do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2010-11-05
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2010299EN.01000301.xml










5.11.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 299/3





Euro exchange rates (1)

4 November 2010
2010/C 299/02

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,4244




JPY


Japanese yen


115,15




DKK


Danish krone


7,4547




GBP


Pound sterling


0,87585




SEK


Swedish krona


9,2550




CHF


Swiss franc


1,3782




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,1480




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


24,408




EEK


Estonian kroon


15,6466




HUF


Hungarian forint


272,40




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7097




PLN


Polish zloty


3,8958




RON


Romanian leu


4,2848




TRY


Turkish lira


1,9830




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4056




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4269




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


11,0404




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,7889




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,8280




KRW


South Korean won


1 571,18




ZAR


South African rand


9,6600




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


9,4915




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,3445




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 661,75




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,3916




PHP


Philippine peso


60,217




RUB


Russian rouble


43,4300




THB


Thai baht


42,298




BRL


Brazilian real


2,3960




MXN


Mexican peso


17,4046




INR


Indian rupee


62,9370






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case T-525/10: Action brought on 5 November 2010 — Azienda Agricola Colsaliz di Faganello Antonio v OHIM — Weinkellerei Lenz Moser (SERVO SUO)
Date: 2010-11-05
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: EU trade mark, European Union Intellectual Property Office, action for annulment (EU), trade-mark law








C_2011013EN.01003401.xml










15.1.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 13/34





Action brought on 5 November 2010 — Azienda Agricola Colsaliz di Faganello Antonio v OHIM — Weinkellerei Lenz Moser (SERVO SUO)
(Case T-525/10)
()
2011/C 13/65
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties


Applicant: Azienda Agricola Colsaliz di Faganello Antonio (Refrontolo, Italy) (represented by: G. Massa and P. Massa, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Weinkellerei Lenz Moser AG (Linz, Austria)

Form of order sought







—


Annul the contested decision.










—


Order OHIM to pay the costs.





Pleas in law and main arguments


Applicant for a Community trade mark: Azienda Agricola Colsaliz di Faganello Antonio.

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘SERVO SUO’ (application No 5 798 244) for goods in Class 33.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Weinkellerei Lenz Moser Aktiengesellschaft.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community word mark ‘SERVUS’ (No 579 193), international figurative marks containing the word element ‘SERVUS’ (Nos 580 447 A and 844 793) and the international word mark ‘SERVUS’ (No 727 131), for goods in Class 33.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Pleas in law: Misapplication and misinterpretation of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark.
Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Common Position 2006/795/CFSP (Annex II) and Council Regulation (EC) No 329/2007 (Annex V) apply
Date: 2010-11-05
Institutions: Council of the European Union
Subjects: North Korea, economic sanctions, international affairs, legal person, natural person, restriction of liberty, trade restriction








C_2010299EN.01000601.xml










5.11.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 299/6





Notice for the attention of the persons, entities and bodies to which restrictive measures provided for in Council Common Position 2006/795/CFSP (Annex II) and Council Regulation (EC) No 329/2007 (Annex V) apply
2010/C 299/04
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
The following information is brought to the attention of the persons, entities and bodies that appear in Annex II to Council Common Position 2006/795/CFSP and in Annex V to Council Regulation (EC) No 329/2007.
In accordance with Article 7(2) of Council Common Position 2006/795/CFSP and Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 329/2007, the lists of persons, entities and bodies designated pursuant to that Common Position and that Regulation shall be reviewed at regular intervals and at least every 12 months.
For this purpose, the persons, entities or bodies concerned may submit a request to the Council, together with supporting documentation, that the decision to include them on the above mentioned list should be reconsidered.
Any such requests should be sent, by 26 November 2010, to the following address:





Council of the European Union




General Secretariat




Rue de la Loi/Wetstraat 175




1048 Bruxelles/Brussel




BELGIQUE/BELGIË




The attention of the persons and entities concerned is also drawn to the possibility of challenging the Council's decision before the General Court of the European Union, in accordance with the conditions laid down in Article 275, second paragraph, and Article 263, fourth and sixth paragraphs, of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position given at its meeting of 5 November 2010 regarding a draft decision relating to Case C.39258 — Airfreight (2) — Rapporteur: Belgium
Date: 2010-11-05
Institutions: Advisory Committee on Restrictive Practices and Dominant Positions
Subjects: additional duty, air transport, carriage of goods, cartel, fine, infringement of EU law, price agreement








C_2014371EN.01000801.xml










18.10.2014   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 371/8





Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant position given at its meeting of 5 November 2010 regarding a draft decision relating to Case C.39258 — Airfreight (2)
Rapporteur: Belgium
(2014/C 371/07)






1.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the application of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (1). A minority of the Advisory Committee abstain.










2.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the basic amounts of the fines for each addressee of the draft decision. A minority of the Advisory Committee abstain.










3.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the adjustments to the basic amounts applicable in this case for each addressee of the draft decision. A minority of the Advisory Committee abstain.










4.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission as regards the amounts of reductions of the fines based on the 2002 Commission Notice on immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases. A minority of the Advisory Committee abstain.










5.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission’s assessment on inability to pay. A minority of the Advisory Committee abstain.










6.


The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the final amounts of the fines. A minority of the Advisory Committee abstain.










7.


The Advisory Committee asks the European Commission to take into account any other points raised during the discussion. A minority of the Advisory Committee abstain.










8.


The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. A minority of the Advisory Committee abstain.






(1)  OJ L 1, 4.1.2003, p. 1.