do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Case T-143/09 P: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Commission v Petrilli (Appeal — Staff cases — Auxiliary contract staff — Fixed-term contract — Rules on the maximum duration for employing non-permanent staff in the Commission services — Decision to refuse renewal of the contract)
Date: 2010-12-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European civil service, European official, action by staff, appeal, labour law, regulations for civil servants, servant (EU), termination of a contract, work contract








C_2011038EN.01001202.xml










5.2.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 38/12





Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Commission v Petrilli
(Case T-143/09 P) (1)

(Appeal - Staff cases - Auxiliary contract staff - Fixed-term contract - Rules on the maximum duration for employing non-permanent staff in the Commission services - Decision to refuse renewal of the contract)
2011/C 38/19
Language of the case: French

Parties


Appellant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin and B. Eggers, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: Nicole Petrilli (Woluwé-Saint-Étienne, Belgium) (represented: initially by J.-L. Lodomez and J. Lodomez, and subsequently by D. Dejehet and A. Depondt, lawyers)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 January 2009 in Case F-98/07 Petrilli v Commission ECR-SC I-A-1-0000 and II-A-1-0000), seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the appeal;










2.


Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mrs Nicole Petrilli in these proceedings.






(1)  OJ C 153 of 4.7.2009.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5995 — VW/Karmann)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2010-12-16
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: economic concentration, exchange of information, merger control, motor vehicle industry








C_2010341EN.01000101.xml










16.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 341/1





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.5995 — VW/Karmann)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2010/C 341/01
On 29 November 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in German and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5995. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.
Case T-48/10 P: Order of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Meister v OHIM (Appeals — Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2008 promotion procedure — Decision awarding points in the promotion procedure — Mention of points accumulated in previous promotion procedures — Distortion of the facts — Burden of costs — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Date: 2010-12-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Union Intellectual Property Office, European official, action by staff, professional career, promotion, rights of civil servants, staff assessment








C_2011055EN.01002302.xml










19.2.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 55/23





Order of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Meister v OHIM
(Case T-48/10 P) (1)

(Appeals - Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2008 promotion procedure - Decision awarding points in the promotion procedure - Mention of points accumulated in previous promotion procedures - Distortion of the facts - Burden of costs - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
2011/C 55/42
Language of the case: German

Parties


Appellant: Herbert Meister (Muchamiel, Spain) (represented by: H.-J. Zimmermann, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: I. de Medrano Caballero and G. Faedo, acting as Agents, and D. Waelbroeck and E. Winter, lawyers)

Re:

Appeal against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 30 November 2009 in Case F-17/09 Meister v OHIM ECR-SC I-A-1-0000 and I-A-2-0000, seeking for that order to be set aside.

Operative part of the order







1.


The appeal is dismissed.










2.


Mr Herbert Meister is ordered to bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) in the appeal proceedings.






(1)  OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.
Case T-259/09: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Commission v Arci Nuova associazione comitato di Cagliari and Gessa (Arbitration clause — Agreement entered into as part of support for European discussion projects organised by non-governmental organisations for 2003 — Action brought against the head of an association — No jurisdiction — Failure to implement the agreement — Repayment of sums advanced)
Date: 2010-12-16
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commission, disclosure of information, immigration, integration of migrants, limitation of legal proceedings, location of production, originating product








C_2011038EN.01001302.xml










5.2.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 38/13





Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Commission v Arci Nuova associazione comitato di Cagliari and Gessa
(Case T-259/09) (1)

(Arbitration clause - Agreement entered into as part of support for European discussion projects organised by non-governmental organisations for 2003 - Action brought against the head of an association - No jurisdiction - Failure to implement the agreement - Repayment of sums advanced)
2011/C 38/22
Language of the case: Italian

Parties


Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. M. Rouchaud-Joët and N. Bambara, agents, and by M. Moretto, lawyer)

Defendant: Arci Nuova associazione comitato di Cagliari (Cagliari, Italy) (represented initially by S. Diana, then by P. Aureli, lawyers); and Alberto Gessa (Cagliari, Italy)

Re:

Action brought under Article 238 EC on the basis of an arbitration clause seeking an order that Arci Nuova Associazione Comitato di Cagliari and Alberto Gessa, in a personal capacity and jointly and severally, should repay an advance paid by the Commission under the agreement 2003-1550/001-001, together with late payment interest.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


dismisses the action so far as brought against Mr Alberto Gessa;










2.


orders Arci Nuova associazione comitato di Cagliari to repay to the European Commission the principal sum of EUR 15 675, together with late payment interest at the rate of 7,32 % from 20 May 2007 until full payment of the debt;










3.


orders Arci Nuova associazione comitato di Cagliari to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 220 of 12.9.2009.