do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Statement of revenue and expenditure for the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the financial year 2010 — Amending Budget No 1
Date: 2010-12-22
Institutions: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights
Subjects: EU office or agency, European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, expenditure, financial year, publication of accounts, revenue








C_2010351EN.01000901.xml










22.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 351/9





Statement of revenue and expenditure for the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights for the financial year 2010 — Amending Budget No 1
(2010/C 351/03)
REVENUE









Title
Chapter


Heading


Budget 2010


Amending budget No 1


New amount





2






EUROPEAN COMMUNITY SUBSIDY





2 0


EUROPEAN COMMUNITY SUBSIDY


20 000 000


90 010


20 090 010




 



Title 2 — Total




20 000 000




90 010




20 090 010






3






FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTION OF THE HOST MEMBER STATE





 



Title 3 — Total




p.m.



 



p.m.






4






REVENUE ASSIGNED TO SPECIFIC ITEMS OF EXPENDITURE





 



Title 4 — Total




2 420



 



2 420






9






MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE





 



Title 9 — Total




p.m.



 



p.m.





 



GRAND TOTAL




20 002 420




90 010




20 092 430





EXPENDITURE









Title
Chapter


Heading


Appropriations 2010


Amending budget No 1


New amount





1






STAFF EXPENDITURE





 



Title 1 — Total




10 975 420



 



10 975 420






2






BUILDINGS, EQUIPMENT AND MISCELLANEOUS OPERATING EXPENDITURE





 



Title 2 — Total




2 499 000



 



2 499 000






3






OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURE





3 3


EQUALITY


2 790 000


90 010


2 880 010




 



Title 3 — Total




6 528 000




90 010




6 618 010






4






OTHER EXPENDITURE





 



Title 4 — Total




p.m.



 



p.m.





 



GRAND TOTAL




20 002 420




90 010




20 092 430
Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Research Executive Agency for the financial year 2010 — Amending Budget No 1
Date: 2010-12-22
Institutions: European Commission, European Research Executive Agency
Subjects: EU office or agency, expenditure, financial year, publication of accounts, revenue, scientific research








C_2010351EN.01003701.xml










22.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 351/37





Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Research Executive Agency for the financial year 2010 — Amending Budget No 1
(2010/C 351/10)
REVENUE









Title
Chapter


Heading


Budget 2010


Amending budget No 1


New amount





2






COMMISSION SUBSIDY





2 0


EU BUDGET CONTRIBUTION TO THE EXECUTIVE AGENCY


32 334 265


456 345


32 790 610




 



Title 2 — Total




32 334 265




456 345




32 790 610






4






REVENUE FROM OTHER INSTITUTIONS OR BODIES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION





4 0


REVENUE ACCRUING FROM THE SUPPLY OF SERVICES AND FROM PAYMENTS CONNECTED WITH LETTINGS FOR OTHER INSTITUTIONS OR BODIES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION


451 000


351 000


802 000




 



Title 4 — Total




451 000




351 000




802 000






9






MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE





 



Title 9 — Total




p.m.



 



p.m.





 



GRAND TOTAL




32 785 265




807 345




33 592 610





EXPENDITURE









Title
Chapter


Heading


Appropriations 2010


Amending budget No 1


New amount





1






STAFF EXPENDITURE





1 1


SALARIES, ALLOWANCES AND OTHER PERSONNEL CHARGES


21 303 000


–1 662 000


19 641 000




1 2


SUNDRIES OF RECRUITMENT AND CHANGE OF PERSONNEL


135 800


–3 600


132 200




1 4


SOCIAL, INFRASTRUCTURE AND TRAINING EXPENSES


835 000


–43 000


792 000




 



Title 1 — Total




22 862 800




–1 708 600




21 154 200






2






INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPERATING EXPENDITURE





2 1


COMPUTER EQUIPMENT PURCHASE AND MAINTENANCE


2 000 000


1 382 000


3 382 000




2 2


MOVABLE PROPERTY AND ASSOCIATED EXPENSES


497 340


240 660


738 000




2 3


CURRENT ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENDITURE


161 000


150


161 150




 



Title 2 — Total




7 955 340




1 622 810




9 578 150






3






TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT EXPENDITURE





3 1


MEETINGS OF EXPERTS, CONFERENCES AND SEMINARS


5 000


10 000


15 000




3 2


INFORMATION, PUBLICATIONS AND COMMUNICATION


381 000


–78 000


303 000




3 3


OTHER TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT EXPENDITURE


1 581 125


961 135


2 542 260




 



Title 3 — Total




1 967 125




893 135




2 860 260





 



GRAND TOTAL




32 785 265




807 345




33 592 610
Case C-517/09: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 December 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Collège d'autorisation et de contrôle du Conseil supérieur de l'audiovisuel (Belgium)) — in proceedings concerning RTL Belgium SA, formerly TViSA (Directive 89/552/EEC — Television broadcasting services — Licensing and Control Authority of the Broadcasting Authority — Court or tribunal of a Member State for the purposes of Article 267 TFEU — Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
Date: 2010-12-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: approximation of laws, audiovisual communications policy, audiovisual production, audiovisual programme, freedom to provide services, interpretation of the law, right of establishment








C_2011063EN.01000902.xml










26.2.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/9





Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 December 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Collège d'autorisation et de contrôle du Conseil supérieur de l'audiovisuel (Belgium)) — in proceedings concerning RTL Belgium SA, formerly TViSA
(Case C-517/09) (1)

(Directive 89/552/EEC - Television broadcasting services - Licensing and Control Authority of the Broadcasting Authority - Court or tribunal of a Member State for the purposes of Article 267 TFEU - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
2011/C 63/17
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Collège d'autorisation et de contrôle du Conseil supérieur de l'audiovisuel (Belgium)

Party to the main proceedings

RTL Belgium SA, formerly TViSA

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Collège d’autorisation et de contrôle du Conseil supérieur de l’audiovisuel (Belgium) — Interpretation of Article 1(c) of Council Directive 89/552/EEC of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by Law, Regulation or Administrative Action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities (OJ 1989 L 298, p. 23) — Freedom to provide services — Television broadcasting services — Concept of ‘supplier’ of audiovisual services and of ‘effective control both over the selection of the programmes and over their organisation’ — Concept of national court or tribunal for the purposes of Article 267 TFEU

Operative part of the judgment

The Court of Justice does not have jurisdiction to answer the question referred by the Collège d’autorisation et de contrôle du Conseil supérieur de l’audiovisuel in its decision of 3 December 2009.


(1)  OJ C 51, 27.2.2010.
Statement of revenue and expenditure of Eurojust for the financial year 2010 — Amending Budget No 1
Date: 2010-12-22
Institutions: European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation
Subjects: EU office or agency, Eurojust, expenditure, financial year, publication of accounts, revenue








C_2010351EN.01002501.xml










22.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 351/25





Statement of revenue and expenditure of Eurojust for the financial year 2010 — Amending Budget No 1
(2010/C 351/07)
REVENUE









Title
Chapter


Heading


Budget 2010


Amending budget No 1


New amount





9






REVENUE





9 0


ANNUAL INCOME


30 163 220


2 159 160


32 322 380




 



Title 9 — Total




30 163 220




2 159 160




32 322 380





 



GRAND TOTAL




30 163 220




2 159 160




32 322 380





EXPENDITURE












Title
Chapter


Heading


Appropriations 2010


Amending budget No 1


New amount




Commitments


Payments


Commitments


Payments


Commitments


Payments





1






EXPENDITURE RELATING TO PERSONS WORKING WITH THE INSTITUTION





 



Title 1 — Total




16 197 377




16 197 377



 


 



16 197 377




16 197 377






2






INVESTMENTS IN IMMOVABLE PROPERTY, RENTAL OF BUILDINGS AND ASSOCIATED COSTS





 



Title 2 — Total




7 102 200




7 102 200



 


 



7 102 200




7 102 200






3






OPERATIONAL EXPENDITURE





 



Title 3 — Total




6 863 644




6 863 644



 


 



6 863 644




6 863 644






4






COMMON PROJECTS EUROJUST-COMMISSION





4 1


PARTICIPATION IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROGRAMMES


—


—


2 159 160


2 051 202


2 159 160


2 051 202




 



Title 4 — Total




—




—




2 159 160




2 051 202




2 159 160




2 051 202





 



GRAND TOTAL




30 163 221




30 163 221




2 159 160




2 051 202




32 322 381




32 214 423
Case C-304/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 December 2010 — European Commission v Italian Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — State aid — Aid for newly listed companies — Recovery)
Date: 2010-12-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: European Commission, Italy, State aid, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, aid recipient, aid to undertakings, control of State aid, corporation tax, redemption, tax incentive








C_2011063EN.01000602.xml










26.2.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/6





Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 December 2010 — European Commission v Italian Republic
(Case C-304/09) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - State aid - Aid for newly listed companies - Recovery)
2011/C 63/11
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, E. Righini and V. Di Bucci, Agents)

Defendant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, Agent, assisted by P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to take, within the period prescribed, the measures necessary to comply with Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Commission Decision 2006/261/EC of 16 March 2005 on aid scheme C 8/2004 (ex NN 164/2003) implemented by Italy in favour of newly listed companies (notified under document No C(2005) 591) (OJ 2006 L 94, p. 42).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that, by failing to adopt, within the time-limits laid down, all the measures necessary to abolish the aid scheme which was declared unlawful and incompatible with the common market by Commission Decision 2006/261/EC of 16 March 2005 on aid scheme C 8/2004 (ex NN 164/2003) implemented by Italy in favour of newly listed companies and to recover from the beneficiaries the aid granted under that scheme, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2 and 3 of that decision.










2.


Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 256, 24.10.2009.
Case T-586/10: Action brought on 22 December 2010 — Aktieselskabet af 21. november 2001 v OHMI — Parfums Givenchy (only givenchy)
Date: 2010-12-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment, trade-mark law








C_2011080EN.01001901.xml










12.3.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 80/19





Action brought on 22 December 2010 — Aktieselskabet af 21. november 2001 v OHMI — Parfums Givenchy (only givenchy)
(Case T-586/10)
2011/C 80/36
Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties


Applicant: Aktieselskabet af 21. november 2001 (Brande, Denmark) (represented by: C. Christiansen, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Parfums Givenchy SA (Levallois Perret, France)

Form of order sought







—


Set aside the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 7 October 2010 in case R 1556/2009-2; and










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark in colour ‘only givenchy’, for goods in class 3 — Community trade mark application No 3980241

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Danish trade mark registration No VR 2001 03359 of the word mark ‘ONLY’, inter alia for goods in classes 3 and 9; Danish trade mark registration No VR 2000 02183 of the word mark ‘ONLY’, for goods in class 25; Community trade mark registration No 638833 of the word mark ‘ONLY’, for goods in classes 14, 18 and 25

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal erred in finding that there is no likelihood of confusion and that the relevant public would not establish a link or a connection between the earlier marks and the contested mark.
Case C-507/08: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 December 2010 — European Commission v Slovak Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — State aid — Partial write-off of a company’s tax liability as part of an arrangement with creditors — Commission decision declaring that aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Failure to execute)
Date: 2010-12-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Slovakia, State aid, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, control of State aid, fine








C_2011063EN.01000202.xml










26.2.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/2





Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 December 2010 — European Commission v Slovak Republic
(Case C-507/08) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - State aid - Partial write-off of a company’s tax liability as part of an arrangement with creditors - Commission decision declaring that aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery - Failure to execute)
2011/C 63/03
Language of the case: Slovak

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: C. Giolito, J. Javorský and K. Walkerová, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Slovak Republic (represented by: B Ricziová, acting as Agent)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Commission Decision 2007/254/EC of 7 June 2006 [notified under number C(2006) 2082], which found that aid granted by the Slovak Republic in favour of Frucona Košice in the form of a write-off of a tax debt by the tax office under an arrangement with creditors was incompatible with the common market and ordered its recovery (State Aid No C-25/2005 (ex NN 21/2005) (OJ 2007 L 112, p. 14).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Declares that, by failing to take within the prescribed period all the measures necessary to recover from the beneficiary the aid referred to in Commission Decision 2007/254/EC of 7 June 2006 on State aid C 25/2005 (ex NN 21/2005) implemented by the Slovak Republic for Frucona Košice a.s., the Slovak Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under the fourth paragraph of Article 249 EC and Article 2 of that decision;










2.


Orders the Slovak Republic to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 102, 01.05.2009.
Case C-273/09: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 22 December 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Haarlem (Netherlands)) — Premis Medical BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane Rotterdam, Kantoor Laan op Zuid (Regulation (EC) No 729/2004 — Classification of the product ‘walker-rollator’ in the Combined Nomenclature — Heading 9021 — Heading 8716 — Corrigendum — Validity)
Date: 2010-12-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Combined Nomenclature, electric cable, footwear industry, information processing, interpretation of the law, manufactured goods








C_2011063EN.01000502.xml










26.2.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/5





Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 22 December 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Haarlem (Netherlands)) — Premis Medical BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane Rotterdam, Kantoor Laan op Zuid
(Case C-273/09) (1)

(Regulation (EC) No 729/2004 - Classification of the product ‘walker-rollator’ in the Combined Nomenclature - Heading 9021 - Heading 8716 - Corrigendum - Validity)
2011/C 63/09
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank Haarlem

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Premis Medical BV

Defendant: Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane Rotterdam, Kantoor Laan op Zuid

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Rechtbank Haarlem (Netherlands) — Interpretation of Commission Regulation (EC) No 729/2004 of 15 April 2004 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ 2004 L 113, p. 5) — Orthopaedic appliances or appliances designed to compensate for a defect or disability within the meaning of Heading 9021 of the Combined Nomenclature — Mobile walking aids designed to designed to assist those with limited mobility

Operative part of the judgment

Commission Regulation (EC) No 729/2004 of 15 April 2004 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature, in the version resulting from a corrigendum published on 7 May 2004, is invalid in so far as, first, that corrigendum extended the scope of application of the initial regulation to walker-rollators consisting of an aluminium frame on four wheels, two of which are front swivel wheels, handles and brakes, and designed to assist persons who have difficulties in walking and, secondly, it classifies those walker-rollators under subheading 8716 80 00 of the Combined Nomenclature.


(1)  OJ C 267, 7.11.2009.
Communication from the Commission on the authority authorised to issue certificates of origin under Regulation (EU) No 1085/2010
Date: 2010-12-22
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: Thailand, agricultural product, certificate of origin, customs regulations, import policy, market organisation, tariff quota








C_2010349EN.01001601.xml










22.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 349/16





Communication from the Commission on the authority authorised to issue certificates of origin under Regulation (EU) No 1085/2010
2010/C 349/07
By Commission Regulation (EU) No 1085/2010 of 25 November 2010, published in 
Official Journal of the European Union L 310 of 26 November 2010, an import tariff quota has been opened for manioc starch and sweet potatoes.
Article 3 of Commission Regulation (EU) No 1085/2010 of 25 November 2010 stipulates that entitlement to this quota is conditional on the presentation of a certificate of origin.
The following authority is authorised to issue certificates of origin under this Regulation:





Department of Foreign Trade




Ministry of Commerce




Bureau of Import-Export Certification




44/100 Nonthaburi 1 Road




Nonthaburi 11000




THAILAND




Tel. +66 25474829 / 66 25474832 / 66 25474825




Fax +66 25474757




E-mail: eximdft@moc.go.th
Case C-245/09: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 December 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidshof te Brussel (Belgium)) — Omalet NV v Rijksdienst voor Sociale Zekerheid (Freedom to provide services — Article 49 EC — Contractor established in a Member State — Recourse to contracting partners established in the same Member State — Purely internal situation — Inadmissibility of the reference for a preliminary ruling)
Date: 2010-12-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Belgium, debt, entrepreneur, interpretation of the law, liability of the State, social security








C_2011063EN.01000501.xml










26.2.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 63/5





Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 22 December 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidshof te Brussel (Belgium)) — Omalet NV v Rijksdienst voor Sociale Zekerheid
(Case C-245/09) (1)

(Freedom to provide services - Article 49 EC - Contractor established in a Member State - Recourse to contracting partners established in the same Member State - Purely internal situation - Inadmissibility of the reference for a preliminary ruling)
2011/C 63/08
Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Arbeidshof te Brussel

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Omalet NV

Defendant: Rijksdienst voor Sociale Zekerheid

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Arbeidshof te Brussel — Interpretation of Article 49 EC — Social legislation — Undertaking established in Belgium and having recourse to subcontractors which are also established in that Member State but are not registered with the national authorities — Whether or not Article 49 EC is applicable

Operative part of the judgment

The reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeidshof te Brussel (Belgium), made by decision of 25 June 2009, is inadmissible.


(1)  OJ C 220, 12.9.2009.
Case C-606/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’Etat (France) lodged on 22 December 2010 — Association nationale d’assistance aux frontières pour les étrangers (Anafé) v Ministre de l’intérieur, de l’outre-mer, des collectivités territoriales et de l’immigration
Date: 2010-12-22
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: EU visa policy, border control, external border of the EU, interpretation of the law, residence permit








C_2011072EN.01001201.xml










5.3.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 72/12





Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’Etat (France) lodged on 22 December 2010 — Association nationale d’assistance aux frontières pour les étrangers (Anafé) v Ministre de l’intérieur, de l’outre-mer, des collectivités territoriales et de l’immigration
(Case C-606/10)
2011/C 72/20
Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’Etat

Parties to the main proceedings


Applicant: Association nationale d’assistance aux frontières pour les étrangers (Anafé)

Defendant: Ministre de l’intérieur, de l’outre-mer, des collectivités territoriales et de l’immigration

Questions referred







1.


Does Article 13 of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (1) apply to re-entry by a third-country national into the territory of a Member State which has issued that person with a temporary residence permit, where re-entry into its territory does not require entry, transit or stay in the territory of the other Member States?










2.


In what circumstances may a Member State issue to third-country nationals a ‘re-entry visa’ within the meaning of Article 5(4)(a) of that regulation? In particular, may such a visa limit entry only to points of entry into the territory of that State?










3.


In so far as Regulation No 562/2006 excludes all possibility of entry into the territory of the Member States for third-party nationals who hold only a temporary residence permit issued pending examination of a first application for a residence permit or an application for asylum, contrary to what was allowed under the Convention of 19 June 1990 implementing the Schengen Agreement, in the version prior to its amendment by that regulation, did the principles of legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations require that transitional measures should be laid down in respect of third-country nationals who left the territory of those States when they were holders of only a temporary residence permit issued pending examination of a first application for a residence permit or an application for asylum, and wish to return there after the entry into force of Regulation No 562/2006?






(1)  OJ L 105, p. 1.