do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
2010/727/EU: Council Decision of 22 November 2010 appointing a Spanish member of the European Economic and Social Committee
Date: 2010-11-22
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: EU Member State, EU institution, European Economic and Social Committee, appointment of staff








L_2010313EN.01001201.xml










30.11.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


L 313/12








            COUNCIL DECISION
         
of 22 November 2010
         
appointing a Spanish member of the European Economic and Social Committee
(2010/727/EU)


THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,


Having regard to the proposal made by the Spanish Government,


Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:







(1)


On 13 September 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015 (1).












(2)


A member’s seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Ángel PANERO FLÓREZ,





HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:



Article 1
Mr Alberto NADAL BELDA, Director Adjunto a la Secretaría General de la CEOE, is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the term of office, i.e. until 20 September 2015.


Article 2
This Decision shall take effect on the day of its adoption.




Done at Brussels, 22 November 2010.


For the Council


The President

S. VANACKERE
            





(1)  
            OJ L 251, 25.9.2010, p. 8.
Case T-531/10: Action brought on 22 November 2010 — Häfele v OHIM (Vorfront)
Date: 2010-11-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), furniture industry, trade-mark law








C_2011030EN.01004301.xml










29.1.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 30/43





Action brought on 22 November 2010 — Häfele v OHIM (Vorfront)
(Case T-531/10)
()
2011/C 30/78
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Häfele GmbH & Co. KG (Nagold, Germany) (represented by M. Eck and J. Dönch, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 14 September 2010 in Case R 570/2010-1;










—


Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘Vorfront’ for goods in Classes 6, 7, 19 and 20.

Decision of the Examiner: refusal to register

Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1), as the Community trade mark in question has distinctive character and is not purely descriptive


(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).
Case T-534/10: Action brought on 22 November 2010 — Organismos Kypriakis Galaktokomikis Viomichanias v OHIM — Garmo (HELLIM)
Date: 2010-11-22
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), food industry, trade-mark law








C_2011030EN.01004501.xml










29.1.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 30/45





Action brought on 22 November 2010 — Organismos Kypriakis Galaktokomikis Viomichanias v OHIM — Garmo (HELLIM)
(Case T-534/10)
()
2011/C 30/81
Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties


Applicant: Organismos Kypriakis Galaktokomikis Viomichanias (Lefkosia, Cyprus) (represented by: C. Milbradt and H. Van Volxem, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Garmo AG (Stuttgart, Germany)

Form of order sought







—


Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 September 2010 in Case R 794/2010-4;










—


Order the defendant to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: Garmo AG

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘HELLIM’ for goods in Class 29

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant

Mark or sign cited in opposition: the collective word mark ‘HALLOUMI’ for goods in Class 29

Decision of the Opposition Division: rejection of the opposition

Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1), as the marks and goods at issue are similar and there is a likelihood of confusion between the marks, and infringement of Article 63(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 as the applicant should have been able to rely on having the opportunity to respond to the observations of the respondent in the appeal proceedings before OHIM


(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).
Case F-123/10: Action brought on 22 November 2010 — Bancale and Buccheri v Commission
Date: 2010-11-22
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: European Commission, European official, action for annulment, competition (EU)








C_2011030EN.01006702.xml










29.1.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 30/67





Action brought on 22 November 2010 — Bancale and Buccheri v Commission
(Case F-123/10)
()
2011/C 30/134
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Giovanni Bancale (Waterloo, Belgium) and Roberto Buccheri (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the selection board decisions in the competitions COM/INT/OLAF/09/AD8 and COM/INT/OLAF/09/AD10 not to admit the applicants to the competition.

Form of order sought







—


Declare unlawful section 4 of Title III of competition notice EPSO/COM/INT/OLAF09, in that it prohibits taking into account university level experience obtained prior to the obtaining of a university qualification;










—


annul the decisions excluding the applicants from the competition EPSO/COM/INT/OLAF/09;










—


order the Commission to pay the costs.