do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1198/2010 of 14 December 2010 establishing a prohibition of fishing for common sole in IIIa; EU waters of IIIb, IIIc and IIId by vessels flying the flag of Sweden
Date: 2010-12-14
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: EU waters, Sweden, catch quota, fishing area, fishing regulations, fishing rights, sea fish, ship's flag








L_2010333EN.01003301.xml










17.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 333/33








            COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1198/2010
of 14 December 2010
         
establishing a prohibition of fishing for common sole in IIIa; EU waters of IIIb, IIIc and IIId by vessels flying the flag of Sweden


THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,


Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,

Whereas:







(1)


Council Regulation (EU) No 53/2010 of 14 January 2010 fixing for 2010 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in EU waters and, for EU vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required (2), lays down quotas for 2010.












(2)


According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for 2010.












(3)


It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,





HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:



Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2010 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.


Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.


Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.




This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 14 December 2010.


For the Commission, On behalf of the President,
Lowri EVANS
            

Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries






(1)  
            OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

(2)  
            OJ L 21, 26.1.2010, p. 1.




ANNEX






No


17/T&Q




Member State


Sweden




Stock


SOL/3A/BCD




Species


Common sole (Solea solea)




Zone


IIIa; EU waters of IIIb, IIIc and IIId




Date


7.6.2010
Case T-577/10: Action brought on 14 December 2010 — Trenzas y Cables de Acero v Commission
Date: 2010-12-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment, fine, general legal principle








C_2011055EN.01002902.xml










19.2.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 55/29





Action brought on 14 December 2010 — Trenzas y Cables de Acero v Commission
(Case T-577/10)
2011/C 55/52
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC, SL (Santander, Spain) (represented by F. González Díaz and A. Tresandi Blanco, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:






—


annul, pursuant to Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the decision of the European Commission of 30 September 2010 amending the decision of 30 June 2010 (C(2010) 4837 final in Case COMP/38.344 — prestressing steel);










—


in the alternative, annul, pursuant to Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Article 2 of the decision of the European Commission of 30 September 2010 amending the decision of 30 June 2010 (C(2010) 4837 final in Case COMP/38.344 — prestressing steel) insofar as it entails an infringement of the principle of non-discrimination in not having extended to TYCSA PSC the additional period for payment of the fine, and fails to state reasons; and










—


order the European Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those already raised in Case T-575/10 Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías v Commission.
Case T-575/10: Action brought on 14 December 2010 — Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías v Commission
Date: 2010-12-14
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment, competition, general legal principle








C_2011055EN.01002801.xml










19.2.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 55/28





Action brought on 14 December 2010 — Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías v Commission
(Case T-575/10)
2011/C 55/50
Language of the case: Spanish

Parties


Applicant: Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías, S.A. (Gijón, Spain) (represented by F. González Díaz and A. Tresandi Blanco, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:






—


annul, pursuant to Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the decision of the European Commission of 30 September 2010 amending the decision of 30 June 2010 (C(2010) 4837 final in Case COMP/38.344 — prestressing steel); and










—


order the European Commission to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its appeal, the applicant relies on three pleas in law:






—


first plea, based on breach of the principle of inalterability of the acts of the institutions and of the principle of good administration.










—


second plea, based on the fact that the amended decision breached essential procedural requirements, in that it was adopted without the mandatory consultation of the Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions, as required pursuant to Article 14 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty (OJ 2003 L 1, p. 1).










—


third plea, in the alternative, based on breach of the principle of non-discrimination in the fixing of the conditions of the payment of the fine and breach of the obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based.
Special Report No 9/2010 ‘Is EU Structural Measures spending on the supply of water for domestic consumption used to best effect?’
Date: 2010-12-14
Institutions: European Court of Auditors
Subjects: European Commission, report, water consumption, water management








C_2010337EN.01001501.xml










14.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 337/15





Special Report No 9/2010 ‘Is EU Structural Measures spending on the supply of water for domestic consumption used to best effect?’
2010/C 337/05
The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 9/2010 ‘Is EU Structural Measures spending on the supply of water for domestic consumption used to best effect?’ has just been published.
The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://www.eca.europa.eu
A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:





European Court of Auditors




Communication and Reports Unit




12, rue Alcide De Gasperi




1615 Luxembourg




LUXEMBOURG




Tel. +352 4398-1




E-mail: euraud@eca.europa.eu




or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.