 10 January 2011 approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Limone di Sorrento (PGI))
Date: 2011-01-10
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Italy, agricultural product, designation of origin, labelling, location of production, product designation








L_2011006EN.01000101.xml










11.1.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 6/1








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 14/2011
of 10 January 2011
         
approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Limone di Sorrento (PGI))


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


In accordance with the first subparagraph of Article 9(1) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the Commission has examined Italy’s application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected geographical indication ‘Limone di Sorrento’ registered in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 2400/96 (2), as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2446/2000 (3).












(2)


Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the Commission published the amendment application in the Official Journal of the European Union (4), as required by the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of that Regulation. As no statement of objection within the meaning of Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been notified to the Commission, the amendments should be approved,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1
The amendments to the specification published in the Official Journal of the European Union regarding the name contained in the Annex to this Regulation are hereby approved.


Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 10 January 2011.


For the Commission


The President

José Manuel BARROSO
            





(1)  
            OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

(2)  
            OJ L 327, 18.12.1996, p. 11.

(3)  
            OJ L 281, 7.11.2000, p. 12.

(4)  
            OJ C 105, 24.4.2010, p. 12.




ANNEX
Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

ITALY
Limone di Sorrento (PGI)