do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Communication from the Commission on the authorities authorised to issue certificates of origin under Regulation (EU) No 1085/2010
Date: 2010-12-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Indonesia, agricultural product, certificate of origin, customs regulations, import policy, market organisation, tariff quota








C_2010349EN.01001701.xml










22.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 349/17





Communication from the Commission on the authorities authorised to issue certificates of origin under Regulation (EU) No 1085/2010
2010/C 349/08
By Commission Regulation (EU) No 1085/2010 of 25 November 2010, published in 
Official Journal of the European Union L 310 of 26 November 2010, an import tariff quota has been opened for manioc.
Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 1085/2010 of 25 November 2010 stipulates that entitlement to this quota is conditional on the presentation of a certificate of origin.
The following authorities are a authorised to issue certificates of origin under this Regulation.





PT. (Persero) Kawasan Berikat Nusantara




Unit Usaha Marunda




(Nusantara bonded zone in Marunda)




Jl. Lampung No 1 Cilincing




Jakarta 14120




INDONESIA




Tel. +62 2144851525




Fax +62 2144851431




E-mail: marunda@kbn.co.id









PT. (Persero) Kawasan Berikat Nusantara




Unit Usaha Tanjung Priok




(Nusantara bonded zone in Tanjung Priok)




Jl. Pelabuhan Nusantara Tanjung Priok




Jakarta 14130




INDONESIA




Tel. +62 214301183




Fax +62 2153930513




E-mail: priok@kbn.co.id









PT. (Persero) Kawasan Berikat Nusantara




Unit Usaha Cakung




(Nusantara bonded zone in Cakung)




Jl. Raya Cakung Cilincing




Tg. Priok




Jakarta 14140




INDONESIA




Tel. +62 2144820909 EXT 1501




Fax +62 2144820068




E-mail: marketing@kbn.co.id




Authority responsible for the subsequent verification of certificates of origin (Article 63(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93) (1):





Director of Export and Import Facilitation




Directorate General of International Trade




Jl. M.I. Ridwan Rais No 5




Jakarta 10110




INDONESIA






(1)  Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code.
Case C-614/10: Action brought on 22 December 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Austria
Date: 2010-12-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Austria, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, data protection








C_2011072EN.01001301.xml










5.3.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 72/13





Action brought on 22 December 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Austria
(Case C-614/10)
2011/C 72/22
Language of the case: German

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: B. Martenczuk and B.-R. Killmann, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Austria

Form of order sought







—


Declare that the Republic of Austria has infringed its obligations under the second subparagraph of Article 28(1) of Directive 95/46/EC because the legal situation in Austria of a Data Protection Commission created as data protection inspection body does not fulfil the criterion of complete independence.










—


order the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The Commission is of the opinion that the independence of the Data Protection Commission as inspection body for the control of data protection regulations in Austria is not guaranteed.
The Data Protection Commission is organisationally closely connected with the Federal Chancellor’s Office (Bundeskanzleramt). The latter supervises the employees of the Data Protection Commission and is also responsible for that commission’s material provisions. Furthermore, an administrative officer of the Federal Chancellor’s Office is responsible for the management of the Data Protection Commission, who is also for the duration of his duties bound by the directions of his supervisor and subject to that supervision. That situation leads to clear conflicts of loyalty and interests.
Moreover, the Federal Chancellor (Bundeskanzler), who like other public posts is subject to the control of the Data Protection Commission, has a comprehensive right to supervise and instruct that commission. As a result, it is possible for the Federal Chancellor at any time and without any concrete ground to inform himself about all aspects of the management of the Data Protection Commission. There exists thereby the risk that that right could be used in order to exercise political influence.
Case C-438/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 22 December 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Bogusław Juliusz Dankowski v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Łodzi (Sixth VAT Directive — Right to deduct input VAT — Services provided — Taxable person not registered for VAT — Details required on the VAT invoice — National tax legislation — Exclusion of right to deduct under Article 17(6) of the Sixth VAT Directive)
Date: 2010-12-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Poland, VAT, goods and services, interpretation of the law, national law, tax relief








C_2011063EN.01000802.xml










26.2.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/8





Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 22 December 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Bogusław Juliusz Dankowski v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Łodzi
(Case C-438/09) (1)

(Sixth VAT Directive - Right to deduct input VAT - Services provided - Taxable person not registered for VAT - Details required on the VAT invoice - National tax legislation - Exclusion of right to deduct under Article 17(6) of the Sixth VAT Directive)
2011/C 63/15
Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Bogusław Juliusz Dankowski

Defendant: Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Łodzi

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Interpretation of Article 17(6) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Compatibility with this provision of national legislation excluding the right to deduct input tax paid for supply of a service on the basis of an invoice issued, in breach of national law, by a person not on the register of taxable persons for the purposes of VAT

Operative part of the judgment







1.


Articles 18(1)(a) and 22(3)(b) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 2006/18/EC of 14 February 2006, must be interpreted as meaning that a taxable person has the right to deduct value added tax paid in respect of services supplied by another taxable person who is not registered for that tax, where the relevant invoices contain all the information required by Article 22(3)(b), in particular the information needed to identify the person who drew up those invoices and to ascertain the nature of the services provided;










2.


Article 17(6) of the Sixth Directive 77/388 as amended by Directive 2006/18 must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which excludes the right to deduct value added tax paid by a taxable person to another taxable person, who has provided services, where the latter has not registered for the purposes of that tax.






(1)  OJ C 37, 13.02.2010.
Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Aviation Safety Agency for the financial year 2010 — Amending Budget No 2
Date: 2010-12-22
Institutions: European Union Aviation Safety Agency
Subjects: EU office or agency, European Aviation Safety Agency, expenditure, financial year, publication of accounts, revenue








C_2010351EN.01001701.xml










22.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 351/17





Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Aviation Safety Agency for the financial year 2010 — Amending Budget No 2
(2010/C 351/05)
REVENUE









Title
Chapter


Heading


Budget 2010


Amending budget No 2


New amount





1






REVENUE FROM FEES AND CHARGES





1 0


REVENUE FROM FEES AND CHARGES


70 259 000


2 700 000


72 959 000




 



Title 1 — Total




70 259 000




2 700 000




72 959 000






2






EUROPEAN COMMUNITY SUBSIDY





 



Title 2 — Total




34 197 000



 



34 197 000






3






THIRD COUNTRIES CONTRIBUTION





 



Title 3 — Total




1 650 000



 



1 650 000






4






OTHERS CONTRIBUTIONS





 



Title 4 — Total




673 000



 



673 000






5






ADMINISTRATIVE OPERATIONS





 



Title 5 — Total




600 000



 



600 000






6






REVENUE FROM SERVICES RENDERED AGAINST PAYMENT





 



Title 6 — Total




p.m.



 



p.m.






7






BUDGETARY CORRECTIONS





 



Title 7 — Total




27 135 133



 



27 135 133





 



GRAND TOTAL




134 514 133




2 700 000




137 214 133





EXPENDITURE









Title
Chapter


Heading


Appropriations 2010


Amending budget No 2


New amount





1






STAFF





1 1


STAFF IN ACTIVE EMPLOYMENT


52 142 000


– 450 000


51 692 000




1 4


SOCIOMEDICAL INFRASTRUCTURE


2 248 000


450 000


2 698 000




 



Title 1 — Total




56 430 000




0




56 430 000






2






BUILDINGS, EQUIPMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS OPERATING EXPENDITURE





2 1


INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY


4 450 000


30 000


4 480 000




2 3


CURRENT ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE


1 084 000


100 000


1 184 000




2 4


POSTAGE AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS


885 000


–30 000


855 000




 



Title 2 — Total




14 082 000




100 000




14 182 000






3






OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURE





3 0


CERTIFICATION ACTIVITIES


24 695 000


2 300 000


26 995 000




3 1


‘S’ ACTIVITIES


500 000


– 100 000


400 000




3 2


DEVELOPMENT DATA BASE


3 602 000


696 000


4 298 000




3 3


INFORMATIONS AND PUBLICATIONS


400 000


–76 000


324 000




3 8


TECHNICAL TRAINING


645 000


– 220 000


425 000




 



Title 3 — Total




39 707 000




2 600 000




42 307 000






4






SPECIAL OPERATIONS PROGRAMMES





 



Title 4 — Total




673 000



 



673 000






5






OTHER EXPENDITURE





 



Title 5 — Total




23 622 133



 



23 622 133





 



GRAND TOTAL




134 514 133




2 700 000




137 214 133
Case C-116/10: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 22 December 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg (Luxembourg)) — État du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, Administration de l’enregistrement et des domaines v Pierre Feltgen (in his capacity as administrator in the bankruptcy of Bacino Charter Company SA), Bacino Charter Company SA (Sixth VAT Directive — Exemptions — Article 15(4)(a) and 15(5) — Exemption for the hiring of sea-going vessels — Scope)
Date: 2010-12-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Luxembourg, VAT, basis of tax assessment, interpretation of the law, maritime shipping, provision of services, turnover








C_2011063EN.01001102.xml










26.2.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/11





Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 22 December 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg (Luxembourg)) — État du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, Administration de l’enregistrement et des domaines v Pierre Feltgen (in his capacity as administrator in the bankruptcy of Bacino Charter Company SA), Bacino Charter Company SA
(Case C-116/10) (1)

(Sixth VAT Directive - Exemptions - Article 15(4)(a) and 15(5) - Exemption for the hiring of sea-going vessels - Scope)
2011/C 63/20
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg

Parties to the main proceedings


Appellants: État du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, Administration de l’enregistrement et des domaines

Respondents: Pierre Feltgen (in his capacity as administrator in the bankruptcy of Bacino Charter Company SA), Bacino Charter Company SA

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg — Interpretation of Article 15(4)(a) and 15(5) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Exemption for hire operations of sea-going vessels — Exemption subject to the condition that such vessels be assigned to navigation on the high seas and provide transport of travellers or the pursuit of commercial, industrial or fishing activities, for reward

Operative part of the judgment

Article 15(5) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 91/680/EEC of 16 December 1991, must be interpreted as meaning that the exemption from value added tax provided for by that provision does not apply to services consisting of making a vessel available, for reward, with a crew, to natural persons for purposes of leisure travel on the high seas.


(1)  OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.
List of credit rating agencies registered in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on credit rating agencies (CRA Regulation)
Date: 2010-12-22
Institutions: The Member States
Subjects: administrative transparency, credit institution, data recording, financial legislation, operation of the Institutions








C_2010349EN.01001801.xml










22.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 349/18





List of credit rating agencies registered in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on credit rating agencies (CRA Regulation)
2010/C 349/09
According to Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of 16 September 2009 on credit rating agencies (CRA Regulation), credit rating agencies are legal persons whose occupation includes the issuing of credit ratings on a professional basis. Credit rating agencies established in the Union have to apply for registration pursuant to Article 14(1) in conjunction with Article 2(1) of the CRA Regulation. Registration is granted by the competent authorities of the home Member State if all the requirements set out in the CRA Regulation are fulfilled. The registration is effective for the entire territory of the Union. According to Article 18(3) of the CRA Regulation the Commission shall publish in the Official Journal of the European Union and on its website a list of credit rating agencies that have been registered. That list is updated within 30 days after the competent authority of the home Member State have notified the Commission of the registration.
A registration according to the CRA Regulation does not automatically include the recognition as External Credit Assessment Institution (ECAI) according to Part 2 of Annex IV to Directive 2006/48/EC.
Last update: […]








Name of CRA


Address


Competent authority of home Member State


Date of decision by competent authority




Euler Hermes Rating GmbH







Gasstrasse 18




22761 Hamburg




DEUTSCHLAND






Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht
(BaFin)


16.11.2010