do-me/EUR-LEX huggingface dataset:
Euro exchange rates
Date: 2010-10-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: euro, exchange rate








C_2010289EN.01000401.xml










26.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 289/4





Euro exchange rates (1)

25 October 2010
2010/C 289/04

1 euro =











 


Currency


Exchange rate




USD


US dollar


1,4031




JPY


Japanese yen


113,21




DKK


Danish krone


7,4579




GBP


Pound sterling


0,89255




SEK


Swedish krona


9,1990




CHF


Swiss franc


1,3618




ISK


Iceland króna


 




NOK


Norwegian krone


8,0935




BGN


Bulgarian lev


1,9558




CZK


Czech koruna


24,510




EEK


Estonian kroon


15,6466




HUF


Hungarian forint


273,53




LTL


Lithuanian litas


3,4528




LVL


Latvian lats


0,7095




PLN


Polish zloty


3,9316




RON


Romanian leu


4,2680




TRY


Turkish lira


1,9845




AUD


Australian dollar


1,4107




CAD


Canadian dollar


1,4291




HKD


Hong Kong dollar


10,8887




NZD


New Zealand dollar


1,8623




SGD


Singapore dollar


1,8120




KRW


South Korean won


1 565,89




ZAR


South African rand


9,6931




CNY


Chinese yuan renminbi


9,3420




HRK


Croatian kuna


7,3413




IDR


Indonesian rupiah


12 485,42




MYR


Malaysian ringgit


4,3405




PHP


Philippine peso


60,347




RUB


Russian rouble


42,4705




THB


Thai baht


41,883




BRL


Brazilian real


2,3889




MXN


Mexican peso


17,2332




INR


Indian rupee


62,2400






(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.
Case F-3/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 October 2010 — AB v Commission (Staff cases — Contract staff — Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract — Complaint out of time — Manifest inadmissibility)
Date: 2010-10-26
Institutions: Civil Service Tribunal
Subjects: Commission Delegation, European Commission, Laos, action for annulment, servant (EU)








C_2011013EN.01003801.xml










15.1.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 13/38





Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 October 2010 — AB v Commission
(Case F-3/10) (1)

(Staff cases - Contract staff - Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract - Complaint out of time - Manifest inadmissibility)
2011/C 13/73
Language of the case: English

Parties


Applicant: AB (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S.A. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and D. Martin, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision not to renew the applicant’s contract as a member of the contract staff.

Operative part of the order







1.


The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.










2.


The applicant shall pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 100, 17.4.2010, p. 69.
Case T-23/09: Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2010 — CNOP and CCG v Commission (Competition — Administrative procedure — Decision ordering an inspection — Article 20(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Absence of legal personality of an addressee — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Concepts of undertaking and association of undertakings)
Date: 2010-10-26
Institutions: General Court
Subjects: European Commission, action for annulment (EU), biology, health service, pharmaceutical industry, pharmacist








C_2010346EN.01004001.xml










18.12.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 346/40





Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2010 — CNOP and CCG v Commission
(Case T-23/09) (1)

(Competition - Administrative procedure - Decision ordering an inspection - Article 20(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Absence of legal personality of an addressee - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Concepts of undertaking and association of undertakings)
2010/C 346/78
Language of the case: French

Parties


Applicants: Conseil national de l'Ordre des pharmaciens (CNOP) (Paris, France); and Conseil central de la section G de l'Ordre national des pharmaciens (CCG) (Paris) (represented initially by Y. R. Guillou, H. Speyart van Woerden, T. Verstraeten and C. van Sasse van Ysselt, and subsequently by Y. R.Guillou, L. Defalque and C. Robert, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet and É. Gippini Fournier, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 6494 of 29 October 2008 in Case COMP/39510 ordering the Ordre national des pharmaciens (ONP), the CNOP and the CCG to submit to an inspection pursuant to Article 20(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 [EC] and 82 [EC] (OJ 2003 L 1, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:






1.


Dismisses the action;










2.


Orders the Conseil national de l’Ordre des pharmaciens (CNOP) and the Conseil central de la section G de l’Ordre national des pharmaciens (CCG) to pay the costs.






(1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.
Case C-231/10: Order of the President of the Court of 26 October 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia
Date: 2010-10-26
Institutions: Court of Justice
Subjects: Estonia, action for failure to fulfil an obligation, groundwater, national implementing measure, pollution control, pollution control measures








C_2011030EN.01003202.xml










29.1.2011   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 30/32





Order of the President of the Court of 26 October 2010 — European Commission v Republic of Estonia
(Case C-231/10) (1)

()
2011/C 30/56
Language of the case: Estonian
The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.


(1)  OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.
Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5933 — Marfrig/Keystone)  Text with EEA relevance
Date: 2010-10-26
Institutions: European Commission
Subjects: animal product, economic concentration, electronics industry, exchange of information, food production, merger control








C_2010289EN.01000302.xml










26.10.2010   


EN


Official Journal of the European Union


C 289/3





Non-opposition to a notified concentration
(Case COMP/M.5933 — Marfrig/Keystone)
(Text with EEA relevance)
2010/C 289/03
On 22 September 2010, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:






—


in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,










—


in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32010M5933. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.